The Secret Agent (TV Mini Series 2016) - The Secret Agent (TV Mini Series 2016) - User Reviews - IMDb
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Subtle Adaptation that Follows one Thematic Path but Shifts as the Action Unfolds
l_rawjalaurence21 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
As with most adaptations, a comparison with Joseph Conrad's source- text might prove insignificant: suffice to say that Tony Marchant's screenplay bears as much relationship to the novel as Charles Bennett's version for Alfred Hitchcock's SABOTAGE (1936). The plot and characters are there, but Charles McDougall's BBC production is best approached on its own terms.

From the beginning we are plunged into the familiar world of BBC Victorian London - a miasma of darkened streets, thick mud and rickety buildings illuminated with blue-gray light. The interior of Verloc'; (Toby Jones's) seedy Soho shop is illuminated by dim yellow lights that suggest that the wares on offer are not the true reason for the shop's existence. And so it proves: Verloc is a double- agent working both for the Russians and the British, as well as presiding over meetings of an anarchist group attended by the Professor (Ian Hart) and Yundt (Christopher Fairbank), among others.

Director McDougall contrasts this nether-world with the stylish bourgeois world of the embassies, where the Russian consul Vladimir (David Dawson) sits behind a desk in a bejeweled room, the very epitome of surface respectability. Through such contrasts the production makes a pointed criticism of so-called "Victorian Values," where lower- and lower-middle class tradespeople like Verloc are employed to do the upper class's dirty work for them, and cannot really resist for fear of being socially exposed.

Yet things take a much darker turn after the second episode when Verloc's plan to blow up the Royal Observatory at Greenwich goes horribly wrong, and his brother-in-law Stevie (Charlie Hamblett), an innocent young man with learning difficulties, is killed instead. We are made painfully aware of the true consequences of terrorism; it is not the perpetrators who suffer but civilians instead. Verloc tries his utmost to exonerate himself; but with metaphorical blood on his hands, he just seems like a coward unwilling (or unable) to take responsibility for his actions. He meets a violent end which seems somehow right in terms of the story's logic.

But the story has not finished yet: although the Greenwich bombing causes something of a stir in the press, as well as in Parliament, the Establishment manages to close ranks, with no one really being brought to justice for the crime. Assistant Commissioner Stone (Tom Goodman-Hill) preserves his reputation, enabling him to attend the best society parties, while Vladimir continues in his role as a Russian diplomat engaging in subversive activity. Verloc's death causes no more than a ripple of disquiet among these people; he might be gone, but there is always another double agent ready and willing to take his place, who might be equally dispensable in the future.

In the end we feel little else but a sense of frustration at an amoral world where former prisoners such as Michaelis (Tom Vaughan- Lawlor) are automatically suspected of committing further crimes, even though they have never been near the actual scene where the felony took place; and the ruling classes seem to continue the endless whirl of parties, balls, and other gatherings with little or no thought for others' suffering.

This is an angry production, one which castigates everyone with even a tenuous connection to state-sponsored terrorism for the crime of indifference, while suggesting that there is little or no solution to this problem. The cast are uniformly excellent, especially Hamblett as Stevie and Vicky McClure as Verloc's unfortunate spouse.
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Misses the point
paul2001sw-12 August 2016
Joseph Conrad's novel, 'The Secret Agent', is justly acclaimed, a compact and bitter satire nominally about anarchist terrorism but in fact about the wretchedness of the human condition: while ordinary people labour and suffer, we talk about principles and love but will in reality sacrifice anything for an easy life. With hardly a superfluous word, it could easily be adapted into a 90 minute film; but this adaptation lasts three hours, and is slow-paced and boring. Not only that, but the padding serves to undermine the original purpose to no beneficial effect. One of the great characters in the book is the Professor, an extremist (with all the best lines) who asserts he will give everything for the cause, even down to blowing himself up with a bomb he carries on his person at all times should the police come to arrest him. But no actual cause is ever sufficiently revolutionary to earn the Professor's support, and as we see when he is confronted by the stupid, cowardly policeman Heat, his supposed willingness to cause carnage is sufficiently strong to ensure that no-one is ever likely to put him to the test. But in this adaptation, Heat is brave and humane, and he confronts the Professor only for the Professor's bomb to fail to explode when he tries to detonate it, developments that completely miss the point. It's a particular shame to see the usually excellent Vicky McClure stilted and unable to save the story. Sometimes it seems as if those responsible for adapting a story have utterly failed to understand what it is really about; and this series is one such example.
19 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Terrorist plotting in Victorian London
Tweekums31 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This three part drama is centred on Mr. Verloc; a member of a group of anarchists living in London. For the most part they are an ineffectual bunch; they talk a lot but don't actually do anything. Verloc is actually a spy in the pay of Russia and Russia believes that Britain's response to the anarchists has been far too gentle. Hoping to force Britain to adopt a tougher position the Russian First Secretary pressures Verloc to take real action… he wants him to bomb the Greenwich Observatory. To this end Verloc works with fellow anarchist 'The Professor', who makes the bomb before heading out with his autistic brother-in-law on the mission that can only end in tragedy. Before the explosion the police, most notably Inspector Heat, think the anarchists are a bunch of harmless losers but afterwards they are determined to find out who was behind it and expose their backers.

Having not read the book I can't say how this adaption compares but as a piece of television I found it rather enjoyable… if distinctly bleak. Toby Jones does a great job as Verloc; a distinctly unlikable protagonist who can't accept that he is to blame for the tragic event midway through the series. He is ably supported by Vicky McClure, who plays his wife, and excels in the final tragic episode. Stephen Graham impresses as Inspector Heat; the only authority figure who doesn't seem to be self-serving. The rest of the cast are pretty good too. Given the age of the original story this feels remarkably fresh; its themes of terrorist plots seem just as relevant today. The story is well told and thankfully the creators didn't decide to provide a happy ending. Overall this was a solid, if somewhat downbeat, story; it won't be for everybody but I rather enjoyed it.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A very ordinary secret anarchist/spy is forced to renew his double dealings
robertemerald18 January 2018
I had a look over some of the reviews and wondered why they were so hard on this show. After all, it's the type of characters in this show that started The First World War. Few shows actually show us this world. And the characters, given it's such an undeveloped area of period drama, are, for me, hard to beat, bordering on truly original, and brilliantly enacted. The original author is, after all, part of the literary canon for a reason This is comparable to Charles Dickens, but stands on its own merits. The Secret Agent a period piece like nothing I'd encountered before. There are no heroes, only flawed but passionate people, dangerously entwined with the lives of essentially honest people who are, for the most part, unaware of the dangers brewing beneath their floorboards. I really don't know how anyone could have not been totally refreshed by this cinematic experience. Like all good British productions there is a wealth of detail and realism that make this story a true transportation back to the period, with a ripping yarn to keep one glued. And there is a moral here too, relevant to any time.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Most Enjoyable once you get into it
Romany21 August 2016
The first episode does start out rather slow and it has a lighthearted feel to it. Seeing Toby Jones in this type of role for the first time takes a bit of time to get use to ,but He does come through and gives a great performance.

A real stand out performance from Vicky McClure and the rest of the cast give a good performance too. By episode 2 it starts to get dark and much more enjoyable to watch.

Episode 3 is really good ,it takes some really dark twists and holds your interest .

The music really adds to the feel of it all, as does the great location scenes. I thought it well acted and produced, it leaves you wanting more.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Dark, bleak, brooding but really good!
russ-s1 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Finished watching the last episode last night and what a bleak ending!

I though the whole cast were fantastic, Toby Jones can do little wrong for me, (Detectorists is just about my favourite comedy ever), and he played the hapless, hopeless, desperate and cowardly Verloc brilliantly. Stephen Graham was wonderful in the role of the sympathetic but hard-nosed Inspector Heat. Vicky McClure as the loyal, trusting Winnie was brilliant too. I don't care about who did what accent or whether it was accurate to Joseph Conrad's book, it just worked for me. Yes it's very dark and has an extremely bleak ending but I found this refreshing. There is no happy ending where the good guys win or a moral tale that leaves you feeling good about yourself! It's a gritty, realistic story of desperate people trying to survive and succeed in a terrible situation. Loved it.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Uninspiring and badly dated......
s327616918 July 2016
The Secret Agent based on Joseph Konrad's work of the same name, for me at least, is rather uninspiring and badly dated.

This series, on first view, feels like a "dull artifact" that expresses stale, somewhat paranoid sentiments, from a bygone era.

Unlike similar series, such as Reilly Ace of Spies, there's nothing overly exciting on offer here. Reilly beautifully captured the essence of an early period of political intrigue and built an enjoyable tale around it. By contrast, The Secret Agent, simply feels like a proxy for the exhumed opinions of long dead political elites, afraid of the Communist bogey man.

The acting in this series and production values, as is often the case in the UK, are of a high standard. Its not for me, the performances, that are in question, however. The whole proposition seems anachronistic, when filtered through 21st century eyes. The Secret Agent, might have worked as a satire or adapted to a comedic format but, as serous drama, to me, it feels like an absurdity. Five out of ten.
18 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A Travesty
shozzas1528 July 2016
This has only the vaguest connection to the book. The names are the same, just about everything else has been modified out of all recognition. Coincidentally I read the book a few weeks ago. It's a subtle & quite unnerving book, a black comedy really, with no heroes, just people enmeshed in a fallen world of deceit & corruption.

There's very little dialogue, until near the end, when it all bursts like a suppurating boil. This obviously makes it difficult to adapt, but is no excuse for wholesale butchery; frankly if that's the best the adaptor can do he'd best just leave it. The acting was OK, but there was some poor casting. Overall a waste of everyone's time.
12 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A bit lame
pawebster24 July 2016
It's a strange and unconvincing story, but it has its points of interest, as it deals with the murky late Victorian world of mysterious anarchists.

Unfortunately, this BBC version is not very well done. The main problem is that it is too slow and does not flow.

Stephen Graham has a difficult part as Inspector Heat, whose doings and motivations are often obscure. Why he further encumbers this with a heavy Scouse accent is one of the mysteries of the series (I know he's from Liverpool, but he's good at accents).

As for Vicky McClure, what is her accent? It's unrelated to the speech of the rest of her screen family and also seems anachronistic to me (too many glottal stops and -d- for -t- in places). Is it that she is just using her own accent (and does she perhaps do so in every part she gets)?
11 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent!
ashmolean12 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This is a totally enthralling production. It is very contemporary in its topic dealing with suicide bombers. Considering when the story was originally written, it has a very modern appeal. The story has twists and turns. Jones's character works for both Britain and Russia in his role as The Secret Agent. He involves the innocent in his attempt to follow orders. The ending is very intriguing. Was the Frenchman in on the plot from the beginning? I have to read the book now to find out if the original story follows this script. The acting is excellent. Toby Jones and all the cast give marvelous performances. I would highly recommend this.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Engaging and provocative ish
victhom-0023321 September 2021
Not many I would watch twice but this I did Glad to do so production and acting was enough for a repeat look Ps my phone means I cant see what I hve typed.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Locations
chrislally12 August 2016
We enjoyed the production, the filming and actors were excellent though we thought it a bit slow. I became interested in the locations because of a book I was reading that mentioned there had never been a "Great Southern Railway" so the main line railway station with that title was a bit of a mystery. The station building and interior appears to be Kelvinhall Art Gallery in Glasgow, presumably with some CGI to change the name on the building. The opulent "embassy" staircase seems to be Glasgow City Hall, and the "Windsor Castle" ship seen at the docks looks like the ship purchased in 2014 by the Royal Yacht Britannia organisation, so are the docks buildings at Leith?
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Much Better Than Some Would Have You Think
phlipsidecreative10 November 2022
I'm puzzled by the reviews that claim all of Conrad's brilliant story have been abandoned. Utterly untrue. All the main points of the original story are here. The betrayals, the ethical compromises, the cowardice. Not a single one missing. What had changed is how the story is told. Conrad jumped back and forth, a device that works better on writing than on TV. There are always some compromise made when covering a written story to a screen of any size. Those made here seen more than reasonable to me. The result is a thoughtful carefully constructed story that resists the urge to pick up the tempo just for the sake of a little "excitement". Some will find the pace slow, but it builds from the meaningless pretense of the characters lives and the mundane tempo of real life.

Some lovely performances by the whole cast. No one is cast as either superhero or supervillain. These are ordinary people of no great distinction, no matter thier place in life. Both evil and justice are flawed and banal.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent
vic-229654 February 2018
I cannot understand the negative reviews about this film, it was excellent, the only actor l had heard of was Toby Jones who played Capt. Mainwaring in the remake of Dad's Army, and l think that's what made it so much better then a film with big start names it felt more authentic, it was sad, dramatic, drama, but bedside anything else it was excellent l give it 9/10
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Does not pull you in. Ep1
question6522 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
(Contains spoiler of first episode.!!)

Toby Jones!! Excellent mystery era! Nice looking women! Spies and bowler hats!

Sounds great huh? Well not for the first episode.

So you're introduced to the life of a man who is a spy. His wife, her mother. an autistic young man. and the spy's contact. You're told that he is being basically blackmailed by his boss to not just be a spy that delivers info, but to cause commotion by planting a bomb in a public place. If he does not, he will be a target for anyone who would want the spies gone. By the will of his boss, publicly showing that He is on Their payroll...

That's it. That's about the extent of interesting things. after this moment there is a odd mix of unexplained emotional outbursts, dull conversations, bickering between contacts, weird random naked photography in the shop, the mother moves out and the autistic boy is basically the only logical person in it.

I had to drink two cups of coffee and entertain myself on my phone just to even hear this episode out.

It's easy to point the finger and say its simply beyond me, its too deep or something. But the thing is, these kind of movies (preferrably far from the spoon-feeding American touch) is my kind of thing. But this here....? Verly poorly constructed. Its like it copied famous series and scenes, but didn't quite understand and grasp the reasoning behind their successes.
9 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Really poor
dilsonbelper15 October 2020
More BBC predictable rubbish same faces same cinematography same script this could be Sherlock, or Line Of Duty or any other BEEB production really poor effort a time for change is needed new blood new faces, struggled through this wouldn't bother if you value your time.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More spying please..
larmo12 January 2021
This is an interesting period mini-season drama. Acorn dramas tend to below budget, and family friendly productions. This drama takes place in Victorian England in 1885. The acting is good, as are the costumes, and production values. The plot kept me involved, but the story is not so much a spy thriller, but more of a character study. The series' title would lead a viewer to think that the story involves a lot of spy drama and action. Actually, the story revolves around one character, with some police work and international politics. I think the series would have been better with a couple fewer episodes, or, could have been a full length feature film. Overall, the series is okay, and I didn't feel like it wasted my time. But I don't feel as though I would have missed anything if I hadn't seen it. For me, this is another "Meh" series.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Why?
thejdrage20 August 2023
I have not read the book, and after one episode I still have absolutely no idea why the Toby Jones character, Verloc, is a traitor to his country. What caused him to turn to Russia to get what he wanted in a cause? What's the cause for him?

We know the professors. He makes it very clear - several times.

Since there is no reason given, I can't really get into what Verloc is doing. And when I don't care, it takes away from the story.

The filming is outstanding. As is the acting. One reviewer tore apart the locations saying they were in Glasgow instead of England, and the buildings were built int the wrong period. That doesn't make a difference to me - but a well informed story does.

I wanted to like this and am disappointed that a production this long leaves major questions is frustrating. Here's a man who has a family who loves him and for reasons we are not privy to, is a traitor to his country.

So, 5 stars.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Poor attention to detail
micksterdee5 August 2016
The BBC is well known for its attention to detail in its drama, and in the main The Secret Agent was also suitably well detailed. Sadly, this attention to detail did not extend to the railway scenes.

I understand that the railway scenes were filmed at the Bo'ness & Kinneil Railway in Scotland - close to the main filming location of the series. The setting of the drama is in the late 19th century and yet in all railway scenes inappropriate rolling stock was employed. The locomotive used in all the filming could clearly be seen to be 61272. This locomotive was not built until 1928 - over 30 years after the date setting of The Secret Agent. The number on the locomotive did not exist until the nationalisation of Britain's railways in 1948. The locomotive's tender showed the British Railways "lion & wheel" logo - also post 1948. The coaching stock was part of the Bo'ness & Kinneil's own Caledonian Railway carriages. Indeed, the carriages are stencilled CR. The carriages are also out of period, as these were not built until 1923! I doubt the Caledonian Railways carriages would have been seen on London to Southampton trains.

I am disappointed with such poor attention to detail from a BBC production
5 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great storytelling all the way through.
irvingwarner12 March 2023
All the episodes get high marks for production values, and the great acting-all the way through. I don't think I have ever read Conrad's "Secret Agent", but a visual media must stand of itself, and this does in all departments. The character actor Toby Jones once again gives an "A List" performance, as does Stephen Graham and Vicky McClure. All other actors do very well too, no doubt. It is a dark, revealing production and script, and knowing the history of the times helps. Above all, it is a period/history piece, two monarchist countries, one with an autocracy using a 'lockdown' attitude on keeping it that way. Both were plagued with genuine fears over anarchist, socialists, and other revolutionary groups who had successfully used bombs in their activities. And it is in this social and political ambience that this story takes place. And it does an excellent job. The writers and producers understood this, and it shows. Great stuff!!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed