The Earliest Alphabetic Writing (20a) - The Cambridge Ancient History
Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T19:58:48.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20a - The Earliest Alphabetic Writing

from PART III - THE BALKANS AND THE AEGEAN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

B. S. J. Isserlin
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

EARLY ATTEMPTS AT CANAANITE WRITING

Byblian

In the light of present information, the origin of the alphabet appears as the culmination of developments which took place in the Levant, where both Egyptian, and Mesopotamian (cuneiform) writing were known and occasionally used from the third millennium B.C. onwards.

That the earliest ‘Canaanite’ writing, from which the later Phoenician alphabet was to develop, arose from a local selective adaptation of Egyptian hieratic signs employed during the time of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Dynasties, has been suggested repeatedly; but there is no evidence to substantiate this hypothesis. However, an early but apparently abortive attempt to evolve a system of writing suited to local conditions is represented by the so-called pseudo-hieroglyphic script of Byblos. This system, represented by a total of about ten inscriptions on stone, or on bronze tablets and spatulae (besides one bronze spatula palimpsest), originated in Byblos and apparently never spread outside its place of origin. Dated formerly c. 2300 B.C. it is now attributed to the time between about 1800 B.C. and possibly the fourteenth or thirteenth century B.C. The writing is in vertical columns or horizontal lines, running mostly from right to left, and word dividers (vertical strokes) appear occasionally. It includes so far perhaps 114 signs appearing in a more lapidary form on stone but in a more cursive ductus on bronze. These have been analysed by M. Dunand, according to whom many of the shapes are derived from representations of animals, plants, buildings etc., besides purely linear designs; nearly half of them can be compared with Egyptian hieroglyphic or more rarely hieratic signs, while there is also a smaller number of less close parallels with Minoan hieroglyphic and linear (A and B) writing and with Cypriot.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, W. F.A note on early Sabean chronology’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 143 (1956) 9ffGoogle Scholar
Albright, W. F.The Beth Shemesh Tablet in alphabetic cuneiform’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 173 (1948) 51ffGoogle Scholar
Albright, W. F.The early alphabetic inscriptions from Sinai and their decipherment’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 110 (1948) 6ffGoogle Scholar
Albright, W. F.The Phoenician inscriptions of the tenth century B.C. from Byblus’, Journal of the American Oriental Society 67 (1947) 153ffGoogle Scholar
Albright, W. F. The Proto-Sinaitic Inscriptions and their Decipherment (Harvard Theological Studies 22). Cambridge, Mass., 1966
Alt, A. Kleine Schriften 1, 208ff, especially. Munich, 1953
Bauer, H. Der Ursprung des Alphabets (Alte Or. 36, 1/2). Leipzig, 1937
Bauer, H. Zur Entzifferung der neuentdeckten Sinaischrift und zur Entstehung des Semitischen Alphabets. Halle, 1918
Blau, J. and Loewenstamm, S. E.Zur Frage der scriptio plena im Ugaritischen und Verwandtes’, Ugarit-Forschungen 2 (1970) 19ffGoogle Scholar
Bliss, F. J. A Mound of Many Cities. 2nd edn. London, 1898
Böhl, F. M. T.Die Sichem-Plakette. Protoalphabetische Schriftzeichen der Mittelbronzezeit vom tell baláṭa ’, Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins 61 (1938) 1ffGoogle Scholar
Branden, den A.Comment lire les textes de Deir 'Alla?’, Vetus Testamentum (Supplements) 15 (1965) 532ff, with ‘A reply’ by Franken, H. J. , ibid. 535ffGoogle Scholar
Branden, den A.Essai de déchiffrement des inscriptions de Deir 'Alla’, Vetus Testamentum (Supplements) 15 (1965) 129ffGoogle Scholar
Branden, den A. Les inscriptions deédanites. Beyrouth, 1962
Butin, R. F.The new Protosinaitic inscriptions’, in Starr, R. F. S. and Butin, R. F. Excavations and Protosinaitic Inscriptions at Serabit el Khadem (Studies and Documents VI), 31ff. London, 1936 Google Scholar
Butin, R. F.The Serabit expeditions of 1930: iv. The Protosinaitic inscriptions’, Harvard Theological Review 25 (1948) 130ffGoogle Scholar
Caskel, W. Libyan und Lihyanisch (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Geisteswissenschaften, 4). Cologne, Opladen, 1954
Cazelles, H.Deir 'Alla et ses tablettes’, Semitica 15 (1965) 5ffGoogle Scholar
Coldstream, J. N. Geometric Greece, London 1977
Coote, R. B.The Kition Bowl’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 220 (1975) 47ffGoogle Scholar
Cross, F. M. and Freedman, D. N.An inscribed jar handle from Raddana’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 201 (1971) 19ffGoogle Scholar
Cross, F. M. and Freedman, D. N. Early Hebrew Orthography, A Study of the Epigraphic Evidence (American Oriental Series, 36). New Haven, Conn., 1952
Cross, F. M. and Lambdin, T. O.An Ugaritic abecedary and the origins of the proto-Canaanite alphabet’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 160 (1948) 21ffGoogle Scholar
Cross, F. M. and McCarter, P. K.Two archaic inscriptions on clay objects from Byblos’, Rivista di Studi Fenici 1 (1973) 3ffGoogle Scholar
Cross, F. M.The Canaanite Cuneiform Tablet from Taanach’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 190 (1948) 41ffGoogle Scholar
Cross, F. M.The evolution of the Proto-Canaanite alphabet’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 134 (1954) 15ffGoogle Scholar
Cross, F. M.The origin and early evolution of the alphabet’, Eretz-Israel 8 (1967) 8*ffGoogle Scholar
Degen, R. Altaramäiscbe Grammatik (Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 38/3). Wiesbaden, 1969
Demsky, A.A proto-Canaanite Abecedary dating from the period of the Judges, and its implications for the history of the alphabet’, Tel Aviv 4 (1977) 14ffGoogle Scholar
Dhorme, E.Déchiffrement des inscriptions pseudo-hiéroglyphiques de Byblos’, Syria 25 (1946–8) 1ffGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, M. and Loretz, O.Untersuchungen zur Schrift-und Lautlehre des Ugaritischen. II: Lesehilfe in der ugaritischen Orthographie’, Ugarit-Forschungen 5 (1973) 71ffGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, M., Loretz, O. and Sammartiín, J.Das reduzierte Keilalphabet’, Ugarit-Forschungen 6 (1948) 15ffGoogle Scholar
Diringer, D.Inscriptions’, in Tufnell, O. et al. Lacbish IV, 127ff. London, 1958 Google Scholar
Diringer, D. The Alphabet. A Key to the History of Mankind. 3rd edn. London, 1968
Drewes, A. J. and Schneider, R.Origine et developpement de l'écriture éthiopienne jusqu'à l'é des inscriptions royales d'Axoum’, Annales d'Ethiopie 10 (1976) 95fFGoogle Scholar
Drewes, A. J. Inscriptions de I'Ethiopie antique. Leiden, 1962
Drioton, E.A propos de la stèle du Balou'a’, Revue biblique 42 (1933) 353ffGoogle Scholar
Driver, G. R. Semitic Writing. From Pictograph to Alphabet (Schweich Lectures of the British Academy, 1944). 3rd edn. London, 1976
Dunand, M.Spatule de bronze avec épigraphe phénicienne du XIIIe siècle’, Bulletin du Musée de Beyrouth 2 (1938) 99ffGoogle Scholar
Dunand, M. Byblia Grammata. Documents et recherches sur le développement de l'ecriture en Pbénicie. Beyrouth, 1945
Dupont-Sommer, A.Une inscription phénicienne archaiïque récemment trouvée à Kition (Chypre)’, Mémoires de VAcademic des inscriptions et belles-lettres 44 (1970) 9ffGoogle Scholar
Dussaud, R.L'origine de l'alphabet et son évolution première d'après les découvertes de Byblos’, Syria 25 (1946–8) 368ffGoogle Scholar
Dussaud, R.L'ostracon de Bet Shemesh’, Syria 11 (1930) 392ffGoogle Scholar
Eisler, R. Die Kenitischen Weihinschriften der Hyksoszeit im Bergbaugebiet der Sinaihalbinsel. Freiburg, 1919
Février, J. G. Histoire de l'écriture. 2nd edn. Paris, 1959
Franken, H. J.Clay tablets from Deir 'Alla, Jordan’, Vetus Testamentum (Supplements) 14 (1964) 377ffGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, J. and Röllig, W. Pbönizisch-Punische Grammatik (Analecta Orientalia 46). Rome, 1970
Garbini, G.Considerazioni sull'origine dell'alfabeto’, AION NS 16 (1966) 1ffGoogle Scholar
Garbini, G.Note epigrafiche, 1. Gli ostraka di Kamid el-Loz’, AION 32 (1972) 95ffGoogle Scholar
Garbini, G.Note epigrafiche, 3. Le iscrizioni “protocananaiche” del XII e XI secolo a.C.’, AION 34, 4 (1974) 584ffGoogle Scholar
Garbini, G.Sulla datazione dell'iscrizione di Ahiram’, AION 37, 4 (1977), 81ffGoogle Scholar
Garbini, G. Storia e problemi dell'epigrafia semitica. AION 39 (1979), suppl. 19
Gardiner, A. H., Peet, T. E. and Černý, J. The Inscriptions of Sinai 1, 11 (Egypt Exploration Society, Excavation Memoirs 36, 45). London, 1952–5
Gardiner, A. H.Once again the Proto-Sinaitic inscriptions’, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 48 (1948) 45ffGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, A. H.Writing and literature’, in Glanville, S. R. K. (ed.) The Legacy of Egypt, 53ff. Oxford, 1942 Google Scholar
Gaster, T. H.The archaic inscriptions’, in Tufnell, O. et al. Lachish 11 49ff. London, 1940 Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. A Study of Writing. 2nd edn. Chicago, 1963
Gelb, I.New evidence in favour of the syllabic character of West Semitic writing’, Bibliotheca Orientalis NS 15 (1958) 2ffGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. C. L. Textbook of Syrian Semitic Inscriptions. I: Hebrew and Moabite (1971); 11: Aramaic (1975). Oxford.
Gjerstad, E. The Swedish Cyprus Expedition, iv, 2: The Cypro-Geometric, Cypro-Archaic, and Cjpro-Classical Periods. Stockholm, 1948
Glueck, N.Some Edomite Pottery from Tell el Kheleifeh’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 188 (1967) 8ffGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A.A seal cylinder with an early alphabetic inscription’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 129 (1953) 8ffGoogle Scholar
Gordon, C. H.The Ugaritic “ABC”Orientalia NS 19 (1950) 374ffGoogle Scholar
Gordon, C. H. Ugaritic Textbook I–III (Analecta Orientalia 38). Rome, 1965
Grant, E. and Wright, G. R. Ain Shems Excavations (Palestine) v. Haverford, Pennsylvania, 1939
Grant, E.Beth Shemesh in 1933’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 52 (1948) 4ffGoogle Scholar
Grant, E.Découverte épigraphique à Bet Šemesš’, Revue biblique 39 (1930) 401ffGoogle Scholar
Guiges, P. E.Pointe de fièche en bronze à inscription phénicienne’, Melanges de l'Université St. Joseph, Beyrouth 11 (1926) 325ffGoogle Scholar
Guy, P. L. O. and Engberg, R. M. Megiddo Tombs (Oriental Institute Publications 33). Chicago, 1938
Hachmann, R.Das Königsgrab V von Jebeil (Byblos). Untersuchungen zur Zeitstellung des sog. Ahiram-Grabes’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 17 (1967) 93ffGoogle Scholar
Helck, W.Zur Herkunft der sog. “Phönizischen” Schrift’, Ugarit-Forschungen 4 (1972) 41ffGoogle Scholar
Herdner, A.A-t-il existe une varieté palestinienne de l'écriture cunéiforme alphabétique?Syria 25 (1946–8) 165ffGoogle Scholar
Hillers, D. R.An alphabetic cuneiform tablet from Taanach(TT 433)’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 173 (1948) 45ffGoogle Scholar
Höfner, M. Altsüdarabische Grammatik (Porta Linguarum Orientalium, 24). Leipzig, 1943
Horsfield, G. and Vincent, L. H.Une stèle égypto-moabite au Balou 'a’, Revue biblique 41 (1932) 417ffGoogle Scholar
Iwry, S.New evidence for belomancy in ancient Palestine and Phoenicia’, Journal of the American Oriental Society 81 (1961) 27ffGoogle Scholar
Jamme, A.Preliminary report on epigraphic research in north-western Wâd î Ḥaḍramawt and at Al-'Abar’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 172 (1963) 41ffGoogle Scholar
Janssens, G.Contribution au déchiffrement des inscriptions pseudohiéroglyphiques de Byblos’, La Nouvelle Clio (1955–7) 361ffGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, L. H. The Local Scripts of Archaic Greece. Oxford, 1961
Jensen, H. Sign, Symbol and Script. An Account of Man's Effort to Write. 3rd edn. London, 1970
Kallner, R. B.Two inscribed sherds from Tell e⊡-Ṣarem’, Qedem 2 (1945) 11ff (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
Karageorghis, V. Kition. Mycenean and Phoenician Discoveries in Cyprus. London, 1976
Kochavi, M.An ostracon of the period of the Judges from Izbet Sarṭah’, Tel Aviv 4 (1977) 1ffGoogle Scholar
Kutscher, E. Y.Aramaic’, in Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics 6 (1970) 347ffGoogle Scholar
Leibovitch, J.Die Petrieschen Sinai-Schriftdenkmäler’, Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellscbaft 84 NF 9 (1930) 1ffGoogle Scholar
Leibovitch, J.Le tesson de Tell Nagila’, Le Muséon 78 (1965) 229ffGoogle Scholar
Leibovitch, J.Les inscriptions proto-sinaitiques’, Mémoires presentés à l'Institut d'Egypte, 24 (1934)Google Scholar
Leibovitch, J.Recent discoveries and developments in Proto-Sinaitic’, Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Egypte 40 (1940) 101ffGoogle Scholar
Leibovitch, J.The date of the Proto-Sinaitic inscriptions’, Le Muséon 76 (1948) 201ff, with ‘An additional note’ by Albright, F. W. , ibid. 203ffGoogle Scholar
Littmann, L. R. E. Sabaäische, griechische und altabessinische Inschriften (Deutsche Aksum-Expedition, Bd. 4). Berlin, 1913
Littmann, L. R. E. Thamūd und Safā. S tudienzur nordarabischen Inschriften-kunde (Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 25/1). Leipzig, 1940
Mansfeld, G.Scherben mit altkanaanäischer Schrift vom Tell Kāmid el-Lōz’, in Edzard, D. O. et al. Kāmid el-Loz/Kumidi Schriftdokumente aus Kāmid el-Loz (Saarbrücker Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 7), 29ff. Bonn, 1970 Google Scholar
Martin, M.Revision and reclassification of the Proto-Byblian signs’, Orientalia NS 31 (1962) 250ff, 339ffGoogle Scholar
Masson, O. and Sznycer, M. Recherches sur les Phéniciens à Chypre. Geneva and Paris, 1972
Mayani, Z.Un apport à la discussion du texte Deir 'Allah’, Vetus Testamentum (Supplements) 24 (1974) 318ffGoogle Scholar
McCarter, P. KyleThe early diffusion of the alphabet’, The Biblical Archaeologist 37 (1974) 54ffGoogle Scholar
McCarter, P. Kyle The Antiquity of the Greek Alphabet and the Early Phoenician Scripts (Harvard Semitic Monographs. 9). Missoula, Motana, 1975
Mendenhall, G. E.A new chapter in the history of the alphabet’, Bulletin du Musée de Beyrouth 24 (1971) 13ffGoogle Scholar
Mendenhall, G. E.The Inscription from Catal Hüyük in the Plain of Antakya’, Kadmos 14/1 (1975) 48ffGoogle Scholar
Milik, J. T. and Cross, F. M.Inscribed javelin-heads from the period of the Judges: a recent discovery in Palestine’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 134 (1954) 5ffGoogle Scholar
Milik, J. T.Flèches è inscriptions phéniciennes au Musée National Libanais’, Bulletin du Musée de Beyrouth 16 (1961) 103ffGoogle Scholar
Millard, A. R. Scriptio Continua in early Hebrew: ancient practice or modern surmise?’, Journal of Semitic Studies 15 (1970) 2ffGoogle Scholar
Millard, A. R.A text in a shorter cuneiform alphabet from Tell Nebi Mend (T.N.M.022)’, Ugarit-Forschungen 8 (1948) 459ffGoogle Scholar
Millard, A. R.The Canaanite linear alphabet and its passage to the Greeks’, Kadmos 15 (1976) 130ffGoogle Scholar
Millard, A. R.The practice of writing in ancient Israel’, The Biblical Archaeologist 35 (1972) 98ffGoogle Scholar
Naveh, J.A palaeographic note on the distribution of the Hebrew script’, Harvard Theological Review 61 (1968) 68ffGoogle Scholar
Naveh, J.Some Semitic epigraphic considerations on the antiquity of the Greek alphabet’, American Journal of Archaeology 77 (1973) 1ffGoogle Scholar
Naveh, J.The scripts in Palestine and Transjordan in the Iron Age’, in Saunders, J. A. (ed.) Near Eastern Archaeology in the Twentieth Century. Essays in Honour of N. Glueck, 277ff. New York, 1970 Google Scholar
Naveh, J.Word division in West Semitic writing’, Israel Exploration journal 23 (1973) 206ffGoogle Scholar
Naveh, J. The Development of the Aramaic Script (Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Proceedings V.1). Jerusalem, 1970
Obermann, J.The archaic inscriptions from Lachish’, Supplement to journal of the American Oriental Society 2 (1948)Google Scholar
Owen, D. I. J. Article in Pritchard, J. B. Sarepta. A Preliminary Report on the Iron Age, 102ff. Philadelphia, Penn., 1975
Peckham, B. The Development of the Late Phoenician Scripts. Cambridge, Mass., 1968
Petrie, W. M. F.The alphabet in the XIIth Dynasty’, Ancient Egypt (1921 I) 1ffGoogle Scholar
Petrie, W. M. F. Ancient Gaza 11. London, 1932
Petrie, W. Flinders Researches in Sinai, 129ff. London, 1906
Pirenne, J. Paléographie des inscriptions sud-Arabes. Contributions à la chronologie et à I 'histoire de i'Arable du Sud antique. i: des origines jusqu'a l'é Himyarite. Paris, 1956
Posener, G.Sur les inscriptions pseudo-hiéroglyphiques de Byblos’, Melanges de l'Université St. Joseph, Beyrouth 45 (1969) 225ffGoogle Scholar
Priebratsch, H. Y. Š und T in Ugarit und das Amoritisch. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des ABC’, Ugarit-Forschungen 7 (1948) 389ffGoogle Scholar
Röllig, W.Die Alphabetschrift’, in Hausmann, U. (ed.) Allgemeine Grundlagen der Archäologie, 289ff. München, 1969. For Near Eastern writing as a whole see Hausmann, , op. cit., by various authors.Google Scholar
Ryckmans, J.Aspects nouveaux du probléme thamudéen’, Studia Islamica 5 (1956) 1ffGoogle Scholar
Ryckmans, J.L'origine et l'ordre des lettres de l'alphabet Éthiopien’, Bibliotheca Orientalis 12 (1955) 2ffGoogle Scholar
Segert, A.Aramäische Studien IV: Die Rolle der Aramäer bei der Vermittlung des westsemitischen Alphabets and die Griechen’, Arch. Orient. 26 (1958) 572ffGoogle Scholar
Segert, S.Altaramäische Schrift und die Aünfange des griechischen Alphabets’, Klio 41 (1963) 38ffGoogle Scholar
Segert, S.Vowel letters in early Aramaic’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 37 (1978) 111ffGoogle Scholar
Sethe, K.Die neuentdeckte Sinaischrift und die Entstehung der Semitischen Schrift’, Nachr. Göttingen 1917, 437ffGoogle Scholar
Sobelman, H.The Proto-Byblian inscriptions: a fresh approach’, Journal of Semitic Studies 6 (1961) 226ffGoogle Scholar
Speiser, E. A.A note on alphabetic origins’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 121 (1948) 17ffGoogle Scholar
Sprengling, M. The Alphabet. Its Rise and Development from the Sinai Inscriptions (Oriental Institute Communications 12). Chicago, 1931
Stager, L. E.An inscribed potsherd from the eleventh century B.C.’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 194 (1969) 45ffGoogle Scholar
Sukenik, E. L.Note on the sherd from Tell as-Sarem’, Qedem 2 (1945) (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
Sznycer, M.L'inscription phénicienne de Tekke près de Cnossos’, Kadmos 18, 1 (1979) 89ffGoogle Scholar
Sznycer, M.L'origine de l'alphabet sémitique’ in L'espace et la lettre, Cahiers Jussieu/3 Université de Paris 7 10/18, 79ff. Paris, 1977 Google Scholar
Sznycer, M.Les inscriptions pseudo-hiéroglyphiques de Byblos’, Le déchiffrement des écritures et des langues. Colloque du XXIXe congrès international des orientalistes présenté par Jean Leclant, 75ff. Paris, 1975 Google Scholar
Sznycer, M.Quelques remarques à propos de la formation de 1'alphabet phénicien’, Semitica 24 (1975) 4ffGoogle Scholar
Sznycer, M. Article ‘Protosinaïtiques’ (Inscriptions), in Supplément au Dictionnaire de la Bible VIII, cols. 1384ff. Paris, 1972 Google Scholar
Taylor, W. R.The new Gezer inscription’, Journal of the Palestine Oriental Society 10 (1930) 79ff; cf. ibid. 17ffGoogle Scholar
Ward, W. A. and Martin, F. M.The Balu'a Stele: a new transcription with palaeographic and historical notes’, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 8/9 (1964) 5ffGoogle Scholar
Weippert, M.Archäologischer Jahresbericht’, Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins 82 (1948) 274ffGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, G.Eine Krughenkelschrift in alphabetischer Keilschrift aus Kāmid el-Lōz (KL 67: 428p)Ugarit-Forschungen 5 (1948) 284ffGoogle Scholar
Winnett, F. V. and Reed, W. L. Ancient Records from North Arabia (University of Toronto Studies, Near & Middle Eastern Series, 6). Toronto, 1937
Winnett, F. V. A Study of the Lihyanite and Thamudic Inscriptions (University of Toronto Studies, Oriental Series, 3). Toronto, 1937
Wissmann, H. vonDie Geschichte des Sabäerreichs und der Feldzug des Aelius Gallus’, in Temporini, H. and Haase, W. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 11, 9.1, 308ff. Berlin, 1976 Google Scholar
Yadin, Y. et al. Hazor 1. Jerusalem, 1958
Yeivin, S.A new Ugaritic inscription from Palestine’, Qedem 2 (1948), 32ff (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
Young, R. S.Old Phrygian inscriptions from Gordion: towards a history of the Phrygian alphabet’, Hesperia 38 (1969) 252ffGoogle Scholar
Zauzich, K. T.Vorläufige Mitteilung zur Herkunft der phönizischen Schrift’, Enchoria 3 (1973) 155ffGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×