The World of Don Camillo (1984) - The World of Don Camillo (1984) - User Reviews - IMDb
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Warmhearted but unsatisfying.
gridoon22 November 2003
Terence Hill does a surprisingly adept job of directing this film (according to IMDB, it was his first effort behind the camera), but there isn't much of a script to support him; most of the laughs are supposed to come from seeing a priest do such "outrageous" things as cheating at cards, roller-skating in his church and organizing amateur soccer games. The spirit of the film is just too gentle for a successful satire. At 120 minutes, it's also overlong - especially since the dramatic incidents don't build out of each other. It does have a beautiful score by Pino Donaggio. (**1/2)
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A newer Don Camillio!
jalilidalili2 August 2007
OK, I have to say that the old Don Camillio films were excellent, but this one is not as bad as people would let you know.

It is said that the hard line communists are watered down and that Don Camillio is too cool (not too cold and remote, but too hip, to trendy).

Well, it is in the eighties, so one should bare in mind that it was the time when everybody was tired of the constant struggle between the communists and the church. So having them actually work together and showing more of the down sides of a worldly priest and more or less a positive side of a communist leader of a local community is also a message. You can't have a crusade against something that's not evil, but simply is. The communists in that era (acctually in all eras after the death of Lenin) who lived outside the Eastern Block (and most of them in the Eastern Block as well) were not monsters trying to destroy everything. So in this case you see a very human communist mayor and a skeptical priest, who is still trying to fight communism for the very principle of it, even if there is really no need for it.

In my opinion it's a great movie, but with a completely different message from the original series. The times have changed, and so has the situation and Terence Hill saw that change and tried to incorporate it in the movie. It's actually very good that there were no stereotypical communist bad guys (like it's a positive thing to present the low ranking officers in Nazi Germany as humans instead of blood thirsty monsters).
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Childhood favorite
Coventry28 June 2018
Back in the early nineties (oh, what glorious times), my dad and the 9-year-old version of myself were tremendous fans of the action/comedy duo Terence Hill and Bud Spencer. We videotaped a lot of their films on TV and collected them, including this one. At first it was a minor disappointment that Bud Spencer wasn't the actor playing Mayor Peppone, but it nevertheless became a childhood favorite that I must have seen at least 15 to 20 times! Of course, I was young and didn't pay attention to many things. For example, I was totally unaware that Hill's film was a reboot of a popular film series of the fifties (starring Fernandel) and the political undertones were also completely lost on me. Through the eyes of 9-year-old, this is simply a fun and exhilarating movie about a fit and atypical priest versus a mean and sleazy mayor! They argue, bare-knuckle fight and eventually assemble as many local kids as possible to settle their differences via a soccer game. The game turns into an unforgettable climax, with the church boys in blue and the town hall kids in red, and ending in a giant mass-fight in the pouring rain. Apart from the soccer game, there are numerous sequences that I still know by heart, even though it must have been 25 years since I last saw it. Terence Hill simply was the coolest priest ever! He drove around town on a dirt bike, he had the coolest dog and he talks to God via and old and color-faded Jesus Christ statue.

Note: for once the Dutch title is reasonably clever, as it contains wordplay and can be translated in two equally relevant ways, namely "Don Camillo hits hard" or "Don Camillo goes bonkers".
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Too Cool - No Warmth - No Edges
SMK-414 August 2002
This movie lacks the charm and the warmth of the original stories by Guareschi. Transporting the context 30 years forward into present-day (that is: 1980s) Italy was probably the right thing to do, since the distance in time wasn't big enough to film this as a period piece, but turning Don Camillo into such a cool dude rips the heart out of these stories. Mario Girotti plays the character in Trinity style, aloof, quirky, dead-pan; but this Camillo is barely recognisable as the passionately caring priest of the books. I don't think the earlier Camillo incarnation by Fernandel was right either (e.g. Fernandel's Camillo was not physical enough), but at least it exuded the required warmth.

A cool Don Camillo creates another problem: what happens with his constant little battles with Peppone and his party? Peppone's communist shenanigans are similarly toned down and as a result the antagonism between the two sides does not ring true - at least not to the extent the stories require. Thus, this film version also lacks the tension, conflict and hatred between the two camps. Perhaps there was some sensitivity here towards the American market: no children's movies with real communists in them, please!

A few changes to cater for the international market are also embarrassing: the two soccer teams are called "Angels" and "Devils" (in English!) and a couple of the songs performed in Church are in English as well. This is situated in rural Italy!
17 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Terence Hill's best
josemg200314 December 2008
In my opinion, this is possibly the best movie of Terence Hill. It's funny (the kind of funny you don't laugh loudly but you smile very often) and it is also a warm-hearted comedy with human and credible characters. I think Hill is a very good director and I like the script and the way of describing Camilo and Pepone, both with virtues and shortcomings but above all human beings fighting from opposite sides (Church vs Communism) and at the same time trying to understand each other. I really think the comparison with the films of Fernandel is not necessary, this film is made in eighties and, as another reviewer comments, the times had changed. Nice score and nice (underrated) movie.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Gentle comedy with an unconventional priest who sometimes resorting to worldly solutions to problems
ma-cortes14 May 2021
Amusing and nice farce freely based on the beloved novels of Giovanni Guareschi . It deals with earthy priest Don Camillo, Terence Hill , clashes repeatedly with his friendly enemy , the communist mayor , Colin Blakely , of a tiny Italian village . Along the way , our hero talks directly to God at a village where Catholicism and Communism fight each other . Don Camillo is determined to thwart Peppone's ambitions and while Camillo ignores the recomendaciones of the Lord , at times . As Don Camillo plays cards , football , makes tricks , uses his fists but all for God's glory .

Charming , good-natured version but inferior other renditions usually starred by Fernandel and Gino Cervi . It is the hilarious all new adventure of that imprudent , impish, impossible droll character well played by Terece Hill and including other characters so perfectly drawn , giving a very true-to-life picture of the social and political scene in Italy . What makes this unusual , though is that God talks to him telling him that this is not the way to resolve troubles . While this might seem a bit sacrilegious, it seems to be actually pretty benign and God did not come off as a result . This Don Camillo 1954 is an overlong recounting , dealing with various disjointed episodes about the unusual priest , his confrontation to Peppone with obstinate duels as political as personal and relying heavily on extended soccer play . Containing a deep and strong message , religious or no about honesty , comradeship , goodness , redemption and faith . Stars Terence Hill along with Colin Blakely , both of whom give sympathetic interpretations . They are well accompanied by a decent support cast , such as Mimsy Farmer , and two veterans actors of long careers : Cyril Cusack as a bishop and Lew Ayres as a doctor . And Ross Hill , Terence's son , who unfortunately died while shooting Lucky Luke in USA . The picture was middlingly produced and directed by Terence Hill.

There are other retellings based on the uproarious book-of-the-year best selling stories by Guareschi , such as : The Little World of Don Camillo 1951 Julian Duvivier with Fernandel, Gino Cervi and Orson Welles as God . The Return of Don Camillo 1953 by Julián Duvivier . Don Camillo Monsignore 1965 by Carmillo Gallone with Fernandel , Cervi , Andrea Checchi . Don Camilo and Honorable Peppone 1965 by Carmine Gallone . Don Camillo in Moscow 1965 with Fernandel, Cervi . And The little World of Don Camillo 1981 TV series with Mario Adorf , Brian Blessed , Cryl Cusack .
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Very different Terence Hill movie, but not in a good way
Horst_In_Translation23 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Here we have the film "Don Camillo" from 1984, the year that really brought out a great deal of high quality, but sadly this movie we got here is not necessarily a reason for that. Before I go into detail about what I felt was wrong with the outcome here, let us have a look at the basics first. The film runs for slightly under two hours or if you include the closing credits in full, then it makes it past the two-hour mark even. This film that will have its 40th anniversary soon was the first directing credit by a certain Mario Girotti, who is much more known under his alias Terence Hill and he was 45 years old when he made this movie. This fairly massive running time is nothing too usual for Hill in general. Many of his films, not just the ones he starred in, but also the ones he directed afterwards, stay around the 1.5-hour mark. This was really a family affair as the writer here is Lori Hill, the director's wife and you see she also carries the name Hill, so it really all changed from that perspective, not just with Girotti himself, but also those closest to him and this also includes his sons. For adopted son Ross Hill this was his first of only two screen performances as his life was cut tragically short. Jess Hill, the older son, is still alive today and his parents are also still married. Hill made the headlines recently because he acquired German citizenship now deep into his 80s and he said he is happy to have it, but it makes sense with his mother's nationality and also if you look at his wife's background. The other writer credit here he Giovanni Guareschi and he is the one who invented the character of Don Camillo and who wrote the books, so he has quite a few film credits to his name now. Some of them still happened during his lifetime like the black-and-white movie from the early 1950s that featured Fernandel as the title character, but as Guareschi only lived until 1968, which was 15 years before this film got made, he did not witness Terence Hill's take on the fairly famous priest protagonist. Maybe better this way.

I am a fan of Hill and an even bigger fan of his films with Bud Spencer, but this one here did not work out well at all. I would not even blame Hill himself too much. He does what he can and his directing is also not awful, but it is pretty telling that a film with such a well-known protagonist portrayed by such a well-known actor has only 2,000 ratings on imdb. The writing is the biggest issue and I mostly blame Lori Hill here. I am not surprised she did not work on any projects as a writer that did not include her husband. Her effort sank the movie here. Or lack of effort. Okay, I have not read Guareschi's base material, but I cannot imagine what he came up with there could feel as uninspired as this movie here. Major disappointment. So with what I just wrote, I also cannot compare the base material to this movie, but my entire review only focuses on the film. As for Terence Hill, you can surely say that he liked playing a priest character enough to start portraying the character of Don Matteo at the beginning of the new millennium, so slightly over 15 years after this movie here, and this series is the epitome of longevity it seems and still seems to be running now in 2022 over two decades later. But let's stay with the 1984 film "Don Camillo" now. It is still on German television from time to time and maybe also shown in your country or maybe not I don't know. It is an Italian production originally also in the Italian language, so probably Italian viewers have the best chance to see it. With Hill's background, also nobody can be surprised that there are also a few actors on board here that are English native speakers. This includes mostly Colin Blakely, a man with several BAFTA nominations, who plays the also pretty famous character of Peppone and is close to being a co-lead in this film. In any case, he is the biggest supporting player. Mimsy Farmer plays the biggest female character and still there is not a lot to her character, slightly implied as romance interest and that is it. Her career looks interesting though with how she stopped acting a few years later, but became pretty prolific in a totally different position in the new millennium on Hollywood blockbusters even. Lew Ayres is also in this film here and he was an Oscar nominee several decades earlier.

Some of the actors here were unlucky, not just Ross Hill, but also Blakely and Sam Whipple who both died from cancer at too young ages, especially the latter. Now let us look at the movie itself: I think looking at the fact that we have a pretty wild priest here, who rides a motorbike, jumps out of airplanes with his parachute and also goes hunting, the character was really as boring as he could have been. The hunting sequence in general was not to my liking at all how the two protagonists ignore the fact that hunting is not allowed there. I thought at first that Hill's character would go there to kinda catch and expose somebody who went hunting in the area, but no. He was that man. And so was the fella Peppone with whom he had some kind of love-hate relationship here. All platonic of course. Speaking of the motorbike the priest owns that I mentioned earlier, there was one brief sequence that I guess is one reason why this is called an action film or action comedy. Admittedly, comedic moments or at least funny moments are also the exception. Nothing really works out well here, also not the moments in which Hill's character talks to a Jesus statue at his home. But the motorbike scene I mean was of course when he uses a few planks to perform a stunt and jumps over a certain distance. It was also fairly obvious that it was not Hill riding the bike in this sequence, but oh well. The epitome of a forgettable stunt scene that was. Not 10% as cool as it wanted to be.

Then football was a major aspect in this film too. Not American Football, but what Americans know as soccer and what people adore here in Germany and Europe in general. There are two lengthy sequences. First, it is the boys playing and then towards the end it is the men playing and both times Camillo and Peppone are the coaches of the teams. Fittingly, the blue team stands for the sky and heavens and God I guess and the red team is the one that is linked to the devil and to evil and very much so also to communism. You could hear the Internationale on so many occasions. I will not be sad about that as I think it is an incredibly catchy tune and actually this melody was a rare highlight in this movie, but still this was handled in a way that it almost felt like a propaganda film here, how red is evil is the devil is communism. It was not even subtle. Fit in very nicely with the Cold War phenomenon from that time and I am disappointed to see Hill join in this obviously here. The only things you can say in his favor are that the character of Peppone was definitely not an antagonist in here, at least not a full-on antagonist and that Hill's character is also quite a crook. And also a lot of it was maybe this way in the books too, but they still could have left it out for this movie. Another thing you can say is that it is not unusual for Hill to share the screen with a (dark-haired) co-lead that he has a tumultuous relationship with, but they do not despise each other, but help and fight each other at the same time. You could see this at the card game scenes for example and there they are pretty much equals. As for the football matches I talked about earlier, it was pure chaos. Only the cheerleaders were nice. But the first was such nonsense with the red team catching one red card after the other and they still kept scoring and winning. Made no sense given how outnumbered they must have been, even if the umpire was not not neutral. This umpire at least brought in one of the very few funny moments when he is hiding in the church from the angry folks and Hill says something along the lines that his fat belly can be seen by everybody anyway. I liked it. That was a retro high-quality moment similar to the many ones we have seen in other Hill films.

The football game then with the grown-ups is an even bigger mess. It is as boring as it gets, but when Hill's character himself starts becoming part of the action and gets on the field and basically knocks out all the opponents that the paramedics with the stretcher are continuously right behind him, it is just an utter absurdity. Like what is the referee doing there? Nothing. He just keeps watching and sitting on his little chair then because he is so exhausted. Fairly messy. The ending a little later felt realistic at least when Hill's character is sent away to a village, but also agrees sort of. I was still surprised. I kinda expected more of a happy ending where he would stay in town because the townsfolk would not want him to leave. This was so absurd nonetheless, like how all the people applaud the mayor when he says that Camillo has to go and a few moments later they are all there to tell Camillo how much they will miss him when he is in the train already. So I thought he would get out and stay, but nope he really departs via train. There I was also confused with how the boy was all of a sudden sad that Camillo was leaving. The son of the potential love interest I mean. He and Camillo had almost no connection from my perspective before that, so it made no sense and looked like fake emotion for me. This boy was played by Hill's adopted son Ross by the way and he sure looked totally different in the other film he made a few years after this one here. Aged more than the time gap would suggest. That one (Renegade) is by the way also a much superior film compared to this one here. "Don Camillo" gets a massive thumbs-down from me and I do not recommend checking it out. It is a weak film that was much closer to failure territory at times than to being a good movie. The winning lottery ticket plot was also a bad joke.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Strange Terence Hill vehicle
Wizard-88 July 2001
This is quite an atypical vehicle for Hill. Though I've never read any of the original stories, apparently they are short stories. This may explain why there is no central plot here, and there being a mass collection of vignettes instead. It may also explain why the tone of the movie is so wildly inconsistant - sometimes it's melancholy, sometimes goofy, sometimes dead serious, sometimes of a (and quite violent at times) slapstick nature. I guess it's supposed to be a comedy at its heart, but I didn't really find that much humorous about it, though there are one or two smiles here and there.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
only a good movie, but no much more.
claudioarias1 August 2005
In the first place, I clarify that this is a automatic translation of my original language review, in Spanish, so that I request excuses by any spelling mistake. I believe that although it is a good adaptation of "Don Camillo, little world", does not happen of one movie to spend the short while. I believe that make a new version, and suggest to Roberto Begnini for the role of Don Camillo, and somebody like Danny De Vitto or Joe Pesci on the Peppone's role. Terence Hill, is well in the role in that version of film, but I don't believe that is sufficient like equaling the original movie of 1952. Some of the jokes they are not understood for the American audience that it does not know in general almost hysterical humor of the Italian cinema.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed