UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs Intel Core i9-9900KF
IntelBX80684I99900KF
AMD100-100000061WOF
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
298 EFps 318 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+7%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
108 EFps 108 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps 142 EFps +3%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
137 EFps +3% 133 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
149 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+23%
121 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 110,397 user samples
50,265 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 91st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
60,132 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 87% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 87% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 79th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
97.8 % 99 % +1%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
93.1 Pts Lower memory latency.
+15%
81.1 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
142 Pts 163 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+15%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
282 Pts 320 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+13%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
550 Pts 626 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+14%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
981 Pts 1157 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+18%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
97.4 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6%
92.3 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
153 Pts 179 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+17%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
305 Pts 356 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+17%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
605 Pts 694 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+15%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1114 Pts 1318 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+18%
Market Share
Based on 67,695,249 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.25 % 0.63 % Hugely higher market share.
+152%
Value
Value For Money
94 % 102 % Slightly better value.
+8%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
55 % 72 % Much more popular.
+31%
Price
Price (score)
$321 $250 Cheaper.
+22%
Age
Newest
60+ Months 41 Months Much more recent.
+32%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1594 Pts 2290 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+44%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1457 Pts 2000 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+37%
ADVERTISEMENT

The iGPU-less i9-9900K. Comes with nearly same specs as original i9-9900K but without iGPU could be a better overclocker than the original ones and enthusiast gamers probably don't need iGPU when they have high end discrete GPU. [Dec '19 ColdSpy]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9 5900X is second in AMD’s line-up of new Zen 3 CPUs. The 12-core hyper-threaded processor has base/boost clock speeds of 3.7/4.8 GHz, a 70 MB cache and a TDP of 105W. The 5900X took center stage in the 5000 series launch presentation where AMD gunned for Intel’s “best gaming CPU” crown. They showed the 5900X as being 26% better for gaming than the previous generation’s Ryzen 9 3900XT, attributing this to the new architecture’s faster single core speeds and lower latency. AMD also stated that the 5900X achieves, on average, 6.8% faster gaming performance than Intel’s 10-core i9-10900K. The details around AMD’s testing were not disclosed but it is safe to assume that 6.8% is the highest average lead that AMD are willing to stand by. Our benchmarks show that the 5900X’s slightly faster cores and the 10900K’s slightly lower memory latency balance out to yield similar performance. Whilst presenting their figures, AMD admitted that their 3000 series CPUs were far from “best for gaming” and conceded that the 10900K is approximately 19% faster than the 3900XT (our effective speed marks the gap at just 14%). Despite this clear performance deficiency, AMD supported 3000 series sales with an aggressive and successful marketing campaign to easily outsell Intel over the last 12 months. Given the real performance uplift observed in the 5000 series, and the absence of any meaningful marketing from Intel, we expect CPU sales to shift even further in AMD’s favour. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” should investigate Intel’s $175 USD 11400F, the $660 USD savings would be far better spent on a higher tier GPU. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback