Tolkien's works

ArielAriel Shipmate
Since this author seems to be of interest to many, here's a thread for all things Tolkien-related.

While I enjoyed the LOTR books I have views on the portrayal of women in them. It was very much a Boys' own adventure, periodically enlivened by the remote Arwen, the frosty Eowyn, the garrulous Ioreth, the stay at home Rosie Cotton, the rapacious Lobelia Baggins, and the evil spider Shelob. Only Galadriel comes out of it well. Goldberry doesn't seem to have much personality at all.

I liked the Orcs. They could be refreshingly rude and sparky. I don't think the films did them any favours.

Over to you...

Comments

  • CameronCameron Shipmate
    I really like Tolkien, but the background of class eventually drives me nuts. Most particularly, I can’t bear it that Sam goes through hell with Frodo in LOTR, but at the end is still calling him Mister Frodo - while Frodo calls him Sam.

    On the positive side, if I could live anywhere in literature it would be Rivendell. Or maybe Isengard (before Saruman). However, I think the movies may have influenced me a lot in that regard…

  • Bishops FingerBishops Finger Shipmate
    edited April 16
    Agreed re the treatment of women in LOTR, though the Peter Jackson films did make a little more of Arwen (Liv Tyler was spot-on in this role, looking exactly how I imagined Arwen to look...). Her rescue of Frodo at the Ford of Bruinen is one of the few alterations to the book of which I approve.

    Frosty Eowyn thawed, once she realised that Aragorn was not for her, and seems to have found a worthy partner in the feisty Faramir.

    Rapacious Lobelia became a more sympathetic character in the end, given her spirited defiance of the evil Men sent in by Sharkey/Saruman...

    Rosie Gamgee nee Cotton provides a useful excuse for Sam to stay at home, at least until she dies...bit of a cardboard cutout, otherwise.

    Ioreth provides some welcome light relief amongst the horrors of the Siege of Minas Tirth, but her garrulity is conveniently cut off by Tolkien Aragorn at several points...

    Galadriel
    is a terrific character - *ALL SHALL LOVE ME, AND DESPAIR!* - but, as she herself says, she passes the test...

    Shelob is a spider (or *an evil thing in spider form*), and so is, in a way, true to her nature - AIUI, female spiders are formidable creatures IRL...

    Goldberry?
    I could never quite see the point of her, or of Tom Bombadil, her husband (?). My impression is that Tolkien invented the pair of them and worked them into the story (if it were not for Tom rescuing the hobbits from the Barrow, there would not have been a Sword of Westernesse to help destroy the Lord of the Ringwraiths), but was then at a loss to know what to do with them next...

    One commentator remarked that the Orcs at least had a sense of esprit de corps, though even when arguing and fighting amongst themselves, they would have instantly turned on anyone else and slain them...

    In the book, the Orcs come across as very ugly, wiry, stocky, hairy beings - the films made them larger and (for some reason) slimy...
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    edited April 16
    With the disclaimer that I am a big Tolkien fan, and I read LOTR at least once every two years . . .
    Agreed re the treatment of women in LOTR, though the Peter Jackson films did make a little more of Arwen (Liv Tyler was spot-on in this role, looking exactly how I imagined Arwen to look...). Her rescue of Frodo at the Ford of Bruinen is one of the few alterations to the book of which I approve.
    I agree with the comments so far about how women generally are portrayed in the books, but I’ll admit that even so, I didn’t like what Peter Jackson did with Arwen. (But that pales in comparison to how I didn’t like what he did with Faramir.)

    And I do think Eowyn is the exception in regard to the general portrayal of women. Yes, she is very frosty at first, but she is a strong character who knows her own mind and makes her own choices, rather than waiting for a man to make a decision. And as a result, she plays a key role in the war.

    Goldberry, like Tom Bombadil, is in a class alone.

    ETA: in the other thread, @Bishops Finger said:
    The Orcs get a bad press, which given their origins, is hardly their fault. I rather like the idea that Elves, despite their immortality, are capable of Sin and Rebellion...
    Well, The Silmarillion and Galadriel’s story make that capability of sin and rebellion quite clear, without any orcs involved.

    As for battle scenes, my feeling is that the books keep them relatively short, unlike Peter Jackson, who drags them on forever.

  • Cameron wrote: »
    I really like Tolkien, but the background of class eventually drives me nuts. Most particularly, I can’t bear it that Sam goes through hell with Frodo in LOTR, but at the end is still calling him Mister Frodo - while Frodo calls him Sam.

    Whereas that feels completely natural to me. If you went through Mordor with your father, you'd still call him Dad, wouldn't you? You wouldn't start calling him by his given name.

    Sam calling him "Mister Frodo" is a sign of their relationship.
  • KoFKoF Shipmate
    Samwise Gamgee is one of my favourite characters in all literature.

    I loved the stories as a child, enjoyed all the films but don't feel much urge to get deeper into it.

    Incidentally, I think there are some interesting parallels with Don Quixote and would quite like to see LoTR reimagined as a farce.
  • NicoleMRNicoleMR Shipmate
    I didn't like the movies much, it's not that they changed things from the book, it's that they changed the wrong things for the wrong reasons.
  • ArielAriel Shipmate
    edited April 16
    I don't really have a favourite character in the books, but am intrigued by Bombadil. He doesn't fit in anywhere and was never satisfactorily explained. I quite like the interlude where the hobbits stay with him, and he rescues them from the barrow wight. There's a lot of hardship and winter in LOTR and this, Rivendell and Lorien make a welcome contrast.
  • TelfordTelford Deckhand, Styx
    It would be true to say that he mainly writes of masculine characters and the few female characters are there out of necessity,

    Bilboe and Frodo are, of course, confirmed bachelors
  • CameronCameron Shipmate
    Cameron wrote: »
    I really like Tolkien, but the background of class eventually drives me nuts. Most particularly, I can’t bear it that Sam goes through hell with Frodo in LOTR, but at the end is still calling him Mister Frodo - while Frodo calls him Sam.

    Whereas that feels completely natural to me. If you went through Mordor with your father, you'd still call him Dad, wouldn't you? You wouldn't start calling him by his given name.

    Sam calling him "Mister Frodo" is a sign of their relationship.

    Yes, but the relationship it is a sign of is: master and servant.

    That’s the opposite of the warmth of ‘Dad’ for me, and more like someone still ‘knowing his place’.
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    Ariel wrote: »
    I don't really have a favourite character in the books, but am intrigued by Bombadil. He doesn't fit in anywhere and was never satisfactorily explained.
    Which for me is part of his charm, and part of what makes LOTR read as much like myth or saga as novel.

  • CameronCameron Shipmate
    The poetry is a mixed bag in LOTR, but I think “Where now the horse and the rider…” is great stuff - and was used well in the second of the movies.

    Do others have favourite bits of the poetry / songs?
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    edited April 16
    Probably too many to name. But certainly Namárië, Durin’s Song (“The world was old, the mountains green”), the Song of the Mounds of Mungburg (“We heard of the horns in the hills ringing”)* and “The Road goes ever on and on” (in its various iterations).

    When I was younger, I generally skipped the songs, but I came to see them as integral to the story .


    * I love how the Rohirrim speak Old English, and this poem follows the form of Anglo-Saxon poetry, based on a specific form of alliteration rather than rhyme.


  • Some of the songs (in English and Elvish) were set to music many years ago by Donald Swann, and I used to have an LP of them (sung by one William Elvin - IIRC the pianist was Swann himself).

    Here's a recording made in 1972, with baritone Stewart Hendrickson.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dmRwj6QFIA

    Two other female characters worth mentioning are Mrs Maggot, who helps the hobbits on their way to Crickhollow by presenting them with a basket of mushrooms, and the godlike Vala, Elbereth Gilthoniel, whose name is mentioned or invoked in several places. She is regarded as the highest of the Valar, and is greatly reverenced and venerated by the Elves. Given that Tolkien was a devout Roman Catholic, she has been likened to the Blessed Virgin Mary, though her role in the mythology is different.

    The hymn to Elbereth which appears in LOTR is a lovely piece of quasi-religious poetry, and sounds beautiful when sung in Elvish:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Elbereth_Gilthoniel
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    Some of the songs (in English and Elvish) were set to music many years ago by Donald Swann, and I used to have an LP of them (sung by one William Elvin - IIRC the pianist was Swann himself).
    Yes, I have the book of that song cycle, for which Tolkien provided notes.

    BTW, Swann’s setting of Namárië came from Tolkien himself; Tolkien sang for Swann how he had always heard the song in his head. He can be heard singing it here.

    Those who pick up on a Gregorian chant-like quality in Tolkien’s tune have good ears—it is essentially the melody to which the Lamentations of Jeremiah are chanted in the service of Tenebrae. A very apt and poignant choice for Galadriel’s lament.

    I particularly like this version, by The Fellowship, who set every poem and song in LOTR to music.


  • Bishops FingerBishops Finger Shipmate
    edited April 16
    Wow. That version by The Fellowship is superb indeed, and has an almost Oriental feel...

    Tolkien himself had quite a good voice, too. His pronunciation is, as you would expect, perfect.
  • ArielAriel Shipmate
    I had the book of the song cycle. Unfortunately my mother disposed of it (along with a lot of my other books) when early dementia set in. It hasn't been reissued and is now a rare book. I hope whoever got my copy appreciates it: I used to like to play the songs and sing along.
  • Bishops FingerBishops Finger Shipmate
    edited April 16
    There appear to be reprints of the song cycle available on eBay - is this the book you meant?

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/364826966792
  • ArielAriel Shipmate
    edited April 16
    That's the book, though mine was a first edition with a cream-coloured jacket. Currently available here and there for £££. Glad to see there are affordable new copies now.
  • Yes, I imagine a first edition would be quite a bit more than around £20!

    I might treat myself to one of the reprints, as an un-birthday present.
    :wink:
  • ArielAriel Shipmate
    Go for it. I hope it has colour inside.
  • HarryCHHarryCH Shipmate
    Another female character whose name appears repeatedly is Luthien Tinuviel, daughter of an Elven king and a Maia, said to be the most beautiful individual in all of history. Elrond's daughter, Arwen Evenstar, was said to have the beauty of Luthien reborn. Each of these women married men, chose to be mortal, and eventually died. Galadriel, one of the oldest of all the characters, actually knew Luthien and thus could testify to the resemblance.

    An interesting point about Elves is that while they live indefinitely long lives, they can die, and there is no guarantee that they will live again.
  • I've ordered a copy, though the seller's description doesn't specifically mention colour. It does come with a bonus CD of the songs, though.
    🎶🎻🎵🎹
  • ArielAriel Shipmate
    Well, that's certainly something I didn't get in 1970whatever! Enjoy your purchase 😁
  • Jane RJane R Shipmate
    NicoleMR wrote: »
    I didn't like the movies much, it's not that they changed things from the book, it's that they changed the wrong things for the wrong reasons.

    Same. Gimli was turned into the Plucky Comic Relief, the hobbits were basically treated like children and patronised by everyone (except possibly Gandalf) and all the cultural differences between humans, elves, dwarves and hobbits were erased. I could just about see Rivendell as an Art Deco hippy commune, but what happened to Elrond's karaoke evening? The only positive change (imnsho) was that the films actually made Aragorn likeable, but that doesn't excuse what they did to Faramir and Denethor's characters.
  • Seeing people's comments on the films, I'm glad that I stoutly resisted seeing any of them: I was sure the people wouldn't look like the ones in my head!
  • DafydDafyd Hell Host
    I thought Elijah Wood and Viggo Mortensen actually looked better in their parts than the Frodo and Aragorn in my head - except that Aragorn should actually have the same unhealthy pale complexion as Wormtongue.
  • The films annoyed me a lot at first, but less so with time and watching the documentaries accompanying the extended additions. The Hobbit films, on the other hand, I couldn't stand to watch. They were, to coin a phrase, like butter spread over too much bread.
  • Seeing people's comments on the films, I'm glad that I stoutly resisted seeing any of them: I was sure the people wouldn't look like the ones in my head!

    Some did, as far as I was concerned - Gandalf, Legolas, Boromir, Theoden, Arwen, and Eowyn - but others didn't. Aragorn should have been taller, and a bit more rugged-looking (he's 80+ at the time of the War of the Ring, but looking less than his actual age, as he himself says).

    The films were, in many ways, flawed masterpieces, but, if you have your own images of the characters and places, stick with them!
  • My images of the characters were already indelibly coloured by the 1970s animated film long before I actually read the books. I also deployed the early "black rider" scenes to good effect as a child when trying to get my younger (by three years) sister to leave me alone. She was scared of them so putting the video on would cause her to run from the room. :naughty:
  • Bishops FingerBishops Finger Shipmate
    edited April 17
    I don't recall seeing any of the animated film back in the 70s, but Mrs BF and I did listen to the whole of the radio adaptation in 1981. I think I still have the full set of cassettes, which I bought after the series ended.

    Voices only, of course, but IIRC Michael Hordern was an excellent Gandalf, with Ian Holm as Frodo (he played Bilbo in the Jackson films), John le Mesurier as Bilbo, Bill Nighy as Sam, and Robert Stephens as Aragorn.

    Anyone else remember the radio version? Necessarily foreshortened, but IMHO very well done anyway.
  • TwangistTwangist Shipmate
    I don't recall seeing any of the animated film back in the 70s, but Mrs BF and I did listen to the whole of the radio adaptation in 1981. I think I still have the full set of cassettes, which I bought after the series ended.

    Voices only, of course, but IIRC Michael Hordern was an excellent Gandalf, with Ian Holm as Frodo (he played Bilbo in the Jackson films), John le Mesurier as Bilbo, Bill Nighy as Sam, and Robert Stephens as Aragorn.

    Anyone else remember the radio version? Necessarily foreshortened, but IMHO very well done anyway.

    My dad loved it!!
  • ArielAriel Shipmate
    edited April 17
    The films! Dirty-looking characters with stringy, greasy long hair who all badly needed a bath and the services of a good barber. And Elrond was certainly not picked for his looks, while the very youthful Galadriel never came across as convincing in the part. The only one who came out well of it was Gollum, and to some extent Gandalf.

    Anybody who'd read the books would have their own mental images of the characters. I can only say I never visualised a balding, gap-toothed Elrond, but there you go, everyone's different.

    That radio adaptation sounds great. Lots of great actors in it.
  • Bishops FingerBishops Finger Shipmate
    edited April 17
    Elrond in the film was completely wrong - nowhere near enough gravitas...
  • The5thMaryThe5thMary Shipmate
    Yeah, casting Hugo Weaving as Elrond was a serious mistake. I like Hugo Weaving, don't get me wrong. But his bulging forehead and premature balding was concerning. Also, he looked bored in the movies, as if he's just there to collect a hefty paycheck.

    Worst of all, he and Liv Tyler had zero chemistry. He's supposed to be her beloved father!

    My worst experience of all three films is that they got monotonous quickly. One skirmish or a big fight, okay. That's a given. The evil must be vanquished. But the battles got bigger and... loooooooonger. I worked in a movie theater when the second and third films had come out. Yeah, it was great that I got to have a nice toilet break whilst the movies were playing on and on and on. But, it also meant that I had to hear those loud-ass battles continuously through the theater walls. On and on, day after day. I wanted to stab myself with a pencil. 😅. AND! I was making a mere $6.50/hr. at that time. Yippee for Georgia state's crappy minimum wage.

    Anyway...
  • Dafyd wrote: »
    I thought Elijah Wood and Viggo Mortensen actually looked better in their parts than the Frodo and Aragorn in my head - except that Aragorn should actually have the same unhealthy pale complexion as Wormtongue.

    Why? Didn't he spend a huge amount of time in the outdoors? As a ranger?
  • When Frodo first meets him, in the Inn at Bree, Strider is described as weatherbeaten, with a shaggy head of dark hair flecked with grey, and in a pale, stern face a pair of keen grey eyes. Viggo Mortensen didn't really look the part, I'm afraid - as I mentioned earlier, Aragorn is actually about 80 years old at this point.
  • DafydDafyd Hell Host
    Dafyd wrote: »
    Aragorn should actually have the same unhealthy pale complexion as Wormtongue.
    Why? Didn't he spend a huge amount of time in the outdoors? As a ranger?
    Tolkien uses the same words to describe Aragorn as he does to describe Wormtongue. It's not an oversight, since there is a conversation between Aragorn and the hobbits when they meet him about how Aragorn looks evil but doesn't feel evil ('looks foul but feels fair' IIRC).

    As for how that works on someone who spends a lot of time outdoors, I don't know. Andor is quite far north so presumably not a lot of strong sun. Aragorn makes sure he and the hobbits avoid travelling in the open in the middle of the day so as not to be spotted by agents of the Enemy; that seems to be his regular practice. Perhaps also the Numenorean descent is a factor.
  • HarryCHHarryCH Shipmate
    One of my disappointments was that all the poetry was missing, and likewise the last chapter, about the scouring of the the Shire.
  • Nick TamenNick Tamen Shipmate
    Viggo Mortensen didn't really look the part, I'm afraid - as I mentioned earlier, Aragorn is actually about 80 years old at this point.
    Yes, but he was Númenórean, so 80 was more like 30 or 40; he was 210 when he died. Viggo Mortensen as Aragorn didn't bother me at all—it wasn’t too far off how I’d pictured Aragorn—but Hugo Weaving as Elrond definitely did.


Sign In or Register to comment.