We Think the World of You (1988) - We Think the World of You (1988) - User Reviews - IMDb
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Well Worth Seeing
mrvirgo7 November 2000
There is nothing so disappointing as getting a movie version of a novel you like only to find out the story has been changed substantially and the cinematic version is horrid. I am a new fan of Ackerley. I am pleased to say the movie follows the novel and it was a delight to see it come to life in the screen version. Everyone in the cast is outstanding and the plot moves along quickly so the viewer is never bored. I would not hesitate to recommend this movie to anyone who admires J.R. Ackerley. I even enjoyed the fact that the look and feel of the movie seem dated which helped transport me back pretty close to the time it was supposed to happen.
19 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Charming Film with Unique Story - Great for Dog Lovers
canaryx8 November 2004
This is a good movie and it is especially enjoyable if you love dogs as I do. I never read the novel but I first saw this film years ago, and finally bought the video recently. To my surprise, the film now seems a little dated and even a little bit slow in parts. (But to be fair, American movies tend to move so quickly that many British and European films seem slow by contrast.) Alan Bates is terrific in the story of a middle-aged bureaucrat whose male lover betrays him for love of a female. When Bates agrees reluctantly to make sure his lover's dog is cared for while his lover is in prison, he finds himself really starting to care for the dog himself. Some funny visuals and a satisfying ending make for one good movie.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cheers!
Doctor_C2 February 2001
I saw this movie back when it came out. I was in high school and knew absolutely nothing about it. I knew nothing about the director, the cast, that it was based on a book, nothing. I remember it even today, over a decade later, as one of the best films I've seen. I recommend everyone see it. It is what independent cinema used to be, before it turned into the vast disappointment it currently is.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Man Loves Dog , Dog Loves Man , Man Gets Dog
quinnpj28 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this movie when it was first released and it always comes to mind when anyone mention a favorite movie. If you love animals and are sensitive to the "place" of gays in society just a few decades ago , you have to be touched by the interactions of middle class with lower class Brits,the straight world with the gay world and how one creature "EVIE" a German shepherd brings out the best and the worst in humankind . It is a sweet , gentle story with laughs and tears and the dramatic tension of wondering what will be EVIE"S fate . The acting is wonderful.The script is tight and every word of dialogue rings true . The final scene in the park is one of my all time favorites . You can't help but want to watch the movie again if just to marvel at how well acted and perfectly cast are all of the characters. Unfortunately the movie is out of print but shows up on cable every once in a while.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unsatisfying!
the amorphousmachine10 March 2002
Alan Bates and Gary Oldman star in this film about a dog called Evie that changes their lives. Johnny (Oldman) is sent to jail, and leaves his dog, Evie, with his poor old parents, who barely have time to walk her, and Johnny's stepfather abuse the creature. Frank (Bates) is Johnny's "friend", or more precisely his ex-lover, (although this isn't spelt out as such in the film) who befriends Evie, and is frustrated by her treatment. Frank begins to attempt to get Evie away from Johnny's parents, and he becomes quite attached to the dog. He struggles to gain contact to Johnny, to advice him about the dog's treatment. Eventually Evie becomes the central issue in their lives.

To say the least, 'We Think the World of You' is fairly well acted by both Alan Bates and one of my favorite actors, Gary Oldman. But the film doesn't really go anywhere for me. I was even confused as to what time period it was set in. Based on the novel by J.K. Ackerly which I've never read, 'We Think the World of You' doesn't provide enough interest as a film. It touches a little on how to treat a dog, and a little on the reasons why owners love their pets so much- and even put up with their misbehavior, but as a story 'We Think the World of You' is hardly compelling and some plot points are never quite tied up- leaving the viewer unsatisfied. I also think the film felt longer than it's running time! **1/2 out of *****!
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
seriously flawed adaptation for me at least. . .
marymorrissey21 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
It's nice that someone wanted to adapt this book, but there are a few big problems. One: Johnny is supposed to be very beautiful with "honey colored skin". Gary Oldman? It's like, as John Waters would say, Jaws without a shark. What's worse though is that the novel is told from the point of view of Frank. The film is too objective in its writing. Not that give a whit about Frank "growing" which he does, to understand Megan and finally respect her. The fact is the fun of the book is Frank's bad attitude towards these people who, in his view, and perhaps even objectively, if your objectivity doesn't match that of the screenwriter, treat him abominably. Instead we get this pathetic old queen with a poor dye job who and instead of identifying with him and his curmudgeonly prospective, we find almost painful to watch! In effect not only the "arc" but the whole feel of the story is undermined.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I wish I had written this review in 1988 when I first saw it so I didn't have to sit through it again.
mark.waltz2 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
In spite of the fact that Alan Bates and Gary Oldman are great actors, they are completely upstaged by Liz Smith (the British character actress, not the new york-based gossip columnist) as Oldman's mother, who along with her husband (Max Wall), cakes in Oldman's dog when he is sent to prison. Bates and Oldman, one time lovers, have remained friends and when Bates goes to visit the dog, she learns that the dog is being mistreated by Wall, and often beaten. Smith, seemingly naive about the abuse, claims that all is well, but Bates and the dog manage to bond even though Wall goes out of his way too beat the dog with his stick when Bates is around.

It's depressing stuff, a return to the British kitchen sink dramas that Bates did in the 1960's, with some good visuals of the surrounding area of this working class neighborhood, but I didn't find the characters outside of Smith's dotty matron to be well-rounded or fully detailed, forcing the viewer to attempt to care about characters they know really nothing about. There are too many miscellaneous subplots that just slows the film down, and it becomes a very trying and ponderous drama where the relationship between man and dog doesn't really fully bond until later in the film. The beautiful German Shepherd is trained well, but it became rather disconcerting to hear the dog yelping in both pain and loneliness while Bates goes on and on about not getting any correspondence from Oldman. This definitely seems like a film that would have played better on BBC rather than be released in the theaters.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not a comedy
BandSAboutMovies27 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
As London recovers from World War II, an aimless young man - who is bisexual and already married - named Johnny (Gary Oldman) is sent to prison. He gives his dog Evie to his parents, Tom and Millie, who are conniving at best and abusive at worst. The man who really falls in love with the dog is Johnny's older ex-lover and best friend Frank (Alan Bates).

Based on the 1960 J.R. Ackerley novel, this film was directed by Colin Gregg, who also directed the Liam Neeson-starring Lamb, which you guessed it, is also on this Mill Creek box set.

If you ever wonder how much our world has changed, when the trailer for this movie played in the U.S., it was sold as a light-hearted comedy about a dog and nothing was said about the romance between two of its leads.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A wretched one-dog show
fredrikgunerius18 October 2023
Despite Alan Bates' undeniably personal affiliation to the part of Frank Meadows, and director Colin Cregg's desire to tell a perceptive story about the difficulties of life as a homosexual in post-war Britain, We Think the World of You is a greatly unsatisfactory film which turns into little more than a whining version of Lassie with a gay twist if you like. Much of the blame is Cregg's, who angles his story badly, with too much seen from the point of view of Frank, and he also goes for an easygoing, semi-humorous tone which is perplexing at best, downright annoying at worst, and certainly never funny. There's a lot of potential in both these characters, and especially Gary Oldman's Johnny is underdeveloped, but we're not really given any reason to sympathize with any of them, and in the end, it all becomes a wretched one-dog show.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed