10 Minutes Gone (2019) - 10 Minutes Gone (2019) - User Reviews - IMDb
157 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
89 minutes gone from my life that I'll never get back!
Wizard-815 January 2020
Bruce Willis must currently be the laziest actor in Hollywood. For the past few years, he has appeared in a string of movies produced by schlockmeisters Randall Emmett and George Furla, and in every one he just appears for a few minutes while getting a hefty paycheck for doing almost nothing. What's worse is that in those few minutes of screen time, Willis clearly shows that he doesn't give a darn about his surroundings and instead gives a sleepwalking performance. All this happens again in "10 Minutes Gone". Actually, even if Willis gave some effort, this would still be one very bad movie. The only positive thing I can say about this movie is that the photography is fairly professional. Other than that, the list of bad things in the movie is endless. We have most of the movie seemingly filmed very quickly in derelict buildings and back alleys, hardly any set dressings, action sequences that are extremely routine and boring, a boring and unsuspensful main story thread, a performance by lead actor Michael Chiklis that suggests extreme displeasure and pain of being in this project, and a "surprise twist" near the end that you will guess long before it actually happens. Please, Bruce Willis, realize that you'd be better off retiring instead of further damaging your reputation by doing more quickie efforts like this!
19 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Find the lady
Prismark1028 September 2019
This is one of those Bruce Willis films where he charges $1 million a day. So the director gets him for a day or two to shoot enough scenes to craftily insert throughout the movie.

10 Minutes Gone is a heist film with a twist. You know this as it tells you during the opening titles. Something about the three card monte and later someone mentions the phrase; 'honour among thieves.'

Rex (Bruce Willis) is a sharp suited crime boss who hires a crew for a bank job for his client who wants something valuable retrieved from the vaults.

Frank (Michael Chiklis) a safecracker and his brother Joe are part of the crew. Inevitably something goes wrong, Frank's brother is killed as they try to get away and Frank is knocked out for ten minutes.

Frank not knowing what happened when he was knocked out searches for the person who double crossed him and killed his brother. Rex meanwhile brings in an assassin to track down Frank and clean the mess up. Make sure no loose ends are left behind.

10 Minutes Gone is a below average and forgettable thriller. Frank huffs and puffs his way through the members of the gang who made it out alive. He is helped out by some woman who works in a bar whose face has been botoxed to hell. You get flashbacks of what happened during the heist as all the potential suspects act shiftily.

Chiklis is the star of the movie. He brings some credibility as someone who might be out of his depth. The twist is predictable though and absurd.
34 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Oh Bruce...what happened?
julian-640-54405829 September 2019
I am not sure what was going through the mind of Bruce Willis when he agreed to do this film, but I know one thing that wasn't: acting. Stumbling through his lines with a smirk that seemed to say "he he they are actually paying me for this...and paying me a LOT"

Perhaps he only gave them one day so there was no time to rehearse or perhaps he could not take the horribly conceived story seriously enough to do the job right, but either way, it may well be the worst performance of his career.

All the blame cannot go to Bruce alone, the other actors were equally unprepared and with the possible exception of performance of Michael Chiklis, the whole disaster resembled a poorly directed high school play. Even the props were ridiculous, like a single old desktop computer on a shelf running the whole security system for a bank, and a five and dime tin cash box that "is no good without the key"...come on.

The weakness surely started with a sophomoric script most probably written by a first year film school student or maybe a grammar school kid without an imagination.

The filmography was much better than the acting, dialog or the plot, so there is that, but if this is what qualifies as a Bruce Willis film today, then it is a sad day for the action movie genre.
73 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Cliché-ridden nonsense
philfeeley27 September 2019
I've always wondered how it is that 'big-name' stars can get roped into films that are absolute trash. Or how such trash could actually get made. Who among the 5 film companies behind this mess could not have looked at it and said "This makes no sense. We can't do this, it's embarrassing." I guess not. All for the money. Well, I hope they lose a lot, and whoever wrote this, directed it, or whatever, loses their shirts and never gets to make another movie.

Cliched dialogue from start to finish, neither cops nor robbers that can hit a target right in front of them (the robbers had machine guns, for goodness sake, surely they could have hit someone - but no, just general incompetence all around), an ending or plot that makes no sense, a rat telescoped long before they were revealed - and none of this raised a red flag to anyone. Somebody should have pulled the plug on this before a single camera rolled.
60 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Go to B&Q, but some paint, paint anything in your house, get a chair, popcorn, beer, watch it dry!
contactmaz1 October 2019
What a crap film!

Horrendously awful acting and really, I could do better. There was nothing entertaining, exciting, enthralling, good, about this film. Bruce baby! What the hell man! Acting was atrocious... we know the other actors from other crap films and we are already aware of how crap their acting is! The woman, I think Meadow, was born on a farm and milked cows. I suggest she goes back to that thar' farm, and stay there. She can take the other crappy actors from this awful film and go to some distant farm and stay the F there... for a vey long time!
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Boring movie for bored actors
Leofwine_draca30 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
"Bruce Willis filmed all his scenes in one afternoon" in his own hotel room tells you everything you need to know about this routine B-movie thriller, happy to go through the motions without any life, vitality, freshness or effort. Michael Chiklis is a robber who finds himself on the run with his girlfriend after things go bad; even worse, he's suffering from amnesia. A series of violent confrontations takes places, but all this boils down to is one cast member being shot dead in a random shoot-out after another. Chiklis does his best here but it's not enough, and Willis couldn't be more bored.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
AVOID!!!!!!!!
clothingmydemons28 September 2019
The acting in this film is awful, it's like everyone is reading from teleprompter. The "main" woman in it has had so much botox you can't actually tell what emotion she's supposed to be having, and her acting is that bad it's anyones guess. Avoid!!!!
130 out of 136 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
More like 89 minutes I won't get back.
leftnetwork17 October 2019
I like Bruce Willis and lately it seems he forgot how to act, or say no to bad rolls. I know I won't get fooled into watching a movie just because he's in it. I had to stop watching just before the ending, which could have come after 10 minutes had gone by. A waste of good talent.
25 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Terrible acting.
michaz-229744 November 2019
I had to come to see who played Claire. Meadow Williams? I can't believe she was actually an actress, I thought they picked someone off the streets and had her read lines during the film. Wow... Even the star cast seems like they were just reading lines and not acting.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad bad bad
apopa2827 October 2019
I LOVE Bruce Willis and was so looking forward to watching this movie. Unfortunately, this is one movie not like his others. It is poorly written, poorly directed and even the filming is bad! But that's not all, the acting is just so bad I had to stop watching. If you are a huge Bruce Willis fan as I am, DO NOT watch this movie.
49 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Subpar Action Movie Riddled With Clichés
maximusthemerciful28 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The only reason I gave this movie a chance is because I insist on seeing every movie with Bruce Willis. Love most of this work. But this is one he clearly did for the paycheck, because he put no effort into this role and had a total of maybe 10 minutes of screen time. Just a big name meant to pull in poor saps like me.

There is nothing original or inspiring about this C-movie action flick. Michael Chiklis plays a veteran bank robber who in the opening minutes of a "perfectly planned" heist gone wrong, gets knocked to the ground. When he awakens 10 minutes later (with no bruising to account for the head trauma), the loot is gone and his brother is dead. The rest of the movie is him trying to figure out how it all went wrong.

The dialogue is probably the worst thing about this movie. Wooden, unoriginal, poorly written, will make you laugh out loud at the "serious" parts. Second worst is Meadow Williams, whose utter lack of acting talent is exacerbated by the amount of botox in her forehead, the combination of which makes her utterly incapable of expressing any emotion convincingly whatsoever. The choice of Lydia Hull as the badass fixer-upper/cleaner was equally poor casting, though thankfully she's barely in the movie.

And then all the cliches. Guys with machine guns who couldn't hit the ground if they tried, shooting guns with one hand, walking toward the camera in sunglasses in slow motion with an explosion behind you, the "surprise" villain at the end monologuing and providing exposition for the viewers who fell asleep for the first 80 minutes. As for the "plot twist" reveal of the villain, it would have been surprising had I not been able to call it about 15 minutes into the movie.

This is a good movie to have on in the background while you're doing other things. If you lower your expectations to ground level, you will be barely disappointed.
69 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
jakebrann6 August 2020
The acting is horrible! The blonde gf, I've never seen a worse actress in my life! Botoxed to all hell, not a facial expression to be seen! Add in the dark haired "fixer" lady and this movie was such a joke! She couldn't play tough to save her life! Even the camera was jittery and moved around during scenes.

This is just a joke, right? Holy $hit it's so bad...
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bad acting and directing ruined the film
iliasalk6 October 2019
The combination of bad directing and bad acting move this movie to trash. The script is acceptable with some twists. The bad directing, hand in hand with the bad acting of the fainting star Willis, just ruined everything.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Threat level 10
kidmoe5 November 2019
Remember that episode of The Office when they filmed Threat Level Midnight? That's the level of filmmaking we're dealing with here. Seriously, I was expecting to see "A Michael Scott Joint" during the end credits.

Bruce Willis stands around in an empty office and woodenly reads some lines (maybe they just filmed the rehearsals ?) while some other bad actors, including one guy who sounds like the fat gay guy from Modern Family, recite their lines in an even wooden-er fashion.

Meanwhile, Michael Chiklis gives it the old college try, but can't overcome the cliche script or Meadow Williams's inability to express any emotions or facial expressions. I was surprised to see on IMBD that she is, apparently, a real actress and not a porn star trying to go mainstream or a robot.

Ultimately, 90 minutes pass and things happen, and then it's over and you don't remember much of it.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Why why why???
heiko-stauber23 October 2019
Why do they keep shooting these stupid nonsense bulls...t? Okay.... everybody knows by now that mr willis is going for every paycheck he can..... but why is michael chiklis there???
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lame Brained Crime Thriller
zardoz-1314 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Several superstar actors from the 1980s are clinging pathetically to their once prestigious careers in shoddy, second-rate, straight-to-video fodder. John Travolta, Nicolas Cage, and Adam Sandler went into decline years ago. Lately, Bruce Willis has followed in their footsteps with a number of half-baked, B-grade genre thrillers which land in theatres on a limited play basis and cast him in peripheral roles. Nevertheless, Willis takes top billing. Ostensibly, he shows up just long enough to make an impression. Presumably, nobody wants Willis any longer for substantial movies. Willis' last major role was an ill-fated remake of the iconic Charles Bronson's revenge movie "Death Wish," and it deservedly bombed at the box office. The latest Willis quickie is helmed by director Brian A. Miller, who called the shots on two earlier Willis thrillers "Vice" (2015) and "The Prince" (2014). Miller's gritty "10 Minutes Gone," a lackluster heist caper about a flawed bank robbery, lensed in Cincinnati, Ohio, barely passes muster with a formulaic plot any ten-year old could figure out. The abrupt twist ending looks as if it were designed primarily so neither the Willis character nor the Michael Chiklis character die at fade out. This fast-paced, 89-minute movie lacks a shred of originality and generates about as much suspense. Rex (Bruce Willis) hires h nimble-fingered, professional safecracker, Frank (Michael Chiklis of "Fantastic Four"), along with Frank's brother, Joe (Tyler Jon Olson of "Arsenal"), to ransack a safety deposit box which contains a cryptic metal case. Mind you, neither Frank nor Joe know about the contents of the box. At one point, Rex reveals that this highly sought-after case contains $30 million in jewelry. Halfway through the heist, things go sideways for Frank and Joe, and they have to make a fast getaway. No sooner have they exited the bank unscathed while their accomplices shoot it out with the police than their luck runs out. Frank takes a blow to the back of his head. Ten minutes later, when he regains consciousness, he is shocked to learn his brother has been shot and killed. Most of "Ten Minutes Gone" chronicles Frank's desperate efforts to learn what happened and who betrayed them. The best thing about "Ten Minutes Gone" is its breakneck pace as Frank questions his surviving accomplices. The first thing Frank does afterward is look up Joe's girlfriend, Claire (Meadow Williams of "Den of Thieves"), who needs his protection. Joe had told Frank to look after Claire if anything went wrong, and Frank does that very thing. Meantime, Rex is perplexed by the sudden turn of events, and he dispatches a trigger-happy dame, Ivory (Lydia Hull of "Broken City"), to bring back the box. No matter where Frank goes, he doesn't get any answers, until it dawns on him who the culprit is. If you closely watch Frank and Joe's meeting in a bar where they are outlining their plan, you'll know the identity of the dastard. In this kind of sort of 'film noir,' our heroes are undermined by a greedy girl. Miller doesn't waste of second of screen time, but the outcome is so obvious that there is no surprise. Normally, had this been made ten years ago, Willis would have played Frank, and Chiklis would have been cast as Rex. Die-hard Bruce Willis fans are the demographic that Miller and company have targeted in this disposable melodrama.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Total Stinker!
grayesun9 November 2019
One of the worst movies I've seen in a long time, and I'm a big Chiklis fan! As bad as the story is, Chiklis is worse and Willis is even worse. Not a redeeming second in this entire film, far more than "10 Minutes Gone" and wasted, more like 120 minutes. At least we got a bargain matinee price. Chiklis c'mon, what the hell were you thinking?
24 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I wish I could give it zero stars
christophersarles16 October 2019
Omg. Worst piece of crap ever! Had to turn it off after 20 min, and it was FREE!
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So bad
malignantheart28 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Dear gods avoid this movie. Not even Willis cared enough to act. Other review is right about this being nothing new. Just a mindless action movie. Chiklis was good but everyone else was really bad. The actress was so terrible, my friends and I could not stop laughing every time she spoke. First thing I said when she first showed up was "she's the one who did it" and I was right. So glad I didn't pay to see this or I'd have been so much angrier.
45 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Painful
sukumar-8399731 August 2020
If you did a bad deed today, you need to watch this to punish yourself!
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The most obvious plot twist of all time
waynessimpson17 November 2019
The second Brian Miller film where Bruce Willis just seems to turn up & shoot all his scenes within an hour, hardly moving from a single room. Wouldn't mind if the other actors pulled their weight but apart from Chiklis everyone else is out of their depth. Don't bother, very formulaic & predictable.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Come on Bruce make a good action film.
dar041715 October 2019
I have seen this over and over again. This time wasn't any different. Bruce Willis needs to get his stuff together.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Accurate title
jsjs-7273731 October 2019
The title "10 Minutes Gone" is pretty accurate, because "10 minutes" was about as much of this movie that I could watch before I shut it off and was "gone".

When every single line, from every single actor/actress (even the great B.W.) is delivered in such a cringe-worthy awkward manner, then it's time to find something else to watch.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The nadir of filmmaking
jaimemedina-3628816 March 2020
One the one hand, this movie is amusingly bad. I laughed quite a few times.

Every single performance is atrocious. And the writing... wow... it's just laughable.

Bruce Willis is on a major slump these days. It's been a while since I saw anything good with him in it. And I'm a big fan.

Don't let anyone fool you into thinking Chiklis save this film. He's never been any good in anything. And he's consistent here. I heard he spent extra time on his eyebrows for this film and surprisingly that didn't help.

Don't know what else to say on this one.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
10 stars for achieving in making the worst rated Bruce Willis movie in history: 1,3 metacritics score. 3,6 Imdb users score. How low can Bruce go? Low. VERY LOW!!!
imseeg13 February 2020
It's astonishing that some producer is paying to make these movies. It must be former glory of the name Bruce Willis that brings in some money, because othewise no one in their right mind would ever pay for such dribble as this.

1,3 metacritics score. That's the lowest a Bruce Willis movie has ever "achieved". I give this movie 10 stars for being able to get the worst critic AND user score for ANY Bruce Willis movie in history.

Please somebody explain to me how it's possible that Bruce keeps churning out these mega flops, 4 times a year. Is he paying alimony to 100 wives? Has he got a gambling debt? Why o why does Bruce keep denigrating himself to this level of nothingness? There must be a reason!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed