Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The Feather Men Hardcover – 17 Oct. 1991
- Print length280 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBloomsbury Publishing
- Publication date17 Oct. 1991
- ISBN-109780747510499
- ISBN-13978-0747510499
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- ASIN : 0747510490
- Publisher : Bloomsbury Publishing; First Edition (17 Oct. 1991)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 280 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780747510499
- ISBN-13 : 978-0747510499
- Best Sellers Rank: 379,935 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 1,404 in Other Religious & Spiritual Practices
- 4,713 in Other Religions
- 56,965 in Social Sciences (Books)
- Customer reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I think this would be easily addressed by Fiennes making a more frank disclosure in future editions. The book is mostly fiction and should be sold as such. I very much doubt the duplicity adds to sales and may address some of the moral qualms that discourage people like me from purchasing other titles of his.
One of the overriding philosophies of the book Shantaram is that it is possible to do the ‘wrong’ thing for the ‘right’ reasons. And not only is it ‘possible’ but it is sometimes ‘necessary’ to do the wrong thing for the right reasons. The important thing is to be sure that the reasons are right, and that we admit the wrong, and that we don’t lie to ourselves.
Well in Killer Elite even Chairman Mao is quoted, “In given conditions a bad thing can lead to good results.”
There’s no doubt that, “The very decency of democracy hinders the prevention of numerous crimes,” and that as the law forbids the forces of the law to take them out, so the killers (I.e. drug dealers, muggers and other predators), will strike again. It is a sad fact of life that “in democratic societies that there are no-go areas where crime thrives and innocent citizens are preyed upon yet where the police are powerless to act.”
I’d therefore like to think that there are a group of people who believe that, “When the police cannot provide adequate protection (because criminals are more sophisticated at finding loopholes in the law) then more appropriate methods have to be found.”
You might call them vigilantes, yet they harm no one except characters who would continue to harm others, and if you denounce their existence you’re not stopping to think of the lives they’ve saved or the fears they’ve eased. Call them vigilantes if you like, but I’d like to think their conscience is clear.
This book discusses mostly a group of ex-Special Forces and SAS soldiers who are being targeted and killed by professional assassins. I don’t want to throw any spoilers into this review, just that I’d like to believe the whole book is true. Not, of course, those ex-SAS soldiers are being targeted and killed, but more that there are a group of people whose main object – staying ‘loosely’ within the remit of the law, and only flirting slightly with criminality - is to protect them, which surprisingly proves to be no easy task.
Thoroughly recommended
All I can say is that if it was fiction, Sir Ranulph, as well as being the worlds greatest living explorer, has an exceptionally vivid and wild imagination.
I cant see that anyone would be blessed with two such gifts!!
This is an almost word for word reprint of the original and is a fantastically absorbing read even second time round.
Top reviews from other countries
I have also appreciated the description of Omani exotic environment, that provides a pleasant and supporting frame to the narration.
The movie's plot, as usually happens, has some differences when compared to the book, but it's no place to spoilers here! Read the book and watch the movie (in whichever order you like much), I've found both of them very riveting and well done.
A pity for the title: I like much the original one, "The Feather Men", because "Killer Elite" tastes too much of rubbish literature, that it's far to be.
Great job Sir Fiennes, I've appreciated it, even if I warmly hope you can still take your rubbish out after dark!
Another thing worth noting too - in both cases - is the different treatment given to the story between the book and the film. In the film, Killer Elite, the chief assassin, Danny Brice (played by Jason Statham) is made to appear almost as a hero, a reluctant killer, retired from the profession of contract killer but virtually blackmailed back into it in order to save a friend, Hunter (Robert DeNiro) who faces death at the hands of the Sheikh, who seeks revenge for the death of his three sons, all killed by British Special Forces. Only when Danny provides proof of their execution - which must be made to appear accidental - and a taped confession of their guilt, will Hunter be released. The original Special Forces operatives are made to appear brutal and cynical, no better than killers for hire. There is no mention of a multi-million dollar fee as the main motive for Danny and his two accolytes, Davies and Meier.
This is very different from the book, where the chief assassin, the leader of the small killer cell called The Clinic, de Villiers, is motivated solely by money; and where the British Special Forces involved in the death of the Sheikh's three sons are shown to have been simply soldiers doing their duty in a bloody and merciless war in which the three sons were themselves very willing participants, in a communist-inspired insurrection against the lawful regime in Oman, which the British were defending. The character Hunter does not exist in the book. Spike, played by David Owen in the film, is the real hero in the book, trying to discover why former (and serving) British Special Forces members are being targetted for assassination, for no apparent reason - they were never guilty of anything resembling what might now be called a war crime. And in the end he succeeds not only in foiling de Villiers final attempt but in capturing him as well. The author (and we) do not know what happens to him in the end. But he certainly does not return to his native Australia to rejoin his girlfriend in the Yarra Valley.
In that respect, the film is a complete turnaround of the book, where the villains are made to appear righteous.
(Another parallel with The Quiet American, where the first film to be made of the novel, the 1958 version, with Michael Redgrave and Audie Murphy, not the second version in 2002 with Michael Caine, ends up completely distorting the original story, making the English journalist, played by Redgrave, appear to be a naive and bumbling has-been and Pyle, the American agent played by Audie Murphy, is vindicated as righteous and far-seeing, in working towards the establishment of a 'third force' in Vietnam to defeat the communists and replace the effete and outdated French colonialists with the righteous forces of American freedom. I don't know if the director of that film, Joseph Mankiewitz, was still alive at the time of the final communist victory in Vietnam in 1975, but if he was, I hope he had the grace to feel at least slightly ashamed of himself for having so perverted the original film.)
Having said that, as regards the Killer Elite, both the film and the book are well worth watching and reading.
Claude Renaud