UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs Intel Core i9-9900K
IntelBX80684I99900K
AMD100-100000023BOX

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.6GHz, Coffee Lake.
Release date: Q4 2018.

12 Cores, 24 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
298 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+28%
233 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
108 EFps +3% 105 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+6%
130 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
137 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+10%
124 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
149 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+6%
141 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 551,565 user samples
354,223 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 89% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 89% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 89th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
197,342 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 154th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
97.9 % Faster effective speed.
+11%
87.9 %
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
9 % Hitm2 8%, FarC5 23%, TWarW2 10%, SotTR 20%, ACO 8%, MetroEx 3%, MESoW 11%, Divis2 3% StrangeB 4%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
8 % BFV 9%, SotTR 7%, MetroEx 7%, Divis2 7%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
5 % FarC5 16%, BFV 3%, Witcher3 2%, Civ6 0%, ACO 11%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 16%, Wolf2 1% SotTR 2%, Rage2 2%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
5 % FarC5 16%, BFV 3%, Rage2 1%, Witcher3 2%, Civ6 0%, ACO 11%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 16%, Wolf2 1% SotTR 2%
21 May20|Optimum Tech
Intel i5-10600K Review - 6-core Ga...
13 % FarC5 25%, OverW 10%, SotTR 22%, RDR2 8%, StarWJFO 12%, CSGO 14% R6S 2%
28 May20|Gamers Nexus
Best CPUs of 2020 So Far (Gaming, ...
18 % OC SotTR 18% OC
28 May20|Gamers Nexus
Best CPUs of 2020 So Far (Gaming, ...
10 % Hitm2 5%, SotTR 14%, F119 13%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
20 % OC TWarW2 32% OC, F118 10% OC, GTAV 17% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
18 % Hitm2 18%, TWarW2 28%, F118 13%, GTAV 11%, SotTR 19%
07 Jul19|Linustechtips
I had given up on AMD… until today...
4 % SotTR 12%, BFV 17%, MetroEx 9% CSGO 0%, R6S 18%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
93.1 Pts Lower memory latency.
+24%
75 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
142 Pts +2% 139 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
281 Pts +2% 275 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
551 Pts +2% 539 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
981 Pts 1030 Pts +5%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
97.2 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11%
87.9 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
153 Pts +3% 148 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
305 Pts +3% 295 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
604 Pts +5% 577 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1116 Pts 1128 Pts +1%
Market Share
Based on 67,734,973 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.19 % Hugely higher market share.
+495%
0.2 %
Value
Value For Money
88 % Better value.
+10%
79.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
87 % More popular.
+19%
73 %
Price
Price (score)
$410 $395 +4%
Age
Newest
66 Months 57 Months More recent.
+14%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 12 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 24 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz 3.8 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+9%
4.6 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1590 Pts 2224 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+40%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1451 Pts 2036 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+40%
Series
CPU Architecture
Coffee Lake Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 630 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel i9-9900K is an 8 core, 16 thread, unlocked 9th generation Coffee Lake processor. It has a base / boost clocks of 3.6 / 4.7 GHz and a single-core boost of 5.0 GHz (the highest frequency achieved yet from this class of Intel CPU). It features 16 MB of cache, a 95W TDP and Intel UHD 630 graphics. The 9900K is compatible with the new Z390 chipset, and subject to a BIOS update, is also compatible with the older Z370 chipset. Aimed at users who do not wish to compromise, the i9-9900K offers the best gaming and desktop experience available at any price. Heavy workstation users should consider the Ryzen 9 3900X which is similarly priced. Comparing the overclocked 3900X shows that it is just 10% worse for gaming and desktop (sub octa-core) but around 40% better for 64-core computations. Gamers should consider the 9700K which offers identical overclocked gaming performance at a $100 USD discount. [Oct '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback