The Kennedys After Camelot (TV Mini Series 2017) - The Kennedys After Camelot (TV Mini Series 2017) - User Reviews - IMDb
The Kennedys After Camelot (TV Mini Series 2017) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Easy enough viewing
studioAT30 May 2017
Depicting the lives of The Kennedy's seems to be very much in vogue of late. Katie Holmes had had a go previously in the series the precedes this one, and Natalie Portman won great acclaim in the so-so film 'Jackie' earlier this year.

This series however decides, as the title suggests, to show the decline of the super family, and adds former 'Friends' star, Matthew Perry in for good measure (and as a ratings booster) as Ted.

It's well made, and well acted mostly, but it's very hammy, and I imagine playing very fast and loose with the small detail of fact.

I thought Matthew Perry gives a good performance, in a role that is a real test for him.

This isn't the best piece of TV drama you'll ever see, but it passes the time.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrible Sequel! Often Painfully Unwatchable!
Markr012718 April 2017
As a student of The Kennedy administration and old enough to remember, this sequel was disgraceful! I agree with the other reviews. The script is borderline comical and insulting to the viewer. The original series was far superior, not perfect by any means but considerably better.

Matthew Perry was the producer which explains quite a bit, he was difficult to watch as Ted Kennedy as was the character who portrayed Ethel. If I had to hear one more "Kiddo" reference to Jackie, it would induce vomiting. Additionally, where was Caroline? She may have had some input, one can speculate, because she was simply not written into the script.

Katie Holmes does a decent job in her role as Jackie but each time I had hoped for something...anything to resurrect this from near death, it was too late. The other objection I had as how they condensed part 2 of this series. Not much attention was paid to John Jr either. It seems as though his big line was, "My father is dead".

Good lord, this was so bad. It really left so much to be desired and should never have been produced at all.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not a bad sequel, retains some magic from the first series
Kingslaay17 April 2017
The Kennedys After Camelot looks at the next generation of the Kennedy family and life following JFK and RFK's assassinations. It is hard to not compare it to the first series, The Kennedys, which was a perfect and successful dramatization of the Kennedy family. One must try to watch and judge this sequel on its own. On its own this sequel manages to hold its own and deliver some great moments.

The first series (The Kennedys) had close to no issues and earned praise and accolades from fans and critics. Unfortunately there are a few issues with its sequel. Katie Holmes is once again great as Jackie. Not only does she resemble her closely she sounds and acts like her. She manages to carry this series for the most part. However the series lacked a strong male lead to carry it all the way. Matthew Perry was badly cast as Teddy and mediocre in his portrayal. Perhaps they should have changed the time spent on certain parts, Perry as Teddy got a lot of screen time and for the first time in this production I felt the series dragged on. Jackie, JFK Jr and Joan Kennedy could have had more screen time. Joan was perhaps underused in this series. More care in the direction of the 1st half and changes to the screen time might have made a difference.

The second half was a big improvement on the first. It was more eventful and contained better moments. The beauty of the first series was how it resembled a Greek tragedy and while the events of Camelot are different those elements could still be incorporated. The last scene with JFK Jr was beautifully shot and contained these elements. The music worked well in the series and was very solemn when needed.

I was very excited and enthusiastic to hear they were making a sequel. There was certainly a lot of material to be dramatized. However I also knew that the first series was a hard act to follow. One should note that Camelot involves different events and time periods outside the White House. It is not so glorious or grand but slower and solemn.

If you loved the first series and interested in the Kennedys I recommend it.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Hilariously Bad - Especially Matthew Perry
makeham9816 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This should go down in the annals of absolute schlock. Not quite up to the quality of "The Crown", to put it mildly. This dreck belongs on Mystery Science Theater 3000.

Matthew Perry is horrendous in every scene he is in. What fool producer cast him in this mess (oh, never mind)?

Katie Holmes reprises her vapid Jackie-in-a-haze performance as one of only two characters in the entire production that show any redeemable qualities - and her back-and-forth from "I'm in the family" to "I am not in the family" make absolutely no sense.

If 10% of the script is true, Ted Kennedy should have spent many years in prison. His late night call to the front desk of a motel after the car crash is completely moronic. His portrayal of calling the women dumb names like "Joansy" and "Jacksy" are nothing more than annoying. Not clever or "inside Ted", just dumb.

A great scene is where Ted learns that a girl dies from cancer and her parents went broke trying to pay for care. He is an oblivious boob, but this becomes his "calling in life". Which he never fulfilled.

Another where this boob blows any chance to beat Carter for the Democratic nomination (typically through his own stupidity); he bring "Joansy" down to DC to speak for him (she was going to AA twice a day at the time), and then, when he blows it, it drives her to the airport and embraces his mistress while old "Joansy" is sitting in the car. What a great human being!

Ethel is portrayed as a psycho witch, believing she has a Kennedy birthright. Crazier than Old Lady Rose.

Joan is almost likable (if you leave out that she was dumb enough to get involved with Ted and was a lush).

Onassis is almost likable as portrayed (if you overlook his Mediterranean views toward women, his ongoing affair with Maria Callas, and best of all, his psycho shrine to Jackie).

John John is a boob. Flunks and flunks, then flunks some more, then decides he should run for office. He has good hair.

Caroline isn't in this, other than briefly as a child. Must have decent lawyers.

The show ends abruptly with John John and wife getting on a plane. Not the trip that killed them, but just another less eventful trip they planned to take. The closing credits allude to the later crash.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Series was 50% too short
anthony_03587 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I am only giving this a bad review because it was 4 episodes rather than 8 as the previous series from 2011 was. This series was so short that it did not include any of the following 1-they should have explained why Teddy did not run in either 1972 or 1976. Even it was only due to the 1969 auto accident and fatality it should have been explained 2-Teddy's run for President in 1980 was accurate but extremely short. His losses during the primaries should have been explored and offering a clearer reason why he lost.

3-No Caroline Kennedy at all. She got married in 1986 and was a big part of her mother's life.

4-no mention of any of the other cousins to John Jr. including the infamous trial of William Kennedy Smith. I believe that trial changed Teddy and from 1991 to 2009 he was more on the straight and narrow 5-No mention of Victoria Reggie's Tedddy's wife until his death 6-no mention of Jackie dating Maurice Templesman shortly before she became terminally ill. She was very close to him at the time of her death in 1994 7-John, Jr's plane crash should have been a one hour episode alone.

8- Teddy's own cancer battle should have been explored in the final hour as the final moment of the mini series. His funeral in 2009 and burial at Arlington, not far from his brothers 9-At some point during the mini series the bizarre behavior of the Kennedy Cousins should have been explored. One Death from Drug Use, One Death during a Ski Accident on 12-31-97. Scandal causing Joe the 3rd to not run for higher office. Another one arrested for driving while under medication, etc.

I think Matthew Perry was okay as Teddy, not great, Katie Holmes was awesome as Jackie. Plus Kristin Booth was very interesting as the evil Ethel.

The series needed to be longer and it would have been as soon as the one from 2011
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Why Caroline Kennedy Is Absent From This Miniseries
gsbltd29 October 2023
Firstly at nearly 80 years old I remember "Camelot" clearly (I even wrote a fan letter to JFK and received an auto-penned photograph) and as such found the entire first miniseries outstanding -and in particular Greg Kinnear as JFK- as it stripped away the mythology of America's greatest political dynasty and revealed that family for the deeply-flawed people they were.

Originally, Showtime was to air THE KENNEDYS but panicked when Caroline Kennedy threatened legal action which nearly scuttled the entire project before the Reelz channel picked up the broadcast option. And even after airing, the DVD release was very slow in coming... especially to the United States. I actually had to order mine from Canada where the series was filmed.

AFTER CAMELOT avoided any such legal problems by simply eliminating Caroline from the narrative and that's why you won't see her portrayed here.

While AFTER CAMELOT lacks the style and quality of THE KENNEDYS it nevertheless furnishes an accurate account of a family riddled with all-too-human frailties and failures as both erase the legends we were once convinced to be genuine.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
glossed over
cdruby-3489413 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The first series last yr about the Kennedy's was a 10 star series but this one sadly fell flat. Matthew Perrys portrayal of Ted Kennedy was not good at all. He was like a fish out of water. At least the other actors resembled the people they were portraying. I think Katie Holmes did an excellent job in both last yrs series and continued on with this series. I don't understand why they short changed after Camelot with this very short series. I was so looking forward to it only to be disappointed how quickly they went thru things that happened in their lives. Not much about the marriage to Ari and much to do about pretty much nothing in regards to John John. The only reason I didn't give it one star was because they did do a little better in regards to Chappaquiddick but not much. It seems someone in the Kennedy family most likely Ethel pulled the plug on this one because after last yrs the Kennedy series I was expecting so so much more and I have to think so was Katie Holmes..what a shame.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Katie Holmes
jenrey9 April 2017
Why did Katie Holmes use a "Northeastern/Boston" accent? Not at all true to life if you've ever heard Jackie O speak. Jackie had a very soft voice with a strange kind of affect, almost like Marilyn Monroe, (sorry to use that comparison), but I never heard a "Massachusetts" sound in her voice. I would have thought they would try to be more authentic.
8 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
laughable castin
dtdenver-987-92554613 February 2020
Matthew Perry as Ted? Oh no. Perry is 15-20 years older than Teddy was at the time - and looks even older and more dissolute. Actually, an Osmond kid would be a better fit. Onassis was barely 5' - a squat, ugly man - not a good-looking 5'11" Arab. A Boris Karloff look-alike would have been better. Katie Holmes is not terrible as Jackie but that has more to do with the hair and clothes than her acting. Was Jackie really that nervous when Onassis was negotiating her dowry with Teddy? Because Ari's estate "settled" with Jackie for $25 million upon his death so she wouldn't contest the will. After 7 years of marriage - not a bad investment of time.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Why no Caroline
cindyfrye12 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
**** Spoiler ***** What? Could they not find an actress willing to play her? It is so totally unbelievable that Jackie's death would have Ethel and Joan but not Caroline! Why did only John and Carolyn get in the plane at the end but not her sister? This made the ending so hokey for me.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Pure Fiction
kblaine-2555816 April 2017
Garbage! It is hard to believe that we are in the year 2017 and still glamorizing this particular group of people. If your looking for pure fiction...this might be entertaining b/c of K. Holmes. If your looking for facts and true historical accounts..you'll need to do the research and find them for yourself.
3 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Wow. How did this make it out of Hollywood?
bizzyziggy9 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Telling some truths about the elite Kennedy's?

It actually showed what a scumbag and coward was, yet the clueless still kept voting for him and celebrated his life. It showed his involvement with the death of a young girl and the power they have to coerce and cover up the truth. Even using the church to assist them. Granted, they did try to show him as redeeming himself a bit in the last installment. This would not be made in today's Hollywood. The sycophants hang on every work that their elite masters regurgitate into their mouths. Do they not realize if this went on back then, it is going on tenfold today. And yet they are in denial.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible film; bad, lying history. Continues the myth of the Kennedys as a high point in American Society when in fact their kind were the lowest of the low.
da-910 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
A very bad for television show concluded last night ---- the surely high rated The Kennedys: After Camelot.

[ I've watched it and this is a review of sorts ]

No one can think that JFK or the Kennedy administration was composed even of decent men let alone heroes.

Beginning at the top these people were bums of the highest ( or lowest ) order.

There is a "halo" which protects each assassinated US president.

Many years ago famed British journalist and historian Alistair Cooke made that observation.

Cooke didn't live long enough to watch the 2 part bubblegum chewing TV travesty which concluded last night.

The worst thing about shows so nonsensical is that they repeatedly peddle the nonsense that somehow Kennedys ( in the JFK age )stood for something good and noble.

JFK stood for nothing.

Idiocy knows no political affiliation and doesn't spare those populations which think they cling to a proper ideology and are "pure" in some way.

Idiocy is no more obvious than in any American who believes that John Kennedy even was a passable human being, let alone a good and decent president.

He was a bum. And, granted the power of the presidency, he was a mass murdering thug.

He ordered multiple murders of foreign heads of state...the list of his inadequacies and obvious moral shortcomings is much longer than I care to detail here.

Actually, the details long have been available to anyone who wants to do anything actually so easy as simply to read the details in long available sources .... how about starting with The Pentagon Papers and anything related to Cuba?

For that matter, anything dealing with his years in power detailed in the family jewels revelations by CIA?

Or look at the fact that he did absolutely nothing to advance Civil Rights...though of course he did find much time to actively hinder it?

This is a guy who, early in his marriage was informed his wife had miscarried and was sure to die...and who didn't leave the Mediterranean yacht on which he was ensconced with multiple whores until his father sent big, armed men to force him stateside.

Which good man won't return to the deathbed of a wife?

Even unlearned ( meaning, resolutely ignorant ) libertarians can be found who insist that somehow JFK planned to deal some kind of death blow to the Federal Reserve.

They are ignorant to the point of being offensive and should be ignored at every opportunity...actively.

The Kennedy family were a part of and represented the elite in American and world politics and the last people JFK ever would have considered disrupting were those members of that selective club of which he and his father were members.

The Kennedy's never would have disrupted the FED for they WERE the FED.

Anyway, the show does have the bright aspect that Katie Holmes plays Jackie, and Katie is always good to look at... far better to look at in my humble opinion than was Jackie.

It's not that Jackie wasn't pretty in her own right. It's just that Jackie married a murdering thug and Katie never did that.
5 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Done in soap opera style, the Kennedy clan after JFK's death.
TxMike16 April 2021
Not sure why but this series received lots of negative criticism. I was in college when JFK was shot, I remember it well and the general theme of what happened in the following years. I have no complaints with the casting but will assume most of the "behind the scenes" activities and conversations are partly or mostly fiction, to tell what is believed to be the family reaction to various events.

I found the four episode series on a two DVD set at my public library. My wife and I watched the first episode, it has a "gossip column" feel to it, and is presented almost like a soap opera. My wife had no desire to see the remaining three episodes. I watched the fourth one, it ends right before JFK Jr's fateful plane trip that ended his life and presumably signaled the actual end of "Camelot."
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed