Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
$16.95$16.95
FREE delivery: Saturday, April 27 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$16.10
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Audible sample Sample
The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics Hardcover – September 14, 2021
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Purchase options and add-ons
A sitting justice reflects upon the authority of the Supreme Court―how that authority was gained and how measures to restructure the Court could undermine both the Court and the constitutional system of checks and balances that depends on it.
A growing chorus of officials and commentators argues that the Supreme Court has become too political. On this view the confirmation process is just an exercise in partisan agenda-setting, and the jurists are no more than “politicians in robes”―their ostensibly neutral judicial philosophies mere camouflage for conservative or liberal convictions.
Stephen Breyer, drawing upon his experience as a Supreme Court justice, sounds a cautionary note. Mindful of the Court’s history, he suggests that the judiciary’s hard-won authority could be marred by reforms premised on the assumption of ideological bias. Having, as Hamilton observed, “no influence over either the sword or the purse,” the Court earned its authority by making decisions that have, over time, increased the public’s trust. If public trust is now in decline, one part of the solution is to promote better understandings of how the judiciary actually works: how judges adhere to their oaths and how they try to avoid considerations of politics and popularity.
Breyer warns that political intervention could itself further erode public trust. Without the public’s trust, the Court would no longer be able to act as a check on the other branches of government or as a guarantor of the rule of law, risking serious harm to our constitutional system.
- Print length128 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHarvard University Press
- Publication dateSeptember 14, 2021
- Dimensions4.5 x 0.75 x 6.5 inches
- ISBN-100674269365
- ISBN-13978-0674269361
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may ship from close to you
From the Publisher
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Seeks to provide a historical backdrop to current public discussions about reforming the court…[Breyer] warns that these politically polarized times threaten public confidence in the high court.”―Joan Biskupic, Washington Post
“Supreme Court Justice Breyer offers a selected history of court cases, a defense of judicial impartiality, and recommendations for promoting the public’s respect for and acceptance of the role of the judiciary in the future…A cogent overview of the court’s crucial role.”―Kirkus Reviews
“A concise plea for greater understanding of the judiciary.”―Claude Marx, FTCWatch
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Harvard University Press (September 14, 2021)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 128 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0674269365
- ISBN-13 : 978-0674269361
- Item Weight : 5.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 4.5 x 0.75 x 6.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #8,855 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1 in Courts & Law
- #5 in United States Judicial Branch
- #5 in General Constitutional Law
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
You need not be an attorney or constitutional expert to read and understand what is said here. The book is written for any person interested in our country's democratic system of governance.
All who would tinker with the court's structure for temporary political gain should read this book. If they were to do so, I think they would move on to other and more productive efforts.
I would have been overjoyed if Breyer had discussed the only proposal I consider viable, as contrasted with enlarging the Court, imposing term limits, and instituting super majority requirements. The framers wisely vested in Congress the power to define the Court's appellate jurisdiction. During the Civil War when the Taney Court appeared to be on the verge on handing down a damaging decision, Congress stripped the pertinent element of jurisdiction until the War was over. This device requires no constitutional amendment and can be reversed by another act of Congress. It merely keeps the Court out of dangerous areas until things calm down. What does Breyer think about this?--we will never know from reading this book.
The second problem with the book is that Breyer seems to be looking at the Court's recent decisions through extremely thick "rose colored glasses." He wants to convince us that a Court driven by Justices such as Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and even Barrett should be of no concern as it trashes stare decisis and reaches out to grab the most controversial cases to decide. Breyer talks of "minimalism," compromise, and swallowing dissent as steps the Justices can take. Those meek correctives will not solve the problem; the Court has to be replaced on the right track, and withholding jurisdiction is the most expeditious and least harmful method to accomplish this.
Incidentally, I do agree with the Justice that any decision to retire should be exclusively within his discretion and when he, and he alone, feels the time is right. He has well explained his reasoning in numerous interviews and newspaper articles. I only wish he had done the same in this book.
Top reviews from other countries
Minha biblioteca em casa acolhe três obras de sua autoria.
Essa intitulada “The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politcs” realça a importância da Corte e alguns de seus grandes momentos, como a decisão em Brown v. Board of Education (1954), caso que estabeleceu o fim, do ponto de vista jurídico, da segregação racial nos Estados Unidos e que ele comenta na p. 16, reproduzida acima.
Sobre o caso Bush v. Gore, que decidiu a eleição presidencial do ano 2000, Breyer registra seu voto contrário, sua discordância da maioria (5 x 4) mas realça a autoridade da Corte e o respeito ao resultado, inclusive pelo maior interessado, Al Gore.
Esse livro “The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politcs” foi escrito em um momento crucial, de profunda divisão política da sociedade norte-americana. Vem em bom momento para que sirva de reflexão especialmente no que diz respeito à preservar a Suprmea Corte dos Estados Unidos, instituição de mais de dois séculos de funcionamento ininterrupto, dos "perigos da política".
Recomendo fortemente a leitura.
Reviewed in Brazil on January 26, 2022
Minha biblioteca em casa acolhe três obras de sua autoria.
Essa intitulada “The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politcs” realça a importância da Corte e alguns de seus grandes momentos, como a decisão em Brown v. Board of Education (1954), caso que estabeleceu o fim, do ponto de vista jurídico, da segregação racial nos Estados Unidos e que ele comenta na p. 16, reproduzida acima.
Sobre o caso Bush v. Gore, que decidiu a eleição presidencial do ano 2000, Breyer registra seu voto contrário, sua discordância da maioria (5 x 4) mas realça a autoridade da Corte e o respeito ao resultado, inclusive pelo maior interessado, Al Gore.
Esse livro “The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politcs” foi escrito em um momento crucial, de profunda divisão política da sociedade norte-americana. Vem em bom momento para que sirva de reflexão especialmente no que diz respeito à preservar a Suprmea Corte dos Estados Unidos, instituição de mais de dois séculos de funcionamento ininterrupto, dos "perigos da política".
Recomendo fortemente a leitura.