Unten ist eine Momentaufnahme der Seite angezeigt, wie sie am 04.07.2023 angezeigt wurde (das letzte Datum, an dem unser Crawler sie besucht hat). Es handelt sich um die Version der Seite, die für das Ranking Ihrer Suchergebnisse verwendet wurde. Die Seite hat sich möglicherweise seit der letzten Zwischenspeicherung geändert. Damit Sie sehen können, was sich geändert hat (ohne die Markierungen), navigieren Sie zur aktuellen Seite.
Bing ist nicht für den Inhalt dieser Seite verantwortlich.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
Nouvelle théologie is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
There is a significant amount of bias in this article, especially in the "Criticisms" and "Ideas" section. Namely, it offers criticism against the movement rather than actors of the movement without having demonstrated its defining characteristics; it subsequently directs the criticisms found in Humani Generis at the entire Nouvelle Theologie movement itself; a striking reliance on Mettepenningen, whose book's extreme bias is laid bare in the title Nouvelle Théologie - New Theology: Inheritor of Modernism, Precursor of Vatican II; and a series of uncited parentheticals in the last paragraph of the "Ideas" section that are ostensibly there to discredit the associated theologians. The "Ideas" section also omits to include that one of the defining characteristics of movement according to the proponents of said movement was a return to the scriptures and writings of the early church fathers. I plan to work on this eventually, but I want to drop this note here in case someone else comes along to clean it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keathleymp (talk • contribs) 20:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Veverve article should refer to the movement in the terms of its proponents not it's detractors. use of the name New Theology and Nouvelle Theology should be the parenthetical reference, not Resourcement Theology. 97.116.12.228 (talk) 20:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nouvelle théologie is not the common name for proponents of this theology. Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 20:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It clearly is the most widespread name. You only need to have a look at the 'Further reading' section. Veverve (talk) 20:33, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No dice. I could provide a much longer list of books using the Resourcement label, including Joseph Ratzinger's book The Unity of the Church. This list proves nothing. Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 20:50, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Then please go and ask the Christian Wikiproject to see if it is truly the case. Veverve (talk) 22:31, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Agreed! This article should be renamed Resourcement Theology and completely re-written to NPOV. Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 20:22, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Or at the very least the 'resource' redirect to this article should be deleted so a new article with the proper name can be created, and the two articles can reference each other. I would oppose this as a clumsy division of a subject to avoid NPOV arguments. Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 20:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Referencing and citation: not checked