Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
$5.95$5.95
FREE delivery: Wednesday, Jan 10 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$4.46
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Audible sample Sample
Follow the authors
OK
The Communist Manifesto Paperback – August 29, 2008
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length58 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateAugust 29, 2008
- Reading age18 years and up
- Dimensions5.25 x 0.15 x 8 inches
- ISBN-101438241569
- ISBN-13978-1438241562
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may ship from close to you
Product details
- Publisher : CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (August 29, 2008)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 58 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1438241569
- ISBN-13 : 978-1438241562
- Reading age : 18 years and up
- Item Weight : 9.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.25 x 0.15 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #786,099 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,120 in Communism & Socialism (Books)
- #2,232 in Political Philosophy (Books)
- #3,074 in History & Theory of Politics
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the authors
Friedrich Engels (English /ˈɛŋɡəlz/ or /ˈɛŋəlz/; German: [ˈfʁiːdʁɪç ˈɛŋəls]; 28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895) was a German philosopher, social scientist, journalist and businessman. He founded Marxist theory together with Karl Marx. In 1845 he published The Condition of the Working Class in England, based on personal observations and research in Manchester.
In 1848 he co-authored The Communist Manifesto with Karl Marx, though he also authored and co-authored (primarily with Marx) many other works, and later he supported Marx financially to do research and write Das Kapital. After Marx's death, Engels edited the second and third volumes. Additionally, Engels organised Marx's notes on the "Theories of Surplus Value," which he later published as the "fourth volume" of Capital. He has also made contributions to family economics.
Bio from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Karl Marx (1818-1883) was a German philosopher, political economist, historian, political theorist, sociologist, communist, and revolutionary, whose ideas played a significant role in the development of modern communism. Marx summarized his approach in the first line of chapter one of The Communist Manifesto, published in 1848: "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." Marx argued that capitalism, like previous socioeconomic systems, would inevitably produce internal tensions which would lead to its destruction. Just as capitalism replaced feudalism, he believed socialism would, in its turn, replace capitalism, and lead to a stateless, classless society called pure communism. This would emerge after a transitional period called the "dictatorship of the proletariat": a period sometimes referred to as the "workers state" or "workers' democracy". In section one of The Communist Manifesto Marx describes feudalism, capitalism, and the role internal social contradictions play in the historical process: We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under which feudal society produced and exchanged...the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder. Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it, and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. A similar movement is going on before our own eyes.... The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring order into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property.Marx argued for a systemic understanding of socio-economic change.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The title of the document, simple and purely descriptive though it is, is commonly regarded as inflammatory, arousing derision, disdain, and virulent hostility among many, including those whom it was written to benefit. Nevertheless, there is much in the Manifesto, especially in the first chapter, that with the aid of hindsight could have been written by a contemporary neo-conservative intellectual, someone like Harvard sociologist Daniel Bell.
Specifically, Marx and Engels begin with a tribute to the unparalleled productive capacity of the capitalist organization of production. They freely laud the technological innovations fostered by capitalists' pursuit of surplus value, a process that has dramatically transformed the forces of production and the social relations of production. The result has been rapidly expanding output of industrial and agricultural goods of all kinds.
In accomplishing this, capital has extended its markets beyond national borders, creating a world market and a world economy. Raw materials from Latin America, Africa, and Asia are routinely used to manufacture finished goods in England, Germany, and other European countries. The same manufactured goods may then be sold in the very places that supplied the raw materials.
All this, Marx and Engels observe, requires concentration of vast numbers of people in swollen industrial cities. Small manufacturers and family farms are swallowed up by larger enterprises with which they have neither the capital nor productive capacity to compete. Marx and Engels find it particularly noteworthy that men like Thomas Jefferson had envisioned America as a land of independent yeoman farmers with small land holdings, but the concentration of agriculture was rendering this vision obsolete.
As we get farther into this brief document, Daniel Bell, the other neo-conservatives, and people generally may take angry exception to its tone and substance.
Concentration of resources in capital-intensive enterprises, Marx and Engels argue, reduces the vast majority of people to the degraded status of wage labor, workers who own nothing but their labor power. It is in the interests of the bourgeoisie -- of capital -- to pay workers as little as possible, increasing surplus value by buying labor power for no more than its natural price, the amount needed to survive and reproduce.
The culture of workers is nothing more than a brutalizing culture of production, lacking in scope and richness due to the pitifully small part that each worker plays in the overall production process. Families of working people are men, women, and children who labor for the natural price and have little time, energy or emotional sustenance to offer each other, having been wrung dry by capital's conditions of employment.
