De Facto Segregation | Definition, History & Examples
Where was de facto segregation used?
De facto segregation was used in many areas throughout U.S. history. Schools were segregated across the South as well as other public areas. Homes and residential areas also experienced many de facto segregation practices like redlining.
What is the difference between de facto and de jure segregation?
In Latin, 'de facto' means 'in fact' or 'in reality'; 'de jure' means 'in law'. De jure segregation refers to the lawful separation of people, while de facto segregation refers to the separation of groups 'naturally' as a result of racism such as in schools and neighborhoods.
De Facto Segregation was a term used in the 1960s during the fight for the desegregation of public schools. The De Facto Segregation definition means that people are segregated into separate areas by fact rather than by law or policy. The "de facto" concept usually outlines what is actually occurring in reality rather than what should be taking place in reference to the law. The Latin term de facto translates to "in fact" in English. The de facto segregation concept was part of the wider issue of de facto discrimination. What is de facto discrimination? The de facto discrimination definition means that discriminatory practices, like segregation, are occurring in a manner that is not subject to the law. De facto discrimination happens when discriminatory practices are prevalent that are not part of any legislation but are observed by the majority of the people.
History of De Facto Segregation
De facto segregation has a long history in the U.S. with most practices being centered around de facto racism. Discrimination and segregation have roots in the slave trade from the early 17th century in America. Most colonies and then eventually states used slaves in agricultural labor. Slave quarters and areas of work were often segregated from the rest of society. Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 that outlawed slavery. The passing of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments made slavery illegal and protected their civil rights like voting after they became free. To combat former slaves from having rights, some states issued what was known as Jim Crow Laws that set up de facto racism policies to oppress Black people outside the reach of federal laws. Jim Crow Laws were de facto discrimination laws that prevented, or limited, access to certain rights such as voting and property ownership.
De facto segregation practices became law in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson 1896. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of segregation in public areas citing the principle of "separate but equal" as constitutional. The ruling in the case created the de jure, or by law, segregation. Almost 60 years after the Plessy case, the Brown v. Board of Education 1954 case ruling overturned the Plessy decision. In the Brown v. Board case, the Supreme Court found that segregation in public schools and public areas was unconstitutional. The Court decided that the "separate but equal" de jure concept was not fair to segregated people and organizations. However, the ruling inspired the move back to de facto segregation practices to stall the rights being given to minorities.
De Facto Discrimination Examples
A common de facto discrimination example was when states or local jurisdictions segregated public areas, like schools, based on race. Many school districts in the south would consist of two schools, Black and white. The Black schools were notoriously underfunded compared to their in-district white school counterparts.
Another de facto segregation example was in residential matters. Redlining was a term used in real estate and neighborhoods that indicated which neighborhoods were the best choices for certain races. Many neighborhoods were segregated in this way, and some still are.
There were many de facto examples of segregation that existed in voting during the Civil Rights Era. These were often part of the Jim Crow Laws that made access to voting and voting itself more difficult for racial minorities. Some states and towns utilized a writing test, poll taxes, grandfather clauses, and other methods that encouraged de facto racism.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
De jure counters de facto because de jure means policies or practices that have been lawfully ordained and that are followed. De jure vs. de facto segregation policies tended to swing back and forth during the Civil Rights Era. There were many de jure segregation policies that persisted throughout U.S. history but most never held reality until later on in the late 1960s. De jure often clashed with de facto segregation policies because there may have been a federal law in place, but local ordinances held stronger authority through de facto segregation.
An example of this is when Brown v. Board was decided, the court made segregation illegal. However, many states did not follow the decision and many districts stalled in enforcing the desegregation policies. By the 1960s, states and local jurisdictions were still holding out against the segregation policy. The federal government wanted segregation to end with haste. Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which created many federal laws aiming to end legal segregation in the U.S. and solidify the rights of several minority groups.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Register to view this lesson
Unlock Your Education
See for yourself why 30 million people use Study.com
Become a Study.com member and start learning now.
Become a MemberAlready a member? Log In
BackResources created by teachers for teachers
I would definitely recommend Study.com to my colleagues. It’s like a teacher waved a magic wand and did the work for me. I feel like it’s a lifeline.