Bad Times at the El Royale (2018) - Bad Times at the El Royale (2018) - User Reviews - IMDb
1,037 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Bad Times at the El Royale review
JoeytheBrit3 July 2020
While the situation may (or may not) have been lifted from Tarantino, the style of writing belongs to writer-director Drew Goddard, who creates a small world with only a passing relationship to our own. Five strangers and a hotel clerk meet at the deserted El Royale, and each has a secret that will be exposed on the long, stormy - and ultimately violent - night that follows. It's intriguing - if a little slow - to begin with, but runs out of steam with the arrival of Chris Hemsworth as a Manson-like cult leader with the haziest of agendas. There are some decent twists, though - and one truly terrifying jump scare - and Jeff Bridges steals every scene that he's in.
46 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Actually Writing A Script
boblipton15 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A man enters a motel room, moves all the furniture, rolls up the rug, pries open the floor, drops a satchel into the hole, puts everything back in place, hangs around, answers the door and is blown to smithereens.

Ten years later, a priest, a traveling salesman, a girl singer and an angry hippie chick are checked into the El Royale motel by a deaf hotel clerk. Only one of them is what he or she claims to be.

It's an elaborately, almost flamboyantly written neo-noir. Clearly writer-director Drew Goddard has seen Quentin Tarrantino's pictures and has learned his stye of writing a movie: take a bunch of great shots, and write a script that gets from one to the next. Add in some shock value and a great setting -- the Arte Moderne El Royale is clearly modeled on the Cal-Neva Lodge, the glitzy hotel half in California and half in Nevada, that was bought by Sinatra and Dean Martin fronting for the Mafia. A great music track is necessary -- 1960s girl-band hits. Where he has bettered Tarrantino -- with whom I have reached my limit -- is that it's not necessary to go all potty-mouth all the time, and if you can't remember a great shot to steal, why, you can write your own.

Gasp! What an insane idea! Thanks to cinematographer Seamus McGarvey, composer Michael Giacchino and the other talent behind the camera, as well as a solid cast led by Jeff Bridges, it works very well... although about ten minutes from the end something bumped my concentration to make it clear all this was scripted. In sum, there's nothing absolutely original about this movie, but it's pretty well put together and will keep you guessing until the end.
43 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"Sh_t happens. Get the whiskey!"
classicsoncall10 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Whoa, pleasant surprise here! The movie delivered a lot more than I was expecting with a title like "Bad Times at the El Royale". Seems like Jeff Bridges can't miss ever since "Crazy Heart", with follow up grizzled, ornery characterizations in "Rooster Cogburn" and "Hell or High Water". He was great here as the dementia challenged old timer bent on reclaiming an old score from ten years prior during a robbery that went South. But he's not alone among a cast that includes relative newcomer Cynthia Erivo, Jon Hamm, Dakota Johnson and Chris Hemsworth, who provides an additional layer of intensity with an appearance late in the story. Part of my fondness for the film comes from an appreciation for Tarantino-esque story telling with a non-linear chronology, which was very effective here and not too difficult to follow.

What really got my attention in the early going was when Calhoun Appliance salesman Laramie Seymour Sullivan (Hamm) placed a call to J. Edgar Hoover at the FBI..., wait, what? Then it gets weirder and weirder with the El Royale's secret passage containing two way mirrors, listening devices and secret recording equipment. The principal story takes place in the mid to late Sixties, with a very satisfying soundtrack recalling some of the big hits of the era, which nicely redounds to Cynthia Erivo's character, a promising lounge singer attempting to make it big with nearby casino bookings. But as the viewer, you're never quite sure what direction the story is going in until the all but invisible Billy Lee (Hemsworth) shows up in the sixth chapter to turn things upside down.

So with a lot of twists and turns and some unconventional characters, the film turned out to be a pleasant surprise for this viewer, who hadn't heard anything about it until running across the title at my local library. I'd strongly recommend it except for the fact that it won't be appreciated by anyone turned off by chronologically challenged stories with less than savory characters. That would be like getting whacked in the head with a whiskey bottle, which by the way, figures prominently in a particularly jarring scene. One of the many surprises in a film full of them.
35 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a late great showing from Jeff Bridges
christopher-underwood8 November 2020
For the most part this is a really good, if not excellent film, with a fantastic central performance from Jeff Bridges, ably supported with an equally compelling performance from Londoner Cynthia Erivo who I recently saw in Stephen King's The Outside TV series. beautifully shot and confidently and surely constructed to have us spellbound but not fully aware of just what is going on. Is it the hotel that is weird or just the people? Jon Hamm is great in the early stages and looked a bit like a young Robert de Niro. Things really only go wrong, for me, in the last half hour. The film is certainly some fifteen minutes too long and there is simply too much time allowed for Chris Hemsworth to unconvincingly develop his character and similarly with Lewis Pullman who had been great as the hapless bellboy cum hotel manager but with whom we spend a little too long in the end. Disappointing end or not this is well worth a watch and always going to be worth it for a late great showing from Jeff Bridges, and those 60s songs where even just a line or two can be surprisingly effective, indeed it is 'strange how potent cheap music is.'
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
special
Kirpianuscus15 September 2019
It is a surprising , perfect puzzle. All is familiar. And you feel that more than you know. The build up is incredible, the mix of western, policier, horror and adventure, war and Tarantino, conspiracy theory, few drops of Scorsese and few crumbs of romance are almost incredible. A film admirable crafted. And that - from impecable story to the acting are ingredients defining it as real special.
43 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Generally likeable
Leofwine_draca26 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
BAD TIMES AT THE EL ROYALE is a generally likeable crime thriller that keeps you guessing for a while before letting rip with a high-energy climax. It's another single location type movie set in the lobby and various rooms of a slightly sleazy motel, but the good news is that it's a lot more intelligent than Tarantino's similar HATEFUL EIGHT. The first half takes a little while to get going with character stories presented as sub-plots that mingle together in a way similar to the likes of 11:14, although not quite as good. The ending really picks up with actors such as Jeff Bridges and Chris Hemsworth shining in against-type roles, and the unknown-to-me cast members pull off effective performances too. Not quite a classic, but still a fun way to spend an hour or two.
34 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
You will love it or hate it, most likely.
zhammons-2105829 February 2020
Just watched this for the first time after stumbling across it on demand. Figured I would give it a chance, since I loved Cabin in the Woods and Jeff Bridges is one of my favorite actors. I'm no film major or snooty critic, just a guy that enjoys movies. It is definitely a film that pays homage to QT, Coen Bros, etc, but I don't think it is trying to be one of their films as others have said. I'm impressed when a director can pull off an interesting story that takes place in a small setting, such as Hateful Eight, Cloverfield Lane, Devil, Insomnia etc. At nearly 2.5 hours, I didn't feel like the movie was too long, and there were several twists to keep it interesting. I believe all good artists are influenced by their predecessors, but they also put their own spin on it. I think if you are a fan of the above directors, you will enjoy the movie. Just don't try and hold it to QT standards.
107 out of 121 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Engaging all the way through
Genti2630 December 2018
It baffles me that this movie did not get better reviews than it did. Bad Times at the El Royale, is incredible, as the story is intriguing and all the actors get your attention with Chris Hemsworth standing out at the end. The action scenes are great, the cinematography and the soundtrack also stand out a lot. This is just a fun movie all the way through and to me personally, it is one of the best films of the year.
51 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It keeps you engaged from beginning to end. Before comparing it to Tarantino style films pls watch Jean-Luc Godard's films.
Fella_shibby23 December 2018
The film starts with a man moving all the items of a hotel room in one corner, he then removes the carpet n the floorboards, stashes a bag underneath n puts back all the things in place. After he has finished his mysterious work..... Fast forward ten years n destiny brings together a group of people who all end up at this same hotel on a dark rainy night due to different circumstances. Comparison to The Identity is present but please do not compare it to Tarantino style films jus cos it has a nonlinear approach. Fellas who r comparing the nonlinear film style to Tarantino's films ain't aware of Jean-Luc Godard, the pioneer of nonlinear filmmaking. Is it a coincidence that the surname of the director of this film too is Goddard. Drew Goddard is in full Jean-Luc Godard-esque mood. Attention is required as every person at the El Royale has a story n the background story of all the characters were properly interwined. Some of the scenes r way too slow n the editing needed some post production work. Jus few days back i saw Chronicles of the Ghostly tribe n i wrote in its review that the flashbacks were confusing n not at all gripping but in El Royale the flashbacks were intriguing n not at all confusing. The film is visually striking and offers a high level of ambience. It has lots of eerie mood, good suspense, a great sense of dread throughout. The background story of one of the character which is shown towards the end is a bit shocking n well placed. The owners of the hotel remained mystery but that is another story.....
175 out of 274 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Settle in, it's gonna be a long night.
Mr-Fusion17 June 2023
A pretty solid crime thriller with loads of retro cool, a well-stocked cast and gorgeous cinematography - and a glut of extraneous flashbacks. If Bad Times at the El Royale has a weakness, it's pacing. It's not a problem during the opening act, as the hotel's emptiness (as well as who the hell are these people?) offers ample intrigue. Plus, there are the sets, I mean this looks incredible. But eventually night falls, backstories start piling up and ... it's enough already.

I have the same problem with El Royale that I did with The Hateful Eight; lots of talent and craft put into the film overall, but it's never again as good as its opening.

And absurdly long-winded.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An absolute cracker
neil-47621 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
It is the 1960s. The El Royale hotel/motel/casino sits on the California/Nevada border. Staffed only by youngster Miles, a number of guests arrive. Each has a secret, and no-one is quite who they might appear to be at first sight. A very eventful night is under way.

This noir crime(ish) thriller starts with an intriguing opening scene before settling down to tell the main story. This is peppered with backstory flashbacks for the various characters, small narrative rewinds so that you can see events from alternative points of view, and a succession of reveals and plot developments which have you constantly on the wrong foot.

It is a narrative delight. I love to be kept unsettled, and this throws things at you which you never anticipated, yet never unfairly. You might not have had any warning, and to that extent you can cry "Deus ex machina!" but such elements are not inconsistent with what has happened previously.

The script was fun. The casting and performances are uniformly great. And the direction is excellent - the film looks great. For a long film - the exact same length as First Man - the time fairly zips by.

Others have compared this with Tarantino. Not me - it doesn't have that smug self-reverential air to it which characterises Tarantino's films.

This is one of my favourite films this year.
42 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Surprisingly good
abenezerberhanu24 December 2018
I didn't expect much from this movie when i started it but it was very interesting and good. The story is pretty interesting and the build up is also perfect. It keeps you waiting shrouding you with mystery. The cast is perfect. Personally i thought Jeff bridge's performance was perfect. The other cast also give a solid performance. All in all the movie is very enjoyable and i definitely recommend it
290 out of 373 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great until it's Not.
truemythmedia18 June 2019
I really wanted to like this movie. For about the first hour, I really did, but by about the two-hour mark I was ready for the film to end, and by the time the credits rolled I found myself walking from the theater slightly disappointed. "Bad Times at the El Royale" was written and directed by Drew Goddard ("Cabin in the Woods"), a man whose work I've been largely split on, but whenever he hits the nail on the head, his stuff really works for me. This film started off great; there were lots of great twists and turns, memorable and diverse characters, and a mysterious premise. But as the film rolled on, and the character's secrets were unveiled, I found myself growing disenfranchised with the film. Goddard continuously hints at darker things happening, but he never really delivered what he promises. The movie felt like it was trying to emulate the overlapping storylines of "Pulp Fiction", and even some of the dialogue felt like it was Tarantino-esque, but Goddard never quite reaches the level of snappiness Tarantino infuses into his films. Goddard's writing seems uneven; some of the lengthy dialogue scenes are great, while others are dull, borderline boring.
23 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great watch
phulla10 April 2021
For me this had a Tarantino style, but looking on IMDB realised it wasn't a Tarantino film.

Interesting characters, good plot build up and development of characters and story, Tarantino style transitions, keeps you interested and guessing all the way towards the end of the film. Some great acting from obviously great actors.

It's worth watching, great entertainment. I enjoyed this like most of Tarantino films and I suppose well done to Drew Goddard for writing and directing this film.
24 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good times had seeing Bad Times
jg_197713 October 2018
First off let me say, Bat Times at the El Royale is most certainly not for everyone. The way the story unfolds and how information is withheld/presented is quite complex. Although this may make it a bit too convoluted for some, it makes it an absolute treat for anyone willing to dig beneath the surface and get analytical. Not unlike Cabin in the Woods (Drew Goddard's directorial debut), Bad Times plays with your expectations. Goddard takes painstaking care to build tension throughout a scene, only to have it all upended by a sudden twist. For that reason, I anticipate the reaction to this film will be divided, as many moviegoers simply don't like surprises or being unsure of what will happen. However, if you are a fan of Goddard's previous work, it's a safe bet that you'll like this one. I also need to talk about the cast, as they deliver an absolute treasure of an ensemble performance. Each person plays their part incredibly well, but Cynthia Erivo and Chris Hemsworth are the definite stand outs. Hemsworth especially shines, showing us that he can do more than play a quippy Norse god. This movie has so much to unpack both visually and in terms of foreshadowing that I cannot wait to see it again. If you're looking for a smart, stylish, and generally thrilling way to spend a few hours, look no further than Bad Times at the El Royale.
164 out of 247 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
too many MacGuffins
SnoopyStyle26 December 2018
It's 1969 Lake Tahoe on the border between California and Nevada. El Royale is an empty destination motorlodge with its best days well behind it. Four strangers check in with the hotel's only employee Miles Miller. Catholic priest Daniel Flynn, singer Darlene Sweet, salesman Laramie Seymour Sullivan, and Emily Summerspring arrive with some hiding secrets.

This is a stylish pulpy noir action thriller from Drew Goddard. I do like most of it but there is a little too much of it. I'm not sure if it needs the tape. There're like two MacGuffins. Concentrating on one MacGuffin usually works better. When Billy Lee shows up, it gets to be craziness overload. At that point, I want the characters to gather in one place and have a climatic conflict. I don't really want to insert another character. Drew obviously expects that more is better. It's a little too more.
32 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Strong build up but doesn't quite deliver
Floated219 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Having heard much praise about this film following its release and since it didn't do well at the box office, it has been labeled as "underrated" and a "hidden gem".

The film starts off interesting and quite different and engaging, when we get introduced to the characters. We expect things to get crazy and unexpected but most that happened was quite predictable and tame. Of course once a character does get killed, things start to get out of hand and we see the other characters panicking and the mystery does start but the film never quite delivers greatness.

Once Chris Hemsworth's character enters with his own title card scene, the film slows and drags down. A decent performance but the film does downhill from here.

The final 20 minutes weren't that great either, and we were left with a disappointing and predictable ending, with a typical gun fight showdown type ending killing all but two of the lead characters. Was expecting some major twists and turns.

Bad Times isn't a great movie or a bad movie but given its hype, it was somewhat disappointing and expected a better finish.
41 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Astounding!
UniqueParticle2 June 2019
Originally saw this in theaters which even then I loved it! Drew Goddard directed this masterpiece and "Cabin in the woods", another masterpiece in my opinion. This felt like a stylish new generation of classic films. I love the entire cast especially Jeff Bridges and Chris Hemsworth! Such a grand beautiful piece of art with a great soundtrack. Superb experience -- highly recommend!
34 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Twisty crime drama...
AlsExGal31 December 2022
...from 20th Century Fox and writer-director Drew Goddard. Circa 1972, various characters, including a doddering priest (Jeff Bridges), a struggling singer (Cynthia Erivo), a traveling salesman (Jon Hamm), and an anti-social mystery woman (Dakota Johnson), converge on the title locale, a former hot spot that straddles the California/Nevada border that has started to go to seed. Each person has their own reasons for being there, and most are not what they profess. Their secrets are revealed over one long, stormy, bloody night.

Goddard was responsible for the excellent horror genre send-up The Cabin in the Woods back in 2011, and this is his long-awaited follow-up. It's nowhere near as good, in my opinion, but fans of crime thrillers going in with diminished expectations will find a watch worthwhile. Bridges is very good, as is Cynthia Erivo, who I wasn't familiar with but who, at the time of release, garnered a lot of awards buzz for her performance here. I also liked Lewis (son of Bill) Pullman as the hotel's struggling sole employee in attendance.

The movie starts to fall flat in the last stretch, when Chris Hemsworth, as a Manson-esque cult leader, shows up and the film's former momentum grinds to a screeching halt. I don't dislike Hemsworth normally, but he's all sculpted abs and chiseled looks, and his character needed a bit more than that to make the last act compelling.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
American ( A+ Movie) My Ratings 8/10
THE-BEACON-OF-MOVIES-RAFA11 December 2021
Thrills, mystery, and suspense hit the mark. A cool flick of the Grand Hotel genre done for the modern dark side with excellent cast and direction. This was a box office flop? Do yourself a favor and watch. Loved it.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good times watching Bad Times
JohnDeSando12 October 2018
Writer/director Drew Goddard's Bad Times at the El Royale is a long and entertaining sendup of Quentin Tarantino's crime world (think Hateful 8 and Pulp Fiction), post-Tarantino caper movies, and a bit of Hitchcock for suspense. It's the late 60's when eccentric characters converge on the seedy El Royale motel to recover cash from a heist 10 years ago hidden under the floorboards of a room.

By far the most interesting visitor is Father Daniel Flynn, aka Dock O'Kelly (Jeff Bridges), who set the heist in motion back then, did time for it, and returns to the half-closed motel to recover the loot. As symbol of a corrupt society that still clings to some semblance of religiosity, Flynn navigates the other crooks with caution.

Until the incarnation of the devil, or at least Charles Manson, arrives, Billy Lee (Chris Hemsworth), muscled and amoral but not loath to preach about a simple life for his devotees and seek the money for himself. With the motel's roaring fireplaces enfolding these untrustworthy survivors, Goddard must surely be thinking of hell on earth as earthlings grapple for lucre.

Surprises abound (be careful with that shotgun!), and not all the players make it out alive. Heck, even undercover cops are vulnerable. And women, watch out, for the bad girls are trigger happy. The exception is a lounge singer, Darlene Sweet (impressive Tony winner, Cynthia Erivo), who needs to hookup with the corrupt priest to escape this hell, but with loot.

The location is Lake Tahoe on the border of Nevada and California, a figurative crossroads for everyone, where the wrong step can take you to life or death. I'm beginning to sound like Twilight Zone's Rod Serling, and rightfully so because there's a claustrophobia to these surroundings, wherein the sins of mankind are scrutinized for their immorality, where redemption is rare, and a lesson can be learned.

As Father Flynn candidly comments, "I'm Old. S**t happens. Get the whiskey." That's Goddard's charmingly amoral world, where even a priest has issues.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A long way around the hotel for no real payoff
BandSAboutMovies15 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Remember when Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction made their initial splash for Quentin Tarantino and studios rushed to get their own chopped up narrative films in theaters? Killing Zoe, 8 Heads in a Duffel Bag, 2 Days in the Valley, Smoking Aces and plenty more, it seemed like everyone was trying to make a movie that didn't follow a linear track, had overly erudite killers with a skewed moral code and plenty of strange MacGuffins. As if 1992 was back again, I threw Bad Times at the El Royale into our blu ray player and sat back to watch.

One night in 1969, on the California/Nevada border, seven strangers all spend the night in a shady hotel -- the El Royale itself. The hotel -- which has seen better days -- is split in half between the two states and is pretty much a "pervert hotel" now, although once it was home to the Rat Pack when they weren't in Reno or Las Vegas (the hotel is based on the Cal Neva Resort and Casino that was once owned by Sinatra).

Catholic priest Daniel Flynn (Jeff Bridges), singer Darlene Sweet (Cynthia Erivo, the best part of this movie), vacuum salesman Laramie Seymour Sullivan (Jon Hamm) and Emily Summerspring (Dakota Johnson) all arrive and wait for the hotel's only worker, Miles Miller (Lewis Pullman).

Much like Tarantino, each section of the story overlaps and features title cards. It starts with the reveal that Sullivan is really an FBI agent who was sent to remove listening devices in one of the rooms. After finding double digits worth of them, he also discovers a tunnel filled with one-way mirrors and cameras that film everything in each room. Although he witnesses what he thinks is a kidnapping in Emily's room, he is told by no less than J. Edgar Hoover himself to not interfere and to sabotage all of the vehicles so that no one can leave until he finds a critical piece of film. However, he can't stop himself from trying to rescue Emily's captive, who ends up being her sister, Rose (Cailee Spaeny). Emily ends up blowing him away with a shotgun.

Meanwhile...

Father Flynn and Sweet have dinner at the hotel's automat diner. She notices him spiking her drink, so she knocks him out and tries to escape. As she watches Emily murder Sullivan, he recovers and discovers the hidden hallway and Miles confesses that the management of the hotel has asked him to film incriminating moments. However, he has kept one film that incriminates a recently killed public figure. As Miles watches the hostage situation in Emily's room, he catches buckshot from her killing Sullivan right in the face.

Sweet tries to escape, but the cars have all been played with. Father Flynn gets into her car and reveals that he's really a criminal who has spent the last ten years in jail only to learn that he has dementia. He knows that his brother (Nick Offerman) has hidden money in the hotel, but he has no idea which room it's in. He offers to split the money if she'll let him in her room. As she sings (this scene took over twenty takes of live singing), he finds the money.

Emily and Rose discover the tunnel and start to question Miles, who somehow survived. The older sister has removed the other from a cult run by Billy Lee (Chris Hemsworth, who even has his own Hairdresser to Mr. Hemsworth employee in the credits), a Manson-esque figure who is responsible for the killings we keep seeing on the TV in the hotel's bar. Even worse -- he's on his way to the El Royale.

The killer and his cult arrive, playing a brutal game of roulette with the lives of the survivors. After a Mexican standoff -- yes, another Quentin trope -- lives are lost, people are absolved and a few people survive.

This is 2 hours and 21 minutes long and the last act feels like forever, with near glacial pacing. At first, I defended it to my wife that everything was leading to this. However, it went on. And on. And then on some more.

This movie was written, produced and directed by Drew Goddard, who also directed The Cabin in the Woods as wrote Cloverfield and adapted World War Z for the screen. He was also part of Deadpool 2 and will be working on the next sequel, X-Force.

TV lovers will enjoy seeing William B. David (the Cigarette Smoking Man from The X-Files) show up as a judge and Jim O'Heir (Jerry from Parks and Recreation) as Reno host. These are simply cameos, but still nice to see these actors in a major movie.

Some may enjoy this film, but the more I thought of those unremarkable wannabe Tarantinos, the more this film felt like it fit right in. It's certainly not a bad film, but it's not one that you need to go out of your way to see. It just is. With time so limited these days, I feel like things have to be better than just fine.
25 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Must Watch
thomasjay-220114 October 2018
My most anticipated release for the rest of this month/year and it's fair to say I left satisfied, although taking a little while to get going pace wise with the majority of the opening being dialogue based once it gets going it's got no problem at all. Tense and odd but brilliantly executed the general plot is so interesting, Goddard pays magnificent attention to detail in every scene all of which becomes useful at a later stage and some of the action was strangely beautiful and original playing with lighting, environments and elements which I can honestly say I've never seen before. Shades of Tarantino and a lovely colour pallete this was a brilliant watch, Goddard strikes again I highly recommend you see this
65 out of 125 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Dark, fun, cool and entertaining as hell!
Darth_Osmosis10 October 2018
This movie is a wild ride. You will not know what happens next and be constantly on the edge of your seat. The cast is wonderful for this type of movie, everybody plays their character very well, and they all have an interesting backstory. The way they play off each other is also good and creates some very funny, intense and great moments. The setting is also brilliant and truly becomes a character on it's own! It is never boring and is beautifully shot, so it is always nice to look at. The story is told in a manner that makes it so it maintains it's momentum throughout. Very enjoyable and definitely worth a watch!
46 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wannabe Tarantino Film
Yee_Reviews1 October 2018
Good: The time period 1969 provides a great stylistic approach to a hotel that has property on both California and Nevada, which adds to the idea of having a good side and a bad side and the hotel also creates a sense of entrapment. The cinematography is great as it makes slow pans to unveil the secrets of the characters and the El Royale. The hotel, costume design, and soundtrack help create a nostalgic setting. The directing and editing are also well done when incorporating sound/music to scenes especially when Cynthia Ervio sings. Erivo's musical performance is filled with heart and soul and helps develop the character and conveys her emotions. Other standouts are Jeff Bridges and Chris Hemsworth. Hemsworth just has a charming presence and provides the slight dark tone of his character. Bridges plays his character well as he connects with Erivo and tries to execute his actions. However, the rest of the cast have trouble making their appearance known...

Bad: At a whopping 2h 20m runtime, the film is a slow burn where it takes a painstakingly long time to make it to the end and even the finale becomes a disappointment. At times it tries to be funny, but the humor is not a standout in this film. There is a lack of emotional pull to the characters which is evident in the finale where the characters are still not fully developed. The concept was there, but the creativity lacked, which ended up in poor execution.

Overall: Style over substance. I wanted to like this movie for the trailer was great with its editing, soundtrack, and cast, but does not live up to Drew Godard's directing predecessor "The Cabin in the Woods," or have the writing creativity from "The Martian." The film reminded me a lot of Quentin Tarantino films as it was divided into chapters and had the same style with flashback stories to gain background, however, I would rather watch "Hateful Eight," or any of Tarantino films that have excellent dialogue and action.

2.9/5 (Not fresh)
356 out of 663 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed