Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
-10% $28.80$28.80
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$25.92$25.92
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: ATwiceSoldTale
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Audible sample Sample
Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism Hardcover – March 26, 2024
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Purchase options and add-ons
“You will not read a more important legal work this election year.” —Bob Woodward,Washington Post reporter and author of fifteen #1 New York Times bestselling books
“A dissent for the ages.” —The Washington Post
“Breyer’s candor about the state of the court is refreshing and much needed.” —The Boston Globe
The relatively new judicial philosophy of textualism dominates the Supreme Court. Textualists claim that the right way to interpret the Constitution and statutes is to read the text carefully and examine the language as it was understood at the time the documents were written.
This, however, is not Justice Breyer’s philosophy nor has it been the traditional way to interpret the Constitution since the time of Chief Justice John Marshall. Justice Breyer recalls Marshall’s exhortation that the Constitution must be a workable set of principles to be interpreted by subsequent generations.
Most important in interpreting law, says Breyer, is to understand the purposes of statutes as well as the consequences of deciding a case one way or another. He illustrates these principles by examining some of the most important cases in the nation’s history, among them the Dobbs and Bruen decisions from 2022 that he argues were wrongly decided and have led to harmful results.
- Print length368 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSimon & Schuster
- Publication dateMarch 26, 2024
- Dimensions6.13 x 1.1 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-101668021536
- ISBN-13978-1668021538
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
"A dissent for the ages." -- Ruth Marcus ― The Washington Post
“Breyer’s candor about the state of the court is refreshing and much needed.” -- Kimberly Atkins Stohr ― Boston Globe
“Breyer offers a cogent explanation of judicial reasoning, focusing particularly on the difference between textualism—now dominating the current Court—and pragmatism, which is his guiding principle. . . . A deeply informed analysis of judicial history.” ― Kirkus Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Simon & Schuster (March 26, 2024)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 368 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1668021536
- ISBN-13 : 978-1668021538
- Item Weight : 1.17 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.13 x 1.1 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,734 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1 in United States Judicial Branch
- #3 in General Constitutional Law
- #92 in United States History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2024
Justice Breyer does an excellent job explaining the methods used in interpreting the US Constitution and why he prefers his method. I don’t believe that a Justice can make a decision that is not influenced by their personal values, worldview, and political philosophy. The book exposes a major weakness in our legal system. The weakness is that there is not an agreed-upon method in interpreting the US Constitution. That means there is no issue that is settled law regardless of past rulings. In the 20th century, political leaders were moderate either right or left of center. This weakness has become exacerbated in recent years by the political parties having become extremely conservative or liberal. This has led to the appointment of Justices with extreme political philosophies that have led to decisions based on the political philosophies of the majority. Justices have denied that their decisions are political but their decisions have told us otherwise. The public will continue to lose confidence in the court until moderate Justices are appointed or an agreed-upon method for interpreting the US Constitution is found.
We are fortunate that he took the to provide us with this detailed analyses.