Nightbreed (1990) - Nightbreed (1990) - User Reviews - IMDb
Nightbreed (1990) Poster

(1990)

User Reviews

Review this title
166 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Classic Monster Movie with Modern Moves
suspiria108 February 2003
Boone is a man plagued by secrets and nightmares. His situation is greatly worsened when his therapist reveals his darkest deeds. With his girlfriend in tow and the therapist hot on his heels will Boone be able to find this town of monsters in his dreams and what will happen when he finds it and they find him. I've always enjoyed this film since its' release. It is a good solid monster flick with some gore and a little mythology to boot. The creature effects are even to this day some of the darkest and twisted ever seen. The directing and look of the film are solid. Translating Clive Barker's imagination is probably very hard…even by Barker himself. The acting of the leads is very good and Cronenberg (a director in his own right) is sedate and creepy. If Hopkins wasn't available to play Hannibal the cannibal I would have chose him. The main detractor is the way the studio hacked up the original cut. And poor marketing didn't help either. Please release a director's cut someone. 7/10
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not to be forgotten!
BandSAboutMovies5 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by Clive Barker and based on his 1988 novella Cabal, this movie was a commercial and critical failure. Barker has always claimed that the producers tried to sell the film as a run of the mill slasher, when it is anything but. In 2014, he finally was able to release a director's cut that fixed many of his issues.

Aaron Boone (Craig Sheffer, Fire in the Sky) dreams of a place called Midian where monsters are accepted. His girlfriend Lori has convinced him to start seeing a psychotherapist named Dr. Phillip Decker, who is ably played by David Cronenberg of all people. All along, Decker has been setting Boone up for the murders that he's been committing, giving his LSD instead of lithium and filling his head with details of the murders.

Decker urges Boone to turn himself in, but he's hit by a truck and sent to the hospital where he meets Narcisse, another man who knows about Midian. He explains to Boone how to get to the hidden story while he cuts off his own face.

Boone makes his way to Midian, where he meets the creatures who make it their home like Kinski (Nicholas Vince, the Chattering Cenobite from Hellraiser) and Peloquin, a demonic creature who smells Boone's innocence, letting him know that there's no way that the murders could have been his doing. He bites Boone, who runs into a police trap led by Decker and is shot and killed.

He'd be dead if it wasn't for Peloquin's bite. Soon, he returns to life in the morgue while his girlfriend decides to come looking for Midian herself. Boone becomes part of the Nightbreed thanks to their leader Dirk Lylesburg (Doug Bradley, Pinhead himself) and from the touch of their god, Baphomet.

What follows is a battle between the police and clergy versus the Nightbreed, ending with Boone rallying the supernatural creatures and destroying their home to stop the attacks. Decker is stopped, Baphomet discusses that this was all part of the prophecy and he renames Boone Cabal.

There are two different endings of the film, depending on the original and director's cut that change the story significantly. One raises Decker from the dead while another places Lori into the Nightbreed. Both set the stage for further adventures that never happened, sadly.

Barker wanted this to be the Star Wars of horror films and envisioned a trilogy of stories. But the film wasn't marketed well and never made back its budget. Barker said that the producers expressed a concern that "the monsters are the good guys," to which he replied, "That's the point."

Marvel's Epic imprint put out several comic books and there were serveral video games, but soon the film slided away into obscurity, Luckily, with the excitement around the director's and Cabal cuts of the film being released, SyFy, Morgan Creek and Barker have announced an entirely new series based on the movie.

Interestingly enough, Filmmaker Alejandro Jodorowsky spoked well of Nightbreed, calling it "the first truly gay horror fantasy epic", as he saw the movie being all about the "unconsummated relationship between doctor and patient."

There are plenty of music ties in this film, as the role of Ohnaka was first intended for singer Marc Almond and Suzi Quatro was in the film, but her scenes were cut. It's also one of the first films that Danny Elfman scored after Batman. Barker stated that "The most uncompromised portion of that entire movie is the score."

Nightbreed has more than held up, reminding me of the convention season of 1990 when you could see buttons and shirts of this movie everywhere. My excitement was at a fever pitch and I thought, "This is going to be huge." Shows how smart I was.
18 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Directors cut was far better movie
chrislawuk31 May 2022
Its been along time since I seen the original, but the directors cut seemed a vastly superior movie. The version I recently saw, as there are several out there, had a 2 hrs long running time.

Undeniably, Hellraiser was Clive Barkers best movie by far. Nightbreed has far larger sets and much more ambitious effects, as the cast is much larger. For the best part it succeeds, and is an impressive creature feature/ fantasy horror. Hellraiser just had a better, more personal, darker story to tell in my opinion. It was a hallmark in the evolution of horror in the 1980s. It was one of those movies which really touched a nerve.

Comparisons a side, this is very decent genre entry.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Who Are the Monsters?
claudio_carvalho6 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A masked serial-killer is slaughtering families. Meanwhile, the youngster Aaron Boone (Craig Sheffer) has nightmares with monsters in a place called Midian. He has therapy with the psychiatric Dr. Philip K. Decker (David Cronenberg) and his girlfriend Lori Winston (Anne Bobby) wants to travel on vacation with him. When Aaron visits Dr. Decker for a session, the doctor convinces him that he is a serial-killer and asks Aaron to turn himself in to the police. He also gives a medication to calm him down. However it is indeed a hallucinogen and Aaron is hit by a truck. He awakes in a hospital where he shares a room with the insane Narcisse (Hugh Ross). When he overhears the man talking about Midian, Aaron learns the direction to reach the place. He heads to the place and finds that Midian is a cemetery. Further, there are monsters hidden from the humans in the underground and is bitten by Peloquin (Oliver Parker). Aaron flees from the monsters and finds Dr. Decker, Detective Joyce (Hugh Quarshie) and a team of police officers waiting for him outside the cemetery. Decker lies and yells that Aaron has a gun and he is murdered by the police. However the bite revives him and he goes to Midian, where he joins a society of monsters hidden in the underground. Meanwhile Lori is seeking him out while Decker wants to destroy the ancient breed of monsters.

"Nightbreed" is a cult-horror-fantasy film by Clive Barker. The film is highly entertaining but screenplay has an abrupt beginning and a deceptive conclusion. The DVD I saw does not have an alternate ending in accordance with the director's cut, but the description gives a perfect conclusion to this film. Aaron says goodbye to Lori, but she suicides and resurrects as a Nightbreed. There is no resurrection of Decker and Ashberry kills Eigerman that is seeking revenge. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Raça das Trevas" ("Darkness Breed")

Note: On 19 July 2020, I saw this film again.
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sympathy for the monsters
Woodyanders24 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Troubled young man Aaron Boone (a likeable and passable performance by Craig Sheffer) gets set up as a serial killer by cunning and deranged psychiatrist Dr. Philip K. Decker (well played with chilling understatement by noted film director David Cronenberg). However, it turns out Boone is actually a monster messiah in disguise who Decker is using as a means of finding a mythical creature Shangri-La called Midian.

Writer/director Clive Barker delivers a potent and provocative horror/fantasy allegory on mankind's cruelty, hatred, and intolerance towards anyone or anything different that goes outside man's ability to understand and subsequently accept. Moreover, Barker presents a dazzling array of monsters that are exotic, grotesque, sympathetic, and wholly convincing: The magical underground world of Midian and its colorful inhabitants are both beautifully realized.

In addition, it's acted with zeal by an able cast: Anne Bobby as Boone's concerned girlfriend Lori Winston, Charles Haid as hateful bigot Captain Eigerman, Hugh Quarshie as the pragmatic Detective Joyce, Hugh Ross as the raucous Narcisse, Doug Bradley as peaceful Moses-like leader Dirk Lylesberg, Catherine Chevalier as the alluring Rachel, Oliver Parker as the ferocious Peloquin, and Malcolm Smith as weak drunken priest Ashberry. Popping up in nifty small roles are John Agar as an ill-fated gas station owner, prolific British bit player Harry Fielder as the redneck who gets taken out by little black demon Devil Lude, and splatterpunk writers John Skipp and Craig Spector as a couple of bloodied dead bodies in a hotel room. Robin Vidgeon's vibrant cinematography offers a wealth of stunning visuals. Danny Elfman's robust and majestic orchestral score hits the rousing spot. A superior creature feature.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Highly original and appealing to the senses, this horror fantasy still has it's problems.
TOMNEL10 July 2009
If you're looking for an original horror flick, this might be the one for you. It's strange and at times lingers on stupidity, but it's just such a good looking, nice sounding and original movie, it never fails, except maybe during the over long climax. "Nightbreed" is a must see for horror fans, or for fans of monster movie make-up.

Boone (Craig Sheffer) has been having dreams of a town called Midian full of mutant creatures. In therapy, his psychiatrist Dr. Decker (horror director David Cronenberg) has come to the conclusion that Boone is a murderer, and gives him hallucinogenic pills, and tells him to turn himself in. After almost getting killed, Boone ends up at the hospital, where he runs into a mental patient who also knows about Midian, and tells Boone where to go. Midian, located in a graveyard, is inhabited by vile mutant creatures that don't let Boone in. After escaping with only a nasty bite, Boone is shot dead by the police, who were lead to his location by Dr. Decker. But Boone isn't dead. The bite causes him to live, and he goes off to Midian. Meanwhile, Boone's girlfriend Lori (Anne Bobby) tries to find Boone and get to the bottom of this. When Dr. Decker also finds out about this place, chaos ensues.

The plot seems long and complicated, but it really isn't hard to understand. The plot, among other things, makes this movie really interesting. The make-up effects are astounding. The creatures look unique and amazing, and make this a very appealing film. To add to more senses appeal, we have a musical score by Danny Elfman, that is both lush and bouncy, and fits the film like a glove. The shots in the movie are also set up beautifully. The cinematography is lovely, and the movie sets up an atmosphere that is never broken. Even the acting is good, with the biggest surprise being director David Cronenberg giving a great, menacing performance as the man, who for one reason or another, wants to see Boone dead. It's odd for a horror film to be this well done.

The problems with the movie...well there are a few, but the positives outweigh the negatives. The script features the occasional lame jokes to try and add some humor, but almost every one falls flat. The mutant creatures look great and for the most part are well acted, but sometimes it feels like they are just posing their awesome makeup for the camera. The worst part of the film would have to be the climax. It takes so long, and is just constant chaos. It's the portion of the film that moves from individual characters and nice tight knit shots, to fiery explosions from each direction and violence happening to characters we don't know or care about.

Overall, this movie is amazing to look at. It's a well done horror film, but even with that said, it has the occasional failure in character's lines, and a messy climax. Nonetheless, this is one to check out.

My rating: *** out of ****. 101 mins. R for strong violence and language.
18 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Sliced and diced by the studio, directors cut to come?
chrysalis_writter5 August 2005
I was peeved that the best make-up academy award went to Dick Tracy, a horrible film with horrible make-up. The Nightbreed (based on the better titled "Cabal" novella) look terrific, the acting is excellent and David Chroneburg makes for a truly creepy and terrific antagonist.

The plot focus's on Aaron Boone, who has recurring nightmares about a society of monsters living under a cemetery. Is he making it up or are they real and calling to him? His Pyschologist (Chroneburg) convinces him he's a murderer, a slayer of families.

Troubled and suicidal, Boone seeks refuge in Midian but the monsters don't want him at first. He is also tracked by his girlfriend, Lori who refuses to give up on him even after he dies and comes back cold and monstrous.

But Decker isn't about to let Boone continue on. He raises the locals on an all out assault on Midian, like a holy war in gods name led by the devil.

Barkers themes of misunderstood monsters may come from his experiences as a homosexual male, but they are always strong and honest. Nightbreed turns the genre on it's head. The monsters are just trying to survive and want to be left alone, but man is hunting them.

A 20+ minute longer cut was originally submitted by Barker, but the studio chopped it into this fractured masterpiece. Barker is hard at work trying to locate the missing footage for a directors cut release. Until then, this version will have to do.
55 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Intrigue, mystery and monstrosity.
Ahnion13 July 2002
Warning: Spoilers
It is interesting to see what people think of this movie, since it is, in fact, quite unique (though it bears some of the trademarks of Clive Barker's writing). Even though it might seem a bit cynical to say so, the movie is just intricate enough to deflect those that need standard Hollywood plot hooks, and layered, so that if you expect to be fed, you will see a normal monster flick with lots of monsters and a disjointed plot.

Those who need a linear, specific and untangled plot line will hate this movie, because the story lies, like in the novella, partially between the lines, or in this case, partially off screen, in comments and the imagination.

Another possible hang-up is the ending, of which I can say, without spoiling it, that it is not entirely good and not entirely bad. It is, in fact, not very defined at all, which I know sends some people into raging tantrums about that they didn't get to know what happened, but to me, and to many others, I'm sure, just adds another dimension to the story - the dimension of speculation, and, in addition, the point that great disruption has a tendency to cause ripples that extend quite far.

There is definitely moral here, but of a rather different kind than the standard Hollywood in-your-face-at-the-end-of-the-movie sort of display. Summing that moral up is simple, even though it is not quite that simply displayed; prejudice and the human tendency to hate the different.

I love this movie, even though, as many of the reviewers have noted, the expressions of the actors (with the exception of David Cronenberg, who does a wonderful appearance) are rather tacky. I'm not sure they are entirely to blame for their rickety appearance and lack of depth, though, seeing that these are common problems in converting literature to screenplay.

All in all, this is a great movie, provided that you do not expect it to be a standard horror movie.
71 out of 98 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Psycho, a Monster, and a Girl in Love
view_and_review20 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This Clive Barker catastrophe was based upon his book "Cabal." A cabal is a small group of secret plotters, as against a government or person in authority. Don't expect the movie to be about that.

It's a Calgary, Canada crapfest that's somehow a freakish love story where a priest abandons his faith and a girl stabs herself in the stomach to join the ranks of the undead. Because, you know... love and crap. Dumbass YA's and the irrevocable decisions they make because they're too damn dumb to think long term.

This pile of Canadian goose poo would have us believe that a doctor accompanies police to apprehend serial killers. And that the doctor, not the police would be the first to engage said killer. And that when the doctor shouts, "He's got a gun!" the police just unload everything they've got into said suspect.

"Nightbreed" was bad enough to make me catatonic with bewilderment at how dumb it all was. The Nightbreeds were monsters, or mutants, or some species of creatures that ranged from very human to very alien. They lived in a cemetery called Midian. What once was a closely guarded secret with no admittance allowed became a well-known nightclub with no security at the door.

Because of a series of absurd events resulting in the main character, Aaron Boone (not the ex-NY Yankee) (Craig Sheffer), being dead and in jail, Midian became Hamburger Hill. It was the "naturals" versus the... unnaturals I guess... with the naturals having the edge with firepower and the Monstars (yes I'm making them a Space Jam basketball team) having the edge with mutant abilities.

Boone leads the underground shapeshifters to victory, immortalizes his irritating shadow of a girlfriend, and fulfills his destiny. He was the Luke Skywalker of horrible horrors. Now, excuse me while I try to go purge my memory before I lose my mind.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Absolutely Fascinating
PatrickH-226 August 1999
Fascinating is an excellent word to describe NIGHTBREED: it doesn't necessarily mean it is good or bad, just interesting. Indeed, Im still not sure whether or not this film is good or bad.

On the credits side, the sets, costumes, make-up, special effects, even the matte paintings are gorgeous, grotesque, perfect for what is required. I was amazed that such fantastic production values could be found in a movie that on the surface seems so schlocky. There is such a wealth of imagination here that one can hardly take time out to think about the flaws. I was so amazed by the knock-out apocalyptic finale that I could barely think about how silly the context is (a bunch of redneck Canadians blow-torching a cemetary.)

he film's biggest flaw is it's sheer magnitude- there are SO many characters, plots, subtexts, overlays, and so on, that no really coherent or involving center emerges. It can be interpreted as: a story about how love conquers the supernatural (a la Dead Again), a Silence-of-the-lambs-like psychodrama about a serial killer; a dreamy horror flick reminiscent of Nightmare on Elm Street and especially Little Monsters; a Gilliam-inspired fantasy (the teeming underworld city is strongly reminiscent of Brazil and the Fortress of Ultimate Darkness in Time Bandits, while other parts are reminiscent of The Adventures of Baron Munchausen); a symbolic tale of racial tolerance; and on and on. So much happens, so many characters are involved, so many subtexts present themselves, its hard to know what is going on at all.

Still, one really does have to see the film to believe it. The underworld city is stunning, its atmosphere created perfectly by both the production design and a series of bizarre tableaux of its residents. It is a mark of Barker's screenwriting talent (so often evident in his other films if you can look beneath the shlock) that all the characters, even monsters seen only briefly, ring true in some strange way. The many stories are actually touching. Also, the ending is cleverly conceived; it doesnt go out of its way to leave the door open for a sequel, rather the open door is integral to the plot. I would love to see a follow-up just to know how Barker carries through the mythical aspects he introduces in this film's last part.

Perhaps the film could have been more focused, with fewer subsidiary characters; perhaps the completely inappropriate (but obviously intentional) humor could have been dropped; perhaps the entire serial-killer sub-plot could have been excised completely. In any case, this film is a knock-out.
34 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not a horror movie: A monster movie, with affection.
erichvm15 July 2000
What's fun about Barker's Nightbreed is that it's the story of a human on a rampage, a deadly threat to monsters everywhere. In this one, the monsters (the night breed of the title) are the "good" guys. It shares its sense of celebrating the different, the twisted, and the dark with the first Addams Family movie, and much of Tim Burton's work. It also has the goriness that one expects from a piece by Barker.

Especially fun is the performance by Cronenberg as the truly evil human doctor who is bent on destroying the Nightbreed. As happens in most classic monster movies, the villagers surround the monsters' castle with torches and pitchforks. Only this time, the modern setting replaces the castle with an old mausoleum and the rustic "weapons" with guns and bombs. And this time the sympathy you felt when you saw Frankenstein's monster burned in the windmill is the very center of the movie.

This isn't a masterpiece, and even Barker has done more interesting, and certainly more chilling, work. But it's pure fun, it looks great, and remains light without mocking itself. Worth a look!
36 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Yes, it's a mess but has enough good material to see what could have been
preppy-322 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Aaron Boone (Craig Sheffer) keeps having dreams about strange creatures and a cemetery. His loving girlfriend Lori (Anne Bobby) stays with him because she loves him. Psychiatrist Philip Deeker (David Cronenberg) is trying to help Aaron...or is he? Aaron is killed and then the nightbreed (a breed of undead creatures) make him one of their own. It all ends up with an all out war.

As everyone knows this film is a disaster. Before it was released the studio (20th Century Fox) cut out almost 30 MINUTES out of the film much to the fury of writer/producer/director Clive Barker. What's left is a very interesting movie which (sadly) has huge gaps in the plot and very choppy editing. I blame the studio for this--not Barker. Also it was horribly advertised and died quickly. It DOES have some glaring faults--there was also a hilarious continuity error in which Lori is being chased in a graveyard and it goes from day to night and back to day again! Also Sheffer is lousy in his role and the ending was just horrible. I caught it in a theatre back in 1990. It WAS confusing and a mess but there was (and is) a lot of good material there to see what MIGHT have been.

The story lacked a real strong back story about the Nightbreed (I attribute this to the editing) but you understand enough to get the plot. The makeup and sound effects are excellent and Danny Elfman provides a GREAT score to the movie. Also there's impressive set designs--especially with Deeker's lair and the Nightbreed's home. Also the movie makes you feel for the Nightbreed at the end and puts the audience firmly on their side--NOT an easy thing to do. Sheffer aside the acting is great by everybody. The actors playing the Nightbreed seem to be having a whale of a time even though they have tons of makeup on. Also Bobby has nothing to do but whine and search for Aaron--but she pulls it off. Also look for Doug Bradley (Pinhead from the "Hellraiser" films), horror authors John Skipp and Craig Spector and genre great John Agar in small roles.

Hopefully we'll see a directors cut one day--but it's been 20 years so I don't think so. What's left is a flawed but very good horror movie. Worth seeking out if you're a horror fan.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It's Shangra-La on Dope. I love it!
Human_Remains14 August 2007
Don't ask me why I love this movie so much...Maybe it came at a time in my life I desperately wanted to fit in, maybe it is the amazing monster effects, maybe because I enjoyed the novel "Cabal", but It's probably because I LOVE Clive Barker. I think it's fair to warn you the movie and the novel have no true resolve and like me you'll probably have a WTF moment at the end. At least two sequels were planned but never came about due to the fact the movie flopped for a few reasons. The studio made drastic cuts to the film cutting a good 30 or so minutes out of it and they did a HORRIBLE job promoting it. The adverts made it look like just another cheap slasher showing mainly the "Button face/Mask" Decker character. This is a movie about the monsters! About fantasy! About a place called Midian! It's a story where the monsters are the good guys. There is truly nothing else out there like it! It's not a movie for everybody I suppose but it stands as one of Clive's many great works. Sit back and be prepared to be taken to Midian - where the monsters are.
30 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Nightmare!
paul2001sw-119 February 2005
Clive Barker's 'Nightbreed' is a lavish, senseless horror film underpinned by a half-baked metaphysics. It's "more is less" plot features a psychopathic psychiatrist (unusually played by David Cronenberg, who has never directed a film as bad this one he appears in), a quasi-fascist police force and a bizarre "community" of undead monsters, all apparently living in the Cascade mountains. I say "community" in quotes as the supposed social dynamics of this group are never remotely plausible; instead, the film simply throws something new at us (a new monster, a new idea, a new enemy, a new place) at every turn of the plot, when just a fraction of the ingredients would have sufficed. It's not scary or funny, and having the monsters swear a lot renders them not frightening but banal. The film also has the most intrusive music of any movie I can remember. The result is a film with all the depth of a pop video; though sadly not the brevity.
15 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Mess In Need of Cleaning
gavin69424 April 2011
Boone has dreams of a city called Midian where the monsters live. He is not alone -- others have dreamt of it, too, and the reason is because it may just be real. That is interesting enough, but then we have the other plot: Boone is also suspected of being a masked serial killer who has amassed more than fifteen victims.

Clive Barker wrote this story (as "Cabal") and directed the film. It is probably his weakest film, despite an underground fan following. It clearly does not rank on the level of "Hellraiser". Yes, it has a decent cast such as Doug Bradley and Simon Bamford (though Doug was almost completely unrecognizable). And there is David Cronenberg, probably one of the greatest directors who ever lived, playing a really creepy psychiatrist. I think it is fair to say he is the highlight of the film. In fact, without Cronenberg, the film would have been a complete waste of time.

The film has some major plot issues Where did the priest come from? He shows up and acts as though he was in the film the entire time, though we know this to be false. In fact, he then becomes a main character somehow. Is there an earlier scene with him that got edited out? Why is the psychiatrist so intent on wiping out Midian? Why does he care? And why should we care about the "nightbreed"? None of their characters is ever developed. And why are they called a different race when it is clear that people can cross over? It is just so strange that the more questions you ask, the fewer answers you will get.

The film as a whole has too much going on. Focusing on the serial killer part would have been enough, but they introduce thirty characters and develop none of them. Recently, an additional 44 minutes of footage was found from the film. Would it probably explain the plot better? Yes. But is it worth sitting through a three-hour version of this film? I suspect not. If two hours was just average (at best), the longer version could not improve on this.

Now, I still support its release. Clive Barker is fighting Morgan Creek, who refuse to release or sell the footage, so for those who want to see it, they cannot. And, to be fair, some is just a second here or there cut by the MPAA (the hospital scene where the man removes his face was trimmed down, for example).

Should you see this? Well, if you like Clive Barker, yes. Or Doug Bradley (though you cannot even recognize him due to the German voice dub). But it is not one of the better films I have seen... none of my reference books even mention it! That is a sad state of affairs!
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If you are a Hellraiser fan.....
slimecity-3866331 January 2021
I've always considered Barker to be a bit overrated, certainly his later work was, and I haven so far found a lot of decent Barker work outside Hellraiser.

But this film.....is great, with good acting by Craig Sheffer (who I thought was a good redeeming feature of Hellraiser Inferno) and a good script.

Look out for the Directors Cut, otherwise dont bother. Epic creature effects and Doug Bradley is also in it! Its a nice old-style film that has a few matt painting effects too. Its also pretty good how the creatures are portrayed as the protagonists, while cops are portrayed as thuggish and corrupt (so in a sense, portraying the mess that the US is currently in with its law enforcement problems.

Watch it!
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I wish I liked it.
toxicpilgrim24 October 2018
This feels like a movie I should be very much into. I love sympathetic monsters and creatures, and strange unique fantasy lore, but this movie just falls flat for me. I've seen it twice now. I gave It a second chance with the Director's Cut, but I came away feeling the same.

I did really enjoy seeing David Cronenberg acting, and I imagine everyone on set had fun, but there's really nothing to come back to in this movie. It feels like they had written a premise, and a first act, and then just winged it for the rest of the film.

There's a decent mystery being built up in that first act, and I'm intrigued, hoping to venture further into this strange culture of Midian, but it seems that there is no actual depth to it. They're just monsters.They sit around in dusty underground lairs waiting for 'normals' to come around and shake things up, and when they do they go "boogie boogie boo" and dance in their faces.
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A self-indulgent film, with potential.
lime-33 December 1999
Clive Barker is, by far, the best horror writer of this century, and a fine visual artist as well. Few of the films made from his fiction are satisfactory "Clive Barker Experiences". This is partly because his main strength as a writer is, naturally, his use of language to provoke emotional reactions and to evoke very special moods above (beneath?) and beyond ordinary shock and revulsion. He raises horrific imagery and psychological situations to the level of poetry. This is not easy to do in film, a purely visual medium. The image of a monster or a monstrous act in film is a picture: there it is before you. A description of same in fiction can be given all sorts of depths and angles in the mind in writing. "Nightbreed" almost works as an adaptation of Barker's "Cabal". Unfortunately, as is apparent, most of Barker's budget was blown on the monsters (which are excellent movie monsters), with insufficient funds remaining for factors like cast. The actor who played the all-important role of Boone was not up to it at all. He conveyed almost nothing of the depth of Boone's torment, which exists on a number of levels. A talent should have been sought instead of a hunk. This is symptomatic of the film's weakness in general. Too many (albeit high-quality) monsters and too little time and attention spent on the basic human values (simply, character) which must underlie all fiction, no matter what its genre.
31 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"We are the Tribes of the Moon".
Hey_Sweden13 November 2014
Note: this review and rating applies to the directors' cut recently released on DVD and Blu-ray by Scream Factory.

Clive Barkers' adaptation of his own story Cabal is one that actually could be described as epic in this incarnation. While it would have been even nicer to get to know our characters a little better before the darkness falls, the film succeeds on a visceral and visual level. The look is something special, and the theme is resonant. The end result comes about through intolerance, hatred, and xenophobia, and one cannot help but root for the monsters. Unfortunately, the producers at Morgan Creek did not see eye to eye with Barker, and compromised his vision. They didn't think it possible for monsters to be sympathetic or to be heroes.

Craig Sheffer stars as Aaron Boone, a young man unsure of whether or not he is committing murders. His psychiatrist, Philip Decker (a well cast David Cronenberg) is not really any help. Unfortunately, the police are convinced that Boone's a killer, and track him down to the gates of a mysterious community named Midian. There he is pumped full of bullets. However, what Boone had wanted was to become a part of this community, believing that it's a place where sin can be forgiven. The monsters soon accept him as one of their own.

Sheffer is okay, but is easily out acted by Cronenberg, who creates a memorable creep indeed. Anne Bobby is very appealing as Lori, Boones' lover who embarks on a journey into this other world in search of answers. Charles Haid is excellent as a gung ho antagonist, police captain Eigerman. The very fine supporting cast also includes Hugh Quarshie, Doug Bradley, Catherine Chevalier, Nicholas Vince, and Simon Bamford. It's a treat to see screen veteran John Agar in a small role.

The varied and vivid makeup effects work on all of the characters is most impressive. Hats off to Bob Keen and his company Image Animation for all of their efforts.

In addition to an engaging romance at the centre of things, Barker is able to create a fierce, dynamic apocalyptic climax that should have its viewers' full attention.

A creature feature with a sensitivity towards its creatures, "Nightbreed" is definitely worth a look, or another one, for fans of the genre.

Eight out of 10.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Horror nope, lots of lazy monsters yep. Very lousy editing.
Fella_shibby14 July 2019
First saw this in the early 90s on a vhs. Revisited it recently. A young man (Craig Sheffer) dreams of a city where monsters inhabitate underneath a cemetery fearing humans. He is being treated by a psychiatrist (David Cronenberg) who is actually a serial killer n who has convinced the young man that he has been committing the murders. This movie has some cool effects, the monsters r of different varieties, some like the ones from Hellraiser, some like the ones from Total Recall but most of em r good for nothing. The editing is totally lousy. The action takes place only in the last 30 mins n the kills r mostly offscreen. There is a bit nudity but the movie is not at all scary or tension filled.
18 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Was Clive Barker trying to out-do Stephen King in sheer nonsense?
fedor82 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This has got to be one of the dumbest/worst horror films I've ever seen - and that's saying so very much. I was very surprised that Barker - of all people - would make a movie as illogical, aimless and full of idiotic characters, dialogues and events, as any of Ed Wood's little films.

The most astounding aspect of the movie are the numerous unanswered questions. I usually don't nitpick at (fantasy) horror films, but if Barker wanted a more complex movie, hinting at things all the time but never answering, then that can't be overlooked, especially since it's annoying. Why did Schaeffer have dreams about Midian? Clearly, he was a "natural" before he was bitten, so why would he know about it through his dreams? And if he was chosen, why? Did Cronenberg the shrink know about Schaeffer's Midian connection before the latter became his patient, or afterward? And if it was afterward, then what a dumb coincidence that Cronenberg would just happen to be a crazed serial-killer. How did Cronenberg find out about Midian?

Cronenberg. If you want to see a famous quality director embarrass the heck out of himself, look no further. Not only was he miscast - the soft-spoken, mild-mannered, gay-looking almost-nerd becoming a brutal killer with a silly mask at night - but his acting is atrocious at times, and the character he plays almost single-handedly sinks this movie. (Actually, even without the shrink the movie would have stunk - it was that bad.) The shrink CONSTANTLY hangs around the cops, practically RUNNING THE SHOW! Whatever he says, the cops believe, and whatever he says they should, they do it! Why would the black detective not doubt the shrink's story about Schaeffer being still alive? What, he sees the dead rise from mortuaries all the time? How the hell did Cronenberg suddenly appear as the "new boyfriend" of that bar harlot? That was amazingly dumb/confusing. And how did Crony know in which hotel Schaeffer and his girlie would stay - and then kill everyone in it with amazing ease?? For someone who was as sophisticated and clever as the shrink was supposed to be, his motive for killing the nightbreeds is shockingly simplistic and unsatisfactory; he kills them because "they're there". (He doesn't use those exact words, but he might just as well have...) So why did he kill all those families then, as warm-up for slaying the monsters? Oh, I forgot, there is no rhyme or reason in the behaviour of a psychopath - and there sure is none in the script, at all.

In the "grand finale" we then have a silly, large battle between the nightbreeds and - guess who - the COPS (plus some rednecks). In this last half-hour there are so many dumb things happening that I'd need ten A4 pages of small-font text to cover them all. The behaviour of the cops is so generic, so anti-authority Hollywood-style lame; they're portrayed as gun-swinging mass-murderers and psychopaths, and their reactions to being suddenly confronted with grotesque monsters is absurd, illogical and badly acted out.

It was amazing to watch how this piece of cretinous celluloid unfolded. It doesn't start that badly, but by half-time the movie just grows exponentially dumb. It literally bombards you with an increasing barrage of nonsense scenes and plot-devices. Barker's movie is an amazing mess; even the make-up looks cheap half the time, and the less said about the "humour" aspects of certain scenes, the better...

I wonder why Cronenberg agreed to be in this. Was it a favour for a gay lover? I know Cronenberg has a wife and kids, but he does dabble in homo-erotic imagery in some of his films ("Naked Lunch" and the awful "Crash"), and Barker is of course openly gay. Hmmm... Or is Cronenberg simply a jackass, a silly person hiding behind that "intellectual" facade, just itching to have an opportunity to act like a clown?

If Barker expects everyone to read the book of the movie in order to understand the messy story, he vastly overestimates his importance and shows a lack of understanding of how movies should work.
14 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
classic
veidt_18 April 2003
Nightbreed is not only great, it is also unique, even taking into account other Barker's movies, which never lack originality. An amazing adaptation of a very interesting idea for a book. For the horror genre, it has quite a few of subtle symbolics and references. Certainly a lot of fun to have, a a bit to think about, if one cares to. And, not to forget, a nice music score. Well, the special effects, as usual, get old faster than anything, but that is probably the only drawback. I've just seen it again after ten years, and I still find it something to recommend.
31 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Paradise Called Midian
bkoganbing7 February 2007
Let me say from the outset I'm not a particular fan of this kind of film, but Nightbreed holds a certain fascination for me with a message about perspective.

Back in the old days, the folks who inhabit Midian would have been called Zombies, the undead. And according to what Clive Barker has given us certain members of human kind, in this Craig Sheffer are born with the potential to become part of that world.

Psychiatrist David Cronenberg at first looking like the mild mannered professional has taken unto himself a fanatical mission to rid the world of the Nightbreed. He tricks the police into killing Sheffer, but Sheffer goes to a graveyard named Midian cemetery where the Nightbreed congregate and live underground.

Sheffer has also left a girl friend, Anne Bobby, who still has feelings for him even after he's been killed and is now one of the undead. She tries in her own small way to be a bridge to humankind.

Clive Barker's creatures are a pretty gruesome looking lot and are not particularly fond of humans. But it's plain to see that if humans left them alone, the Nightbreed in turn not bother with them.

Your sympathies are definitely with the Nightbreed especially after seeing a fanatic like Cronenberg and redneck police chief Charles Haid in action.

Clive Barker's been an out gay man for some time now and some have suggested to me that the Nightbreed is a metaphor for gay people. I can see where that would come in, especially since there are a whole lot of people who don't even think of gays as anything human because they're taught that way.

Granted Nightbreed is pretty bloody with a lot of gratuitous violence, but it also does make you think and I do like the way Clive Barker does turn traditional theology on its head and makes Craig Sheffer a kind of messiah for the Nightbreed creatures.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Adult version of Little Monsters
stevovt15 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this for the first time yesterday, and after it was finished all I could think of is little monsters wyrg Fred Savage only with some morbidity and horror. The movie was both boring and enjoyable. The character development was weak aside from the make up of the creatures and the particular midian "Peliquan" whom was my favorite character of the movie. The scene of the guy cutting his own face off is pretty gruesome and classic. Midian itself is the place you remember from your nightnares, a place you wouldn't be able to comprehend if you actually were there. The climax of the movie could have been better. Great concept, put together at a mediocre level.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A real treat
tvcarsd3 November 2012
Having read the book after watching the movie I was surprised to see exactly how closely the movie was. Some of the lines and acting in this movie are amazing. Lines like 'we are the sons of the free' spoken before embarking on the apocalypse was so cool.

Every character in this movie is played out and acted in sculpture like artistic quality. The whole 'ancient' graveyard median location is done so well it just carries you there.

The real treat from the movie that you don't get in the book comes from the last 15-20mins of the movie. I can't say what these characters are without adding spoilers but this is where the movie improved on the book in explosive fashion. Have fun, enjoy! But before you go, I've got to show you my real face. Yes yes, that's how it works you see. First I show you then they'll take me.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed