Talk:Telephone numbers in Serbia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Serbia (Rated List-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edits by sockpuppet[edit]

As it is obvious that recent edits were made my sockpuppet, i would raise the question here is any user with real account should comment anything about it. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 14:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


Informations on Kosovo are wrong. See ITU bulletin Dec. 2016 [1] and EU Statement Dec. 2016 [2]

As long as there is not more reliable source proving me ITU or EU wrong, I`ll update this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanaparts (talkcontribs) 19:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

What the heck is the problem here? First, you keep on inserting {{main|Kosovo}} and completely inappropriate {{main|Kosovo War}} in an article devoted to telephone numbers. Per wikipedia:Summary style, the main article where this should be debated is Telephone numbers in Kosovo, and only summarized here very briefly, rather than forked in its entirety. I don't think that having the entire history in this article is appropriate. As for having the Albanian town names here as well, I can accept that, but we're edit-warring in an all-or nothing manner. No such user (talk) 09:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
We should not have both Albanian and Serbian, but only article names, as par guideline. No need for something like that in article about telephone, for Christ sake! --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 13:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
@Anastan:@No such user: Actually the guideline do not exclude having both names. See cities in switzerland. The point is that the cities have both names and for the sake of accuracy it should be stated like this. As for the history: OK, I made a mistake. However, the summary is wrong and does not include ITU bulletin statement or EU statement. Its just made up based on one sided sources. See ITU bulletin Dec. 2016 [1] and EU Statement Dec. 2016 [2]

Amanaparts (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)