Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
$13.21$13.21
FREE delivery: Wednesday, Feb 7 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$1.09
Other Sellers on Amazon
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
+ $5.20 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
+ $6.39 shipping
85% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Audible sample Sample
Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius Paperback – July 31, 2012
Purchase options and add-ons
A New York Times bestseller, this sweeping narrative from the author of A Beautiful Mind takes us on a journey through modern history with the men and women who changed the lives of every single person on the planet. Grand Pursuit is the epic story of the making of modern economics, of how economics rescued mankind from squalor and deprivation by placing its material fate in its own hands.
- Print length576 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSimon & Schuster
- Publication dateJuly 31, 2012
- Dimensions6.13 x 1 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-100684872994
- ISBN-13978-0684872995
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
""Grand Pursuit "is a history of economics which is full of flesh, bloom and warmth. The author demonstrates that there is far more to economics than Thomas Carlyle's "dismal science." And she does so with all the style and panache that you would expect from the author of the 1998 bestseller, "A Beautiful Mind. . . ." A wonderful book. "Grand Pursuit "deserves a place not only in every economist's study but also on every serious reader's bedside table."
--"The Economist"
""Grand Pursuit "is a worthy successor to Robert Heilbroner's "The Worldly Philosophers. . . . "Nasar's aim is to put the reader into the lives of the characters of a sweeping historical drama that extends from Victorian England to modern-day India. That she largely succeeds reflects the depth and breadth of her research but also the elegance of her prose."
--Steven Pearlstein, "The Washington Post"
"A fascinating excursion into the economic ideas and personalities that have deposited most of us at a standard of living unparalleled in human history...engrossing...Nasar, who wrote "A Beautiful Mind, " ...is drawn to intellectual giants. They stomp across the idiosyncratic and readable pages of "Grand Pursuit, "which unfurls with a David McCullough-like knack for telling popular history....On these pages, the dismal science shines."--Karen R. Long, "Cleveland Plain Dealer"
"A timely reminder of the importance of the so-called dismal science. . . . Written almost as a novel and aimed at those without a background in economics, the book charts capitalism's evolution through the eyes of the people who invented it. . . . It is compellingly written, full of detail and vivid anecdotes, and with a refreshing focus on people rather than prices."
--Gregor Hunter, "The Nation"
"Nasar brilliantly brings to life game-changing economists from Marx to Hayek and from Sidney Webb to Milton Friedman, tracing the evolution of modern economic thinking through the richly detailed stories of the men and woman who reshaped how we think of life's possibilities. . . . This is an utterly fascinating book on many levels. . . . "A Beautiful Mind, " Nasar's previous book, was about an economist named John Nash, but Nasar's mind is pretty good, too. No lesser mind could have written a book so rich, so compelling, so important, and so much fun."
--Mickey Edwards, "The Boston Globe"
"Nasar has written a compelling history of modern economics, a story of the theorists as well as of their theories. . . . "Grand Pursuit" is artfully rendered and a delight to read. . . . One suspects that future economics textbooks will warrant some revisions. All the same, their authors would profit from consulting "Grand Pursuit"."
-- Bloomberg BusinessWeek's **FIVE STAR** Review
"Nasar is a superb writer. . . . The book is a kind of portrait gallery of economic thinkers, each artfully set down in his or her time and place. . . . You can't help becoming engrossed in their lives."
--James Grant, "The Wall Street Journal"
"One of the many wonderful things about Nasar's book is that in it, economic genius isn't limited to the usual suspects....Even when exploring famous economic minds, Nasar brings out the humanity in the dismal science by showing their ideas are nearly always rooted in formative experiences."
-- TIME Magazine
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Product details
- Publisher : Simon & Schuster; Reprint edition (July 31, 2012)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 576 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0684872994
- ISBN-13 : 978-0684872995
- Item Weight : 1.41 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.13 x 1 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #825,250 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #316 in Psychologist Biographies
- #1,375 in History of Civilization & Culture
- #1,670 in Economic History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Videos
Videos for this product
4:01
Click to play video
Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius
Publisher Video
Videos for this product
16:32
Click to play video
Sylvia Nasar on THE GRAND PURSUIT Audiobook
Publisher Video
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Sylvia Nasar of Columbia University has arrived in the same pantheon of economic historians with her debut of her five part excerpt series on Bloomberg of her book Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius in the tradition of Robert Heilbroner’s The Worldly Philosophers and the London School of Economics (LSE) lectures on economic history of Lionel Robbins.
She makes a valiant attempt to bring to relief the nuances in the evolution of economic science since Alfred Marshall’s demand curve and Karl Marx’s critique of the distribution of economic output among the European social classes during the transition from feudal societies to the burgeoning industrial age of modernity as most political scientists characterize it (I date modernity to the invention of the printing press by Johan Gutenberg in the 15th century).
Karl Marx’s economic critique of John Stuart Mill’s political economics of liberty seems as true at the onset of modernity as it does during postmodernity. If Leninism and Maoism had undone Mill, it feels now as though Mill has undone himself.
Average living standards have indeed risen, as bread rises upon the addition of yeast, since the Industrial Revolution. The poor are still poor but no better off because the entire income spectrum has been lifted, the top more so than the bottom, similar to a volcanic island congealing on the molten lava beneath. Technical change has changed the way of life, made it more convenient, but did not eradicate class, social before the American Revolution and socio-economic after. Class, the salient aspect of human nature, has remained ineradicable, Mill or Marx.
The central tenet of scarcity which begets the price of the barter of real things at the dynamic intersection of the upward sloping supply and downward sloping demand curves against a backdrop of perpetual uncertainty (dynamic stochastic general equilibrium or DSGE) only holds as long as the supply curve can be upward sloping ad infinitum.
The demand curve is the law of economics. The supply curve is not – it is pure hope, a Pandora’s Box, in the saga of geopolitical pestilence for the perpetuation of species survival. Economic science falls apart, at some point, as the production possibilities frontier grinds to a halt in the molasses of technical change. For how long this envelope can be pushed is the great game.
That economic development means ever more consumption of goods and services is precisely the wrong understanding of the economy. The stake through the heart of economics, the science of scarcity, is its presumption of eternal abundance. It is alchemy to seek the elixir of youth and cornucopia. History is riddled with quacks and charlatans peddling immortality and abundance. Overestimating and extrapolating the capacity of technology to increase longevity to live forever and produce plenty is absurd. It is an illusion caused by fiat money which is disconnected from any real resources but tied to gross domestic product growth driven by ever increasing consumption of goods and services which need real, finite resources to make. Economics needs to be rewritten to address this contradiction at its core. Malthus will prove to be true in the long run and, as Keynes said, we are all dead by then.
Nasar’s aspiration is to save open markets from their most vehement critiques in the aftermath of the Cold War and at a time when those markets are failing the world’s masses (or the uncertain middle classes in the industrialized world and the rising middle classes in the rest), invoking the ghosts of Marx, co-opted by the new autocracy of democracy in the 21st century just as they had served the interests of the upper aristocratic classes in the 19th.
Blessed are the meek: for they have always inherited the earth in their Armageddon with the wealthy and powerful.
Revolutions, American or Marxian, happen for a reason, for the masses always want to improve their lot in a system of political economy where the distribution of power and wealth is dynamic in their yearning for economic equity in individual liberty.
Sustainable political economics recognizes this imperative.
While this storytelling style offers insight, it unfortunately can be very confusing since a lot of names are introduced to the reader. If you are not already familiar with the major economic players and vaguely what they are known for it is very easy to get lost. Also Prof. Nassar has a bad habit of sometimes introducing a person without giving you their names. Two examples of this are the first mention of Hayek and Bela Kun. The first time Hayek is mentioned is in relation to his grandmother; my reaction to his name was "well, if I didn't know Hayek would be talked about later I would be confused why emphasis was placed on his name." Bela Kun is introduced without a name and then you are expected to make the connection when all of a sudden this guy named Bela Kun is discussed at length. I had to google him to make sure I was right about his identity. However, often these side tangents to minor players such as Dr. Harvey Kellogg and Herbert George Wells add cultural insight and are entertaining. If you are unwilling to cope with a lot of characters, then you will dislike the writing style.
The book is organized into three main Acts: Hope, Fear, and Confidence. This choice is succinct and emphasizes the evolution of thought. The first section, Hope, is all about how economics developed as the hope to improve daily life. This feeling is a sharp contrast to the dismal conditions of Malthus. The second, Fear, is strongly tied to the disaster caused by the First World War. Many economists believed this war could not happen due to the interconnectedness of the economies. War was viewed as economic suicide. The war and the following depressions created a fear that life couldn't / wouldn't get better. The last section, Confidence, is about how we finally felt like we knew what we were doing with the economy post WWII. Economists had confidence that they could eliminate great depressions. This conclusion, however, may be more debatable given the current economic events since 2009.
Since familiarity with the economists greatly enhances the readability of the text, a list of the major players is given below with a brief statement about their views/ contributions. These statements are purely based on my understanding from the text. Even though they are placed in the act they are introduced, many of them span several acts and are entangled with each other.
Act I: Hope
K. Marx (German): Father of Communism. No means existed to convert production increases into higher wages and living standards.
A. Marshall (English): Productivity. As opposed to the views of Malthus where humanity would forever be trapped in poverty, the cure to economic woes and higher living standards was to increase productivity.
B. Webb (English): Government safety net. Destitution is preventable in a population and public services (like education) are overall beneficial for the economy despite taxation to pay for it.
I. Fischer (American): Everything is interconnected in the economy and money greatly affects the real economy. He is perhaps best known in American history texts as an opponent of William Jennings Bryant and "the cross of gold."
Act II: Fear
J. Schumpeter (Austrian): Austrian finance minister tasked with fixing the economy post WWI. Unlike the traditional economic viewpoint that a nation's economic health depended on its resources, he believed what matters was what a country did with what it had. Innovation, entrepreneurs, and credit are necessary to drive progress.
F. Hayek (Austrian): Anti-Communist. He is perhaps best known for his book "The Road to Serfdom." This piece was an attack on the Soviet system and a defense of free markets. He believed that central planning was incompatible with freedom.
M. Keynes (English): Arguably the best known name in economics. Instability, not inequality, was the greatest threat to capitalism. While the traditional cure to stabilizing the economy was balancing the books to restore investor confidence, he believed the real solution was easier money. This approach avoided the liquidity trap and got money to those who could spend it: the government needed to be prepared to be the spender of last resort. His theories were the rational behind FDR's New Deal.
J. Robinson (English): Communist. The free market economy would tend to long-run unemployment, excess industrial capacity, and stagnation. Supposedly, she had a huge disdain for mathematics. I do not understand how this is possible for an economist.
M. Friedman (American): Permanent income hypothesis. During WWII, he constructed a huge database of consumers and their purchases. This put him in a unique position to analyze spending patterns. He believed taxation could be used to stabilize the economy.
Act III: Confidence
P. Samuelson (American): Unemployment. He emphasized the importance of preventing unemployment, particularly after the demobilization of WWII.
A. Sen (Indian): Freedom. The expansion of freedom is viewed both as the primary end and the principal means of development.
The test is full of pure facts; Prof. Nassar stays away from any topic where there is not a clear-cut conclusion and she would need to offer her opinion. For instance, she goes into great depth describing the economic fallout following WWI. No one will dispute this mistake since it led to another world war. However often she hints at more modern economic results, but does not go into what they are. Milton Friedman, for instance, is described as the future father of Reagan-era tax cuts (in opposition to his earlier positions), but this story is not explained further because the jury is still out on whether or not these tax cuts were a good idea. The one exception is that the author clearly believes the Soviet model of communism is a mistake (many western economists will not dispute this, but communists may disagree). Specifically, "China's remarkable leap in modernity left the Soviet Union in the dust and finally discredited the Soviet economic model." I wish the test included more modern economics (post - 1970s) and further explained such statements.
Overall the text is extremely well written and engaging as expected of a professor of journalism. The book is full of good references to historical texts (e.g. The Economic Consequences of Peace) as well as many solid one-liners. The main reason for reading this book is summed up in the epilogue: " economic intelligence was far more critical to success than territory, population, natural resources, or even technological leadership. Ideas matter." I don't entirely agree with this statement, but economic theory is nonetheless an important determinant for society. Furthermore, it is shown what has been done and whether or not it worked. These statements are particularly relevant to price controls, which surprisingly larger numbers of countries are still trapped in. This text should be required for all politicians and leaders.
Having looked at other reviews here, I noticed many recommend "The Worldly Philosophers" over this book. I'm currently in the process of reading that and it appears that book is a better reference for understanding the economics. However, I prefer to think that the books compliment rather than subtract from each other.
I am not an economist. As an undergraduate 45 years ago, I planned to devote my life to the economic history of the Roman Empire and took many courses in Latin, Greek, economics, and mathematics. Instead, I went into law and am now a retired lawyer.
Throughout my life, I have read many economic works merely as a pastime, including the Skidelsky's new biography of Keynes, Milton Friedman's joint autobiography, assorted works of Schumpeter, Joan Robinson, Hayek, and Paul Samuelson. So there wasn't much in the Grand Pursuit that was totally new.
But what was new was putting this all together in a continuous narrative that shows interrelationships that I never suspected. Ms. Nasar writes extremely well, and I found the entire book engrossing.
It also has stimulated me to read or reread quite a few books. I have now reread Keynes's Economic Consequences and am halfway through the General Theory. Next I'm going to reread one of Schumpeter's books, and then I will tackle some of the works of Léon Walras, beginning with L'Économie politique et la justice (hélas it is cheap on Kindle, but only in French!).
The Grand Pursuit provided me with just kind of reading experience I enjoy. A very good book.
Top reviews from other countries
However the copy which reached me was not in a good shape. Page edges were irregular and poorly cut. Doesn’t give a good feel while reading. Publisher should take care of this.
Reviewed in India on May 24, 2019
However the copy which reached me was not in a good shape. Page edges were irregular and poorly cut. Doesn’t give a good feel while reading. Publisher should take care of this.
All in all, it is an excellent read, an opportunity to know more about leading economists, the world that shaped their ideas and the world these helped shape.
As for the causal relationship between economic thought and reality, I will borrow a sentence from a main newspaper review: "Economists no more set the world to producing and consuming than baseball statisticians hit home runs..."