Talk:Brigadier general (United States)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject Military history (Rated C-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
C This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality assessment scale.
Additional information...
Exquisite-kfind.png
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:
  1. Red x.svg Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Orange check.svg Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Orange check.svg Structure: criterion met
  4. Orange check.svg Grammar: criterion met
  5. Orange check.svg Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces (general topics):
Sunset Taps.jpg
Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
North America satellite orthographic.jpg
North American military history task force
United States Arms.svg
United States military history task force
WikiProject United States / Military history (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
C This article has been rated as C-Class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
 

Requested move[edit]

Brigadier General (United States)Brigadier general (United States) — To conform with the grammar guidelines set forth by Wiki:MOSCAPSNeovu79 (talk) 03:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments: Neovu79 (talk) 03:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Support Wiki:MOSCAPS states: Military ranks follow the same capitalization guidelines as titles (see above). Thus, one would write "Brigadier General John Smith", or "John Smith was a brigadier general". While general use of ranks is most commonly in front of an officer's name, in article form, and grammar, ranks are not capitalized. The U.S. Code of law also use standardized grammar specifically 10 U.S.C. § 3281 which establishes regular ranks for federal uniformed officers. Neovu79 (talk) 03:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The information in the History subsection was moved from Brigadier General#United States and is not the work of myself. All information is credited to the original auther(s). Neovu79 (talk) 08:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Support, although I would prefer a solution like this one through centralized discussion (but then again, the MOS can be considered a centralized discussion of course). Fram (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Command of a Brigadier General[edit]

Would it be fair to say a Brigadier General is always in command of a Brigade? Is often in command of...? Is typically in command of...? The article should tell us what the typical command is for this rank. It probably should do this for every rank. —MiguelMunoz (talk) 18:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]