Consequentialist & Non-Consequentialist Views of Morality - Video & Lesson Transcript |

Consequentialist & Non-Consequentialist Views of Morality

Lesson Transcript
Christopher Muscato

Chris has a master's degree in history and teaches at the University of Northern Colorado.

Expert Contributor
Sasha Blakeley

Sasha Blakeley has a Bachelor's in English Literature from McGill University and a TEFL certification. She has been teaching English in Canada and Taiwan for seven years.

In normative ethics, one's actions are either moral or immoral, and this concept is further explored through a lens of either consequentialism or non-consequentialism. In this lesson, explore the differences between consequentialist and non-consequentialist views of morality. Updated: 11/10/2021

Morality of Actions

Actions speak louder than words. Talk is cheap. Action is eloquence. We hear these sorts of proverbs all the time. Clearly, we put a lot of emphasis on how people act, and many of us judge right or wrong by actions as well.

Well, there's actually a deep philosophical precedent for this. The philosophy that morals are determined by actions is called normative ethics. This is actually pretty prevalent in our society - just look at the justice system. We judge actions, not intentions. So normative ethics evaluate the morality of actions, but there's more to it than that.

You didn't think we were just going to leave it at normative ethics, did you? No, this is philosophy; there's always another layer to explore. And it's time to take action, specifically, taking a look at the competing theories of consequentialism and non-consequentialism.

An error occurred trying to load this video.

Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support.

Coming up next: Comparing Psychological & Ethical Egoism

You're on a roll. Keep up the good work!

Take Quiz Watch Next Lesson
Your next lesson will play in 10 seconds
  • 0:00 Morality of Actions
  • 1:03 Consequentialism
  • 2:54 Non-Consequentialism
  • 4:46 Lesson Summary
Save Save Save

Want to watch this again later?

Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course.

Log in or Sign up

Speed Speed


All right, we're entering one level within the normative ethics school of thought. While all normative ethics agree that morality is based in actions, there are different ways of viewing this. For example, how do you actually evaluate an action?

Well, here's one idea - how about judging morality of an action by the consequences it creates? We call this theory consequentialism. In this viewpoint, a moral action is one that produces a positive outcome, and an immoral action creates a negative outcome. A common way to express this is the end justifies the means, so if something will ultimately be beneficial, the action is moral.

Now, again, this is philosophy, so nothing's quite that simple. In consequentialism, the morality of an action is based on its consequence, but how do you define a consequence as negative or positive? There are a few basic divisions here. The first is personal. If an action is personally beneficial, some say that makes it moral. But what if that action hurts others? More commonly, consequentialism is judged by a larger consequence, sometimes by the impact on society, or the state, or the greater good in general.

One of the most common beliefs is in utilitarianism, or the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This idea recognizes that no action is universally beneficial, so the most moral action benefits the most number of people possible. But what if that action hurts the individual who has to make it? Is it still moral if there is a negative consequence for that person? And now, we're back where we started.


So how about we explore another side of this? The opposite of consequentialism is, unsurprisingly, non-consequentialism, although this could also be labeled as deontological ethics. From this viewpoint, the morality of an action is based on its adherence to accepted rules. So the outcome of the action doesn't really matter; what matters is, essentially, the intention.

To unlock this lesson you must be a Member.
Create your account

Additional Activities

Views of Morality: Explore Further

This lesson gave you an introduction to two schools of thought that fall under normative ethics: consequentialist and non-consequentialist morality. This can be a tricky subject, but you can use the following activities to learn more.

Be the Teacher

Consequentialist and non-consequentialist views of morality have different and complex definitions. Now that you have read this lesson, imagine that you are going to teach a class explaining these theories of morality. Write down in point-form what you will say to define each view of morality, making as little reference as possible to this lesson (come back if you get stuck!). For example, think about what questions your students might ask and how you would answer them.

Your Opinion

Now that you have heard about these two major schools of thought, which one do you think you agree with more? It's okay if you fall somewhere in between the two ideas, but give them both some thought. Think about some real life examples of each kind of morality in action. Write an essay explaining which view of morality you take and why.


This lesson briefly mentioned utilitarianism. Do some research on your own and see what more you can learn about this area of philosophy. Look up famous utilitarians like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Write a paragraph summarizing your understanding of their ideas. For instance, how do you feel about utilitarianism? Do you think it is applicable to our society? Why or why not? Explain your answers in a second paragraph.

Register to view this lesson

Are you a student or a teacher?

Unlock Your Education

See for yourself why 30 million people use

Become a member and start learning now.
Become a Member  Back
What teachers are saying about
Try it now
Create an account to start this course today
Used by over 30 million students worldwide
Create an account