Talk:Ghetto house

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Music/Music genres task force (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject iconGhetto house is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good and 1.0 standards.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Electronic music (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Definition[edit]

Hey pretty correct! I ll use this definition for my personal use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.198.0.93 (talk) 09:43, 12 July 2003‎

Name[edit]

the more popular name for it would be juke music or juk. I live in Chicago by the way:)

not sure where the name came from but if i know that it came from house music hence: Jacking=Juking — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.69.160.42 (talk) 11:45, 18 November 2005

Jukebox ? 惑乱 分からん 10:32, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Footwork[edit]

Hey by the way I would not consider Swamp 81 a footwork-label. they only released the "footcrab" ep by addison groove aka headhunter. They used to be known as an ultra-deep dubstep label, releasing kryptic minds and the like. just because they bring out two footwork tracks it doesn't make them a footwork label. also since footwork has gained that much media attention in the last few months i would not consider it an untouched genre anymore. -- 93.128.7.49 (talk) 20:13, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Pictures of Chicago[edit]

They seem a bit unnecessary to me. 128.243.236.10 (talk) 17:40, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Juke/Footwork need their own article(s)[edit]

I would argue that Juke and Footwork need their own article(s), or that this article needs to be renamed. Juke/Footwork is starting to break into the mainstream and is almost never referred to as being a sub-genre of or part of Ghetto House. They definitely have their own defined sounds and should be documented accordingly. While I would argue that I have enough knowledge to contribute to such an article, I'm not an experienced enough wiki user to go about creating it. Is there anyone else who agrees? 82.21.164.134 (talk) 21:03, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

The way WP notability works, the J/F section here would have to have enough reliable sources to support its own article, and ghetto house is hurting enough for sources as it is. Let's focus on getting the information in this article actually sourced and reputable and before we talk about splitting them. czar  21:59, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

I agree with the first poster. The current Juke/Footwork scene is in no way connected to Ghetto House, and having it filed under that heading is thus incorrect. Now that the UK/Japan has latched onto Footwork, it needs to be represented as a proper genre. And i should know, i DJ/produce/run a Footwork/Juke record label :-) 82.40.141.76 (talk) 02:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

G-House is NOT booty house[edit]

Subj

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ghetto house. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)