Below is a snapshot of the Web page as it appeared on 5/30/2023 (the last time our crawler visited it). This is the version of the page that was used for ranking your search results. The page may have changed since we last cached it. To see what might have changed (without the highlights), go to the current page.
Bing is not responsible for the content of this page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
The essay-like writing tag was removed by VikSol here [1]. I have to say that this article is as clear an example of essay-like writing as anything I've ever seen on Wikipedia, so it really won't do to remove the tag with the unexplained comment that it is "inappropriate." Discussion with Tropylium, who originally added the tag [2], might prove helpful. BGtalk 06:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Mostly I'm worried about the style "X appears to say that… but on closer reading… which was countered by Y stating that…" Priority 1 should be the current status of Uralic-Yukaghir, not a synopsis of how that status was reached (we could distill the gist of that to a History section). Could perhaps use more wikification too.--Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 22:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I added some recent articles in the "Further reading" -list. If I have time, I maybe will try to add something from them also into the text, but because my english is bad and I am no linguist, it maybe would be easier if someone more fluent in english would do that.--Urjanhai (talk) 10:58, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This article suffers badly from unsourced and undersourced material, its essay-like style in many paragraphs of the section "Arguments", and a considerable amount of apparent WP:synthesis and WP:original research. User:Florian Blaschke and I will start to cleanup the page, other editors are invited to join with input and critique. –Austronesier (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
