Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
$18.24$18.24
FREE delivery: Wednesday, Feb 7 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$16.42$16.42
FREE delivery: Wednesday, Feb 7 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Krak Dogz Distribution
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
Star Trek Into Darkness [4K UHD]
- Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
- Learn more about free returns.
- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
- Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
- Learn more about free returns.
- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
Additional 4K options | Edition | Discs | Price | New from | Used from |
4K
February 20, 2017 "Please retry" | — | 2 | $30.70 | $30.78 |
4K
June 14, 2016 "Please retry" | — | 2 |
—
| — | — |
Watch Instantly with | Rent | Buy |
Purchase options and add-ons
Genre | Science Fiction & Fantasy |
Format | 4K |
Contributor | Peter Weller, Alice Eve, Simon Pegg, Zoe Saldana, Anton Yelchin, John Cho, Karl Urban, J.J. Abrams, Leonard Nimoy, Chris Pine, Benedict Cumberbatch, Zachary Quinto, Bruce Greenwood See more |
Language | English |
Runtime | 2 hours and 11 minutes |
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may ship from close to you
From the manufacturer
Star Trek Into Darkness
When a ruthless mastermind known as Khan (Benedict Cumberbatch) declares a one-man war on the Federation, Captain Kirk (Chris Pine), Spock (Zachary Quinto), and the daring crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise will embark on the greatest manhunt in history. It will take all of their skills and teamwork to defend Earth and eliminate Khan’s threat.
Star Trek Into Darkness Cast:
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Chris PineJames T. Kirk. |
Zachary QuintoSpock. |
Zoe SaldanaUhura |
Benedict CumberbatchJohn Harrison/Khan. |
If you enjoyed Star Trek Into Darkness, don't miss these 4K titles:
If you enjoyed Star Trek Into Darkness, don't miss these 4K titles:
Product Description
J.J. Abrams' "Star Trek: Into Darkness" is the best-reviewed blockbuster of the year. When a ruthless mastermind known as Khan (Benedict Cumberbatch) declares a one-man war on the Federation, Captain Kirk (Chris Pine), Spock (Zachary Quinto), and the darling crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise will embark on the greatest manhunt in history. It will take all of their skills and teamwork to defend Earth and eliminate Khan's threat in this "sleek, thrilling epic."
CREDITS:
Actors: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Karl Urban, Zoe Saldana, Simon Pegg
Directors: J.J. Abrams
FEATURES:
- Format: 4K, Widescreen
- Language: English
- Subtitles: English, French, Portuguese, Spanish
- Dubbed: French, Portuguese, Spanish
- Region: Region A/1 (Read more about DVD/Blu-ray formats.)
- Number of discs: 3
- Rated: PG-13 Parents Strongly Cautioned
- Studio: PARAMOUNT
- Run Time: 131 minutes
Star Trek: Into Darkness -- 4K ULTRA HD
Product details
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- MPAA rating : PG-13 (Parents Strongly Cautioned)
- Product Dimensions : 0.7 x 7.5 x 5.4 inches; 4 Ounces
- Item model number : 35386463
- Director : J.J. Abrams
- Media Format : 4K
- Run time : 2 hours and 11 minutes
- Release date : June 14, 2016
- Actors : Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Simon Pegg
- Dubbed: : Spanish, French, Portuguese
- Subtitles: : French, English, Spanish, Portuguese
- Studio : PARAMOUNT
- ASIN : B01DY8AWNO
- Country of Origin : USA
- Number of discs : 3
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,871 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #2,252 in Blu-ray
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Others have detailed the plot specifics so I will go with my own perspective as a lifelong Star Trek fan who started watching TOS in syndicated rerun in the mid-70's. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan is my favorite Star Trek movie by far and it is in my list of the Top 10 films of all-time. So I was a bit concerned when I read the rumors on the Internet that Cumberbatch was going to reprise this iconic Science Fiction role in Star Trek: Into Darkness. I felt that JJ & company needed to do something different since they had created an alternate timeline with the first movie. I think the writing team had given lots of thought of parallel universes and how certain points and people are fixed in time in all possible universes. The work they did on Fringe pushed them to do several seasons worth of story about an alternate universe. Peter was their fixed person in the Fringe universe who impacted both realities. The writers looked at Khan the same way. I had to think about the plot threads of terrorism, betrayal, security, revenge, optimism, family and trust that were weaved through Into Darkness after seeing it Wednesday night. I then read the novelization and the prequel graphic novel to gain a better perspective before I went and watched the movie again today.
The main themes hit by this story are many such as Kirk being too young, impetuous, inexperienced, undisciplined, egotistical, etc., to command a starship effectively; Spock still suffering emotionally from the traumatic loss of his home-world and his mother while trying to connect with his erratic, emotional, impulsive Captain; Starfleet Command reacting badly to the devastating terror attack by Nero against Vulcan and Starfleet in the previous film causing Starfleet Command to turn to extraordinary extra-legal actions to bring security to the Federation despite undermining the very freedoms and ethics espoused by the Federation (Section 31); Scotty being the one crew member (besides Spock) willing to take a moral stand with Kirk over crossing the line of legality and ethics while Kirk & Starfleet are preoccupied with revenge against Khan.
So to me this wasn't a rehash of Wrath of Khan because that story was about coming to terms with growing older and feeling that life had passed you by. Kirk's past comes back to haunt him and the Enterprise and Kirk finally had to face his own Kobyashi Maru test with Spock's sacrifice. Khan was motivated by his need for vengeance against Kirk over the loss of his wife and being left marooned on a doomed planet. This too was an issue from Khan's past he could not let go and it was his undoing. ST:ID is about surviving the viccitudes of youth and learning from your mistakes to mature into a better sentient being connected to your friends and society. Kirk had Pike to place his faith and trust in him even when Kirk had royally screwed up from the hubris of flagrantly violating the Prime Directive on Nibiru even as Kirk failed to recognize this error. It took Pike's death and the pursuit of Khan to bring Kirk to the realization that he had to change his worldview and behavior.
Spock was struggling with his inner demons over the loss of Vulcan and his mother. He also made a personal journey of self-discovery in ST:ID especially after Kirk sacrificed himself to save the ship. Spock is filled with rage and pursues Khan with a fury never seen before. He helps save his friend Jim Kirk and he can now acknowledge this friendship and let it evolve.
Starfleet Command reacted like the US did after 9/11. They undermined their own principles in the name of imagined security. Admiral Marcus had sent out ships looking for resources to help Starfleet defend the Federation and they found the Botany Bay. Admiral Marcus thought he could exploit Khan's genetically engineered superior intellect and his capacity for violence to give the clandestine Section 31 (think CIA/Homeland Security/Special Forces) an advantage in building a capacity to take on the biggest perceived threat to the Federation for Admiral Marcus... the Klingon Empire. Thus you get the top-secret special prototype photon torpedoes and the built for combat USS Vengeance along with who knows what else that didn't get mentioned. You get incidents manipulated to provoke a state of war with the Klingons. All justified in the name of security.
Scotty was just awesome in this story. He was a moral compass while getting in on the action with the sabotage of the USS Vengeance. He also got some more great comedic scenes and lines. I was a bit disappointed that Bones didn't get more involved in this story but since it involved more technological issues I can see why Scotty was used rather than McCoy. Bones still got in some great metaphors and scenes and you know he can deliver Gorn babies in a crisis situation. Sulu gets a taste of the command chair and Checkov gets to flex his savant genius abilities as Scotty's replacement (temporarily) as Chief Engineer. Uhura has some issues with Spock, talks up some Klingons, battles some Klingons & makes some tough long distance calls. Getting a young Carol Marcus was cool and they didn't force her to be romantically involved with Kirk, She gets to join the crew and maybe they will hook up in the next installment. The Big E gets a refit to repair her battle damage and the crew of the USS Enterprise embark on the start of what should be an eventful, glorious and historic Five-Year Mission to Boldly Go Where No One Has Gone Before.
So I give Into Darkness a 9.235 out of 10. My biggest issue was with how long it took to warp to Kronos and then back to Earth. Unless warp speed had improved by a factor of 100 over the old Star Trek this was a plot device that was just way out of step with the rest of the movie. So other than that I am cool with the rest of the film elements as they were explained by the prequel graphic novel and in the novelization book for the film. I look forward to Star Trek 3 to come out in May of 2016 to be a part of the celebration of the 50th Anniversary of Star Trek!!!
**************DVD Release Addendum*************
I was really excited about the Blu-ray release of Into Darkness. I had read about the multitude of extras that JJ Abrams and his team shot for inclusion with the Blu-ray that would be exciting for the fans. Apparently the good folks in the marketing department at Paramount took a look at this treasure of bonus material and saw a way to extort the fans for even more profit. They struck deals to parcel out these bonus features to different retailers forcing fans to buy a plethora of copies to collect all of the bonus features. I didn't cancel my order because this isn't Amazon's fault and I do want the awesome phaser. I won't be buying these extra copies to line Paramount's pockets full of gold-pressed latinum. Actually, if Paramount had an ounce of integrity they would make a public apology for trying to screw over the fans of Star Trek who have made them profits that would make a Ferengi blush and offer a Blu-ray disc with the bonus material to make up for this error in judgement.
The website Digital Bits is where I was alerted to this shameful avarice. It stated the following: "Yes... the seven featurettes listed in the press release are basically everything you get on the disc, aside from the usual DVD copy, Digital Copy, UltraViolet copy, Xerox copy and what not. The featurettes amount to about 42 minutes of EPK-style behind the scenes material. There's no commentary, no deleted scenes, no trailers... which would be bad enough.
Except...
It turns out that more extras were created for this release - more featurettes and even an audio commentary with director J.J. Abrams and members of his crew. None of it is available on the wide release Blu-ray or Blu-ray 3D SKUs. The commentary can only be found as an iTunes "extra" download. And those extra featurettes? Some are on a Target bonus disc. Some are on a Best Buy bonus disc. And some are only available via CinemaNow and VUDU downloads. That's right: More than half of the special features created for Star Trek Into Darkness were used by Paramount's marketing team as retailer exclusives. It's a terrible way to treat your consumers, who are sometimes spending $30 or more for a Blu-ray, expecting to get a little genuine value for their money. And no, six different versions of the exact same movie isn't value. If you're a serious Blu-ray enthusiast - or for that matter a Star Trek fan of any kind - all you care about when you buy a Blu-ray is getting the movie in pristine quality with lots of extras. Though its A/V quality is exceptional, in all other respects the Star Trek Into Darkness Blu-ray is an insult." (to see the entire column, visit www - thedigitalbits - com /columns/my-two-cents/082813_1415)
Writers: Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damon Lindelof.
Starring: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Simon Pegg, John Cho, Anton Yelchin, Bruce Greenwood, Benedict Cumberbatch, Alice Eve and Peter Weller.
Running Time: 132 minutes.
Rated: PG-13 for Intense Sequences of Sci-Fi Action and Violence.
There's something I really enjoy about JJ Abrams style of filmmaking. Yes, its flashy and fast and it may come off as a bit shallow, but there's something about it that gives off a spark that really gets me engaged. He can get establish a lot within the first 15 to 30 minutes of a movie, which would take most filmmakers quite a while to build up. Everything from the big action scenes, to the core characters and their motivations to what they do - He knows exactly what he's doing behind the camera.
A prime example of this would be when he did Super 8. Within a half hour, we know just about the entire cast, what the kids are doing in the movie, the big awesome train crash that was so publicized happens and it happens at full force and it never feels like its overstuffing its self.
Which brings us to his take on the much loved Star Trek franchise. These films of his really cause some weird reactions with people. They make nice amounts of money and get excellent reviews from critics, but if you went to a random forum on the cesspit that is the internet, you'd probably find the opposite reaction. Almost like as if Abrams and co. spat in the face of everyone's mother and other relatives.
Personally, I actually really liked - hell, maybe even loved - his reboot of the Trek franchise. Great visuals, excellent chemistry, fun dialogue, fast paced, awesome music - It did a lot of things right, even if the plot was a bit confusing, with the alternate universes, black holes and what not.
Something that puzzles the hell out of me is why did the sequel, Into Darkness, take so long? I know Abrams was busy with Super 8 but maybe he should have put that off (as much as I love that film) in favor of doing this. It probably would be doing better business at the box office and critics than it is doing now.
Now, in the event you are wondering if I'm attacking the film or am going to spew out negative thoughts on the film, let's get this out of the way:
I'm not.
While Into Darkness certainly has its problems, and we'll get to those latter, its a worthy sequel to the original and one of the most entertaining things I've seen this year. It still has all the elements I loved from the original with a few new things thrown in.
Set a few years after the original, the Federation has come under attack from a terrorist by the name of John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch), a former Starfleet officer out for revenge after he felt that Star command screwed him over in the worst ways possible. The crew of the Enterprise, led of course by Kirk n' Spock (Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, respectively), are sent in to take him down by orders of one Admiral Marcus (Peter Weller). But while the plot may seem simple, things are not as they seem.
I feel the need to get the bad stuff out of the way first, like in the same way a bratty child is forced to eat his vegetables before he can get to the good stuff. One of my main complaints of the film is that I feel it goes on for far too long. While Abrams's previous films have sported great pacing, Into Darkness kind of mess up a bit. There's filler in the movie that could have been seriously cut out and it would have been all the better for it, like bits where good ol Scotty (Simon Pegg) gets drunk off his ass or the bar scene between Kirk and Commander Pike (Bruce Greenwood and yes, I know its done to show their Father-Son-like relationship but it came off as forced).
Another thing that film does that bothers me is that it suffers from being unpredictable to predictable. There's some twists that caught me off guard but there's some stuff that can be seen a mile away. I think it may have to do with the fact that it had 3 screenwriters doing it, the first two being the scribes from the previous film Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman while the third scribe was divisive Prometheus and Lost writer Damon Lindelof. I always get this weird feeling like whenever Mr. Linelof is involved, the product always ends up spawning weird reactions with people. Eh, moving on.
As for the good stuff for the film, a lot of the things that made the first film great are still here. The visual effects and set design are better than ever, ranging from seeing things like an incredible fight in hyper-space in which we see all sorts of people flying out of the hull as things explode left and right, to the now famous scene in the trailers and advertisements where we see a Starfleet cruiser crash into a sprawling metropolis. Michael Giacchino's score is still nothing short of incredible, bringing out some true excitement and wonderment to the universe and some of the music is bound to get stuck in your head after its all over.
The performances across the board are quite good as well. Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto continue to show they have their characters down pat and never ceases to stop being amusing from watching them be bros one moment to bickering about the rules and personal approaches to how the current mission on hand should be accomplished. Or how Karl Urban, who will always be Judge Dredd in my mind from now on thanks to to the excellent 2012 adaptation, continues to be the best replacement for Bones McCoy, with his quips and grumpy attitude.
While some have had problems with the character of Dr. Carol Marcus, a doctor who pops up on the Enterprise under a different name (Don't worry: No spoilers), and her actress Alice Eve, I never really had a problem with her. I thought she did well with the material that was given to her, especially her scenes between her and Bones.
But special mention must go to Benedict Cumberbatch as Harrison. Charismatic, intimidating, fierce and methodical are just the few words to describe his villain. One moment, you can go from being fascinated and even wanting to see him defeated, to feeling incredibly sorry for the guy. Quite a performance here. He's a true threat and makes the villain of the previous film, Nero (Eric Bana), look like a chump. No disrespect to Mr. Bana, who played a very fun and dangerous villain, but you look like old stuff compared to Cumberbatch. Kinda funny how the guy who has a ship with the ability to create black holes looks less threatening than one man with superpowers.
One might ask me: "Is Into Darkness better than the original?" I cannot say no, as due to the problems I've mentioned here that were not or at least weren't as big in the 2009 reboot. Star Trek 2009 was incredibly fresh at the time and sadly, with this, some, if only a little of the polish has come off. But that's only minor. Both films are pretty much on the same plane, with Darkness coming up just a tad short.
Into Darkness is bound to piss people off, as with most "sacred" works in nerdom, like whatever Joss Whedon pumps out or live action adaptations of Anime (which always almost suck). But even with the problems that the film has, there's still a lot to like here. If you can get past the pacing issues and the predictability of the film, you're in for one fun summer movie.
Now that all that is said and done, two questions remain: How will Abrams take on Star Wars turn out and what will Paramount do with the next film in the Trek franchise? I've got high hopes for his take on SW, but I'm not sure what to think the next Trek film will turn out. I just hope they get someone who's just as confident and energetic as Abrams is.
Top reviews from other countries
Es ist ein wirklich guter Film, nicht mehr aber auch nicht weniger.
Bij deze advertentie stond dat er Nederlandse ondertitels bij zaten, maar achterop het doosje staat dat dus niet op deze Scandinavische uitvoering van de film. Dus ik was een beetje huiverig dat ze misschien dat alleen bedoelde voor de bijgesloten Blu-ray en niet voor de 4K Blu-ray. Bij aankomst meteen in mijn X-Box gedaan en ik werd helemaal blij, want je kan meteen kiezen in welke taal je het menu wilt hebben.
En ‘s avonds heb ik meteen de film Nederlands ondertiteld gekeken en van genoten.
Je ne raconterai rien de l’intrigue. Autant vous laisser porter par le souffle de l’aventure devant l’écran. Sachez simplement qu’il y est question de complot, de manipulations, d’attentats terrestres, de combats spatiaux (liste non exhaustive). Autre enjeu pour Kirk : dans le film précédent, il accédait au grade de capitaine en partie par chance et en partie par son audace ; ici, il devra acquérir la maturité nécessaire pour devenir un « vrai » capitaine. L’histoire, linéaire, se suit avec plaisir, mais une fois la principale menace révélée vers les deux tiers du film, il faut reconnaître que les péripéties et rebondissements sont relativement classiques et prévisibles. Comprenez-moi bien : on passe un excellent moment, mais on pouvait espérer un surcroît d’inventivité de la part de J.J. Abrams, le créateur de Lost, le régénérateur de Mission Impossible au cinéma, et qui avait fait merveille en 2009 avec l’opus précédent , sans parler de son petit bijou Super 8 . En outre, si le ton du film gagne en gravité par rapport au premier volet, Star Trek into darkness est légèrement moins nerveux, tendu, haletant, bien que l’action ne soit pourtant pas en reste. L’humour, en revanche, n’a pas diminué : de nombreuses petites piques parsèment les dialogues et font mouche systématiquement.
Côté image, on en prend plein les yeux. Les effets spéciaux sont exemplaires, les visuels (les grandes villes terrestres du futur, notamment) magnifiques, les images de synthèses insérées à la perfection dans les plans et il n’y en a pas plus que nécessaire. Visuellement, parions que ça vieillira bien. Oui, les plans du pont restent saturés d’effets de « flare » qui lassent un peu, mais rien de grave : Abrams a finalement décidé d’assumer – tant mieux pour la cohérence visuelle de ses deux films. Cette cohérence se maintient également au niveau musical, puisque Michael Giacchino est de retour avec une partition se situant dans la rigoureuse continuité de ce qu’il avait composé en 2009, avec toujours quelques rappels du thème musical de la série d’origine. Le générique de fin est particulièrement frappant : il est construit sur l’exact modèle du précédent film.
Les acteurs assurent très proprement leurs prestations, mais il leur manque pour la plupart une complicité réelle d’équipage. On ne peut pas leur reprocher : une telle connivence ne se crée qu’après de longs mois voire années de tournage ensemble, comme c’est le cas pour une série télé. Il est vrai que la relation amicale Kirk-Spock commence à avoir de la substance mais pour les personnages un peu périphériques, c’est encore loin d’être le cas. Anton Yelchin, par exemple, est très sympathique en Chekov, mais sa complicité avec des personnages comme Sulu ou Scotty reste embryonnaire. Gageons que cela se mettra en place si la série des films continue. Du côté des méchants, en revanche, nous sommes très bien servis. Benedict Cumberbatch (Sherlock, l’excellente série de la BBC) apporte une remarquable complexité à son personnage de John Harrison. Il est assurément menaçant, mais humain (ses motivations sont compréhensibles) et loyal (il n’a qu’une parole et n’est jamais gratuitement sadique). Sa voix adopte un timbre très grave, ainsi qu’une diction lente et parfaitement intelligible, son corps ne fait jamais un geste qui ne soit utile ou calculé, son regard est fixe, glacial, ne cligne jamais, tout cela confère au personnage une aura de détermination inflexible et surhumaine. L’autre méchant du film n’est pas en reste, mais je ne m’étendrai pas dessus pour ne pas vous gâcher l’histoire. Là où l’intrigue de ce deuxième volet est légèrement moins enlevée et haletante que le précédent, les méchants font, eux, largement oublier un Néro qui était pourtant déjà très respectable. Ils sont l’un des grands atouts du film.
J’en arrive à mon paragraphe qui, j’espère, intéressera les néophytes mais sera PLEIN DE GROS SPOILERS POUR LES FANS (vous êtes prévenus !). Quant Abrams s’est mis à Star Trek en 2009, il a clairement annoncé qu’il ferait un reboot complet, c'est-à-dire qu’il repartirait de l’équipage de la série d’origine (3 saisons entre 1966 et 1969). Mais vu l’intégrisme d’un grand nombre de fans de l’univers, sur le soutien et le bouche-à-oreille desquels la Paramount comptait beaucoup pour la promotion de ses films, Abrams ne pouvait se permettre d’ignorer complètement ce qui avait été mis en place avant lui. A savoir : la série d’origine mais aussi comme les six films qui en furent tirés (entre 1979 et 1991) avec les mêmes personnages. En particulier, Star Trek 2 la colère de Khan (1982) est unanimement reconnu comme étant le meilleur film Star Trek de cette période, voire tout court. Abrams allait-il oui ou non oser en faire un remake (quelque chose d’aussi osé que de vouloir refaire disons Les dents de la mer ou L’empire contre-attaque) ? Allait-on reprendre le mythique et terrifiant Khan (fantastique Ricardo Montalban) ? Soyons brefs : oui, ils ont osé. Évidemment, cela laissera un néophyte tout à fait froid, mais ne soyez pas surpris d’entendre au cinéma un certain nombre d’exclamations venant des fans : ils sont passés en mode « exégèse comparative ». En effet, de nombreux éléments du film et de l’épisode « Space seed » (qui lui est lié) ont été repris, allant de certaines lignes de dialogues à des scènes entières (notamment la mythique scène du réacteur), en passant par plusieurs personnages annexes (comme Carol Marcus, ou les compagnons de Khan). Et pourtant, ce n’est pas le même film, ce n’est pas la même intrigue, ce ne sont pas les mêmes enjeux. Abrams est parvenu à s’approprier le personnage sans le trahir, et à la placer au cœur d’une intrigue à la fois nouvelle et respectueuse de l’univers Star Trek. En tant que néophyte, vous pouvez parfaitement voir le film sans savoir tout ce que je viens de vous raconter. Mais vous pouvez également beaucoup y gagner si vous prenez le temps de regarder auparavant « Space seed » (dans la saison 1 de la série d’origine) puis « Star Trek 2 la colère de Khan ». Soyons clairs : l’épisode a mal vieilli, son histoire est un peu naïve, les décors sont en carton-pâte de deuxième choix et le jeu des acteurs est désuet. Mais Khan et ses compagnons y sont très bien introduits. Le film, quant à lui, a très bien vieilli (bravo aux effets spéciaux d’ILM, encore très beaux 30 ans plus tard), et son intrigue inspirée de Moby Dick (Khan poursuit Kirk de sa soif inextinguible de vengeance) est toujours magnifiquement menée. Et, au final, le Khan d’origine reste inoubliable. Cumberbatch a beau être bon acteur, il n’éclipse pas son modèle. Abrams a beau être bon scénariste, il n’égale pas la pureté et l’efficacité du screenplay de Nicholas Meyer. Oui le remake est très bon, il parvient à incorporer des éléments de l’épisode et du film d’origine, mais n’en égale pas complètement le souffle épique.
Résumons : Abrams signe une suite très réussie à son film de 2009, un tout petit peu moins haletant que celui-ci, mais avec de meilleurs méchants. La mise en scène est sans défaut et les acteurs très compétents. La 3D est belle mais pas forcément indispensable. Même si vous êtes néophyte, vous pourrez l’apprécier. Ne vous en privez donc pas !