Wikipedia talk : WikiProject Historic sites

|CINCINNATI LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK|CINCINNATI LANDMARK|CINCINNATI|CLHL = [[List of Cincinnati Local Historic Landmarks|Cincinnati Local Historic Landmark]]

|CINCINNATI LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK|CINCINNATI LANDMARK|CINCINNATI|CLHL = #F5ABB6

|CINCINNATI LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK|CINCINNATI LANDMARK|CINCINNATI|CLHL = #C4122C

Explanatory note for inclusion in Template:Designation/doc and Template:Designation/Supported designations

{{designation/Supported designations/row|t={{{t|}}}|CINCINNATI|[[United States]] – [[Ohio]] – [[Cincinnati]]|71|Cincinnati Local Historic Landmark; Cincinnati Landmark; Cincinnati; CLHL}}

-- $ɱ$ (talk) 16:47, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Using sandboxes, I added Cincinnati to Template:Designation/Supported designations/State to test the display. Looks good.~~, though I'm not sure right now why the left side is displaying with a border, not filled in...~~

ɱ

(talk) 17:18, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Xaosflux: what do you think?

ɱ

(talk) 20:01, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ɱ: OK so here's what I think :D I think this is a special, complex case, and that you have the best understanding of it and what needs to be done. I'm going to make you a temporary template editor to deal with this request, conditioned that you may only use that access related to this batch of templates. (You can apply at WP:PERM for continuing access if you otherwise need it). Please monitor this change later in the day, and watch for any unexpected issues that may occur in the next few days. If anything breaks that you can't easily resolve or this is otherwise contentious, revert to the current status and continue discussing here. If you don't want to do this, that is also OK - you can just not and wait for someone else to get to it. Best regards, — xaosflux ^Talk 15:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, done. I will add the template to the remaining sites and take a look at how it reacts.

ɱ

(talk) 16:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Designation box border line width for "National Historic Site of Canada"[edit]

The red border line for the designation box "National Historic Site of Canada" appears rather wide. It tends to dominate every Infobox it appears in, and, being red, suggests a warning or critical information. Is there a way to thin the line so it's not as urgent-looking? The one that appears on the Template Talk page for "Designation" looks much better. See the section called "Using borders instead of backgrounds". You will notice, there, that I have asked this question several times over the past two YEARS, with no reply. Thanks. Yoho2001 (talk) 05:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Designation for Korea Cultural Scenic Location[edit]

I ran across Dinosaur Ridge (Korea) which uses the Protected Area template for a mountain that is also a listed Cultural Scenic Location in South Korea. The original author tried to show this designation in the infobox, and I (hopefully) improved with an embedded Designation template - but CSL is not yet supported. Can this be added? I don't know any more about it; and the article sources are in Korean. MB 23:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New designation? HABS / HAER / HALS[edit]

Hi! It'd be nice to have an infobox for sites listed in the Heritage Documentation Programs (the Historic American Buildings Survey, the Historic American Engineering Record, and the Historic American Landscapes Survey). I was assuming the "Infobox historic site" template would be the appropriate place to start, but I gather that new designations need to be proposed and accepted. Does that seem to be the right option for creating a HABS infobox? If so, I'm not quite sure what the official designation or color scheme should be (for reference: Heritage Documentation Programs from the National Park Service, and HABS/HAER/HALS collection from the LOC), or really how to go about this at all. If not, is there a better option? Thanks. Andrew Jameson (talk) 15:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Andrew Jameson: I'd support somehow integrating these designations into the infobox, so long as they'd not take up too much space. Ergo Sum 04:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was thinking three lines: designation name, number, and date; although I'd be OK with other ideas. However, I really don't know how to code up the Designation template, and (looking at the number of replies) there's not much interest from anyone else. :( Andrew Jameson (talk) 12:00, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool[edit]

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request for assistance at {{Designation}}[edit]

I recently added created the District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites article and added support for it at {{Designation}}. However, the template does not seem to be functioning with respect to the DCIHS. Can someone familiar with the template please assist? Ergo Sum 04:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perhaps xaosflux might be able to lend a hand, given their past experience with this? Ergo Sum 14:07, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ergo Sum: there may be a limit to the number of arguments at Template:Designation/text, for testing I've reduced it to |DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES|DCIHS. Can you see if it is at least working with that first? If so, try adding single additional texts one at a time. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Xaosflux: ~~That doesn't seem to have solved the issue. Ergo Sum 18:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)~~Reply[reply]

Actually, I overlooked something very obvious (using the right parameter in {{Infobox NRHP}}. It seems to be working now. Thank you for your help. Ergo Sum 18:26, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requested move 2 November 2019 about Stepped gables or Crow-stepped gables[edit]

Hi, there is a requested move open at Talk:Crow-stepped gable#Requested move 2 November 2019, which you might be interested in. My proposal is to rename from "Crow-stepped gable" to what I perceive to be the more common, broader usage of "Stepped gable". --Doncram (talk) 00:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categories for Tentative List, nominated for deletion[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_November_3#Category:World_Heritage_Site_Tentative_list. – Fayenatic London 08:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Manzanar featured article review[edit]

I have nominated Manzanar for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:13, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The external links on the Manzanar article are being discussed. There are currently 18 of them, which is excessive. Please come participate in the discussion at Talk:Manzanar#External links. Thanks! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 04:26, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Finding a monument[edit]

Hey everyone! I am intending to create a page detailing confederate soilder memorials in my county (Cooke County, Texas). Our county commissioner said both of the sites (one in 'Lenoard Park' and the other on the Courthouse lawn (in Gainesville, Texas), are protected under Texas law, but I have been unable to find list with the monuments in them. I thought I might as well turn to those that are familiar with searching through records for official documentation for help.

Here's the Waymark for the statue at Leonard Park: https://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WMWQZK_Leonard_Park_Confederate_Monument_Gainesville_TX

Here's our housing authority's information about the monument on the Courthouse Lawn, with the inscription proivided: http://www.gainesvilletxhousingauthority.com/about/history-of-gainesville#:~:text=%22God%20holds%20the%20scales%20of,will%20stand%20it%20without%20shame

Any help y'all could provide would be much appreciated! (Whether my county commissioner lied to my face or not.)

ThatSuperNerd (talk) 03:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada[edit]

I'd like to request the addition of Historic Resources Act (Newfoundland and Labrador) to {{Designation}}. This is provincial heritage legislation ("State/provincial designations") limited to sites in the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador. Under the legislation the Heritage Foundation of Newfoundland and Labrador can designate "registered heritage structures" and "registered heritage districts." Over 300 are currently recognized as such. Callnames can be and Newfoundland and Labrador Historic Resources Act, NLHRA, Newfoundland and Labrador, Newfoundland and Labrador Registered Heritage Structure, Newfoundland and Labrador Registered Heritage District. For colour I would suggest #FFE978 from the recommended list as yellow is used as an accent in the provincial flag. Let me know if anything else is necessary, thanks! mjphilpott (talk) 14:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kosovo[edit]

Hallo, while stub-sorting I came across City Tekke (Vučitrn) which uses the historic site infobox but comes up with "Invalid designation". Looking at the local article there seems to be a list of Kosovo recognised monuments. Perhaps someone here could sort out what, if anything, needs to be done to enable Kosov listings to present properly? Thanks. PamD 07:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PamD, The problem is that Kosovo monuments aren't supported; see the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Historic sites. The previous post asks to add a Canadian designation, and I requested one in South Korea over a year ago but both have gone unanswered. It appears there is no one active now with an interest in this area. It's probably quite straightfoward to add designations; determining the best background color to use for a new designation may be the most difficult part. MB 21:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Recent template changes broke a few list-type articles, recommend splitting them to fix the problem[edit]

First, I want to thank OliverGalvin for improving Template:English Heritage listed building header and its companion template, Template:English Heritage listed building row.

However, some pages that use this template are now "too big" for Wikipedia because their post-expand include size is over 2,097,152 bytes. Pages over the limit wind up in Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded. More importantly, templates, including reference templates, at the bottom of the page may not display correctly.

As of 16:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC) this list included the following pages that call these templates:

Grade I listed buildings in Essex
Grade II* listed buildings in West Sussex
Grade II* listed buildings in Wiltshire (A–G)
List of Grade I listed buildings in Wiltshire
Scheduled monuments in Mendip - featured list, part of featured topic Scheduled monuments in Somerset
Scheduled monuments in West Somerset - featured list, part of featured topic Scheduled monuments in Somerset

A "live" list of article pages in that category along with the date they most recently exceeded the limit is here.

The most straightforward thing to do is split the articles. Another option is to go back and re-do the templates so their "post-expand include size" is smaller, but as these articles were already "close enough to the limit" to be pushed over by a small change to a template, it's better to just split them.

Some thought may need to go into how to handle the last two, so they don't lose their featured list status or jeopardize the featured topic status of Scheduled monuments in Somerset

I don't have time to jump in and fix it now, I'm hoping someone else will see this and fix the problem before I get back to it. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I put notifications of this discussion on the talk pages of the articles and on Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Scheduled monuments in Somerset. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Davidwr: Thanks for bringing this up and letting me know! I'd forgotten Wikipedia had that limit and hadn't realised that some lists were getting that big.

I've made some small changes that will reduce the post-expand size slightly, and I'll try and do more, but I agree splitting is probably the best option for some articles.

On a technical note regarding the template code size, do you or does anyone else know why extra classes are set in the code? "label" and "category" are set on the <td> tags and there's a <span> with a class around the uid links. I haven't touched them, being cautious as someone else must have added them, but I can't see that they're being used (i.e. having any style changed for those classes). It looks like they might have been added 'just in case', and removing them would shave off some size which could add up to a decent amount on those big lists. If no one objects and I don't spot any errors in testing, I'll just get rid of them.

odg (talk) 00:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I made some headroom in the Wiltshire Grade I list by deleting 38 in favour of the already-existing List of Grade I listed buildings in Salisbury. Wasn't a good idea to have these in two places anyway – I found some divergence. Wire723 (talk) 11:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A day later the oversized list has grown a little:

-- Wire723 (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Rodw: The issues discussed in November 2018 at User talk:Wbm1058#Scheduled monuments in Mendip and User talk:cyberpower678/Archive 60#English Heritage website changed the URL syntax for accessing its site database don't appear to have ever been resolved. I made a couple of demo edits for one solution, which still stand, but another solution involving using a bot to update URLs instead was proposed.

Scheduled monuments in Mendip has ~300 transclusions of Template:Vcite web, which is similar to {{cite web}} except that it uses the Vancouver system, a popular citation style in science and medicine. The problem might be solved by converting Template:Vcite web to use Lua module coding, or changing the citation style of the article to use {{cite web}} instead of {{Vcite web}}. {{Vcite web}} only transcluded on 161 articles. – wbm1058 (talk) 18:04, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If I knew anything about "Lua module coding" I might have a go but my expertise is limited. I have never understood quite what these limits were for and introduced Vcite (at someones suggestion) to over come this problem a few years ago on one of the list pages. There are no smaller adminitsrative units in Somerset the lists could be split into.— Rod ^talk 18:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The easiest way to deal with the issue here is to use wikitext tables, not template tables. That may increase the wikitext size but the template expansion will reduce to modest numbers. If not done already, you can use the bare references tag instead of reflist. (And generally, don't use vcite templates. Those really should be TFDd.) --Izno (talk) 21:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. {{subst:EH listed building row}} reduces the post-expand include size down to 1,753,226 of the 2,097,152 byte maximum, while leaving some template-logic clutter in the article source. Stopgap fix, pending consensus for a different solution. – wbm1058 (talk) 23:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks all for help. This fix seems to have worked on Scheduled monuments in Mendip but on Scheduled monuments in West Somerset the references (which I spent hours adding) are still not showing for me.— Rod ^talk 07:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's because that page hasn't been changed from what I can see. --Izno (talk) 14:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RexxS: has been trying a fix on it. A complication since I wrote this (and similar lists) is that the West Somerset council has combined with Taunton Deane to create Somerset West and Taunton so the scheduled monuments list should really be combined with List of scheduled monuments in Taunton Deane. Having moved from Somerset I really don't feel up to this fairly massive bit of work (along with the lists of listed buildings etc) at the moment.— Rod ^talk 14:33, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Buildings and structures on the National Register of Historic Places by territory has been nominated for merging to Category:Buildings and structures on the National Register of Historic Places by state or territory[edit]

Category:Buildings and structures on the National Register of Historic Places by territory has been nominated for merging to Category:Buildings and structures on the National Register of Historic Places by state or territory. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 14:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New designation for Taiwan[edit]

This edit request to Template:Designation has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I've recently created List of national monuments of Taiwan, and I would like to create a new designation for it for infoboxes.

|NATIONAL MONUMENT OF TAIWAN|TAIWAN NATIONAL|TAIWAN|TWN = [[List of national monuments of Taiwan|National monument of Taiwan]]

|NATIONAL MONUMENT OF TAIWAN|TAIWAN NATIONAL|TAIWAN|TWN = #FFC7C7

|NATIONAL MONUMENT OF TAIWAN|TAIWAN NATIONAL|TAIWAN|TWN = #B00000

Explanatory note for inclusion in Template:Designation/doc and Template:Designation/Supported designations

{{designation/Supported designations/row|t={{{t|}}}|Taiwan|[[Taiwan]]|106|National Monument of Taiwan; Taiwan National; TWN}}

I hope I'm doing this right. Thanks! ◢ Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 14:25, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Ganbaruby! Is there somewhere (Taiwan govt website, or so, ideally, or some reliable source) where I can verify these designations and colours? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:45, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ProcrastinatingReader: Yup! See https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/, which is the Bureau of Cultural Heritage's site. There's a search section if you scroll down, and you want to sort by Monument (古蹟) and National Level (國定/重要). I chose red because that's what zh:Template:TW monument uses, but I'm fine with any color. Also, you'll notice that the database contains lots of other protected items, but I didn't make a request because there's no list article containing all of them, and I need to find a more efficient way of creating an article than manually entering a excel sheet. ◢ Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 11:05, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ganbaruby: I've added those - please check if they are working correctly. Sorry about the delay. You can add the documentation bits yourself. Cheers — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@MSGJ: Works like a charm. Thanks! ◢ Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 09:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FAR notice[edit]

I have nominated New Orleans Mint for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Collaboration Request — Cueva de las Manos[edit]

Hi all! I've been working on an article on Cueva de las Manos, a UNESCO World Heritage Site and a National Historic Monument in Argentina. It's a really cool ancient cave with paintings from over 9000 years ago. The article is currently at a B class overall but I'm hoping to get it prepped for a peer review so it can become GA class. Anyways, please come by to help with the article and join in the current collaboration if you're interested. Thank you in advance! Tyrone Madera (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, could someone rate Cueva de las Manos? It currently has no rating from the project but it is rated in plenty of others. If an uninvolved editor could stop by and help out it would be much appreciated. Thanks! Tyrone Madera (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Designation For Historic Monuments of Cairo[edit]

I've recently created List of Historic Monuments in Cairo, and I would like to create a new designation for it for infoboxes.

|HISTORIC MONUMENT OF CAIRO|CAIRO MONUMENT|ATHAR RAQAM CAIRO|CAIRO|ARC = [[List of historic monuments of Cairo]]

|HISTORIC MONUMENT OF CAIRO|CAIRO MONUMENT|ATHAR RAQAM CAIRO|CAIRO|ARC = #A8BDEC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dr._Cyril_O._Spann_Medical_Office

|HISTORIC MONUMENT OF CAIRO|CAIRO MONUMENT|ATHAR RAQAM CAIRO|CAIRO|ARC = #A8BDEC

It meets the requirements with the exception of an external official website but this has to do more with the infrastructure of Egypt's ministries that should do this but don't (although I hope this will change). However, there are official lists from government cultural bodies. You can see their lists at:

Official history of Comite: http://www.islamic-art.org/comitte/Comite.asp

1890 List: http://www.islamic-art.org/Comitte/BArchViewPage.asp?BookID=681&PO=145

1903 List: http://www.islamic-art.org/Comitte/BArchViewPage.asp

1914 List: https://www.persee.fr/issue/ccmaa_1110-6824_1914_ind_1_1

Official Maps were produced as well: 1951 Map produced by Egyptian Government printing https://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~323475~90092674

I am not sure if I am going about this correctly and would be happy to corrected. Mamlukist (talk) 23:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Asking for help on inserting NRHP templates[edit]

I need help having NRHP templates put in for this page:

Made several attempts to do it but I'm not doing correctly. Thanks! ProfessorKaiFlai (talk) 02:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I added one a basic one. You can add additional fields if you have more info on the building. MB 04:04, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Historic markers with no buildings[edit]

Hello everyone - my comment is about this site:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_historic_places_in_South_Carolina

I notice that there are a number of places listed that have historical markers, but there is actually no building there. I would like to remove these, and possibly have a new category created for African-American historic markers.

Of course, this doesn't include sites like battlefields. But often we have a historic house that was demolished due to preservation failures, and a marker is put there as a stop gap. People seeing the list will expect to see a building there, so its a bit misleading.

This is probably the case for a lot of historic places, not just African-American.

I am willing to do this for the ones in Richland County, but I wanted to hear feedback first from members of the WikiProject on Historic sites ProfessorKaiFlai (talk) 21:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion[edit]

A discussion of interest to the members of this group can be found here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

GAR notice[edit]

Tower Building of the Little Rock Arsenal has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 01:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heritage registers: two sets of names for English gardens[edit]

There are two sets of values/callnames used for the National Register of Historic Parks and Gardens, one which displays the border in green (#1E8C00) and the other in cyan (#A8EDEF). Should these be merged so that all the names give the same colour (my preference would be green as this would match the equivalent Scottish Inventory), or is there a particular reason, maybe relating to the gardens register being listed together with other designation types on the Historic England website, for having different colour options. EdwardUK (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request for Heritage at Risk Register (England)[edit]

Hello. I'd like to request the addition of the Heritage at Risk Register (England) to {{Designation}}. Please advise on how to make this happen (if it requires further action on my part). Thank you!

TurboGUY (talk) 23:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New register designation for Massachusetts[edit]

Massachusetts is a state full of historic sites and has its own state-wide historic site registry. There is currently no Wikipedia article for the registry, but I have created a redirect for Massachusetts State Register of Historic Places to go to Massachusetts Historical Commission. I have manually added the proposed designation to Benedict Fenwick School as an example of how I envision the new designation looking. Thoughts? Ergo Sum 21:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Chaco Culture National Historical Park Featured article review[edit]

I have nominated Chaco Culture National Historical Park for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New Designation for Major Historical and Cultural Site Protected at the National Level of China[edit]

Would it be possible to add Major Historical and Cultural Site Protected at the National Level of China to the list? I believe this designation meets all the criteria:

1. There are 5,058 such sites

2. There is an article

3. National - only sites and relics in China can be designated.c

4. Text could just be a link: "Major Historical and Cultural Site Protected at the National Level", and the bar color could be red, as it is popular in China and associated with government (see Color in Chinese culture#Red / Vermilion).

5. Suggested callnames: Major Historical and Cultural Site Protected at the National Level, Cultural Heritage Sites under State-level Protection, Guobao

HenryMP02 ^TALK 20:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Designation proposal: Hawaiʻi Register of Historic Places[edit]

I'd like to propose a new designation be added for Hawaiʻi Register of Historic Places. This is a US state-level register with 1,054 listings as of February 2022, many of which are also NRHP-listed. As I'm not a template editor, I need help adding this designation to the appropriate templates. Thank you in advance.

Color selections: #395878 (background and border color); #FFFFFF (text). Chosen from the Hawaiʻi State Historic Preservation Division website.

Callname selection: Hawaii; Hawaiʻi Register of Historic Places; Hawai'i Register of Historic Places; Hawaii Register of Historic Places; Hawaii State Register of Historic Places; USHI

Text selection: Hawaiʻi Register of Historic Places

– T C Memoire 23:45, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

State Register of Immovable Landmarks of Ukraine[edit]

This article seems to have been edited recently, and in examining the link boxes on it, there appear to be some red-linked regions, where coverage of historically and culturally important heritage sites may be limited.

I sadly don't speak, read or write Ukrainian at all, but perhaps there are some active people here that do?

Expanding Wikipedia's documentation of cultural heritage which exists in a physical form, and could be under threat given events in the news, is a worthwhile activity that should be encouraged. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:13, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User script to detect unreliable sources[edit]

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Wikipedia:Hs" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:Hs and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 23#Wikipedia:Hs until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) 04:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requesting some article expansion help[edit]

Greetings,

Hi, I am User:Bookku, I find information and knowledge gaps create Drafts, try to recruit draft expanding editors and promote drafts articles for further expansion.

Requesting your visit to following drafts and help expand the same if any of these interests you.

Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia

Draft:Irrational beliefs

Draft:Superstitions in Christian societies

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 11:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Natura 2000[edit]

This edit request to Template:Designation has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I'm surprised that Natura 2000 sites (Special Area of Conservation and Special Protection Area) aren't supported. I haven't found any previous discussions regarding them, so here's my proposal:

 |SPECIAL AREA OF CONSERVATION|SAC = [[Natura 2000]] site ([[Special Area of Conservation|SAC]])
 |SPECIAL PROTECTION AREA|SPA = [[Natura 2000]] site ([[Special Protection Area|SPA]])
 |SPECIAL AREA OF CONSERVATION SPECIAL PROTECTION AREA|SPECIAL PROTECTION AREA SPECIAL AREA OF CONSERVATION|SAC SPA|SPA SAC = [[Natura 2000]] site ([[Special Area of Conservation|SAC]]/[[Special Protection Area|SPA]])

 |SPECIAL AREA OF CONSERVATION|SAC = #ACE1AF
 |SPECIAL PROTECTION AREA|SPA = #ACE1AF
 |SPECIAL AREA OF CONSERVATION SPECIAL PROTECTION AREA|SPECIAL PROTECTION AREA SPECIAL AREA OF CONSERVATION|SAC SPA|SPA SAC = #ACE1AF