Rocket Science (2007) - Rocket Science (2007) - User Reviews - IMDb
57 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
A Movie Set During That Oft-Overlooked Period In Life
jzappa23 September 2007
Rocket Science is essentially a movie about a boy who discovers his worth and abilities throughout his furious campaign for his dreams. The film's mood pushes the limit of tongue- in-cheek, and it is certainly felt as a comedy because after all, the premise is a stuttering boy joining a debate team, but despite all the hilarious non sequiturs and plot-driven laughs, I take that essential theme to heart. Hal Heffner is an innocently gawky young high school kid, portrayed in a should-be career-making performance by Reece Thompson, who has a severe stuttering problem and experiences a change of events that he finds to have had a tempestuous emotional effect on him that I'm just dying to give away but won't. From this point on, we share those emotions, because it's nearly impossible not to throw in all your chips for this kid. The reason is because growing up, frankly, is hard. Once one has done it, one doesn't feel like it was as hard as it was, but at the time, it most definitely was. Watching this film, we watch this naive stuttering boy crippled by inhibitions and shyness mature, reaching the extremes of anger, confusion, love, intellectual growth, and introspection.

There are plenty of movies about high school, and they're full of comeuppance, humor targeted for that age, discovery of sex, et cetera, but there is very very rarely a movie like Rocket Science, a movie about that particular time in your life when you were just growing into yourself and you didn't even know it, and you hardly look back at that time because of the unawareness of self at that point and, hopefully, the growth since then. This is an important little film that, though it isn't receiving the attention I feel it would and should get with a wider and longer release, time will be kind to, with great hope.
57 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A fresh surprise
Michael Fargo13 August 2007
With another entry in the "coming of age" category, I really was pleasantly surprised to find--if not an original--a deeply-felt, honest portrayal of the trials of adolescence. The strongest aspects were the performances from the entire cast with Anna Kendrick and Vincent Piazza being standouts. Of course, the fine work of Reese Thompson will be rewarded by the praise he deserves (and hopefully awarded).

But this deeply personal film has many fine moments, both hysterically funny and painfully revealing. Because it refuses to be predictable--even in the final moments--I believe it will stand above other films of this genre. A well chosen score will keep it from becoming dated. It's never glib towards a range "bent" characters, and chooses to leave the smart remarks for the characters and not the film itself. Despite the subject of repressed anger and expressed rage, there's a sweetness that avoids the sentimental.

Clearly Jeffery Blitz needed to tell this story. And I hope he has many more for us in the future.
39 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
As heartfelt as it is intelligent
oneloveall25 January 2008
One of last years best scripts and a breakout performance from the natural Reece Thompson ensures Rocket Science is up on 2007's biggest sleepers list. Unlike the overrated Juno, Jeffrey Blitz's stimulating screenplay hardly ever rings hollow, despite the fact some of these high schooler's made that pregnant whippersnapper sound like a three year old. Here though, as unrealistically hyper-articulate as this high school debate team, indie-romance styled dramedy feels, Blitz possesses the rare ability to seamlessly merge it with a whole bunch of tender awkwardness and create something far superior then a wit-fest.

Encapsulating this neurotic whimsy is the gifted Thompson (amongst other very well casted performances) who like a younger, more accessible Jason Schwartzman, takes an annoyingly exploited trait of stuttering unease and mines it into a tender, thoughtful coming of age characterization that should inspire even the most cynical of introverts.

Littered with scene after scene of a simply far more perceptive quirk then what Hollywood's continuously dumbed-down interpretations of independent film used to be, Rocket Science blasts off with personality and style to spare.
25 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Neurotic Anti-Love Story
cwd90007 May 2007
This film is simply astounding, in my opinion. The acting is top notch as well as the soundtrack, writing, editing, and photography.

I'll start with the general story:

Hal Heffner (Reece Thompson) is just an ordinary , no frills high-school kid who happens to have a severe stutter. He has a some-what broken home life, living with his older, bullying, thief of a brother, Earl (Vincent Piazza). Their parents don't get along so well... Hal has a difficult time dealing with his stutter in school as well as general daily life. He is especially shy. Well... Hal is approached by the school Debate Team Star, Ginny Ryerson (Anna Kendrick) and she entices Hal into joining the Plainsboro High Debate Team. Hal develops a fondness for Ginny and desperately attempts to be closer with her. Hilarity Ensues...

The Acting in this film is nothing but astonishing. Reece does an incredible job of balancing his lines and creating a very convincing stuttering problem. Not only this, but the jokes he has to carry out are low-key and very natural. The very impressive fast-paced and garbled speech that Anna and Nicholas D'Agosto (Ben in the film), as well as the other debaters in the film have to employ is incredible. According to Jeff Blitz, real debaters speak faster, but the Actors/Actresses had to slow their speech so that everything was intelligible. Every player in this film speaks so naturally and fluently that the jokes are not obvious. They require thought, despite their beautiful simplicity. If you know Wes Anderson films, you know what I am talking about.

Speaking of the Writing, it is, once again, amazing. The love story that this film illustrates is a very different type of love story. It takes the genre and flips it upside-down at every turn. This trend also emanates in all other facets of the film as well. Just when your mind thinks one thing is going to happen, something unexpected happens. This film is very unpredictable, which is very nice as this film does not follow the fairy tales that are so common in film today.

Rocket Science is also just beautiful looking. The film was made predominately in the Baltimore Area. The crew did a most convincing job of turning South East Baltimore into Trenton, NJ and turning the suburbs of MD into those of NJ. As a Dundalk resident myself, I can testify.

The editing is also innovative in that it employed its fitting soundtrack into the cutting. The music will fire up to match the sequence and then pause to let a key moment carry itself out, and then pick up right where it left off. Speaking of the music, The Violent Femmes are all over the place and their songs of Love Angst match perfectly with the entire flow and story of the film.

All in all, this film was a most enjoyable experience. The laughs I had are unforgettable and the emotions that I felt watching Hal chase his dreams really tapped into me. Its a realistic film with a slight neurotic sitcom twist to it. Jeff Blitz is simply brilliant and it shows in this work. Reese has a most bright future and will be fully discovered once this film hits.

For a truly uplifting, however, realistic experience that will certainly make you laugh and impress as well, go see Rocket Science when it releases on August 10th.

-Daniel J. Carlin-Weber
105 out of 143 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Best film so far of 2007
howard.schumann26 August 2007
For some, the joys of being a teenager include excelling at sports, having a girlfriend or boyfriend, being part of a close circle of friends, or just having fun. For others, there is only the constant feeling of being an outsider looking in. For some, even the thought of getting out of bed in the morning to go to school is filled with dread. Case in point - Hal Hefner, a fifteen year old attending Plainsboro High School in New Jersey, who is trying to make sense of growing up but is burdened by a stutter so debilitating that he cannot even tell the cafeteria worker at school that he wants pizza instead of fish. Rocket Science, the second feature by Jeffrey Blitz (Spellbound), who overcame his own stuttering disability, is a teen comedy that poignantly captures the painful loneliness of adolescence.

While on paper Rocket Science sounds like other coming of age films such as Election and Rushmore, it manages to capture something unique and very special about being a teenager without having to rely on grossness, stereotypes, or implausible situations. Brilliantly played by Vancouver actor Reece Thompson, Hal's sweetness and innocence is totally captivating and we identify with his pain and root for him to succeed. His family support, however, is virtually nonexistent. His brother Earl (Vincent Piazza) is a compulsive thief and bully who calls him by girls' names, his father has moved out of the house and his mother (Lizbeth Bartlett) has a Korean boyfriend, a Small Claims judge, (Steve Park) who laughs inappropriately and whose son Heston (Aaron Yu), a bisexual, shows an unusual amount of interest in him.

Hal has a speech therapist, Mr. Lewinsky (Maury Ginsberg), but he is so incompetent that he tells him that he wishes Hal was hyperactive so he would know how to treat him. Under these circumstances, the last place he would want to be is on the high school debating team, a collection of driven, super-confident word magicians who can speak with authority at breakneck speed on both sides of an issue. Surprisingly however, Hal is recruited by top debater Ginny Ryerson (Anna Kendrick) to be her debate partner after her former partner Ben Wekselbaum (Nicholas D'Agosto) went blank at last year's championship match.

Ginny, a charming but overly aggressive super student, tells Hal that "deformed people" make good competitors because they have so much anger to express. Hal's first inclination is to say no but he is so taken with Ginny and flattered that someone could see some possibility in him that he accepts. Giving it the old high school try, he stumbles badly both in pursuing his romance and in debating the subject of sexual abstinence in high school, so badly in fact that he often has to hide in the janitor's closet from embarrassment.

