Fort Lauderdale High School in Fort Lauderdale, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

Fort Lauderdale High School in Fort Lauderdale, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 40.

1600 NE 4TH AVE
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33305

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
The Quest Center School (8.9 miles):

87
Doctors Charter Of Miami Shores School (19.1 miles):

79
Miami Lakes Educational Center School (18.6 miles):

60
South Broward High School (8.3 miles):

42
Fort Lauderdale High School:

40
Drop Back In School (2.8 miles):

22
Broward Detention Center School (2.6 miles):

12
North University High School (7.3 miles):

2
Fort Lauderdale High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Broward County:

47
Fort Lauderdale:

46
Fort Lauderdale High School:

40

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (754) 322-1100 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 951
School type: Senior High
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (754) 322-1230
Magnet Program.
Principal: Gina Eyerman
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 20
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 93
Senate District: 29

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

44%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

525
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 842 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 841 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 274
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 781
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 738

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 781
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 736
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 716 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 716 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 237
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 664
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 626

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 664
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 625
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 595 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 594 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 178
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 549
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 515

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 549
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 511
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

41%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

538
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

68%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

12%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 850 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 849 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 299
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 798
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 763

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 796
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 765
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 747 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 746 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 263
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 706
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 677

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 705
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 680
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 570 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 570 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 202
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 529
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 506

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 527
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 508
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

32%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

60%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

494
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

62%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

11%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1142 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1142 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 351
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1079
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1022

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1079
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1023
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1019 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1020 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 311
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 969
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 920

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 970
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 922
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 702 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 701 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 195
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 651
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 619

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 651
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 620
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 210 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 209 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

44%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

28%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

475
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

96%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 823 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 815 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 335
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 772
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 768
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 187 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 177
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 526 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 521 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 207
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 487
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 488
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 392 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 391 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 141
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

39%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

387
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 909 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 905 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 415
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 879
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 873
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 200 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 86

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 191
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 189
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 592 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 589 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 268

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 572
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 569
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 40

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 435 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 435 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 181

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 417
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 415
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 42

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 112
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 112
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (95%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 80

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

35%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

45%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

352
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1380
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1560
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1611
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1687
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

1815
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

1869
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

50%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1954
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

33%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1952
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

56%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

304
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

37%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1521
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

348
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1514
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

46%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1663
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1631
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1761
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1877
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1927
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

303
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1978
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

76%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1287
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

1511
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

308
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 02%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

1608
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1708
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

311
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1791
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

314
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1877
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

1975
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

1975
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

309
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1410
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

324
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1542
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

1636
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1635
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1761
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1867
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1939
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1986
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 56
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 312
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 408
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

1324
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1504
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

1660
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1660
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

302
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1739
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1852
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1938
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1986
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1466
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1498
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1708
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1621
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1758
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1869
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1926
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1965
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

64
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

632
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

60
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

72
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

60
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

76
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

77
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

343
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

661
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

375
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

332
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

61
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

452
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

706
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

13
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

464
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

721
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

77
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 69
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

320
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 67%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 363
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

278
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 476
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

318
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1927
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1953
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1904
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 49

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1933
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1941
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1918
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 23

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1954
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1977
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1920
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 57

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1992
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

325
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1994
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1956
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 38

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 443
Mean Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

708
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 330
Mean Scale Score
Here:

708
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 443
Mean Scale Score
FORT LAUDERDALE HIGH SCHOOL:

721
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 78
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 330
Mean Scale Score
Here:

720
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 346
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

301
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 84%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Fort Lauderdale, FL
  5. Fort Lauderdale High School in Fort Lauderdale, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.