Pros And Cons Of Online Learning Vs Traditional Learning | ipl.org

Pros And Cons Of Online Learning Vs Traditional Learning

971 Words4 Pages

With the development of the network, online learning has slowly entered the people's eye, and the impact is becoming more and more powerful. It brings a great challenge to the traditional classroom. Comparing online learning and traditional teaching, this article will analyze in several ways to know why online learning is now better. Talking about education, our focus should be on students and teachers. Which way is better for them, which one is better. The reason that network learning is better than traditional classroom is that it has the characteristics of keeping pace with the times, develops new advantages, and solves the problems existing in traditional classroom teaching.
Firstly, as the limitations of the class bring a lot of inconvenience to the traditional classroom, network learning can solve these problems well. For example, the time and place of traditional teaching are fixed, but online learning can quickly get into the classroom anytime or anywhere(Fedynich 3). Another thing that needs to be noticed is that the number of students is increasing every year. …show more content…

“Teaching beyond the classroom walls: The pros and cons of cyber learning.” ERIC. AABRI journals, n.d. Accessed 25 Dec. 2017. (-- removed HTML --)
Enid, Acosta-Tello. “Enhancing the online class: Effective use of synchronous interactive online instruction.” ERIC. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, Nov. 2015. Vol.17. Accessed 25 Dec. 2017. (-- removed HTML --) Jesus, Trespalacios and Perkins Ross. “ Sense of community, perceived learning, and achievement relations in an online graduate course.” ERIC. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, July 2016. Vol.17. Accessed 25 Dec. 2017. (-- removed HTML --)
Davies, Cotton, et, al. “Student Usage And Perceptions Of The Value Of Recorded Lectures In A Traditional Face-To-Face (F2F) Class” ERIC. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 2016. Vol.13, no. 13. Accessed 1 Jan. 2018. (-- removed HTML