Mr. Lewinsky advises Hal to try singing the words of the debate to the tune of Battle Hymn of the Republic, or speaking with a foreign accent and he does both with hilarious effect. Partly out of revenge and partly out of desperation, he turns to failed debater Ben Wekselbaum, now working in Trenton in a cleaners, to be his new partner after Ginny transfers to a different school. The ending is ripe for the big debate in which all the pieces fit neatly together but Blitz does not go there. Instead he relies on the inner strength of the characters to see them through, not on a contrived narrative.

While there are some predictably oddball characters like Philosophy major Lionel (Jonah Hill), pint-sized Josh (Lewis Garrles) who spies on Ginny for him (and models her bra that he has stolen), and an older couple who practice the Kama Sutra and play Violent Femmes "Blister In The Sun" duets on the cello and piano, Rocket Science has few false notes. It is wise, honest, funny, touching, and painfully sad with Oscar-caliber performances. It's not rocket science to figure out why it is the best film so far of 2007.
33 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Smart Dialog, Sharp Performances
ekeby8 June 2008
I'm surprised that this film elicits so many negative reviews here. I enjoyed reading the rant by the guy who spells cello "chello." I think that pretty much explains it. Literacy will be required to appreciate this movie.

This has to be the best dialog in any film ever made with a stutterer as a central character.

I found the performances letter-perfect; not a false note anywhere. This is a movie where even the bit parts are played by well-cast actors, not producers' pretty boyfriends or girlfriends. I loved the girl in the washroom with the nosebleed, for example. Perfect.

Rushmore did not come to mind while I watched this film, nor did any of the other "quirky" films named here by other reviewers. But I did think of it as a companion piece to "Welcome to the Dollhouse." Both set in NJ, and both with central characters at the bottom of their school social ranking, and coping with their realities better than one would think.

I particularly liked the relationship between adults and kids in this film. The adults (parents and teachers) are wise about the kids, and the kids are just as wise about the adults. The tone was just right.
18 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not likely to make state finals
JohnSeal8 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER: A very disappointing feature indeed, Rocket Science suffers from virtually all the symptoms of AIFD (American Indie Film Disease). From the deeply unlikeable and endlessly flawed characters to the overly arch dialogue to the overly busy soundtrack of 'cool music', it hits on all cylinders. The badly developed plot makes no sense (why would any top ranked debater choose a complete loser to be their partner?), and the film is poorly structured and about twenty minutes (far) too long. As a former high school debater, I can't really argue with the depiction of the activity, but there's so little actual debating in the film that it hardly matters. Director Jeffrey Blitz would have been far better served by sticking to the documentary format--quirky comedy drama just ain't his thing.
22 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Performances from some excellent new talent!
lucashillsinlondon21 January 2008
The entire time I was watching rocket science, I was gob smacked by the performances of the entire cast, but in particular Anna Kendrick and Nicholas D'Agosto. Their performances were unlike anything I've seen in years!!! I think it's difficult to portray a character that you hate and love quite like Anna has done in this movie, and even now.. I'm still wondering..? but mostly it's love ;)

Seriously, for the last 2 decades or so, Hollywood has been lacking the ability to produce anything that even resembles 'originality' and usually just chews up and spits out a recombination of 3 or 4 stories that have been told time and time again..... and for that reason alone, there'll probably be one or two people that won't even appreciate this movie because its not that run of the mill crap they're used too.

But honestly, whoever put together the cast of this movie deserves a massive pat on the back. I cannot think of another name that could have fit the profile of these characters so perfectly!

I question how the hell it got the 'R' rating however?? Come on, its language and sexuality content was on par with 'Lost in Translation'.. What the? Whether you're 25 or 12, watch this movie by yourself with no distractions and no one to influence your reactions and you will LOVE this movie, it's very clever. I recommend it highly!
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Rocket Science Makes Perfect Sense
blueyedathena328012 August 2007
On the brink of exhaustion after a week at Sundance, I sat down in a comfy plush seat in a theater that was not really a theater, but rather a library converted into a theater. Between the habitual midnight showing and average three movie viewing a day, I had fallen asleep in the last two, (Trust me, I did everything in the book to try and keep myself conscious) and thought this would be the third as I began to slouch down in this sumptuousness of a chair, but suddenly, the catchy music, witty dialog, and stimulating visuals had enlivened me. I was literally on the edge of my seat, hanging on to every word Hal Hefner uttered. It was remarkably fresh, continuously entertaining, and even profoundly deep. But in a good way. Which is quite rare not only in movies, but in life really. It made teenage angst and the mid-life crisis a little lighter, even hilarious. And who would think either would be funny. Anyways, this is quite a memorable tale, leaving you with a feeling of infinity, and the wisdom of approaching the serious things with a bit of humor.
49 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
good message, plenty of laughs, anyone can watch this and enjoy it!
bonersoup12 August 2007
I saw this movie earlier this year at a preview screening. The cool thing was that I had no Idea what it was about, I didn't even look it up for a plot outline. I was extremely pleasantly surprised. It was a very good movie, definitely worth seeing. The soundtrack was extremely fitting to the theme of the film as well. It turns out from some of the comments I have read here, some people just do not like this film. I cannot find a reason for that. I have noticed that with the younger crowd, this movie seems to not be as popular as others. This movie is very linear when it comes to how things really are. You can relate to several main characters and their struggles in life. If you are expecting a slapstick, non realistic comedy with tons of shock value, go and watch Wedding Crashers (which I love by the way). If you want to see a movie with intelligent dialogue with a good message and great acting, go and see Rocket Science. My rating 10.
45 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
ROCKET SCIENCE is really a wonderful film!
Donato14 September 2007
How anyone could be bored with this is beyond me. Perhaps the film hits too close to home. See it, if for no other reason, for the terrific performances of Reece Thompson and Anna Kendrick. They are both amazing in their key roles, and, were this a high-profile Hollywood film, would no doubt be considered come Oscar time, as well they should be! High school can be a painful time, so to expect some Disney version of perfect, perky kids, who all look like teen models, is downright unrealistic. This film, on the other hand, rang true in just about every scene, which is no easy task. And I have to add that I have become a big fan of Margo Martindale, who can do just about anything asked of her. (See her touching segment in the multi-segment film "Paris, je t'aime" and her work in "The Riches" to get an idea of how terrific this actress is.) In any event, if you want to see a film that reflects high school in all its good-bad-and-ugly splendor, this is one film you should not miss.
18 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Overlong, tedious, stupid, annoying, irritating film with a terrible lead performance by Reece Thompson
Jackpollins18 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
A movie can get no more boring than this. It's a movie about a little, annoying twit with a stutter who gets to help a girl out on the debate team. The boy is Hal (Reece Thompson, just annoying as hell in this.) The girl is Ginny (Anna Kendrick, also pretty bad in this.) Together they form an annoying, stupid predictable relationship. The only mild laugh was from Jonah Hill as a student who sits next to Ben at the library. The movie is a mess from start to finish. It's another annoying, extremely predictable teen comedy in which a no one gets to be a someone. There is no real plot, the characters feel too forced, and scripted, and the jokes are just depressing. I can't really say I was disappointed by this film- I knew nothing of it, although I regularly do like D'Agosto. I feel like I should have never seen it. It's 98 minutes of my life I'll never get back. It's such an annoying film. The main problem with the film is that the film presents itself with a main character I just wanted to shut up. It's a movie of such tedium and annoyance that I have to say it's one of the worst film I've seen in a long, long time.
12 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Another teen-age movie? Yes, and this one is good, especially since Hal finally gets pizza and not fish
Terrell-430 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I hope old Hollywood and what's become the new Hollywood, namely the Sundance Film Festival, haven't yet established that the angst of suburban high school life really is a metaphor for all those life lessons they want to share with us. Rocket Science is one more in a long line of sensitive and not-so-sensitive teen-age movies. Surprisingly, this one is pretty good. On the other hand, if you're not prepared early on to recognize low-key exaggeration to achieve humor and make a point ("Wait a minute, why didn't Hal just point to the pizza?") you might leave the theater scratching your head.

Hal is Hal Hefner (Reese Thompson), a schlumping, unhappy, shy high school student with a stutter. The stutter, in fact, is more like a series of strangled gargles. He knows the answers; he has ideas...and he simply can't get them out. When the captain of the debating team, Ginny Ryerson (Anna Kendrick) recruits him to be her partner, it's because, she says, she can see his potential. Turns out she has some other, not so altruistic, motives. Hal first finds infatuation and what he thinks is love for this cute, smart high school star. He decides he'll join the debate team, even though he has never been able to get more than a sentence or two out of his mouth, because Ginny wants him to. Hal also has to deal with an older brother who bullies and steals, the break-up of his parents' marriage, and his mother taking up with the father of a schoolmate. Through it all, Hal perseveres. Those who think this movie will be a series of crude jokes and high school hormone scenes will be disappointed. Of course, those who think Hal will overcome that strangulating stammer, will win Ginny's heart and the two will face a tense debating contest which will leave them state champs...are going to be disappointed, too.

What Hal faces is a series of struggles and challenges, keyed to the awful inexperience and misunderstandings of adolescence. The director and writer, Jeffrey Blitz, who gave us the documentary Spellbound, sets up Hal and his world as a series of situations for Hal to deal with. There is no self-pity from Hal. As the movie progresses we figure out that Hal is not going to have an epiphany of speech or love, but that he's going to manage, even if just barely at times. Along the way we can enjoy what Blitz gives Hal...a high school speech counselor who only knows about hyper-active kids; Hal's continuing battle to deal with the choice of pizza or fish in the cafeteria; Ginny Ryerson's neighbors, a couple who work through their marriage issues with a cello, a piano and a copy of the illustrated Kama Sutra; the debate technique of "spreading," or cramming a breathless, fast-talking debate position into 30 seconds (ten if you're responding). I hope this is a Blitz invention. It causes some awe-inspiring situations...when a debater goes dry, when Hal tries, when Ginny wows 'em...but it seems as unnatural a part of real debate technique as miniature poodles are to dogs.

And at the close? "Love shouldn't be as complicated as rocket science," Hal says to his father. Most of us over the age of 30 have figured out that it shouldn't be, but usually is. Rocket Science is a good-natured, good-humored movie about a kid with a stammer who is willing to try for the sake of love. Is it a realistic slice of high school life? I wouldn't know. I tried my best to forget my high school years as quickly as I could.

For those who enjoy their high school movies filled with double-dealing, back-stabbing, uneasy laughter and wickedly sharp irony, you can't do better than Alexander Payne's black comedy, Election. Reese Witherspoon's over-achieving Tracy Flick would leave Ginny Ryerson with the stammer and Hal Hefner nothing but a moist lump in the janitor's closet.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Good message-yes.....Entertaining-NO
stevepat9917 March 2008
This time around high school angst hands us a lad whose additional teen burden is indeed a heavy one, severe stuttering. So, of course a school yummy convinces him that he's a PERFECT candidate to join the school's debating team. Rip off on another film I viewed about an illiterate teen who entered the national spelling bee. But that's another story.

It has been said the film departs, does not thereafter go where one expects. My take finds it a sadly predictable film that proceeded to take me on a lack luster, unwelcome and irritating journey. Acting? Yes, fine, so fine I found myself screaming at the screen in vain attempts to help our hero render to verbal completion.

Yes, our hero yearns for love and strives gallantly to find it. While many see it quite differently I saw it as: Strive, crash and burn, strive, crash and burn, strive, crash....HI DAD...THE END...(the antidote: I'm off to see Juno again).
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lame mix of "ELECTION" and "RUSHMORE"
george.schmidt14 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
ROCKET SCIENCE (2007) * Reece Thompson, Anna Kendrick, Nicholas D'Agostino, Vincent Piazza, Margo Martidale, Aaron Yoo, Josh Kay, Steve Park, Lisbeth Bartlett, Denis O'Hare, Jonah Hill. (Dir: Jeffrey Blitz)

Lame mix of "ELECTION" and "RUSHMORE"

Why is it some of the indies heralded at such prestigious film fests like Sundance often come across as crass, self-involved, hateful pieces of turgid junk? I realize they can't all be gems but the latest offering had me grinding my teeth in deep hatred.

Hal Hefner (newcomer Thompson) is a NJ teen who has a difficult life: namely his father has just left his family to fend for themselves as if he was going onto a better job position instead of total abandonment for no good reason (well maybe the mother is a bit of a clinger), and more notably a persistent, heart-breaking stutter that has made him a complete social misfit at his high school (and life in general).

Add to the mix debate team extraordinairre Ginny Ryerson (newbie Kendrick), whose hyperkinetic speech is an obnoxious, grating device that inspires her to force hapless Hal to join the club in spite of his woeful absence of speech in general.

Ginny has her reasons: namely she was robbed the previous year of the state championship when her partner Ben Wekselbaum (D'Agostino) suddenly froze in the midst of his patter ruining their chances altogether and sending him into self-exiled seclusion.

While documentary filmmaker Blitz is said to have based this alleged comedy on his own childhood battle with stuttering, you could have fooled me in this highly mean-spirited, ugly and too-proud-of-itself attitude that I immediately disliked it from the get go and the cutesy touches (Hal's creepy friend's parents use musical therapy with a cello and piano recital of the Violent Femmes' "Blister in The Sun"), the fact NJ (my home state) is once again a one-note joke (and um, shot in BALTIMORE!!!), and namely no likable characters (nope even Hal becomes a real jerk in the long run). I truly loathed this lame film and hope it doesn't get an audience at all for its attempt to be 'clever' by mixing elements of "Election" and "Rushmore" (in fact rent those instead!)
11 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Apparently it is!
come2whereimfrom13 September 2007
Billed as 'Election' like and the first feature from the director of 'Spellbound', the documentary that followed American students through the harrowing spelling bee competitions, 'Rocket Science' is quite frankly disappointing. It's not a bad film, but it's also not that great. It so wants to be Rushmore, Thumbsucker or anything by Wes Anderson and unfortunately its not and so falls quite flat. The story is basically about a guy with a stutter who wants to join the debating team, problem number one; he then falls for his debating partner who doesn't reciprocate and eventually defects to the other side, problem number two. There are some funny moments and I don't like using the word but it is 'quirky'. Trouble is all the interesting characters are never explored, the weird kid who lives opposite, the untrained teacher who councils, the strange goth girl etc have such fleeting screen time. The boy meets girl storyline is so old that if you are going to do it you really need to approach it in a fresh and exciting way this does neither and with the weak story underpinning it the film plods along to an inevitable conclusion. Where as films before have injected something, anything into the visual make-up, think 'Science of Sleep' or 'Eagle vrs Shark', this is filmed straight and uses natural light that renders some scenes so dark and dingy that it is at times almost unwatchable. Sometimes films where nothing happens works, 'Old Joy' being a great example but here that nothingness doesn't translate into anything and although I wasn't bored it was dragging towards the end. Subject matter aside this had the potential to be something but sadly ended up another in a long line of pretenders to the throne. Roll on 'The Darjeeling Limited' to see, hopefully, how it's done.
10 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Completely Mediocre
chas777 April 2008
I haven't bothered to read all of the other comments but I'm sure it must have been stated before -- this is a completely mediocre comedy that is simply yet another attempt by Hollywood to ride on the coattails of much better films like "Rushmore" and "Napoleon Dynamite." Whereas those films had one or two quirky characters, the hack director of this film decided to up the ante and make ALL but one or two characters "quirky." Was this an attempt to quadruple the laughs? If so, he failed miserably.

I was thinking about a great teenage comedy film from the late '70s/early'80s - "My Bodyguard" which carried a similar theme of a young, loser kid trying to find his place in the world. That film not only appeared a million times more real but it also limited the "quirky" quotient to one character -- Ruth Gordon.

C'mon Hollywood, stop cannibalizing yourself. Let's see something new...

UPDATE, 5/2/2020: I was looking over my past reviews and stumbled upon this. I have ZERO RECOLLECTION of this film. That's how forgettable it is. I looked through the trailer twice. Honestly I can't recall one thing about this movie. Even terrible films usually leave some kind of hideous memory -- like the smell of burnt toast that won't go away. Not this one.
11 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Depressing from start to end
a_flynn7819 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
You know how there are stories that are adversity to triumph, unstable to stable, confused to knowing. This is not a happy story, i sat through all the frustrating bits in the movies, putting my shirt over my head whenever he tried to debate with his enormous stutter, thinking its okay, because I'm gonna see some scenes at the end where he has finally lost his stutter. I didn't.

Maybe i had the wrong idea when i watched this movie, i was convinced from start till perhaps the last scene, that i was going to see an inspiring transformation, where i would no longer feel sorry for the kid, and that marred my view on the film. All i could think about during the whole film is not what this kid was talking about, what he was thinking about, but how he was speaking. Its like a movie where the main character looks like a bunyip, all you can think about is this main character looks like a bunyip, and not really what he/she is saying. I was convinced the inevitable transformation was going to be in his speaking patterns so i wasn't particularly interested in his views on love, because I'm sorry, i don't mean to be offensive to anybody but having a speech impediment as BAD as that, is something i couldn't bear to hear for the rest of my life, you have to try and do something about it. I thought thats what this movie was about! Look I'm sure what the kid was saying was important, and meaningful, but i was looking for more blunt changes that were imperative to me saying at the end of the movie, wow that was good. The stutter was a vehicle to portray a message about love when i went through the whole movie thinking it was the opposite, that all the references to love would make him lose his stutter. Not a horrible movie, but after i finished watching it, i felt horrible, Im a bit tired of movie producers thinking 'it will be more meaningful if we deprive the movie of a happy ending'. To be honest, i don't need happy endings, but what i do need is some light. At the end of 'Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind' i was left thinking, despite its lack of a cliché happy ending, that the main characters were not doomed because of it, that they could bounce back from the issues in the movie. I felt at the end of 'Rocket Science' that the kid was never going to get rid of his stutter, and when did his last debate and he turned to the judges and said 'Im killing it right?' that he was in fact, not killing it, he sucked, you can't debate in a musical tone, there was no growth there.

Was it that hard to put a happy ending in!?!
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Brilliant beginning, bad ending.
Dav-san5 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
"Rocket Science" lifts off with brilliance. Defying gravity, its perfectly-cast high school characters ascend above their dysfunctional parents, above their prior perceived limitations. They chart the lift that debating--the single most educational endeavor in which a student can participate-- can give to those who learn to wage warfare with rapid-fire words.

The film opens with promise--the promise us that our protagonist, the stuttering Hal Hefner, played by Reece Thompson, along with his even better partner, the perfectly cast Anna Kendrick, will rise above his prior limitations.

But halfway through, the movie loses its direction and wanders aimlessly. Hal loses his partner, then his chances at debating. The audience expects him to regain the girl, to overcome these obstacles, and to reach the State finals. But in the end, the film falters and just…ends. It ends with his beaten, defeated father telling him that most people give up trying to make sense of it all, and that he should do the same.

What a shame. What a shame that the writer/director, having brought his characters to such heights, lets them down, and with them, the audience.

Somehow, more seasoned writers and directors manage a happy ending. Stuttering can be overcome (e.g., in "Shakespeare in Love"); disabilities can be overcome (e.g., "Murderball"); wrongful accusations can be overcome (e.g., "Frenzy"); childhood limitations can be overcome (e.g., "The Miracle Worker"). Even the dark and violent "Eastern Promises" somehow manages, in the experienced hands of a Cronenberg, to show how a bad beginning can have a happy ending.

Not so in the hands of inexperienced, newbie writers/directors. They (perhaps having seen too many screenings of "Bicycle Thief") think happy endings are trite or forced, and let things end badly, thinking themselves sophisticates. Their scripts, like "Rocket Science," lack a last reel.

If the promising "Rocket Science" had followed its initial trajectory, it could have soared above now-famous movies, like "Searching for Bobby Fischer" or "Hoosiers." But when a movie betrays an audience, the audience has a way of voting with its feet and its dollars; it can choose not to view such a disappointing movie. This movie has thus been hastily ushered out of the theaters and relegated to obscurity. And its writer/director, Jeffrey Blitz, having disappointed his audience so badly, has probably gone on to write his next epic: "How Helen Keller Gave Up And Failed To Overcome Her Disabilities."
15 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Anna Kendrick's funny and Reece Thompson is endearing
SnoopyStyle16 June 2015
Ben Wekselbaum and Ginny Ryerson (Anna Kendrick) are fast-talking high school debate teammates in Plainsboro, New Jersey. Then Ben goes blank in the big tournament and Ginny is stuck with second place. In school, Hal Hefner (Reece Thompson) stutters terribly. His parents are separated and his brother is a kleptomaniac. He's struggling and then surprisingly Ginny recruits him for the debate team. She wants to mold him into her new partner.

Anna Kendrick's quick talking is hilarious. It's a relentless non-stop flow of thoughts. Reece Thompson is endearing. When he tells her that she's not an object of desire for pedophiles, her reply "That's the worst thing anyone has ever said to me" killed me. There is this aura of quirky indie that will either enchant the audience or annoying them. I could probably use less of it. Hal needs a better friend character. I would have loved to see Jonah Hill in that role. The movie doesn't quite work all the time when Ginny isn't with Hal.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Debate is Life?
solojere24 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Rocket Science is a mixed bag that starts out sweet, fun, and clever but takes a dive in the movie's second half. The film follows Hal Hefner, a high school freshman who suffers from a bad stutter and comes from a broken home. Unknown to Hal, the older Ginny Ryerson (Anna Kendrick) loses her debate partner because he loses his voice during the debate championship. Determined to regain her rightful place as a champion debater, Ginny seeks out Hal and convinces him to join the debate team. However, Hal seems like a strange choice as he is socially awarded, and his stutter makes it hard for him to speak, let alone debate. Yet, Ginny reassures him that she believes in him, and Hal develops a crush on her. Up to this point, the film is pretty fun. However, things take a quick turn as it is releveled that Genny is deceiving Hal and that she only picked him because she was planning on switching schools and knew he would be easy to beat in a debate. This, of course, breaks Hal's heart and starts a downward spiral for him as everything in his life turns bad. Personally, this twist just killed me, as Ginny was the best part of the movie. Anna Kendrick is one of my favorite actors, and she is clearly the highlight of the movie. Even though this is one of her earlier roles, she stills the show in every scene she is in. Also, the way she is able to speak so fast really sells you on the character and this world of debate. It also shows just how witty the script and the writers are. And when Genny leaves, you really notice her absence, which was intentional, but it still stings. Any way Hal decides to get revenge by finding Genny's old debate partner in an attempt to get revenge. This could've been a fun twist, but it sadly didn't go anywhere, and the movie just ends without any real resolution or closure. The result is a movie that starts out fun but ends up being tragic and just depressing. Simply put, there are better movies about heartbreak and the struggles of growing up. However, I did enjoy the idea that you need to just accept who you are. All in all, it was a disappointing movie, but worth watching if you are an Anna Kendrick fan.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This movie did not age well
Kirk0429 November 2018
First, as many others have pointed out, the people behind the excellent movie Rushmore should sue this writer/director for plagiarism.

It is cool seeing Anna Kendrick in an early (2007) role, but you know how some movies show where the main character ends up in a year? If this movie did that, I'm convinced the main character would be in jail either for some sort of stalking/sex crime or a school shooting. Probably both. Seriously.

It was one thing for comedies made in the 1980s to show obsessive, even violent behavior as entertainment, but watching this movie in 2018 I felt like it should be renamed "Making of a School Shooter."
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Does Anyone Ever Figure It All Out?
bkoganbing4 July 2010
Rocket Science proves that the spirit of John Waters is alive and well with some independent film makers. Even without the big name Brat Pack stars of the Eighties, Rocket Science could easily have been a project Waters would have been proud to put his name to.

Teen angst is busting out all over in Rocket Science. Young Nicholas D'Agosto in the middle of a high school debate just flakes out and quits the debate and school altogether in the stultifying air of suburban New Jersey. He goes off to seek fame and fortune working in a dry cleaner in Trenton.

His debate partner is overachieving Anna Kendrick who has been counting on winning this debate which would place her first in that category as well. She lights on this wallflower of a kid in Reece Thompson who has a stuttering problem as one she can nurture into a champion debater. Since this is the first time anyone of the opposite sex has ever even noticed him, poor young Reece's hormones go into deep overdrive and he thinks he's in love with Kendrick.

To say she has an ulterior purpose in mind is belaboring the obvious. What it is and what young Thompson does about it you have to watch Rocket Science for.

Shot on location in New Jersey, Rocket Science is blessed with perfect performances by its three young leads. You don't think you're watching actors act in Rocket Science, these young people achieve a level of reality in their work that you don't often get.

They're given good support by the rest of the cast which centers around Thompson's dysfunctional family. On the same night that D'Agosto breaks down, Thompson's father Denis O'Hare leaves the home which he probably considers a freak show.

Mother Lisbeth Bartlet is continually reliving her childhood and brother Vincent Piazza looks like a candidate to be a serial rapist. No wonder poor Reece stutters, it's like he wants to run and hide from the world. You'll also like Steve Park who moves in with Bartlett and her kids and his budding young gay son, Aaron Yoo.

Rocket Science is a really well done piece of film making, John Waters would be proud.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
98 minutes of my life I wish I could have back
flyingpolyp2 September 2007
I really hated this movie, and I cannot imagine for a minute what the heck everyone sees in it. It was 98 minutes of plain old-fashioned pretentious cinematic torture. I was lured into it by all the critical acclaim, and I walked away feeling like I'd been utterly had.

Nothing was funny in this movie. It was all pain, pain, pain, one awkward, horrible, painful moment after another.

This is the kind of movie that could steer me away from the art-house cinema for good. I've just been burned too many times by movies like this, movies that are apparently made to cause people to suffer, and I'm beginning to wonder if the nation's movie critics are getting together and having a good laugh at all the people who they've sent to the cinematic abattoir of awfulness by recommending painful snoozers like Rocket Science.
15 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This film got me angry
faustocausto7 October 2008
Te acting is good i have to say... But my god, it is slow, and the script is so pretentious. And too too too much of the kid's speech problem come on. It made me want to slap him like 20 times!! Anyway what sort of film is it? It's pushing too much the witty comedy genre in vogue. Tired of this kind of stuff. Please make intelligent comedies but because they are intelligent. It seems that the point of this was to prove how many fancy words they can write. It is like the characters of Dawson's creek. Mixed with the wonder years, the girl name is even Ginny like Winnie. And what about the stereotypes like the funny intrusive Asian people and the pervert Indian.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed