Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
$12.96$12.96
FREE delivery: Tuesday, Nov 28 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$8.82$8.82
FREE delivery: Tuesday, Nov 28 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Growing Knowledge
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
Serenity (2019) [DVD]
Learn more
- Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
- Learn more about free returns.
- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
Learn more
- Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
- Learn more about free returns.
- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
Purchase options and add-ons
Genre | Drama, Mystery & Suspense/Thrillers |
Format | Subtitled, NTSC |
Contributor | Steven Knight, Jason Clarke, Greg Shapiro, Matthew McConaughey, Jeremy Strong, Anne Hathaway, Djimon Hounsou, Diane Lane, Guy Heeley See more |
Initial release date | 2019-04-30 |
Language | English |
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may ship from close to you
From the manufacturer
Serenity (2019)
From the creative mind of Oscar nominee Steven Knight comes a daringly original, sexy, stylized thriller. Baker Dill (Academy Award winner Matthew McConaughey) is a fishing boat captain leading tours off a tranquil, tropical enclave called Plymouth Island. His quiet life is shattered, however, when his ex-wife Karen (Academy Award winner Anne Hathaway) tracks him down with a desperate plea for help. She begs Dill to save her – and their young son – from her new, violent husband (Jason Clarke) by taking him out to sea on a fishing excursion, only to throw him to the sharks and leave him for dead. Karen's appearance thrusts Dill back into a life he'd tried to forget, and as he struggles between right and wrong, his world is plunged into a new reality that may not be all that it seems.
Product Description
From the creative mind of Oscar® nominee Steven Knight comes a daringly original, sexy, stylized thriller. Baker Dill (Academy Award® winner Matthew McConaughey) is a fishing boat captain leading tours off a tranquil, tropical enclave called Plymouth Island. His quiet life is shattered, however, when his ex-wife Karen (Academy Award® winner Anne Hathaway) tracks him down with a desperate plea for help. She begs Dill to save her—and their young son—from her new, violent husband (Jason Clarke) by taking him out to sea on a fishing excursion, only to throw him to the sharks and leave him for dead. Karen's appearance thrusts Dill back into a life he'd tried to forget, and as he struggles between right and wrong, his world is plunged into a new reality that may not be all that it seems.
Product details
- Aspect Ratio : 2.39:1
- MPAA rating : R (Restricted)
- Product Dimensions : 0.7 x 7.5 x 5.4 inches; 2.72 Ounces
- Director : Steven Knight
- Media Format : Subtitled, NTSC
- Run time : 1 hour and 47 minutes
- Release date : April 30, 2019
- Actors : Matthew McConaughey, Anne Hathaway, Jason Clarke, Diane Lane, Djimon Hounsou
- Subtitles: : Spanish
- Producers : Steven Knight, Greg Shapiro, Guy Heeley
- Language : English (Dolby Digital 5.1)
- Studio : Universal Pictures Home Entertainment
- ASIN : B07MWZ5NL2
- Writers : Steven Knight
- Country of Origin : USA
- Number of discs : 1
- Best Sellers Rank: #10,316 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #1,608 in Drama DVDs
- Customer Reviews:
Videos for this product
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Okay, now that you have been warned, I will explain to you the plot. It's so sad that so few people seem to be able to follow a complicated plot these days-- the old crime thrillers thrived on the audience being able to follow something that is not spelled out for them, but that skill is lost these days. Even after this movie completely spelled out what is going on.
This is what happens in the plot of the movie, in time order:
A young man, John, is happily married with a kid son. Then he goes off to war in Iraq and is killed. His wife remarries a local construction kingpin, who becomes abusive to both the woman and her son. Her son is brilliant and hides away in his room every day programming his computer. He eventually creates a computer game about fishing (in remembrance of a great memory of fishing with his father) and populates the game with artificial intelligences (AI). The program is so good that these AIs become self-aware and think they are real people living in a real world (like the Matrix, or the Truman Show, or The Sixth Sense, the main character doesn't know what the real deal is until the end).
Eventually this kid becomes so disturbed at the violence of his father that he changes the game and inserts AI versions of his mom and his stepdad into the program, and then has the mom try to bribe the real dad (the AI dad in the program) to kill the AI stepdad. The greatly disturbed the operating system of the game, which is also self aware (represented in the program by a dorky guy with a briefcase). It tries to contact the AI version of the dad and convince him not to kill the stepdad, and instead to return to the original mission of catching a fish, and also tries to put road blocks in his way. The AI dad (the main character) forces out of the operating system AI the truth that they are all AI consciousnesses, not in the real world. Although he struggles to accept this, he decides to go ahead and perform the new mission of the son, to kill the stepdad, since the son is his creator. He eventually convinces the operating system to embrace this cause too, since after all they are all just doing the will of their creator.
So they succeed at killing the AI stepdad, and this inspires the kid to go kill his stepdad in the real world. In the end, the kid is in jail but has access to his computer, and he designs an AI version of himself and inserts it into the game, and the movie closes with him embracing his (dead, but now AI) dad. Perhaps they will live happily, or only until someone switches off the computer.
So many fascinating philosophical issues involved. If you realize you are an AI, and the creator is not a good and just creator but a messed up kid, are you duty bound to do the will of your creator? Or is there a higher law that binds you to do the right thing, even above the kid-creator? One of the AIs in the game, the second mate of the ship, argues that they must be faithful to a higher moral call-- but argues this on the basis that there is a creator. But he doesn't know the creator of their world is a messed up kid, not omnipotent. Could it be that he knows somehow in his heart that there is an even higher creator than the kid, a true Creator of the world that contains the kid? After all, the kid lives in the real world and knows about religion. Another question: does the AI dad have free will? Is he responsible for the kid in the real world committing murder? Or did the kid program him to do his will, without a choice? The movie seems to indicate that the kid was waiting to see what his AI-dad would do before making his own decision.
Some reviewers have complained that the opening of the movie is cartoonish--the AI dad is clearly cartoonishly copying the plot of Moby Dick; the AI mom is a caricature of a film noir vamp. But that is because they are the cartoonish creations of a 12-year-old! That's the point-- the whole "world" is a Matrix-like world, the creation of a smart but emotionally crippled child. The really interesting thing to ponder is what if you realized one day you were in that Matrix world.
This type of "what is real?" movie and "would I know the world was a mirage?" has become a genre, including the Matrix, the Sixth Sense, and the Truman Show. One could also put the old movies Gaslight and Walter Mitty (not the recent version) in this category. Serenity, the Matrix, and the Truman Show all ask the question, what if the creator isn't good? In the Matrix and the Truman Show, the main character fights against the creator (who, after all, is not the total Creator but only a sub-creator of a limited world), while in this movie the main character acquiesces to the will of the (deranged) creator of his world. There is an odd meta-nesting: he recognizes that he isn't real, but realizes that there was a real dad who loved his kid before he died, and he takes pity on the kid, trying to parent him by becoming what that real dad could have been-- even though the kid is his creator.
So fascinating. Too bad that so many people couldn't follow it. It will be discussed in philosophy classes for years to come.
“Serenity” is strictly mid-range McConaughey. In the first act, he’s just awful. But so is everybody else in this strange melodrama. A cut-rate Ahab hunting a larger-than-average tuna fish. A cartoon villain of the ridiculous mustache-twirling sort. Heart-of-gold tough girlfriend, mysterious Femme Fatale in white, token magically wise black guy. A very odd mix, acted and written like a Lifetime movie. Clunky exposition and muddled flashbacks show us that McConaughey is damaged goods (Iraq war) with a bad ex-wife, drinks too much, has an estranged son, etc. This is all limned in broad strokes that seem overly broad for reasons that become apparent in act 2.
As M. Night Shyamalan’s puppet parody figure said on Robot Chicken, “What a twist!” And to be fair, it’s not a bad twist. Having stayed resolutely un-spoiled (not that hard; it’s not like this movie was ever well known), the reveal was pretty cute. Nothing is as it seems, forces are at work, there’s a reason for everyone’s repetitious behavior and the improbably chipper radio station and the straying cat. It’s all a game, etc. This reveal at least explained what seemed like terrible writing and acting in the first act. So, not bad.
From there on, kind of padded but reasonably interesting as the game pieces move around the board, or whatever it is that the kids do nowadays with their Sims and Minecraft and so on. The story plays out stylishly enough, and McConaughey dials back the ferocious overacting by a few percent. But again, are we supposed to find him annoying and indicating? Because of his character? I’m not going to get into a whole “Inception” analysis of the deeper meaning of yada yada. “Serenity” isn’t all deep and profound like “Inception” and I didn’t much care for “Inception” to start with. That one was a movie about dreaming that looked like it was written by someone who’d never actually had a dream but had read about them in books. “Serenity” could be debated, I guess, if anyone cares enough about it to ask, "What does it all mean?"
Having gotten into great shape for “Magic Mike”, perhaps, Matthew M. is happy to show off his perfectly toned glutes in any number of shots. Wandering repetitively around the bedroom, diving off cliffs, swimming underwater rather longer than most of us could hold our breath. OK, they’re very nice glutes, but one shot per movie is plenty, OK? Keep your pants on, why not.
If I’m giving short shrift to the other actors, it’s because they don’t really have much to do. Anne Hathaway is the mysterious white-clad femme fatale, and I’m going to allow that she was directed to be vaguely robotic, speaking lines as if reading from an unseen script. Because of the twist, you know. Ditto only more so for Jason Clarke as the cartoon villain. None of his lines are like the things actual humans would say. He hits his marks and says his lines with an affect that has nothing to do with his melodramatic role. Dianne Lane doesn’t even have a part in the plot line. She’s more like those items that Super Mario has to collect to get extra lives. And Djimon Housou has the most thankless chore of all, the protagonist’s philosopher-savant, Bagger Vance-style. He played the same role for Russell Crowe in “Gladiator”, a movie this reviewer did not care for. At all.
But, given the premise of acts 2 and 3, the automaton-like acting style makes a certain amount of sense. The good parts? The premise is, if not wholly original, interesting enough. Not entirely cribbed from the Matrix movies (1, decent, 2, bad, 3, unbelievably awful, and we’re threatened with the 4th) and the photography is excellent. Score, unmemorable but unobjectionable. Set design, pretty darn nice. “Serenity” is great to look at, and the actors are attractive people, and the flashbacks come to make more sense as the scenario develops. I’ll give an extra star for a cute idea, competently executed.
The last act contains a couple small but nice surprise reveals, and then a decent bit of CGI. After which they spoil the whole thing with a sappy walk-off that betrays everything that’s been laboriously established to that point. Somebody focus-grouped the ending and agreed that it would be a bummer without a sunset shot. Too bad, because up to that point, I was satisfied enough with the premise and how it was developed and resolved. Blew it for the last shot. Darn shame.