Scientific Theory | Definition, Characteristics & Examples
Table of Contents
- What is a Scientific Theory?
- Fact vs. Theory
- Scientific Law vs. Scientific Theory
- Scientific Theory Examples
- Lesson Summary
What is the best definition of a scientific theory?
A scientific theory is a well-tested and widely accepted explanation for natural phenomena. Scientific theories begin as hypotheses. Over time, as a hypothesis is tested, verified, and generalized, it may assume the status of being an accepted theory.
What's an example of a scientific theory and a scientific law?
The big bang theory is a an explanatory model of the origin and development of the universe.
Kepler's laws of planetary motion describe the shape, areas, and periods of planetary orbits.
What are some famous theories?
- Theory of evolution by natural selection
- Plate tectonic theory
- Cell theory
- Atomic theory
- Einstein's theories of special and general relativity
- Electromagnetic theory
- Germ theory
- The big bang theory
- Quantum theory
Table of Contents
- What is a Scientific Theory?
- Fact vs. Theory
- Scientific Law vs. Scientific Theory
- Scientific Theory Examples
- Lesson Summary
Scientists develop theories to explain the natural world and to advance scientific knowledge. A theory is the highest level of explanation in science. Some features of scientific theories are that they:
- have been thoroughly tested over an extended period
- provide accurate explanations and predictions for a wide range of phenomena
- are widely accepted by the scientific community
- demonstrate strong experimental and observational support
It is not uncommon for people to use the word "theory" to refer to something that is uncertain or just a guess. For example, someone might say, "I don't know if that is correct. It is just a theory."
However, in science, "theory" has a different meaning: the best scientific explanation for how things work. A theory is not a guess or an unknown. It represents a heightened and tested level of scientific knowledge. A theory, by definition, has been tested multiple times by different people and provides a robust working model of how the natural world functions. A theory is supported by multiple lines of evidence. However, scientific theories are not static, unchanging truths. With new observations and reasoning, theories can develop and change. It is also possible to disprove theories with new data that contradict their underlying assumptions.
Becoming a Scientific Theory
A theory begins as a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for observable phenomena. It takes time and testing for a hypothesis to become a theory. Hypotheses are sometimes described as "educated guesses," but hypotheses are more than mere opinions. A feasible hypothesis is based on prior knowledge, evidence, logic, and scientific reasoning. Experimentation and further research verify a hypothesis.
Hypotheses and theories differ in their scope of explanation and the amount of testing that they have undergone. Theories are therefore more reliable and authoritative than hypotheses because they have been tested multiple times and supported by evidence from multiple sources. A hypothesis becomes a theory through testing and refinement. A well-known example is Einstein's theory of special relativity. Einstein first proposed his hypothesis about the nature of gravity in 1905. After developing, expanding, and testing his hypothesis over years, Einstein conducted an acclaimed experiment in 1919 that confirmed his predictions.
Often, the scientific method is invoked to explain how scientific knowledge is acquired. Scientists do not necessarily follow a strict set sequence of steps when "doing science," but the components of the scientific method nevertheless describe the process of scientific research.
Instead of thinking about the scientific method as a fixed sequence of actions, it is helpful to think of it as a cycle. Scientists engage in a variety of activities as part of the scientific investigation process, including:
- making observations
- forming questions based on observations
- developing hypotheses to answer the questions
- testing the hypotheses with experiments or investigations
- analyzing results and data of experiments
- forming conclusions based on experimental analysis
- restarting the cycle at various points, if necessary
The scientific method can be used not only for specialized scientific research. It can be used to solve everyday problems. One example is someone losing their phone. Finding the phone could be accomplished by:
- Observing: the phone is not next to the bed as it usually is
- Questioning: where is the phone?
- Hypothesizing: the phone is not next to the bed because it is in the backpack
- Investigating: checking out what is in the backpack
- Analyzing: the mobile phone is in the backpack
- Concluding: the phone was left in the backpack rather than placed in its usual location.
In this example, the hypothesis would be changed if the investigation falsified (refuted or proved false) the original hypothesis. For example, a new hypothesis might be, "the phone is in the kitchen," which would require a new investigation.
Characteristics of a Scientific Theory
The following are essential characteristics of a scientific theory:
- Testability: scientists can confirm the theory's predictions through controlled experiments or other rigorous scientific investigations.
- Reproducibility: other scientists regularly produce the same results after following the same experimental procedure
- Replicability: when other researchers examine the same phenomena, they achieve results consistent with the theory's predictions.
- Simplicity: in general, scientists prefer simple theories. This preference is because simple theories do not require additional or contingent objects or concepts.
- Consistency: a scientific theory should be compatible with other widely accepted theories.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
There is a difference between scientific theories and scientific facts. Theories explain universal mechanisms or concepts across the natural world and are well tested. By contrast, a scientific fact is a confirmed observation of a particular phenomenon or object. Therefore, scientists build theories on scientific facts.
For instance, according to atomic theory, matter is described as consisting of atoms and subatomic particles that cannot be created or destroyed during chemical reactions. Scientific facts support this theory: scientists observe that matter behaves as predicted by atomic theory. That is, scientists can observe the fact that a particular group of atoms behaves consistently with the theory that describes how matter behaves generally and universally.
For example, atomic theory predicts that the products' mass equals that of the reactants that produced them during a chemical reaction. When working with specific matter, this can be observed as fact as when ten grams of sodium chloride are produced when ten grams of sodium and chlorine are combined.
A scientific theory can sometimes overlap with a fact. For example, according to the theory of evolution by natural selection, organisms change and mutate over time. Scientists can also observe this change and mutation as scientific fact such as during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is a fact that specific COVID variants have developed and spread throughout the world due to mutations. This observable fact overlaps with the theory that organisms generally change and mutate.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Scientific laws are statements that describe regular occurrences in nature. Scientific laws are not used to predict phenomena or provide overarching, universal explanations for phenomena unlike scientific theories. Scientific laws merely state that things happen in a particular way without providing an underlying mechanism or reason.
Some examples of scientific laws help explain the difference between scientific laws and scientific theories and their different roles:
- Law of gravity: Isaac Newton's law of gravity is a mathematical statement of the acceleration of falling objects based on their mass. The law does not explain why gravitational attraction occurs; it merely describes the behavior of objects subject to gravitational forces.
- Law of independent assortment: Mendel's law of independent assortment states that alleles for genetic traits get separated during gamete formation. When Mendel proposed this law, he did not have a theoretical explanation for how independent assortment happens. He simply knew that it was happening. Since he observed that it happened consistently, it became a scientific law. As with all scientific laws, the law of independent assortment is merely a statement of what happens, not how something happens.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Scientific theory examples include:
- Plate tectonics: The theory of plate tectonics describes how the Earth's crust changes over time. It states that the Earth's outer crust consists of multiple plates that move around over the asthenosphere, the molten layer of the Earth. Science today uses this theory as the basis for predicting and studying the movements of the Earth. Plate tectonics explain earthquakes, mountain formation, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis, seafloor spreading, and even the placement and movement of organisms through geologic time. In 1915, Alfred Wegner proposed a precursor hypothesis called "continental drift." Although initially dismissed and ridiculed, more and more evidence lent credence to the hypothesis. As the hypothesis accumulated supporting data, it evolved into accepted theory that it is today.
- Big bang theory: This is the currently accepted explanation for the origins of the universe. The theory proposes that everything began 13.8 billion years ago as a single, dense, hot, infinitesimal point of energy. The point of energy began to expand and cool, forming the matter and features of the universe that we observe today. The observations of astronomers and investigations of astrophysicists over many decades support this theory and allow them to make accurate predictions about the behavior of energy and matter in the cosmos.
Modification of a Scientific Theory
As time passes, theories are often revised. For example, as new technologies are developed, new observations are possible. Researchers can refine theories as a result of these discoveries. If new observations are greatly inconsistent with the predictions of a theory, then the theory may be discarded or altered.
Atomic theory is an excellent example of how ideas can be modified and improved given new data. Over the past two hundred years scientists have gained a deeper understanding of the complexity of atoms compared to original understandings.
- In the early 19th century, John Dalton described atoms as microscopic, indivisible particles, almost like tiny, unbreakable billiard balls.
- By the late 19th century, J.J. Thomson had identified negatively charged components of atoms called electrons
- In the late 19th and early 20th century, scientists observed other subatomic particles, protons and neutrons, which disproved Dalton's original conception of atoms as whole, indivisible particles.
- During the 20th century, the quantum mechanical behavior of electrons was introduced into atomic theory, resulting in our present-day understanding of atoms and subatomic particles.
Unification of a Scientific Theory
There are times when different theories are combined into a single explanation. Electromagnetism is an example of this. Electricity and magnetism were both well known to scientists during the early 19th century, and for the most part, they were treated as separate phenomena. However, Hans Oersted observed in 1820 that magnetism and electricity were interrelated. Oersted published his observations, leading to Michael Faraday's development of a unified theory of electromagnetism and James Clerk Maxwell's electromagnetic equations.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
A scientific theory explains scientific phenomena and is well-tested, well-supported by evidence, and widely accepted by the scientific community. Theories begin as hypotheses, which are initial explanations of phenomena that have yet to be tested or be supported by wide-ranging evidence. Features of scientific theories are that they are
- testable
- reproducible
- replicable
- simple
- consistent
Scientific research includes specific processes termed the scientific method. These activities include:
- observations
- questions
- hypotheses
- experiments
- analyses
- conclusions
Scientific theories differ from scientific facts and scientific laws. Theories are tested explanations of general natural occurrences that can be applied universally, while scientific facts are verified observations of particular, specific phenomena or objects. Scientific laws describe some observable regularities of nature but do not attempt to explain why these regularities occur.
Theories are not static and unchanging. Scientists modify theories to accommodate new observations and supplementary reasoning. Different theories may be unified when phenomena previously thought to be unconnected turn out to be part of related processes. Researchers can also falsify theories if observations arise that are not consistent with the theories' predictions.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Video Transcript
What Are Scientific Theories?
Have you ever wondered how scientists develop theories? What are scientific theories, anyway? Is the definition of a theory different in the scientific community?
Outside of science, the definition of a theory is a thought that may or may not be true. In the science community, a scientific theory is defined as a hypothesis or a group of hypotheses about some phenomena that have been supported through research using the scientific method.
A hypothesis is basically an educated guess. For instance, a scientist observes something happening repeatedly over time, and a question or a group of questions begin to be formed. One question could be: 'Why am I observing this happening?' Another question might be: 'Could this be occurring every time, or is this just a coincidence?'
To answer these questions, a scientist, or a group of scientists, do an experiment to test the hypothesis. This is described as scientific research. Often, the research studies that are conducted with hypothesis testing happen over a long period of time. After many repeated research studies, a scientist would move to call the hypothesis a theory.
Fact or Theory?
So, we have scientific facts and we have scientific theories. What's the difference? Scientific facts are measured and/or observed. They never change and are unmistakable evidence. Scientific theories are the scientist's interpretation of the facts. Scientists may have differing opinions regarding the best interpretation of the facts. Theories can change and be rejected.
Characteristics of a Scientific Theory
Although there are many characteristics of scientific theories, there are five basic characteristics that can help you understand how they work. A scientific theory should be:
- Testable: Theories can be supported through a series of scientific research projects or experiments. Sometimes a theory is proven to be wrong through evidence: this is called rejecting a theory. However, a theory can never be proven to be absolutely true because it is an interpretation. There is always the possibility that a different interpretation will someday be found to be more correct.
- Replicable: In other words, theories must also be able to be repeated by others. This means that enough information and data must be available in the theory so that others can test the theory and get similar results.
- Stable: Another characteristic of theories is that they must be stable. This means that when others test the theory, they get the same results - so a theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it.
- Simple: A theory should be simple. When we say a scientific theory must be simple, we don't mean that the concept must be basic. We mean that only useful, relevant information should be presented in the theory.
- Consistent: A theory should agree with other theories, meaning that no principles in one theory should contradict another already accepted theory. However, some differences may be evident because the new theory may provide additional evidence.
So, why even bother with theories? Theories are used to advance scientific knowledge. Without theories, information that is gathered in research studies could not be put to use. New medications and treatments could not be tested, and no cures for diseases would be found.
Example of a Theory
Let's give an example of why a theory can be tested but cannot be proven. You go to the grocery store and observe many different brands of green beans. You taste no difference in the green beans no matter what brand name is on the beans. After many hundreds of tests, you move to the theory that no matter the brand name, canned green beans taste the same.
Your theory is that there is no difference in the taste of canned green beans based on the brand name. You can disprove this theory if you open a can and the green beans do not taste the same. But you cannot prove the theory because even if you opened 500 different brands of green beans that all tasted the same, there could be one brand that you have not tried.
Of course, not all theories are about green beans. Famous scientific theories include:
- The Theory of Evolution
- Molecular Theory
- The Theory of Relativity
Lesson Summary
Let's review: in the non-scientific world, a theory is a supposition. However, in the scientific community, a scientific theory is an explanation of a phenomenon that has been tested over time. A theory begins as an educated guess, known formally as a hypothesis. A theory is a scientist's interpretation of the observations about a phenomenon. Scientists continue to do research studies to test the hypothesis.
Over time, the hypothesis can be supported and be called a scientific theory, or it can be disproven and rejected. Scientific theories differ from scientific facts because facts never change and cannot be disputed.
However, scientific theories can be tested through research and found to be supported or rejected. Scientific theories are very important because they are the key to advancing science through the development of new interventions and treatments.
Learning Outcomes
Study this lesson on scientific theory, then test your preparedness to:
- Define scientific theory
- Distinguish scientific theories from scientific facts
- Enumerate the characteristics of scientific theories
- Reference an example of a scientific theory
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Register to view this lesson
Unlock Your Education
See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com
Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Become a MemberAlready a member? Log In
BackResources created by teachers for teachers
I would definitely recommend Study.com to my colleagues. It’s like a teacher waved a magic wand and did the work for me. I feel like it’s a lifeline.