The Hamiltons (2006) - The Hamiltons (2006) - User Reviews - IMDb
83 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"The Hamiltons" Brings A Whole New Meaning To The Term 'Dysfunctional Family'.
drownsoda9031 March 2007
Another one of the eight films that was part of After Dark's Horror Film Festival, "The Hamiltons" is an intriguing little horror film/twisted family drama that will have you interested and disgusted at the same time. This independent horror film focuses around a family of four, consisting of three brothers and a sister, their parents both deceased. Francis is the youngest, who is withdrawn and spends most of his time filming his unconventional life with his camcorder. Darlene is a wild goth girl with an attitude, and her twin brother, Wendell is a bit of a tough guy and a ladies man. David is the oldest, the "man of the house", who is struggling to take care of his siblings and deal with being a homosexual. The Hamilton family may seem like a basically normal bunch on the surface - but little does anyone know, they also kidnap innocent people and tie them under their house and proceed to murder them.

Interesting premise, eh? I thought so myself. Far from your conventional horror flick, "The Hamiltons" contains one of the most twisted suburban families you'll see on screen. The story itself is pretty original - well, at least I can say I've never seen a film quite like this before. The film balances itself out, teetering on the brink between a horror/crime film and a psycho family drama. Script-wise, the film is really quite impressive. It has a few faults here and there (this would mainly be the trouble finding any sympathy for a couple of the characters of the family, when it seems the writers were poking at that), but overall the writing is clever and keeps a couple of important plot-twists pretty well hidden until the appropriate time to reveal them. It does drag it's feet a little during the middle of the film, which could have been a problem - luckily it isn't necessarily uninteresting because the character interaction is really compelling.

The acting here is surprisingly good, the leading actors are mostly unknown (besides Brittany Daniel of "Club Dread" and "Joe Dirt", who has a small role in the opening scene of the film), but I thought everyone performed well and the characters were pretty believable. The film is shot in a strange fashion, and it gives it an almost documentary style, which puts the audience in the moment. The picture is very bright and clear - it captures a realistic effect. There are a few shaky, jittery camera movements, and while I felt they were over used in some areas, they add a nice effect to the film. The big revelation near the end of the film was near genius, and the conclusion is almost perfect. I won't spoil it for you, because it would essentially ruin the biggest plot twist of the movie.

Overall, this is an interesting little flick with some great things to offer. It's not your typical horror movie at all, so don't expect one - but if you want to see a different type of horror film (a little slow moving, but heavy on character development), check it out. It's not a perfect movie, but I thought it was pretty good. If you thought your family was different, wait until you see "The Hamiltons". 7/10.
40 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Family Dysfunction" Gets A Murderous Makeover...
cchase29 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
For lovers of sensitive teen dramas centered around dysfunctional families...have I got a treat for you! THE HAMILTONS will take you back to your high school days of discovering books like CATCHER IN THE RYE, RUMBLEFISH and THE OUTSIDERS...only this has nothing to do with gangs. It does deal with a troubled young man, trying to find his place in the world, and also how he fits in with his VERY unique "family unit." Frances Hamilton (Cory Knauf), confused, withdrawn and in constant turmoil, documents his day-to-day life with his siblings, following them around with a camcorder as he records them and his thoughts in a video journal.

Older brother David (Samuel Child) carries the weight of the world on his shoulders, along with his role as 'man of the house', the legal guardian for everyone else since their parents died. The twins, volatile 'bad boy' Wendell (Joseph McKelheer) and Goth-obsessed Darlene (Mackenzie Firgens) aren't willing participants in the family, unless it involves being with each other. They're as close as a brother and sister can be...actually closer than what's considered appropriate.

The Hamiltons struggle to be good neighbors and put on the best face they can...when they're not shredding off someone else's. They do the best they can anywhere they live, until people start disappearing, and they have to move...AGAIN. Struggling with their murderous, nomadic existence and what it takes for them to survive, Frances is at a crossroads...should he pitch in and help them continue to do what they do, or should he tear the whole family apart in the hopes of finding a more "normal" way to live? If you enjoy 'family dramas with a twist' like George Romero's MARTIN, GINGER SNAPS or even the unconventional psycho-thriller MAY, THE HAMILTONS will definitely be your cup of blood. The Butcher Brothers have carefully fashioned a tale that will keep you engaged even if you figure out the 'family secret' well before the ending.

The actors turn in solid performances, but especially the ferocious effort by McKelheer and Firgens, and Rebekah Hoyle as Sam, the latest victim who may hold the last chance for Frances' most desperate wish.

I'm afraid that hard-core gorehounds seeking maximum carnage may feel cheated. When this film was part of HORRORFEST last year, it was sold as a 'slasher' film in the trailers, which is only half-true. Set your mood for something a little more nuanced and different, and you'll be ready to meet THE HAMILTONS.
26 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Another totally crap 'Film to Die For'.
poolandrews3 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The Hamiltons tells the story of the four Hamilton siblings, teenager Francis (Cory Knauf), twins Wendell (Joseph McKelheer) & Darlene (Mackenzie Firgens) & the eldest David (Samuel) who is now the surrogate parent in charge. The Hamilton's move house a lot, Franics is unsure why& is unhappy with the way things are. The fact that his brother's & sister kidnap, imprison & murder people in the basement doesn't help relax or calm Francis' nerves either. Francis know's something just isn't right & when he eventually finds out the truth things will never be the same again...

Co-written, co-produced & directed by Mitchell Altieri & Phil Flores as The Butcher Brothers (who's only other film director's credit so far is the April Fool's Day (2008) remake, enough said) this was one of the 'Films to Die For' at the 2006 After Dark Horrorfest (or whatever it's called) & in keeping with pretty much all the other's I've seen I thought The Hamiltons was complete total & utter crap. I found the character's really poor, very unlikable & the slow moving story failed to capture my imagination or sustain my interest over it's 85 & a half minute too long 86 minute duration. The there's the awful twist at the end which had me laughing out loud, there's this really big sustained build up to what's inside a cupboard thing in the Hamiltons basement & it's eventually revealed to be a little boy with a teddy. Is that really supposed to scare us? Is that really supposed to shock us? Is that really something that is supposed to have us talking about it as the end credits roll? Is a harmless looking young boy the best 'twist' ending that the makers could come up with? The boring plot plods along, it's never made clear where the Hamiltons get all their money from to buy new houses since none of them seem to work (except David in a slaughterhouse & I doubt that pays much) or why they haven't been caught before now. The script tries to mix in every day drama with potent horror & it just does a terrible job of combining the two to the extent that neither aspect is memorable or effective. A really bad film that I am struggling to say anything good about.

Despite being written & directed by the extreme sounding Butcher Brothers there's no gore here, there's a bit of blood splatter & a few scenes of girls chained up in a basement but nothing you couldn't do at home yourself with a bottle of tomato ketchup & a camcorder. The film is neither scary & since it's got a very middle-class suburban setting there's zero atmosphere or mood. There's a lesbian & suggest incestuous kiss but The Hamiltons is low on the exploitation scale & there's not much here for the horror crowd.

Filmed in Petaluma in California this has that modern low budget look about it, it's not badly made but rather forgettable. The acting by an unknown (to me) cast is nothing to write home about & I can't say I ever felt anything for anyone.

The Hamiltons commits the cardinal sin of being both dull & boring from which it never recovers. Add to that an ultra thin story, no gore, a rubbish ending & character's who you don't give a toss about & you have a film that did not impress me at all.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting, but deeply flawed.
Caustic Pulp20 November 2006
"The Hamiltons" has a great premise, and the ending of the film is inches from being extremely satisfying. On its own, an excellent ending...it's getting there that's the problem with the film.

The fundamental flaw of "The Hamiltons" is that it's caught between being a serial killer film and a family drama, and unlike "Suburban Nightmare" - which was similar, also an indie, and much better in my opinion - "The Hamiltons" refuses to commit to its characters. It wants you to empathize with them at the same time it paints them as violent sociopaths. In doing this I found the ending disingenuous, and most of the movie was simply too scattered.

There ARE strong points to the film. The main character, Francis, is easily the most well-developed character. Although he gets too whiny and, frankly, useless at times, he's able to make the transition into action with aplomb. His relationship with one of the women being held in the cellar of the house is particularly well-written and potent.

The problem is that the movie feels forced to bend to genre conventions, and in doing so it makes the other three members of the family unsympathetic in the extreme. The characters of Wendell and Darlene are written well as sociopaths, but the problem comes when the film wants you to identify with them and accept them as part of this family, and you can't imagine why anyone would love them even if they WERE family.

The film is worth watching, but the script really could've used another run through editing to work out the kinks.
41 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The Hamiltons: Insufferably awful
Platypuschow1 December 2023
Plot

Trying to move on with their lives, and keep their family together after the untimely demise of their parents, the four Hamilton siblings are left all alone to fend for themselves. At first glance, the Hamiltons seem like an ordinary family, and they will do everything in their power to adjust to their new neighbourhood; however, troubled Francis' video camera reveals that there is more to the grieving newcomers than meets the eye. After all, is it normal to keep people captive in your basement

Cast

Nobody I was familiar with.

Verdict

I made a booboo, I watched The Thompsons first, I didn't realize it was a sequel! That I quite enjoyed so upon booting The Hamiltons up I was fairly excited, whoops that was another booboo.

The Hamiltons focuses on this dysfunctional vampire (Of a sort) family. The trouble is the film is cheap, looks cheap, sounds cheap, is cheap and though I watch a lot of indie movies and am generally unphased by this The Hamiltons came across unforgivably so and was very distracting. I wish it had distracted me more then I might not have noticed how terrible the rest of the film is, it's lifeless, it goes nowhere, the characters are wretched and the narration is so tacky it takes you away from what you're watching (But not in the way you'd want).

This isn't a vampire film, this is barely horror.

Rants

Let me be clear, I'm not overly fussed about budgets. A few years ago I remember watching one called Rednecks vs Aliens? I think. It looked like it had been recorded on the oldest VHS recorder imaginable and by someone who was having a seizure from start to finish. But this didn't matter because the film was oddly enjoyable. I don't care about budget but I've always said, keep in line with your budget. If you have a three figure budget, don't make a movie about aliens invading earth.

Breakdown.

Ugly Lifeless Poorly made.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
the thompsons...
rivertam2619 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Like most of the festivals entries Hamiltons makes for an interesting watch a film thats all ideas and little execution. Although impressive for it's obvious low budget the film falters in it's final twist and becomes dreadfully long during it's drawn out and obvious conclusion. The film is about a family of murderous outcasts trying to survive after there parents have died. They kidnap people , drain the blood from them and feed something locked away in their basement. There's some nice darkly humorous performances from Mckellhar and Firgens and the rest are just so-so. The film never feels realistic or very disturbing for that matter. But for the first half taps into an oddly humorous and dark mixture which is a surprising accomplishment. The next half isn't so successful as it receeds into film oblivion with unrealistic twists into a ridiculously cocky finale that turns the entire film into utter crap. It's a shame though there is no doubt that some talent was involved with this production and although deeply flawed it remains original and creative. too bad that when it comes to the delivery it completely fails on every level.

**/5
17 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Hamiltons is a thinking person's "horror" film with a slow pace.
carlykristen22 November 2006
The Hamiltons 2005 (Theatrical "R", After Dark Horrorfest) – Directed by The Butcher Brothers, Winner of the Santa Barbara Intl Film Festival and the Malibu Film Festivals.

The Hamiltons are an unusual family that recent lost their parents. The family now consists of older brother David, who is struggling with his homosexuality and the pressures of running the household, the twins Darlene & Wendell, who are devious troublemakers, and younger brother Francis, who is coming to terms with his family and his place in the world.

The film starts out explaining that The Hamiltons siblings recently lost their parents and they have moved several times within the past couple of years. Twin Wendell soon kidnaps two young girls and it becomes apparent that The Hamiltons are not as they seem. Sensitive Francis grows weary of their ways, but is scared to be alone. Does he decide to do the right thing or stick by his family no matter what?

This is not by any means a typical horror film, but a thinking person's horror film. Those looking for gore and scares will be disappointed. It has an original story with great dialogue showcasing real problems within every family. It is ultimately a very accurate portrayal of a real family dealing with growing pains that features a slight twist at the end. During the end scene, you hear Francis giving a creepy voice-over almost giving it a documentary feel.

Cory Knauf gives a solid performance as Francis, the young man that has so much to say, but cannot. He really shows how torn Francis was in his decision and the isolation felt by many teens struggling to find their place as they hit adulthood. Mackenzie Firgens gives a great turn as twin Darlene who is vicious and sexy at the same time. You will love the scene where she chases Kitty through the house. (And maybe the one where she kisses her own brother!?!)

My only quibble is there is minimal gore and violence. During violent interactions, the camera turns away, so very little is caught on film. There is also an opening scene with Brittany Daniel that looked frightening at first, but there were some jittery camera movements and it fizzled with no pay out.

Bottom Line: The Hamiltons is a subtle "horror" film with a slow pace. This is more of a thinking man's (or woman's) horror film. Gorehounds should pass.

Rating: 7/10

Molly Celaschi www.HorrorYearbook.com MySpace.com/HorrorYearbook
42 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Efficiently captures the spirit of 70s and 80s horror
dgaither6 March 2006
I saw this film at Cinequest, the San Jose Film Festival, in March of 2006. The Hamiltons is a movie with writing and directing credit going to "The Butcher Brothers". I think this is a name we will be seeing more from in the future. They've managed to put together a good old-fashioned scare fest, with some very powerful shocks along the way, all while using very basic gore and makeup effects.

The movie is about a group of grown siblings, whose parents have died, who are living together as a family unit, trying to be a "normal" suburban family. But they have a terrible secret. Part of that secret is that they abduct and kill people (mostly lovely young women). The rest of the secret is what keeps us involved throughout the mayhem that follows.

They've managed to create an atmosphere similar to Texas Chainsaw Massacre, without being quite so gruesome or so unrelenting. Mixed among the powerful killing and torture scenes are scenes of banal domestic dysfunction. They are obviously big horror fans and sprinkle the movie with references to the movies genre fans love.

My only complaint is that they overindulge in camera tricks. Some of the tricks are very effective. In the pre-credit scene a woman is killed, but the violence occurs in a series of extremely rapid cuts (I'm guessing maybe 3 per second) which keeps us from quite seeing what's happening. This allows our bloody imaginations to do much of the work and keeps us from noticing how simple the make-up effects are. I would like to have seen them use this technique again, but instead they went on to try every camera trick they could think of.

The youngest brother is camcording much of the family action, he says for a school project. This gives the directors an excuse to have many square-cropped, bouncy scenes, with jagged edges around the objects and low resolution. Other scenes are grainy with a shot-on-videotape-in-poor-lighting look. Much of the movie is in high-resolution, beautiful 35mm. Then, even more distractingly, they start mixing up the resolution and cropping mattes, so that we get a high resolution square shot, supposedly from the camcorder, so the actor can look good in close up. There's a couple of scenes where the shot alternates between two actors in dialog and one of them is shot in the grainy tape-look format while the other one is in high-res 35mm. Nearly all of the violent scenes are augmented? by quick-motion, tracers, vibrating cameras, or something else to add impact not present in the action itself. I'm sure they had fun playing all these camera games. The problem is that it draws us out of the story. I spent much of the movie's time thinking about such things, instead of wondering what they were going to do to those poor girls next. There are a few soundtrack scares, but they don't overdo this.

If it ever gets released, I'll want to see it again. The camera tricks do not make the movie unwatchable, they're just distracting. It's a much better movie than a lot of low-budget horror and it left me with the kind of feeling I get from the old 70s and 80s slashers, but it's not as graphic.
39 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't bother!
nickilancaster13 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I feel it is my duty as a lover of horror films to warm other people about this horrible and very very bad "horror" film. Don't waste your time or money on this film, the acting is bad, the story is just one of the worst i have come across and the script was just awful. Nothing about it was good, you end up thinking to yourself why am i watching this crap. The plot had so many holes in it and they never got cleared up in the end, it was just so bad, i don't know how a film so terrible could be made. As i said before i love horror films and i was so let down, it was an 18 but you see little blood and no scares or jumps at all. Also what annoyed me was how stupid things happened in the film that had no point to the plot at all like the brother and sister kissing, why? is all i can say. Just don't bother, there are far more great horror films out there, just don't waste your time life is too short.
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good film, but where are the conclusions?
doctor1318 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
As has been described elsewhere, THE HAMILTONS is sort of a mixture of LEAVE IT TO BEAVER and Texas CHAIN SAW MASSACRE. A parent-less family of five, the Hamiltons kill and kidnap people, although we don't know exactly why until the end. The teenage boy, Francis, is the only one who seems to be having doubts about the family's exploits, which he documents with a camcorder.

There are several teen angst themes dealt with here: the lack of privacy, the frightening concept of one's place in the world, a first crush, longing for a better life, etc. The performances are all very good, too.

My biggest problem with the film, though is that a lot of the smaller sub-stories aren't tied up and left inconclusive. Oldest brother David is obviously struggling with his homosexuality. The twins begin challenging David's authority, even going so far as to hinting that they might kill him if he tries to restrain them. Wendell torments his brother Francis repeatedly. The twins kill with abandon and no care as to who the victims are and if their disappearances will start massive manhunts, and they don't! The main theme here seems to be that family blood is thicker than other people's blood, which is fine, but I wanted some conclusions to the story lines above, and I wasn't given any. This left me with an unsatisfied feeling of the film not being "finished", and as a result, prevented me from fully enjoying the movie as much as I might have.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Family that Slays Together .... Well, you know the rest.
Coventry8 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
You never really know what to expect from the debut horror movie brought on by a directors-duo that refer to themselves as "The Butcher Brothers". They very well could be a pair of ambitious young filmmakers with inventive new ideas and an aversion towards political correctness, OR … they could also be a couple of phony and untalented hacks that only want to cash in on the contemporary extremely popular horror genre. After seeing it, I can only conclude that "The Hamiltons" is a bit of a mixed bag. The main storyline, albeit seriously derivative of other horror franchises, has potential and features a handful of ingenious ideas, but still the overall elaboration of the screenplay is unsatisfying and the film definitely required the touch of an experienced director. The film opens with a grim, "Saw"-esque scene set in a filthy basement, where a terrified girl awakes and finds her friends dead. Something vile and aggressive prevents her from escaping, but we can't see what it is because the screen turns black and the girl's screams fade away. Although never really confirmed, I can only assume that the intro sequence took place in the basement of the Hamilton family's last home. The younger son Francis, always carrying around a video camera like the freak in "American Beauty", introduces his deranged siblings and explains how they moved houses six times already since their parents passed away two years earlier. They keep moving around because the oldest son David and the twins Wendell and Darlene are a strange breed of cannibals and they keep hitchhiking girls imprisoned in the cellar. There's more fishy stuff going on in this family, for example the incestuous tension between Wendell & Darlene and the mysterious fifth family member – named Lenny – who always remains locked up in a cage in the cellar. Francis has moral issues with his siblings' life styles, but he's too weak and too afraid to revolt against them. "The Hamiltons" occasionally benefices from an uncanny atmosphere and the morbid set pieces, but the pacing is too slow and the titular characters are too implausible to evoke disturbance. Also, in my humble opinion, The Butcher Brothers are unworthy of their cool name because the amount of gore and graphic bloodshed is sorely disappointing! Still I can't be exaggeratedly harsh, because it nevertheless remains an interesting & experimental new horror flick. The script brings homage to "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" (for example, the oldest son David works in an abattoir) and offers some effectively surprising twists near the climax, like Francis' eventual fate and the long-awaited confrontation with Larry. Worth a least one viewing, especially for tolerant horror fanatics.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Snoozer B-movie
cblakeJoey22 November 2006
This is the second movie I saw for Horrorfest this past weekend, The Gravedancers being the first. Gravedancers was better. I can only guess from watching this that the production must have been quite limited. I will admit the story started out interesting but really fizzled for me in the end. We weren't really given time to sympathize or understand any of the characters which only made each of their erratic characteristics even more annoying. I have to mention that there was also a bit of mis-casting with a 12-year-old boy acting as Sheriff. The only reason I sat through the whole film was to find out what the big secret was, which turned out to not be all that interesting. Some more background about the family would have helped but they didn't really seem like a family at all to begin with.

To me, this film is so amateur that I couldn't even see putting it on DVD. The four rating is for the initial potential the story might have had. This was one to skip for horrorfest.
15 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Ordinary Suburban Family
claudio_carvalho5 June 2009
After the death of their parents, the troubled teenager Francis (Cory Knauf) and the corrupt twins Wendell (Joseph McKelheer) and Darlene (Mackenzie Firgens) are raised by their older homosexual brother David Hamilton (Samuel Child), who sold the farm that belonged to the family. However, the sensitive and confused Francis feels misfit with his siblings and misses his parents; he spends most of his time using a camcorder to film a supposed school project. When Wendell abducts the drifters Dani Cummings (Brittany Daniel) and her friend Samantha Teal (Rebekah Hoyle), he brings them to the cellar of his house. While David daily tortures until he kills Dani, Francis sneaks in the cellar and befriends and feels sympathy for Samantha. When David is ready to kill Sam, Francis rescues her and discloses the tragic secret of his evil family.

"The Hamiltons" is a manipulative tale of an ordinary suburban American family that has a secret. This low-budget movie brilliantly develops the character Francis, performed by Cory Knauf and alternates between a sadistic movie and a family drama in a slow-pace misguiding the viewer. However, the unexpected final twist makes the difference of this original story, when the secret of the siblings is disclosed. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Anjos da Morte" ("Angels of the Death")
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Different and Strange
Kezzizzle11 April 2007
This is a hard one to describe. I had quite high expectations for this film having heard that nearly all of the 8 films from the horror fest were brilliant. This film is sort of half and half. It does deliver the spooks and the chills, but it's also quite slow, and you kind of just want it to get on with it.

It's basically about a family who appear to be all American, all nice and all harmless. But behind closed doors each of them has a sorta, nasty little secret. The older brother has taken over the fatherly role as their parents are dead. He's really plastic. Very smily and cheesy. Then we have the twins, a brother and a sister who are, shall we say, a little closer than most brothers and sisters. Then we've got the younger brother who is confused about his presence in the house. He feels he doesn't fit in with the rest of his family. But by the end of this film, you realise, he more than fits in.

Finally, we have an unknown being that lives in the basement. This 'thing' has an unknown identity throughout the whole film...it's only when it's the last 5 minutes of the film, you actually see what this thing is.

All in all, this film does keep you guessing and it does drag on for abit and strays away from what i would call, the main point of the film. It's very well done, and I do look forward to watching the other 7 films from the horror fest.
14 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disposable entertainment
slayrrr66631 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
"The Hamiltons" is a rather dull and weak barely horror film.

**SPOILERS**

Following their parents' death, the Hamilton family, Francis, (Cory Knauf) David, (Samuel Child) Wendell, (Joseph McKelheer) and Darlene, (Mackenzie Firgens) all move together to get reacquainted. As none of them really cares about any of the others, it always degenerates down into arguments. As they all manage to go out and pick up various strangers to kidnap and torture, some grow weary of the practice and try to do the opposite of the family. As it proves harder and harder to resist the temptations due to outside forces and their own feelings with each other, it becomes too much and they soon erupt into a flurry of violence, leaving a trail of carnage in their wake.

The Good News: There isn't a whole lot to this one. This one does have some nice torture scenes that are pretty disturbing at times. There is a real brutal quality to them that is nicely appreciated. By making them not necessarily graphic but still squirm-inducing is a good step, since it makes it uncomfortable while still getting the point across without going overboard. That is ably demonstrated in the first one, as it displays both qualities in real spades. That it all takes place in a dark, dirty basement gives it a really good creep factor that plays out nicely. Another one is the opening segment, which is dark, disturbing and pretty creepy, and that makes it a real joy as well. The only other scene that works is the delightfully sleazy Dare game played. It starts off nice and innocent, and seen delves into really kinky realms that are really nice to see in such a film. Otherwise, these are all that work for the film.

The Bad News: This is a woefully underwhelming effort. The fact that this is so much like a family drama rather than a horror film is the greatest flaw. This one is incredibly concerned with the family, and rarely takes time to cover them in detail, and that exposes several flaws. The first one is that none of that is all that interesting. It isn't interesting and never once does anything to remedy that. It's also quite boring as it's mostly done through the eyes of a video-taping camera with a voice-over during the whole thing. That nothing at all happens in here is another problem. Beyond the few exceptions, this one doesn't do anything new with this plot and this is hardly all that important in getting any action in the film. That is a really big flaw in the film, since it just goes on and on without ever doing anything but a few select scenes. The film's last big flaw is that this one here doesn't have much of a terrifying premise to it. The actions speak well, but this one doesn't really have a whole lot that can be construed as a horror film. With the family drama coming in a possible source, it drains the film of much-needed horror scenes that instead don't do much of anything for building up scares or suspense. This, along with the others, lowers this one down a lot.

The Final Verdict: This is a thoroughly disappointing and really weak horror film that doesn't do a whole lot right with a lot of flaws. This one here should really only be for those who enjoyed the others in the series, while as a whole it should be taken with extreme caution for those who might find the flaws off-putting.

Rated R: Graphic Violence, Graphic Language and Nudity
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The tag line is ...
kosmasp8 October 2007
... all the money (that's Greek idiom, which means that it's on the spot)! Because we're not talking about your average family (at least that's not how I imagine the US of A ;o) ). But it's best not to know anything else from this movie, just that this is a thriller/horror, with some crazy family folks. The actors might not be up to any academy award standard, but they still do fit the bill here quit nicely.

Some scenes will require the viewer to stomach a few things (although "veterans" might just only suppress a yawn), but it is necessary for the story, as you will found out. So the violence never is as over the top as some other movies (also described as gore porn, because it's too much violence), but still enough/too much for some people. After that warning, I'm leaving it up to you to decide if you want to watch this "nice" little "b-movie" ...
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Interesting Family Tale, A New Perspective
gavin69424 June 2007
The Butcher Brothers deliver a story of a family (The Hamiltons) who must travel from place to place because each time they move something goes wrong and the police show up. Could it somehow be related to the women that they tie up in the cellar? The youngest brother begins to to think this family tradition is something that must end.

In many ways there's nothing new to this movie. I'm sure if you think about it, you can find a film where a family member does bad things, the family protects him or her and when caught they move on. Sadly, the first thing that comes to my mind is Stephen King's "Sleepwalkers" (although some comparisons could be made). So in that respect, nothing shocking here.

But, I still felt there was something -- I don't know what -- special about this film. I think it might be how the plot was more focused on the family relationship and dynamics than with the horror aspects. Yes, there are girls tied up in the cellar. But the main focus is how the brothers relate to each other with the parents being deceased. Sort of like a dysfunctional "Party of Five" (although I guess "POF" was never that functional).

There is a bit of sexuality here for those who need it, including some scenes of two women getting friendly. The gore is very modest, mostly just a trickle of blood here and there. But these things the film lacks are made up for in the strength of the characters. The lead (the older brother) is not a great actor compared to the rest, but it still comes off as mostly believable.

The 2006 After Dark festival wasn't known for its quality films (though I enjoyed a few of them). This was one of the better ones. Give it a spin if you're looking for a character-driven low budget film. While nothing near the masterpiece that "Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer" is, this will provide the viewer an inner glimpse of the mind of a killer. And his family.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Just Dreadful
artpf18 September 2013
Watching this flick has to be one of the biggest waste of times on the planet.

It plods along at a pace that can put an insomniac to sleep.

I didn't read the synopsis before viewing and found it very hard to know what the heck I was watching. This family kidnaps girls and kills them, only it's not really apparent why.

But one brother seems to be the "good" guy. Oh my god! It's so bad.

Odd thing is...the acting isn't horrible. It's the story and the directing that is just dreadful. The directors tried to make a moody arty horror film but really failed big time.

There is so little action. And nothing makes sense. Here's an example of the lunacy: a character wants to get a drink of water and opens every cabinet in the kitchen and then finds ONE glass. One. Where are all the glasses? Who cares. There isn't one scene in this movie that will hold your attention or make sense. I only gave it 2 stars because the acting isn't horrible and the production values for a low budget flick are good.

That's the only positive things I can say. Too bad...it could have been a winner if the writing and directing was any good.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Amateur
jboyaquar25 June 2007
Without effective indulgence of the supernatural or the poetic motivating nuances of humanity, all this creative team has to hope for is effective usage of its middling, unoriginal elements. 'Party of Five' gone maniacal then genetically unescapable there's little rooting interest because the singular non-homicidal element is a second-rate bland awful-acting 'Wes Bentley' mopester. In fact, all of the acting is skin deep. Even though the dark-haired women appeal, the salaciousness is kept to a minimum. No nudity here. Also lacking are sufficient buckets of blood. All sensations are kept at a teasing, safe distance...an unfortunate fact considering the given name of the directors is 'butcher.' Only the soundtrack, the droning angsty alt-country and the tense fluctuating score provide any palpable tension. Sometimes some static storyboarded compositions add appealing low-angles that adds to the malaise...but for a film that calls itself horror, I did not even get close to flinching once. Perhaps a greater emphasis on societal rejuvenation through blood intake, scenes directed with varying geometric shapes outside the square, and a sustained focus on playfulness through the family's maliciousness or traps sympathetic characters need to escape in order to escape their dilemma would have improved my opinion, but this was not a good start to my excursion through horrorfest.
12 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Boy oh boy...
there-we-go3 November 2006
This was a very interesting film. I'm not much of a horror/slasher fanatic, but I can appreciate a good story line. This one has a pretty decent plot behind it, but something was lost along the way. I enjoyed the way it was shot--with the younger brother's video project changing it up a bit from the norm. The family includes a set of twins and I think the relationship between the two of them is pretty bizarre, but actually it added a lot to the film. The character Lenny keeps us interested throughout the whole movie, trying to figure out who/what he is, and that was a totally off-the-wall twist. Francis is a relatable character--young teen full of questions and despair, and his development throughout the story was worth observing. It's definitely a strange one, but I got a real kick out of it. I especially like the ending sequence(s) where they start to explain themselves..totally weird. I recommend it, if nothing else, just for the laughs.
19 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Loved it!
miss_sirriamnis20 November 2006
The description of this film did not excite me overly, as I really despise the "people being horrible to other people" subgenre of horror. Boring.

But, there was a projector glitch in the previous Horrorfest film I'd been attending, and they gave us free passes, I was already at the theater, I figured "Why not?" I very nearly walked out in the middle of the opening sequence, because it looked to be very much a "people being horrible to other people" cliché, but I decided to stick it out and I'm glad I did. Best film of the festival.

I thought the story was engaging, and while the violence and gore on camera was minimal, it was effective. After twenty minutes, I WANTED to see how and why this family was so screwed up. While I started to have my suspicions about the twist at the end, it wasn't until just very shortly before it was revealed.
27 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Skip this one...
kender7515 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This is the first film of the Horrorfest I have watched and after Im almost thinking I don't need to see any of the others. I was told its a "thinking mans horror movie" and have to say that if this was supposed to make me think I shutter to think what the splatter/gore films in the collection will be like. Don't get me wrong not even the gore in this film is worth sitting through.

The plot is very washed out with way too much art for arts sake. The camera effects and music are out of place most of the time and the characters are banal to say the least. Several characters and scenes seem worthless in the end when they start to reveal some of the hooks of "The Hamiltons". I figured out who Lenny was about half hour in when I figured out the movie. I was so visually under whelmed and confused by the Lenny reveal that I completely felt ripped off. I expected what I got but they could have gone so much further, in fact all the gore falls completely flat. With movies out there like "Hostel" and "Saw" you need to come a little better for a film that is "considered to graphic or too disturbing for general audiences".
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Put me in the box with Lenny - Please...
JoeytheBrit17 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Barely deserving to be classified as a horror, this lame attempt at combining teen angst with slasher fare fails on all counts. The storyline has young Francis Hamilton (Cory Knauf) and his siblings constantly moving home because they suffer from a disease that compels them to kill. I believe this is supposed to be some kind of stunning revelation, but anyone with half a brain – a criteria that would automatically dispel this stupid clan – will figure out what's going on long before the end credits mercifully roll.

Early on, the hell-raising brother, Wendell (Joseph McKelheer), abducts a couple of female hitchhikers and stashes them in the basement where a 'mysterious' creature called Lenny lives in a box. After that, nothing happens. Nothing. A hapless teen friend of Francis's goth sister gets herself killed by the Hamilton's, as do a number of homosexuals by David (Samuel Childs) the buttoned-down nerdish oldest brother, and the surviving hitchhiker keeps beseeching Francis to set her free, but other than that – nothing. The story goes nowhere; it just hangs there like one of those hitchhikers. When, in the final ten minutes, the Butcher Brothers decide they have strung-out this plot less mess as long as they can, they attempt to inject a little suspense as Francis makes off with the hitchhiker, but fail completely. It's a shame, because the idea of monsters having to come to terms and accept what they are is one worth exploring by a skilled writer/filmmaker.

Poor script, bad storyline with holes you could drive a steamroller through, mediocre acting, a lack of any real gore or horror, no suspense, this trash really has hardly anything going for it – other than a couple of neatly composed shots. Give it a miss. Please. Then send me a PM telling me you have so that I won't feel I've wasted my time writing this review
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
miserable whiny family dynamics...
Pete9752 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
...that seem to be fooling people into seeing qualities in this film that are just not there.

Near Dark covered the same territory but with much more class, and action.

why the script kept their 'big secret' so long was a total mystery to me - I guessed it at the breakfast scene at the start of the film. By the time it was revealed to the viewer it was just a case of 'big deal, tell me something I don't know.'

I found this to be pointless movie that may have challenged the genre conventions, unfortunately those conventions are that horror films are tense and packed with genuine sense of horror. This was woeful
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed