Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal things[edit]Nominating[edit]Guidelines for nominators[edit]Please read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents[edit]There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." Photographs[edit]On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audio[edit]Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominations[edit]If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new users[edit]Adding a new nomination[edit]If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. Voting[edit]Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidates[edit]Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policy[edit]General rules[edit]
Featuring and delisting rules[edit]A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. There is also a limit of two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be polite[edit]Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember... all rules can be broken. See also[edit]
|
Table of contents[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:Grocery-store-widtsoe-utah-.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2024 at 15:52:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1930-1939
- Info created by Dorothea Lange / Farm Security Administration, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support High quality and high resolution copy of a historical picture by a famous photographer. I recently came across a French edition of The Bitter Years, a book about an exhibition of pictures by several photographers working for the US Farm Security Administration in the Museum of Modern Art. I was surprised that it was translated and published in French, and it led me to look again at these pictures. There are real gems in there! -- Yann (talk) 15:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Hoher Göll - Gipfelkreuz.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2024 at 15:15:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Austria
- Info Summit cross on the Hoher Göll. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Stanley Valley.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2024 at 11:59:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
- Info: Stanley Valley, Kootenay National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 12:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Alu (talk) 13:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Nevelzwam ( nebularis) (d.j.b.) 14-12-2023. (d.j.b).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2024 at 05:29:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Tricholomataceae
- Info A rained out one Clitocybe nebularis in decay. Focus stack of 16 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'd have removed the leaf, the others give the scale. Stacking errors marked. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Los Angeles International Airport by Don Ramey Logan.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2024 at 05:17:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Don (talk) 05:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Don (talk) 05:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. --BigDom (talk) 09:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
File:Vintage military fashion shop and a clerk waiting for customers, January 2024 - 1943.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2024 at 04:01:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Japan
- Vintage military fashion shop and a clerk waiting for customers. (The permission to publish.) c/n/u by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 04:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 04:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Saint Patrick Church (Troy, Ohio) - stained-glass windows, St. Anne Educates the Virgin Mary - detail.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2024 at 01:33:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info created by Nheyob - uploaded by Nheyob - nominated by Nheyob -- Nheyob (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. -- Nheyob (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pleasant design, sharp and detailed in the usual Nheyob quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Can be information about the author and the year of creation provided? — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Is this the church that was sold? Are these windows still in the building? (ps there's an online article saying some windows came from Austria). Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the questions and your support! The building was purpose-built for a Catholic parish. It opened in 1917 and still functions as such. It replaced a previous church building constructed in 1858. Ten windows were transferred from the 1858 building to the 1917 building, in addition to sixteen (then) new windows. See https://www.thecatholictelegraph.com/st-patrick-troy-marks-100th-thanksgiving/39069 I would like to include more about the studios that created the windows, but I have not found that information. --Nheyob (talk) 13:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Silk Loom Jim Thompson House photo D Ramey Logan.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2024 at 20:00:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by WPPilot -- Don (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Don (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cropped feet, tilted image, and perspective doesn't seem rectilinear (see curved pillar) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile Morin. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:The port of Long Beach 2 by Don Ramey Logan.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2024 at 19:43:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by - Don (talk) 19:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Don (talk) 19:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There are chromatic aberrations to be fixed and also cropping was not accurate (see edges), I also think the lighting is sub-optimal, plus the FP gallery "Vehicles" is not correct: vehicles barely visible here. --A.Savin 11:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Venedig Fondamente Nove Alpenblick-20090316-RM-081625.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2024 at 11:28:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Italy
- Info View to the north from the Fondamente Nove in Venice. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 11:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 11:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 23:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well balanced composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 04:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice composition with the distant view of the Alps. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 12:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Forester kangaroo (Macropus giganteus tasmaniensis) portrait Esk Valley.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2024 at 00:13:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Macropodidae (Macropods)
- Info No FPs of the subspecies endemic to Tasmania. Three FPs of the mainland subspecies. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice photo, sharp details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- welcome back... Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Focus stacking allowing an exceptional depth of field, smooth background and nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Ikan and Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Koenigstrasse 45 in Bad Bergzabern (2).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2024 at 09:00:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 09:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Satisfying composition and interesting building. I wish the top was a bit sharper Cmao20 (talk) 15:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Bad Bergzabern Castle (9).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2024 at 08:58:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 08:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 08:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 09:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Satisfying composition and nice gentle light Cmao20 (talk) 15:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but too much distortion. Yann (talk) 21:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Dülmen, Jüdischer Friedhof -- 2023 -- 6451 (bw).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2024 at 07:24:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 07:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 07:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This would be great if the tomb in focus wasn't partially hidden by the blurry one in the foreground. Yann (talk) 21:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support By blurring the objects in the foreground and background, a certain three-dimensionality is created and greater emphasis is placed on the main subject. Appealing black and white photography. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Radomianin --Kritzolina (talk) 10:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Night View of Badshahi Mosque (King’s Mosque).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2024 at 07:17:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Pakistan
- Info created by Muhammad Ashar - uploaded by Muhammad Ashar - nominated by C1MM -- C1MM (talk) 07:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- C1MM (talk) 07:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Without checking details: Perspective must be fixed. --XRay 💬 07:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very noisy and perspective issue. Not a COM:QI -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Great subject, but clearly needs a perspective correction and sadly a lot noisier than our best night photos Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful motif, but oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Motif has potential, but in this quality no FP. --A.Savin 11:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Lake SaifulMalook.jpeg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2024 at 07:02:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Pakistan
- Info A picture of Lake Saiful Mulook in the Hindu Kush of northern Pakistan. The image depicts a scene of mountains reflected in water, just off-center enough to draw the attention. The category of reflections of Lake Saiful Mulook contains several other well-composed pictures like this. created by Passionatephotog - uploaded by Passionatephotog - nominated by C1MM -- C1MM (talk) 07:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- C1MM (talk) 07:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose First impression: tilted and chromatic aberrations -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Reflections of mountains are always likely to do well at FP, but this one is clearly strongly tilted and not very sharp Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice motif, but tilted, sharpness isn't convincing. --Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Pedro II of Brazil by Nadar.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2024 at 02:04:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
- Info created by Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 09:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another one of the emperor! ★ 13:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very well restored compared to the original. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Pointe Saint-Mathieu, Southeast view 20170614 1.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 17:04:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info IMO superb image quality and composition. No FPs of this place. created by DXR - uploaded by DXR - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The tower on the right looks very distorted due to the wide angle. This would be difficult to fix. --Ermell (talk) 18:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Many thanks for the nomination, also a personal favourite of mine. --DXR (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 12:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ermell, crop on the right isn't convincing me. --Milseburg (talk) 15:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Bayrische Voralpen mit Blick in die Jachenau und Isartal.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 17:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info Snowy German mountain landscape that did well in WLE and is in my view spectacular enough for FP. created by Miosta - uploaded by Miosta - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 18:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Breathtaking scenery with all these mountains in the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support The image is beautifuly framed with a strong foreground and a slightly less-strong background giving a real Winter Wonderland impression. C1MM (talk) 07:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 09:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:56, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding capture! Thanks for the nomination, Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per C1MM. --Aristeas (talk) 18:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, but a description is missing. --Harlock81 (talk) 23:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Black-capped chickadee (33729).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 16:09:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paridae_(Tits)
- Info Black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus), a tiny bird in the tit family, at a feeder. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 16:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I dislike feeder shots. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not my ideal context either but this one is very sharp and well composed so I think it can be FP Cmao20 (talk) 02:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 09:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely! ★ 10:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 18:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Pine siskin (33706)2.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 16:07:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Fringillidae_(Finches_and_Allies)
- Info Pine siskin (Spinus pinus). All by — Rhododendrites talk | 16:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, two in a row. This orientation of the head doesn't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Left foot is not completely visable but still OK to me.--Ermell (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Works for me Cmao20 (talk) 02:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 09:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light and posture. --Aristeas (talk) 18:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Mushrooms of Tambov Oblast - 001.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 11:52:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Psathyrellaceae
- Info created & uploaded by Саня Новиков - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 13:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good composition but I'm not fully convinced by the sharpness or depth of field Cmao20 (talk) 02:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light. ★ 10:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Anne of Great Britain statue near St Paul's. London.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 09:58:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures
- Info created by Ввласенко - uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Ввласенко (talk) -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice crop. ★ 13:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wikipedia's article and the Commons category are both incorrect. She is known as Queen Anne. At the time when the original statue was made Anne was Queen of Great Britain and Ireland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs) 17:30, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Excellent, striking angle and composition but not FP level image processing. The contrast is too high so detail is lost in the shadows, and the sharpness could be better for an easily reproducible shot Cmao20 (talk) 02:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info: I propose the new version of the image. -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better now. ★ 13:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Vasu-vihara.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 08:54:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Bangladesh
- Info created & uploaded by Abdulmominbd – nominated by Ivar (talk) 08:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 13:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one works better for me. --Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Question Isn't this oversaturated? Compared to File:Narapatir Dhap 04.jpg. Yann (talk) 12:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Aguja de mar (Syngnathus acus), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2022-07-19, DD 18.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 07:44:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order : Syngnathiformes (Pipefishes and Seahorses)
- Info Greater pipefish (Syngnathus acus), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. The fish is generally 33 to 35 centimetres (13 to 14 in) in length. They are almost square in each segment of the body, and known to feel rigid when handled. The greater pipefish is found all around the British Isles and is regularly found in the Mediterranean Sea and, as shown here, in the coast of Portugal. These fishes are often amongst seaweeds and seagrass. Note: we have no FPs of the whole family Syngnathidae. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose only a fraction of the fish is in focus and the compo is imho not outstanding, sorry. -- Ivar (talk) 08:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The composition would be fine for such an unusual fish (if cropped at the bottom) but the lack of focus is too severe. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Surely VI given that it's the best picture on Commons, but not enough is in focus for FP IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 01:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Felix Nadar in the basket of a balloon, self-portrait, btv1b532323066.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 07:32:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1860-1869
- Info created by Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 11:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dumont vibes? ★ 13:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 13:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 15:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Self-aware and still humorous self-portrait; probably related to Daumier’s famous 1862 illustration (which one was first? it’s a pity that the photograph is just dated “about 1863”). --Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:MissingNo.svg[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 00:01:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated#Others
- Info created by - uploaded by OmegaFallon - nominated by Grandmaster Huon -- Grandmaster Huon (talk) 00:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Grandmaster Huon (talk) 00:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Having checked, the data used for graphics is actually machine code for drawing text boxes and such, so there's no risk of there being graphics data extractable. As such, I'm convinced by the copyright status. This is genuinely non-image data, processed oddly, and not enough code to be significant. Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Missing wow. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Did you mean "missing no" wow? ★ 21:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- No no, pun was intended, sorry if not obvious 🤡 (No missing No).
- I would not support a QR code either, nor a barcode. This picture is certainly useful for the project, but the image on itself is just made of a few pixels, arranged in a pseudo-chaotic order. It is apparently linked to a phenomenon in the Nintendo world appreciated by video game players. I don't find any artistic merit in this work, and the event in itself is rather insignificant in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe you're not part of the geek world, but I think everyone who is an expert or enthusiastic gamer would clearly recognize this vector. ★ 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's not a question of being geek in my opinion, it's just that this picture measures only 24 × 56 pixels, and represents nothing. But even if it was Super Mario, Zelda or Lara Croft, I would simply find the resolution limited. By the way, recognizing an icon, whatever it is, Mona Lisa or else, is not a sufficient condition to promote such candidates in my opinion. Perhaps a COM:VI, less likely a COM:QI (too simple), but definitely not a FP for me. By the way, there's a large number of different versions in the history, some have different colors. I have no idea what are supposed to be the real colors here, but that may be an other issue. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe you're not part of the geek world, but I think everyone who is an expert or enthusiastic gamer would clearly recognize this vector. ★ 01:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Did you mean "missing no" wow? ★ 21:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 09:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support One of the most recognizable glitches of all time (and luckily in the public domain). ★ 21:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Pennisetum Villosum.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2024 at 00:29:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family_:_Poaceae
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 00:29, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support A photo I took nearly 15 years ago, but one I think turned out surprisingly well. -- Mike Peel (talk) 00:29, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 13:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Could be a bit sharper but yes I think it turned out well Cmao20 (talk) 16:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 18:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. It reminds me of a poor hairstyle with electrically charged hair ;) -- Radomianin (talk) 07:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Forte de Santo Antônio--Farol da Barra Salvador Bahia Vista Aérea 2021-0149.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2024 at 21:04:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Brazil
- Info Drone view of the Fort of Santo Antônio da Barra, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. It was constructed to guard the entrance to the Bay of All Saints, during the time of the Portuguese Empire. Created and uploaded by Prburley - nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 21:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 13:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Relaxing place, remember me a bit to Juan Griego Fort --Wilfredor (talk) 14:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Bahia has its charm. ★ 14:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support A very solid find Cmao20 (talk) 16:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Windows in Caracas, Torre Lincoln Building.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2024 at 20:18:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Venezuela
- Info Its a original image of a fake image. This image was taken by a cropped format camera from 10 years ago, so it probably won't have the latest details of modern cameras, but it is from a country where it is extremely difficult to take photos perhaps almost like like Ukraine and North Korea -- Wilfredor (talk) 20:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Now it's spectacular! ★ 21:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose For two reasons:
- Ordinary building, not really special. The patterns are not as interesting as these balconies and Windows of Taj Tower Hotel for example, nominated two weeks ago.
- This nomination is very similar to Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caracas building.jpg which was an obvious fake, leading to several hot discussions (Delist nomination, Village Pump, FP talk page...) not yet finished. Some time is needed to step back and judge the work objectively -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose With almost a balance between open and closed windows, it is an ordinary image. --Tagooty (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I've seen a lot of close-up photos of buildings like this, and while this one is good and the image quality is IMO fine, I don't rly see it as anything special Cmao20 (talk) 16:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the feedback and votes negatives and positives --Wilfredor (talk) 20:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Attackofthe50ftwoman.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2024 at 13:38:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
- Info The iconic film poster of Attack of the 50 Foot Woman (1958). - created by Reynold Brown - uploaded by Easchiff - nominated by Thi -- Thi (talk) 13:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 13:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool. --Aristeas (talk) 08:56, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose low quality reproduction, JPEG artifacting. MER-C 12:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
File:The Wounded Angel - Hugo Simberg.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2024 at 13:33:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Myth,_legends_and_proverbs
- Info Hugo Simberg, The Wounded Angel, 1903. - uploaded by Susannaanas - nominated by Thi -- Thi (talk) 13:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 13:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 15:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 16:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support You believe but what you see... — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Australian ibis (Threskiornis molucca) Darwin.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2024 at 12:02:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Threskiornis
- Info The so-called bin-chicken has moved into Australian cities as much of its wetland habitat has disappeared. One current FP from some time ago. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent light and focus, natural environment. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support It is not exceptional for a photo of such a common bird (that makes a mess on Thursdays if I'm oblivious), but I do think it's the best photo of this we have and it is better than File:Threskiornis molucca - Perth.jpg. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 13:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow, what a sharp photograph Cmao20 (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Eye-catching pose --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support excellent detail and light. -- Ivar (talk) 08:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Ivar. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral It's a pity that the light isn't vice-versa. The grey head over the dark background doesn't look quite well. Otherwise it's a great shot. — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Victoria crowned pigeon Zoo Servion.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2024 at 08:56:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)
- Info created and uploaded by Roy Egloff, nominated by Yann -- Yann (talk) 08:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Zoo picture, but what a bird! -- Yann (talk) 08:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Using flash light in zoos is apparently often forbidden. By the way, @Yann, you opposed per Frank on this nomination probably for the same reason -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- IMO you are comparing apples and oranges. Using flash on wild birds, and on a pigeon in a zoo don't have the same consequences for the birds. Yann (talk) 09:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Pigeon, so maybe not so rare? -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Is not worth a picture in natural light, in my opinion. Poor colors here due to harsh contrasts -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I won't oppose as this could be interpreted as a revenge vote (see Basile's link above) but I anticipate many oppose votes. Low resolution as it was taken a long time ago. Blurred. Unnatural colours. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 11:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Definitely striking but it just looks so unnatural with the strong colour contrasts Cmao20 (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality for a zoo image and unnatural colour. --Tagooty (talk) 03:30, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Cmao20. -- Karelj (talk) 11:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments and votes. Yann (talk) 15:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Photo of a venetian mask in a studio photo session.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2024 at 08:43:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created and uploaded by Oncewerecolours, nominated by Yann -- Yann (talk) 08:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support I am not sure about the gallery, but this is nevertheless a very good portrait. -- Yann (talk) 08:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Early carnival? ★ 10:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Eye-catching, pleasant portrait. It makes up for the lesser quality due to the fact that it was taken in 2014. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin Cmao20 (talk) 22:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Colorful! Юрий Д.К 13:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice, but the filename should be better. --XRay 💬 07:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Panorama of Frankfurt with Ignatz-Bubis-Brücke at sunset.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2024 at 07:33:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
- Info Ignatz-Bubis-Brücke at sunset. created by Marco Nürnberger - uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К 07:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 07:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not our first Frankfurt cityscape FP ;–) (others), but the bridge in the foreground gives it a new touch and the light and colours are great. Because most/all similar existing FPs are in the Cityscapes gallery, I take the liberty to change the gallery link to that. The Settlements gallery is used specifially for “places where landscape is mixed with houses where people live”. --Aristeas (talk) 12:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, thank you. Юрий Д.К 12:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Light is beautiful, but the crop and arrangement of content isn't outanding. --Milseburg (talk) 16:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Baths of Maria de Padilla, Alcázar of Seville.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2024 at 07:39:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Spain
- Info Illuminated Baths of Maria de Padilla, Alcázar of Seville. Сreated by Marco Nürnberger - uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К 07:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 07:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Potential POTY finalist? --SHB2000 (talk) 10:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes! ★ 13:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alu (talk) 11:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice in 2017 shot. --Laitche (talk) 12:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support the coins on the deep end of the pool seem the reflection of the starry sky. Great! --Harlock81 (talk) 16:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exceptional compostion with reflection and lighting. --Tagooty (talk) 03:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Tagooty. --Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:The Sentinels in Southwest National Park, TAS.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2024 at 07:18:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania
- Info created and uploaded by Shuttles12000 - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 07:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 15:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would crop out some of the left, but still good Cmao20 (talk) 22:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Would wish for a bit more detail resolution and there are some minor CAs, but the “spotlight” make this a dramatic and impressive shot. --Aristeas (talk) 08:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Looking north west from Solomon's Throne - Walls of Jerusalem.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2024 at 07:15:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania
- Info created and uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 07:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The light and the clouds are nothing special but the landscape is impressive--Ermell (talk) 09:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 11:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose midday summer light conditions makes it not outstanding, sorry. -- Ivar (talk) 08:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC)