Synchronic (2019) - Synchronic (2019) - User Reviews - IMDb
Synchronic (2019) Poster

(2019)

User Reviews

Review this title
398 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
interesting premise
SnoopyStyle19 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Steve Denube (Anthony Mackie) and Dennis Dannelly (Jamie Dornan) are best friends and paramedic partners. Dennis is married to Tara (Katie Aselton) and Brianna (Ally Ioannides) is their daughter. Steve is diagnosed with terminal cancer. The paramedics have been called to some strange deaths which involve a new synthetic drug named Synchronic. Steve goes to buy up the drug supply and discovers that it has usual temporal effects.

This has an interesting premise. It should reveal itself in a more organic flow. The story telling is a bit too messy and I am a little uncertain about the rules of this world. Also, Brianna's story is a bit muddled. This needs more clarity and more time developing the characters. It needs some better writing beyond the interesting premise.
55 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice weird low-budget brahmedy
ThomDerd30 January 2021
For the ones about to watch this film here's a few things to consider: it's a nicely shot film with an interesting storyline and good acting. Pace is slow but picks up half way through and the plot keeps you interested. You 'll encounter some inconsistencies and some massive plot holes but if you're willing to put these aside, you ll enjoy it. 7,5/10
257 out of 285 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A novel drug development in New Orleans.
TxMike22 March 2021
We watch lots of movies, often 5 or 6 a week. Most of them are recycled themes of one sort or another. This one, Synchronic, is mostly novel and that is refreshing. It also was filmed in and around New Orleans, a place we are very familiar with and love dearly.

A chemist has synthesized a new mind-altering drug, but its novelty is that the user doesn't just imagine they are in some sort of strange journey, they actually go there. Just as you can place the phonograph needle on any part of a record and listen to what is there, the drug causes you to be transported to any place and time, but it is mostly random.

This is all fiction of course but it is treated interestingly in this story of two paramedics, long-time friends. For one of them his teenage daughter disappears after a dose and the other takes it upon himself to buy up all remaining Synchronic and figure out a way to find her and send her back home.

The movie is very well scripted and very well made, we enjoyed it all the way through. At home on DVD from our public library.
35 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Decent with stupid plot holes
rmmil15 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This film is decent, and I love "time travel" concept films in general, but there are few scenes that made no sense in the "no person would do that" kind of way, or contained too many "coincidences", which heavily impacted my ability to suspend disbelief for the remainder of it (the scenes in question happening about 1/2 way thru the film).

I haven't seen anyone else complain about this yet, so I'll rant about it here: WHY did the lead protagonist use his DOG to test if he could bring back living things? No one would do that. No one. Not if they loved their pet. He would have gone to a pet store and bought a mouse, or a snake, or anything. He wouldn't use his dog!

Also, why does this drug that seemingly randomly places people in the past (depending on where you are standing...okay?), always place them within moments of mortal danger? No one is ever just dropped in a random field, no, they are placed inches from death. A frozen Ice Age tundra with nothing for miles...but a caveman is nearby, or a 16th century swamp...with a conquistador feet away, etc., etc. This film would have you believe in the far past everyone was constantly within 7 minutes of being killed. It was all just a little "too much" for me and took me out of it.

And no one would take their darn dog!!
335 out of 443 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Terribly Executed
evanston_dad25 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A slam bang premise is destroyed by terrible execution in this dreary sci-fi sludge.

The most awkward set up ever finds Anthony Mackie, whose character is dying of cancer, dabbling with a drug that allows users to zip to other points in time. He wants to find the daughter of his partner and best friend, played by Jamie Dornan, who looks like he wants to be anywhere but in this movie. She took the drug, went back in time, but got stuck there, because that can happen. The exposition and drama is doled out in haphazard chunks, the film flirts with racial themes about the difference between how white people and black people view the past, nothing coheres with anything else, and to top it all off the film looks terrible, like the whole thing was smothered in colorless gravy.

Mackie tries mightily to do something, anything, with this movie, but he's let down by virtually every single other aspect of the film. Dornan comes as close to being embalmed that a human being can be without being actually embalmed. There are a couple of moments (that scene with the wooly mammoth!) that tease us with the promise of what could have been, which are mostly just cruel because of what we're actually given.

Grade: D.
54 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Could've done a lot more with the subject material
MoistMovies13 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The whole synthetic DMT aspect was something new and besides time travel i thought they were going to go even more weird with it.. But they didn't. And that's kind of a shame considering one of the many report people have from just normal DMT is talking to inter-dimensional beings or aliens. I thought the scene where Mackie goes to the voodoo serimony would have been a good jumping off point for adding some more out there science fiction concepts related to DMT. The ending was very lackluster to me... a hero saves blah blah blah... I've seen that ending in 100x different ways.. fading into history to riding into the sunset..,. The first half I was much more into it, would've been a 8/10 if i stopped there.. the end took two off for me. But thats because i found it bland and uninspired. Would i recommend it... Not sure
113 out of 150 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Quite linear and predictable...
paul_haakonsen12 January 2021
I hadn't even heard about this 2019 movie titled "Synchronic" before now in 2021, as I had the chance to sit down and watch it. I read the synopsis for the movie and it sounded like it could be something worthwhile watching. So I gave the movie a chance.

And yeah, "Synchronic" definitely was watchable, but it wasn't an impressive movie. The storyline was just way too generic and predictable. It felt like writer Justin Benson was opting for the easiest way for constructing a storyline for the movie. Everything was just so linear and running on auto-pilot. So I can't really claim to have been blown away by the storyline told in "Synchronic".

Actually I would say that the movie's directors Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead set up a whole lot of things that had potential, but ultimately they failed to bring them to fruition, and it just felt half-hearted. There definitely was potential to be found in the movie, but it was just wasted as nothing felt thoroughly explored, explained or exposed.

The acting in the movie was good, but the actors and actresses just didn't have an overwhelming amount of material to work with, so it felt like it was semi-hindered performances.

My rating of "Synchronic" lands on a very bland and mediocre five out of ten stars. The movie is good enough for a single viewing, if you enjoy linear sci-fi movies. But the contents of the storyline just were far too feeble to support more than a single viewing. "Synchronic" came and went without leaving much of any ripples in the fabric of time and space.
94 out of 152 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Why the dog???
donttouchmeprimate1 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Come on man, that's some low hanging fruit right there. Could have shot that in a million different ways but we had to lose the dog. Not a goldfish, not a mouse or a slice of bacon,jad to be the dog. Just felt very manipulative.

As for the film, Anthony Mackie and Jamie Dornan were decent enough, so can't complain about the acting. The first half of the film was even pretty good and intriguing before it got into the plot propper and it fell apart pretty quickly and Mackie's character became quite annoying and induced eye-rolling.

Would I watch it again? No, but I would suggest other people watch it just because misery loves company.
20 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Synchronic is a film with lost potential
eva3si0n12 June 2023
Synchronic is a film with lost potential. First of all, the film has a very long plot and the main events begin to develop in the middle of the timing. Secondly, Synchronic does not develop the topic of time travel, not to mention the fact that these movements themselves are not logically related, and the last movement associated with the finale of the film is not only not logical, but looks like nonsense. It seems that the authors had a concept, but they could not implement it in any way. Synchronic is one of the worst time travel movies. Not only because there is a terribly logical ending, but also the incoherence of events in general and lost potential.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
7.5 for this "Buddy-Thriller-Scifi-Horror-Dramady" Movie!
FilmFlowCritics7 October 2019
There are certain topics, that a lot of film makers avoid, because either its physically to complicated to set up rules and explain them, or they fear the possible backlash. This is why it's even more refreshing to see this approach back in cinema again.

While the movie doesn't reinvent the wheel, it is an absolute joy to watch and you are not being held back from enjoying the plot by wondering about the specific mechanics about "how does this actually work?" (Without going into spoilers to much, just see it for yourself!)

Jamie Dornan and Anthony Mackie have an authentic and gripping buddy relationship and both of them should be happy to have signed up for this script. I even struggle to put this movie into a genre, because there is no "Buddy-Thriller-Scifi-Horror-Dramady" category. This movie is weird in the most positive sense of the word and should be enjoyed without reading any spoilers ahead, hence this style of review.

The budget for this movie wasn't massive, but due to a fantastic piece of cinematography work, it looks much more expensive and just beautifully well done! Yes, money is important in this industry, but here we have a stunning example what can be done with dedication and creativity!
183 out of 255 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Allways
nogodnomasters14 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The story centers on Steve (Anthony Mackie) who is a paramedic in New Orleans. He is treating a lot of people who are victims of the new designer drug Synchronic. He buys up the drug to prevent people from taking it. Brianna (Ally Ioannides) is the daughter of his partner. She takes the drug and disappears. The creator of the drug, awkwardly hiding in Steve's closet, explains {PLOT SPOILER} that it allows you to travel in time for 7 minutes.

The science wasn't great but the story held my interest.

Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.
40 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Of Fleeting Interest
Cineanalyst17 April 2021
"Synchronic" is surely only worth watching if you're very much into time-travel movies, which I like to think I am, but even this one was lackluster to me. Plus, it's got Anthony Mackie. Seems like this guy is everywhere on my streaming channels lately. He was just in that other movie that appeared on Netflix lately but I decided to pass on, "Outside the Wire" (2021), and I delayed viewing the latest episode of "The Falcon and the Winter Soldier" on Disney+ for this one. Not that it's Mackie's fault. He seems like a chill guy--kind of an everyman quality to him, yet gorgeous and fit, but I digress. The movie's promotion seems to indicate that another guy is a co-lead here, but his character really doesn't matter. The pacing is pretty bad--wasting a lot of time on paramedic, family and medical stuff that hardly matters even in setting up the time-travel business--and overly-dramatic scoring does much of the heavy lifting early on to try to retain one's interest.

Even when it does finally get to the time travel, it's pretty dull. Right off the bat, the drug that allows these seven-minutes sojourns to the past was designed by a drug maker who claims to have not known what it'd do, but he named it "synchronic?" Uh huh, I'm sure Merck said the same thing about "ecstasy." Furthermore, the scenario and Mackie's character go to great lengths to define the parameters of the drug's time travel capabilities or rules, but I wonder why he never thought he might have more success with the time traveling if he didn't keep doing it while drunk. Maybe he would've had the clarity of mind to buy a guinea pig instead of using his beloved dog for his experiment, then, or maybe carry some sort of weapon or protection if he keeps running into deadly situations every trip. None of that, including the obligatory "Back to the Future" reference, would much matter, though, if the time travel resulted in more than an illustration that history is racist.
24 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A decent Sci-Fi-Thriller that COULD have been great.
jayenglish-8353912 February 2021
This is a decent movie. And that's unfortunate because the concept here is really cool and I think with better writing and less bland and uninspired directing/cinematography, this could have turned out to be a modern sci-fi/thriller classic.

The acting from the two leads, Anthony Mackie and Jamie Dornan is definitely solid, especially Mackie. However unlike Mackie's character, I didn't find Dornan's to be particularly interesting nor compelling, which is disappointing considering that his character has an important connection to the heart of the story.

The visual effects are pretty great but they could have really popped more if supported by directing and cinematography that didn't look and feel as bland as it was at times.

Synchronic also has some serious issues with pacing scattered throughout the runtime which was very hard not to notice, and at times the consistency of tone just wasn't quite there. At times it's a very dark and bleak watch, then there will be scenes that are quite funny but it just didn't work as well as it sounds like it would due to the vast contrasts.

To sum it up, it's a decent movie that is quite enjoyable and gripping enough to make you care somewhat. It's just a shame that it's not what it could have been.
130 out of 150 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
People want original movies and when they have it they complain
Luispei001531 March 2021
Why is it that when theres a movie with an original idea or script people complain and hate about it, because of this toxicity future writers and directors might not want to take the next step to do original ideas. Yes, the movie is not a masterpiece and sometimes it feels a bit rushed ( when Anthony M. Starts discovering how it works ) but overall it has a great concept, great actors and emotion. Just watch it and ignore the bad reviews.
85 out of 103 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Almost, but not quite.
artswan-7764218 April 2021
Interesting concept and excellent base material and acting, but the writing fumbled what could have been a very good story.
51 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
People WAKE THE BLEEP UP!! This is a Great scifi drama, thriller!! PHENOMENAL!! Wow!!
joiningjt9 March 2021
Great acting....check Great story....check Great cinematography....check Great scifi thriller...check Great ending...check Highly recommend you watch this gem.... CHECK!!!!!!!!

It's a very solid scifi thriller very well acted!!
40 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
In Sync
kosmasp7 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
It doesn't happen often, but since I will be talking a little bit about the plot, I thought I'd put up a spoiler warning. I will not talk about the ending, I will not spoil anything that is not being told in general summaries. I still have different standards, when it comes to spoiling and that's why I'm "warning" people, before I go on.

Movies that have time travel themes have quite some problems when it comes to logic. I do think this movie generally moves through them in a good way. You have to suspend disbelief obviously to actually get the most out of this quite crazy and original idea. And just to be clear, this movie does not promote taking drugs! Not the ones we know and especially not the ones no one has ever tried - or lived to tell about ...
35 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
THE DOG!!!
myevilgummybear19 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This is why the movie bombed! The damn dog! How could he not save the dog?!! I would of gone back. Ugh... Stupid.
28 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Drama With Sci-Fi Elements
stevendbeard25 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I saw "Synchronic", starring Jamie Dornan-the Fifty Shades movies, The Fall_tv; Anthony Mackie-Point Blank_2019, the Falcon in the Marvel movies & tv show; Katie Aselton-Legion_tv, Our Idiot Brother and Ally Ioannides-Into the Badlands_tv, Parenthood_tv. This is a hard movie to classify. It is basically a drama with sci_fi elements. Jamie & Anthony are paramedics working in New Orleans when they start coming across some mysterious deaths. One person is found stabbed with a sword, one is found completely burned and another is found at the bottom of an elevator shaft with his broken and scattered body parts all around him. Jamie & Anthony soon discover that all the victims had taken a new psychedelic designer drug called Synchronic-maybe there's a connection to the deaths? Katie plays Jamie's wife and Ally is his daughter. Ally turns up missing and guess what she took right before she disappeared? Anthony discovers clues that he thinks will lead him to her, but doesn't think anyone would believe him so he records what he is doing, in case it doesn't work, at least someone will know what he attempted to do. The explanation of the drugs effects is where the sci_fi elements come in and it's best if you don't know too much about it until you see the movie. The only problem I had was the ending. It left a big question. It's rated "R" for drug content, language, violence and bloody images and has a running time of 1 hour & 36 minutes. I would probably buy it on DVD.
34 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
H.G. Wells on Acid...
Xstal12 January 2021
... but it's a bad trip, mistimed and persistently incurable as 'The Time Machine' is replaced by a synthetic pill and a pair of modern day Morlocks demonstrate just how bad storytelling, film making and special defects can be - couldn't even cast a decent rock!
60 out of 119 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Such potential
jfo-1129115 August 2021
A brilliant idea that could have been really great. But focuses too much on the drama aspect of their normal lives as apposed to this awesome sci-fi idea, which ends up feeling more like the secondary plot. Shame.

There's also many plot holes and inconsistencies.

Really wanted to love it. Fingers crossed they'll one day do a remake and nail it.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
started off really good to become a complete bore half way
kaefab1 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The movie was good until the lead started taking the drug going into the past and recording everything.

From that spot on the movie became a complete bore fest.
76 out of 142 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hybrid
Abfabbb26 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The movie seemed like a hybrid of "What Dreams May Come"/"Limitless"/with a touch of Wachowski's ("Cloud Atlas" or "Inception"). Except it didn't deliver. Some scenes were interesting and the concept had potential, but it never fully fleshed out and unfortunately stayed at the level of an hour long TV program. The dialogue was frequently muddled, low volumes ; weird accents so that it was not relaxing to have to concentrate so hard on "hearing" what the actors were saying. I expect dialogue problems when I am watching some British shows----but not in an all English language movie. I do not have hearing or cognitive issues and found this to be a problem throughout the movie. The opening concept of the snakebite was interesting but went nowhere ; the scientist who created Synchronic was interesting but went nowhere. The examination of the Dannelly marriage is boring. Brianna needed to be more complex and sympathetic so that the rescue was intense. I knew more about/cared more about the dog than Brianna because she only had a few lines before she disappeared. The movie does give food for thought to sci fi fans and was okay to pay for a rental while stuck inside during a pandemic. BUT----it was disappointing .
55 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Slow and Stupid
AJ_McAninch16 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
And don't put a charming dog in the film if your lead character is so stupid he doesn't have brains enough to know he must be holding the dog to bring the dog back. Yet he brings back an annoying brat. I know "it's just a movie", but that adorable dog sacrificed really pissed me off.
37 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I've seen better - I've seen A LOT worse!!
gunn-wrights26 November 2021
Great story idea... execution, however; could have been better. The acting was good - the lead guy has always been one of my favorites.

I guess there was just too much empty time. Time they could have used to bring add some substance to their characters. I didn't really feel connected to any of them. If they all lived - fine. If they all died - fine? And the end - BOORRRING AND LAME!

RECOMMENDATION - If you are like me, and just like to have a movie playing in the background while doing something else. This movie is for you. You could walk out of the room for 10-15 minutes, come back and pick it up without missing much of anything!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed