Why are there leftwingers and rightwingers who both support Putin? : r/lazerpig Skip to main content

Get the Reddit app

Scan this QR code to download the app now
Or check it out in the app stores
r/lazerpig icon
r/lazerpig icon
Go to lazerpig
r/lazerpig

Welcome to r/Lazerpig, the Semi-Official sub with an official gay themed sushi bar! Join the Official Discord @ Discord.gg/lazerpig


Members Online

Why are there leftwingers and rightwingers who both support Putin?

Share
Sort by:
Best
Open comment sort options
u/pass_it_around avatar

Because Putin doesn't have any coherent ideology and he collects support from the fringes of political spectrum, those who are dissatisfied with the status quo. Putin's verbal statements are deliberately all over the place, one can find anything.

u/AvenRaven avatar

Kraut actually made a good video on Putin's ideology, he isn't hiding it, we just don't listen to what he's saying and who he is quoting directly from.

u/TheMOELANDER avatar

The Nazis actually did the same thing back then in the Weimar republic. They called themselves National SOCIALIST german worker party. There were quite a few on the far left who went for them.

The Nazis coopted the success of populist workers’ movements and used any language available to propagandize. They had no coherent or original ideas for a political platform.

u/TheMOELANDER avatar

Yep. Just wanted to point toward that name thing. It was one of their bait hooks.

Oh they had a coherent idea, all right.

Sounds like Trump and increasingly the Australian Liberal Party (who were found as a broad specteum anti-Labor Party Party in the 40s, but since John Howard have gradually morphed in Australia's Republican Party, albeit with monarchists.)

u/Alternative_Oil7733 avatar

The nazis did attempted to carrying out most of the 25 points. But some of goals weren't able to be completed because it would require germany not losing ww2. The nazi are just another socialist country that failed nothing more than that.

Just another failed socialist country my ass. They murdered everyone who actually was dumb enough to think they were socialist.

The parts of the 25 points that sound slightly distributist - to someone who doesn't know better - all have big caveats attached that make it obvious that they were just window dressing. An actual socialist doesn't tie living to working, yet point 11 reads "Therefore we demand the abolition of incomes unearned by work." Point 13 demands "We want all very big corporations to be owned by the government," which is a stupid person's idea of socialism - socialism demands an end to corporations period. And every single point is tied to citizenship, which it demands can only belong to a particular ethnic group ("Germans", which ISN'T EVEN A THING), per point 8, something that no socialist thinker would ever conscience.

We all know the practice was completely garbage, but the theory is rotten too.

more replies More replies
More replies
More replies

And then they murdered them when they had power firmly in their hands. Same as Putin would to the stupid tankies. Like how the ISIS would use the Western Converts to drive the suicide bomb trucks.

Well except the contemporary far left massively opposed them, to the point of them being arch nemeses. Like I’m sure they snagged up some socialists with that move but it wasn’t really the same situation.

u/TheMOELANDER avatar

Are you german? I learned this in history class. Sure the KPD actually declared the NSDAP their arch enemies, that still led to many KPD people getting swayed by the Nazis.

More replies
u/AvenRaven avatar

Thought they had that socialist bit because of the Strasserists.

The Nazi flag was red for a reason.

More replies
u/Nothinghere727271 avatar

He definitely does have a coherent ideology. He’s a right wing auth dictator, the only leftists that would support him are tankies.

Eh there's also a strain of people on the anti capitalist left who see Uncle Sam as the big bad and therefore, anyone who opposes US hegemony are the "Good Guys"™️.

They're wrong and falling prey to some pretty obvious logical fallacies but they definitely exist.

u/pass_it_around avatar

How does it register with him keeping the open door with the Central Asian Republics and Caucasus?

u/Nothinghere727271 avatar

The former soviet states? Can he not keep an open door and be a dictator? You’ll need to explain what you mean

Because he views them as rightful Russian territory that he doesn't de jure own yet. Remember, his biggest stated issue with Lenin was that he theoretically gave the SSRs sovereignty (that wasn't worth the paper it was printed on, in practice), viewing it as an illegal breaking up of the Russian Empire.

He has an open door to them because he doesn't view them as meaningfully separate entities to begin with. They're misguided splinter states that will be brought back into the fold of Great Russia as soon as Russia is able.

More replies
u/Sleddoggamer avatar

If you remove all forms of politics, he doesn't really have much of a defined ideology, and what he promotes goes with the wind and seems to center only as a populist

The best I can tell, Putin actually outright refuses to appeal to nationalists and will only use third parties like Dugin to try rally the socs into the nat field when his popularity is to low to do it himself. Everyone also knows what happens to them when they've outlived their use and how little value national pride actually means to the olicharchy

u/Nothinghere727271 avatar

I think the Putinism characteristics lists would be an interesting read

u/Sleddoggamer avatar

Ita probably not fair to less politicals, but I stopped reading what I don't have a very clear understanding for myself after trying to entertain the farther left and just seeing them rant when I gave contradictions

Putinism has always felt like Stalinism to me, and as far as I'm concerned, it's just a byproduct of Sovietism. The Bolsheviks aren't being tricked there lying to themselves, and Putin is just going along with the lies blinded by the soviet legacy himself

More replies
More replies
u/Sleddoggamer avatar

He's only far right if you go off the European idea that leftism is inheritally incapable of creating an authortian state. If you go off the old American idea that communism is inheritally unsustainable and that it will inheritally always create a state of absolute power and absoute power will always corrupt, he's no different then communist Stalin as his entire national industry is state controlled and his entire welfare system is fully socialized

More replies

Perfect explanation 👏

The only thing that I would add to that is the fringes are the politically illiterate, the idiots who think that they’re such a genius but copy the next opnion on the internet that they see as their own.

The spectrum itself is nonsense and implies that there’s some more ‘reasonable’ stance in the ‘center’ (as if the center isn’t also an inadequate expression of rational thought).

I couldn’t agree more.

More replies
More replies
u/LetsGetNuclear avatar
Edited

Too bad for Putin that my dislike of my largely domestic status quo doesn't translate into a dislike of a geopolitical status quo.

I'm actually the happiest about Western diplomacy than I ever have been.

u/xzy89c1 avatar

Well said. Was not expecting that.

More replies
u/Maverick_Couch avatar

Right wingers admire Putin because they think he's on their side in the culture wars. He's "anti-woke", and wields religion as a club. Never mind that they normally wouldn't consider Eastern Orthodox "real" Christians, at least he's repressing the same people they want to repress. Some left-wingers admire Putin because they see America as inherently bad and imperialist, so anyone opposing American foreign policy must by definition be anti-imperialist, even when they're literally trying to carve out an empire. Then there's this weird Stalin nostalgia on the fringes that seems to infect some both rightists and leftists, that I have a harder time explaining.

u/Imperceptive_critic avatar

Yeah, just don't ask why there are Protestants and Catholics in Ukraine but not in the occupied zones...

As bad as Putin is, much of that is from Ukraine’s changing borders. The west was Polish and Austro-Hungarian, so there’s way more Catholicism in the west of Ukraine. Eastern Orthodoxy is much stronger in the parts of the country that border or were part of the Russian Empire.

u/Imperceptive_critic avatar

From a demographic perspective, yes this is generally true. But the modern Russian state absolutely targets Protestants 

https://time.com/6969273/russias-war-against-evangelicals/

More replies
More replies

Another thing I've seen from some fringe leftists who love Putin is that they tend to see themselves as communist, so Putin trying to put the band back together is seen as a good thing.

I've also seen some right-wingers who are hoping Putin marches on throughout the world to "liberate" America from the "woke-mind-virus" (which they believe is an actual virus created by the CDC to turn people gay/effeminate).

u/SmoothEntrepreneur12 avatar

Look, right, Stalinism has its downsides, sure, but for when you absolutely need to eradicate a fascism problem, it downright can not be beat

u/StickBrickman avatar

"Tired of genocidal maniacs? Have a genocidal maniac! Job done!" "But you didn't solve anything." "Perish in the gulag."

u/Imperceptive_critic avatar

If anything Stalinism actively hindered the fight against fascism. He assisted Germany in a quicker conquest of Poland, which was a large reason France and Britain didn't intervene as much as they could have. He purged tons of his competent officers before the war allowing the army to become insanely incompetent and corrupt, and he held so much onto his plans and vision that he was utterly blindsided by the German invasion in 1941. Even once the war began his initial response was to do nothing for the first critical few days and then just throw units at the front with no rhyme or reason to their positions, allowing them to be constantly encircled. If anything it was only when Stalin began to let his Generals that knew what they were doing do their job that the war turned around.

Look, the Soviets did play a huge and respectable role in stopping the Nazis, that can't be denied. But they also helped them at first and didn't figure things out until way late than they should have.

u/damocles8 avatar

Yeah they didn’t do it without the support of the US.

You do realize the Soviet Union was basically completely bailed out by lend-lease from the US? Like America was basically the Soviet Union’s pocket medic if we’re using a Team Fortress 2 analogy.

The invasion of Poland has a very real possibility of turning into a total grind fest pyrrhic victory that breaks the Heer as an offensive force in a timeline where Poland doesn't have to orient a significant amount of its defensive works and troops eastward. If the USSR were anything other than another imperialist nightmare hungry to reclaim territory it sees as rightfully its own, it wouldn't have been a threat to Poland, and the Poles with the ability to orient all their armed forces to the German and East Prussian borders would have bled the Germans white even in victory.

So no, it turns out, actually, it's very good at making the fascism problem worse.

u/deadname11 avatar

Stalin slaughtered the nascent LGBTQ organizations and scientists because it was more important to be "strong for mother Russia" than it was to have a functional government. Stalin allowed pseudoscience and quackery to run rampant throughout the USSR because it was more important to be anti-Western than it was to be intelligent and educated. This directly helped to contribute to further famine and instability, making Russia weaker as a whole, when Germany inevitably came knocking.

Incidentally, this is why you don't allow reactionary, uneducated peasants take over the government. Putting Stalin in charge was the worst thing that could have happened to the USSR. Though Lenin holds significant blame for not having a line of succession, even a spiritual one, despite him knowing he was cancer-ridden and could die at any moment.

Finally, Trotsky would be known today as a Democratic Socialist, who absolutely could have lead the USSR into an early version of the Nordic countries, had he not been forced into exile.

That and being murdered.

More replies

Stalinism was every bit as bad as Naziism. The body counts, the brutality, the ideological purges. Same guy in two different coats. The only reason history reads any different is that the Nazis lost.

u/IzK_3 avatar

Atrocious take

More replies
More replies

Both Kinda either fall into the America Bad camp or the America Isolationist philosophy.

Left wing supporters think they can do communism right this time, remember that russia was communist and therefore as the leader of a (formerly) communist nation Putin is going to spread communism that works across the globe. Just pay no attention to the bodies.

Right wing supporters recognise Putin for the authoritarian scumbag dictator that he is. The thought of a strapping, muscular person oppressing the masses makes them weak at the knees, because they too yearn to oppress and rule the world, conveniently forgetting that authoritarian dictators don't get to where they are by sharing power and coexisting with anyone. Also pay no attention to all the bodies.

Edited

From what I've seen a lot of the "left-wing" support tends to be from people whose ideology can be summed up as West Bad(tm), moreso than actual communists.

But tankies and vindictive weirdos hardly qualify as left-wing half the time anyway, so-

u/thundercoc101 avatar

That's what I was thinking, as an anarchist I don't call tanky's leftist. They're just fascist with red paint

u/AvenRaven avatar

Technically that's Red Fascism/National Bolshevikism (Nazbol), but regular Bolsheviks fit that pretty well most of the time so I'm just splitting hairs.

Funny enough a lot of the unironically Nazbol Russians would become the “4th positionists” or Duganists which is yet another actual founding ideology Putin believes in

The Bolsheviks murdered the actual socialists in their own country. The Socialist-Revolutionary Party ate shit the same as everyone else. Either right then, if they didn't immediately surrender, in the case of the Right-SRs, or in the next twenty years, as all the senior leadership of the Left-SRs that joined up was later purged.

More replies
More replies
u/Sasquatch1729 avatar

With these "lefties" it's the political equivalent of substituting nostalgia for having ideology.

"Remember when the USSR was leading the world in creating a socialist paradise? Well when Putin brings that back, the communist/socialist paradise will be back."

Anyone with a clear view of the world recognizes that it's not true anymore and Russia is just an imperialist project at this point.

Like all nostalgia, it's all an illusion. Even during the Cold War, lefties (real lefties, not dumbass kids with red USSR flags on their dorm room walls) were questioning whether the USSR was a socialist or communist state or just an imperialist project with unlimited money for interventions in Afghanistan or Angola. France, West Germany, and Norway were better examples of a workers' paradise than the USSR.

Scratch a tankie, a fascist bleeds.

They are two sides of the same coin. They'd rather side with actual fascists than they would with other leftists or liberals.

More replies
u/Material_Lab6716 avatar

That's a pretty well thought out response. Intriguing.

I'm curious to know who the right-wing supporters of Putin are.

Pick pretty much any republican politician.

So, you don't have an example. Gotcha.

How do you not know what the word example means?

more replies More replies
More replies
More replies
More replies
More replies
u/hiebertw07 avatar
Edited

Progressive here. I get hate from within my own circles from the Ukraine thing a ton and it largely circles around a misguided concept of 'warmongering.'

Ukraine has a history going back to the era of the Golden Horde. It is it's own country with its own sovereignty and free will. Helping them protect that from invadors isn't warmongering.

It’s hilarious how everyone seems to have the wrong opposing Ukraine opinion. Like, very rarely anymore is it pointing out the widespread corruption inherent of a post USSR state, it’s all become just splitting hairs and “russia NOT bad”

I think people have just realized that even if Ukraine is ran by people whom are unapologetically corrupt, that doesn’t mean they should be slaughtered by an even more corrupt expansionist regime

The problem is the very same people who "use the Ukraine is corrupt" issue as an excuse not to help Ukraine are very supportive of an even more corrupt country (Russia). They don't oppose corruption, they just love Russia.

But yes Ukraine is indeed corrupt, which is why I favour Ukrainian membership within the EU. The EU has made it clear that one of the conditions of EU membership is to try and decrease corruption. EU membership would massively help Ukraine in reducing corruption. It won't eradicate it fully though, as of course countries like Italy and Hungary are EU members, both nations are notorious for corruption themselves.

Yeah this is by far the most objectively correct opinion to have. It’s like seeing a guy who got arrested for 1st degree murder, and a guy arrested for tax fraud, and arguing they’re both the same. Like no, not at all, the murderer is objectively far worse.

EU membership would resolve much of the corruption as well, since a large amount of it is just general embezzlement, so EU oversight of economic processes would discourage most of it. Mfs will bring up corruption in Ukraine like Russia is some open and honest government with no corruption like my brother in christ the country literally siphoned all of its money to like 10 people and sold half of the military’s shit while lying about it just to siphon even more money into those people’s bank accounts.

I think Kissinger said it best, "Can't they both lose?"

More replies
More replies
More replies
More replies

If you ever watch russian media you will often see contradictory positions within the same show and voiced by the same person. There is a very deliberate Russian social engineering strategy.At play here , which is basically throw everything at the wall and create such a cloud of confusing information that people either tune it out or they find the thing that they want to believe in and the latch onto it.

This has been weaponized in the age of social media by allowing them to target groups with radical political opinions and just keep feeding them talking points. It doesn't really matter if their political opinions that they agree with because the point is not to create a loyal base just to create enough disunion within opponents that they can't act on the world stage.

Like others have said, Putin's online and offline propaganda machine collects from the fringes. On the far left, Russia stands as the inheritor of the Soviet Union which has acquired a mythos of being anti-Imperialist (despite being an aggressive expansionist colonial power). On the right, Putin and Russia epitomizes "might makes right" that the strong may do as they want and the weak must suffer what they must, and his jackbooted authoritarian tendencies draped in religiosity is what many on the right in western countries want for their own homeland. Naturally these are all useful idiots to the ideologically bankrupt Kremlin whose only interest is concentrating more wealth and power into Putin and his inner circles' hands.

u/lizardman49 avatar

Tankies are susceptible to any anti western propaganda

u/Much_Horse_5685 avatar
Edited

Pro-Putin right-wingers are fellow fascists like him, and tend to see him as a “based Christian traditional conservative” ally against the “(((woke cultural Marxist globohomo)))” or whatever the fuck.

Pro-Putin left-wingers either support Putin out of blind anti-Western contrarianism or, in some cases, unironically think that by attempting to restore a Russian empire Putin is attempting to re-establish the USSR.

The right wingers that support him do it because the left doesn't, and their s so politically minded to not be able to agree on anything.

u/No-Dream7615 avatar

The irony of that one for me is that he is just the west’s branch manager, installed after the weakness of the 90s to keep a firm hand on Russia’s nukes and the oil flowing. Ppl knew since 2000 or 2002 that he organized the false flags attacks that served as a pretext for the second Chechen war. The west only got sick of his bad behavior after 2014. This whole conflict is him just trying to leverage a better deal for Russia in its role as Europe’s gas station. 

Meanwhile Putin is a liberal multiculturalist who does everything the American right accuses Obama and Biden of doing. He has been replacing ethnic Russians with central asian  immigrants at a faster clip than demographic change is happening in the west.  He tolerates plenty of cosmopolitan decadence and europeanness in St. Petersburg and Moscow in exchange for the consent of the professional-managerial class.  If the right were applying their own viewpoint coherently they’d determine that this is a globohomo civil war and they should be rooting for Putin to lose and be replaced by a right-wing nationalist like Girkin. 

More replies
More replies

Most right and left winger have one politics and that is america Bad

u/Zucrous avatar

Horseshoe theory

u/thundercoc101 avatar

See, as a anarchist I completely reject horseshoe theory. I don't think communist specifically Marxist leniness are leftist at all

The only coherent aspect of ‘horseshoe theory’ is how certain elements are authoritarian (but this is true across the political ‘spectrum’—not just the fringes). It’s like the USSR banning 1984 for being anti-communist and the US banning it for being pro-communist. It’s neither. It’s anti-authoritarian and, as such, contains its own anti-capitalist/anti-communist framework.

More replies

My opinion, because both sides with people like that want to see America collapse because they don't want to put any work into actually creating a better society, and it's a lot easier to say BURN IT TO THE GROUND REVOLUTION ANARCHY, than it is to actually do something productive in your community.

u/Fuzzy_Lavishness_269 avatar

Because low IQ political analysts think that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”.

Taking turns to arm the Taliban

More replies
u/Vegetable-Election77 avatar

Putin carefully crafted Ostalgia for Russia. He brought some symbols, the national anthem and the hard rule typical of the ussr. To many Russians, putin’s authority is seen as stabilizing and as a comfort after the circus that was the 90s in Russia.

Putin knows he is right winged, he knows he is taking Soviet imagery for the sake of nostalgia.

You don’t need to look further

Here in belgium we have the radical left open communist PVDa who is VERY anti nato and anti-military support for ukraine. They have hidden their agenda now but when the war started it was very sus how pro russian their replies were.

And then we have extreme right nationalist Vlaams belang. Recently been caught taking money from china. And also the same very sus anti ukrainian comments like PVDa. And one of them has been caught taking money from Russia.

Both these parties are .... *flips in book of insults.

Hm...Twatholes.

Lefties that support him think Russia is still communist and fall for big evil imperial west that Russia is fighting against as Russia has NEEEVER been an imperial power.

The righties that support him think only Ukraine is corrupt, misunderstand what is meant by a 40 billion package, thinking it's 40 billion coming from the budget, and like the fact Putin hates minorities, Muslims and LGBT.

Leftwingers - Western imperialism is the ultimate evil, if Eastern imperialism opposes it then it's good. See Noam Chomsky.

Rightwingers - Putin is the anti'woke defender of traditional Christian values even though hes an atheist.

Not sure which is dumber.

Isolationist antiwoke right wingers who have room temp IQ and whose optical views begin and end at the culture wars. Reagan-Bush era neocons (the establishment) are anti Putin.

I would argue that people who are pro Putin on the left are not actually leftists. They are red fash. Authoritarians who happen to have communist aesthetics. They are more common on reddit than in real life. They have taken over the mod teams of most "leftist" subs and ban any anti Putin talk as "liberal".

Its what happens when your leftist politics begins and ends with "America bad." They aren't much different to the culture war MAGA idiots. Lack of critical theory hits both equally.

u/SecureSympathy1852 avatar

Psychopathy is apolitical.

Tankies think Russia is still the USSR

u/Cultural-General4537 avatar

Cause onlibe propaganda works. Simple as that. 

u/Dapper-Stranger-7563 avatar

Severe lack of historical context

u/ReasonIllustrious418 avatar

The rightwingers are butthurt they lost the 2020 Election and think that under anybody who isn't Trump America is a "lost cause" even though under Trump US forces in Syria killed a bunch of Wagner mercs, Trump's administration was the first to actually arm Ukraine, and the US presence in Poland was so heavily beefed up the Polish wanted to name a base Fort Trump.

The rightwingers don't know jack shit about what actually happened during the 2017-2021 timeframe because they don't care about history and just care about "owning the libs".

u/Alternative_Oil7733 avatar

Maybe just maybe it's because people are afraid of going into a war with Russia and I'm pretty sure the us population is sick of wars in the middle east.

More replies

“Left wing” support for Putin makes no sense. Either the lefty in question is confused about authoritarianism, or they’re confused about Putin’s ‘beliefs’. He’s not a communist. He’s not a socialist. He’s a delusional authoritarian with no real ideology.