The more productive the worker, the more he or she strengthens the hand of capital. However, capital's immense productive power and its success in keeping wage rates abysmally low are not an unmixed blessing for the bourgeoisie. Periodic over-production crises wreck havoc with national and international markets, undercutting profits and threatening the commanding position of capital. As a timely example, the U.S. economy is currently approximating an over-production crisis: unemployment is high, wages are low and falling, capital has roughly two and a half trillion dollars to invest, but in the absence of demand the bourgeoisie has become risk averse, and money is not being invested in productive endeavors.
The long-term solution to all this, for Marx and Engels, is elimination of bourgeois property and the property relations that capitalism has created. This is not to say that private property must altogether disappear, but private property as capital, as that which creates a two-class system of exploitation of labor by the bourgeoisie, certainly must cease to exist.
Marx and Engels were entirely too sanguine about the eventual joining together of members of the working class to present a united front in their conflict with capital. They realized that there were ethnic, racial, religious, national, linguistic, occupational, and other barriers that would be difficult to overcome, but I doubt they expected the workers of the world to be as fractionated as is currently the case. If Marx and Engels were alive today, they might take the view that things would have to get much worse for labor before a revolution becames possible.
If you're not inclined to read the Manifesto, just read the introductory remarks by Vladimir Posner, once a member of the Communist Party of the USSR. Posner spent much of his childhood and adolescence in the West, and his insights into the appeal of communist ideals and the failure of the USSR to develop communism as Marx and Engels sketchily envisioned it are extremely interesting. Posner is no apologist for anything, just an honest and intelligent journalist whose idealism is genuine but far from boundless or excessive.
Those who praise The Communist Manifesto as the desired blueprint upon which all world governments will change from their present form to communism almost certainly do so since they are already converted to Marx's cause or at the least foresee melding a significant part of Marxism to their respective nation-states' government. Those who oppose it fall into two broad categories: (1) Those who have personally lived through the rise (and frequent fall) of socialist states like the former Soviet Union and have no desire to see Marx resurrected as the guiding light elsewhere. (2) Those who know little about the historical genesis that is the milieu of the mid 19th century Europe that collectively formed the political, economic, and historical symbiosis against which the despairing and destitute workers had to contend.
As for the first group--those that are predisposed to accept Marx either in part or in entirety--they most often drift left of center and truly believe in the inherent superiority of the Nanny State that cares for its citizens, believing that they will be happy with their lot as the recipients of various enforced entitlements. As for the second group--those with first hand life as citizens of socialist states--they, in turn, have suffered lengthily and massively during their enforced stay in those states. Though they were probably forced to study communist ideology and history in school, what they learned in school about the historical Karl Marx had about as much to do with their real-life experiences as subjects as does Obamacare have with the United States Constitution. In short, the reality does not square with the theory.
When Marx and Engels first published their manifesto in London in 1847, they were only too well aware of the disastrous plight of the typical factory worker who had to toil under the most appalling of conditions. Marx and Engels were primarily motivated by a desire to better the conditions under which workers had to create products. There was no way for them to make surface changes so their only option was to replace by force the current capitalist system with a socialist one in which the workers would own the means of production. It seems incredibly naïve for us today to truly believe that such a massive makeover could actually take place regardless of what Marx proclaimed as the inevitable dialectic of history. His simplistic reduction of all phases of industrialism to the bourgeois and proletarian points of view does not take into account any aspect but the most superficial of his theory. Still, that is exactly what Marx and Engels took for granted. How could they know that just seventy years later, first Lenin, then Stalin, would rule using Marx as both source and symbol of their own perverted power? The answer is that they could not. Thus, today as we look over the laughably simplistic theories of The Communist Manifesto, we ought to recognize that somewhere buried deep is the recognition that workers must not be seen as disposable commodities. That Marx and Engels were wrong about nearly everything else does not mean that they were wrong about this.
Top reviews from other countries
Everyone should read this book.
Workers from all the world: unite!
2.On time delivery.
Reviewed in India on October 15, 2023
2.On time delivery.
The book is a 30 page thin book, not much more to say about it. It’s literally more of a pamphlet (as seen on the back “the most influential pamphlet ever written”)
I didn’t really pay attention when buying it because it was only 1,50 so I just added it to my cart with 2 other books. Now I have this 30 page one of just the communist manifesto and it’s also included in the 2 other books.
So if you want just the manifesto this is a good and cheap option, if you’re interested in more of Marx & Engels it most likely is included in any of their other works.