The decision held that a black slave, could not sue in court for his freedom because he was not a citizen, but a piece of property.
Dread Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Mapp v. ohio (1961)
Miranda v. arizona (1966)
Terry v. ohio (1968)
1 of 14
Scheduled maintenance: March 23, 2024 from 11:00 PM to 12:00 AM
Test: Courts 220 Exam 3 Cases
Name:
Score:
14 Multiple choice questions
Definition
The decision held that a black slave, could not sue in court for his freedom because he was not a citizen, but a piece of property.
1 of 14
Term
Plessey v. Fergusson (1896)
2 of 14
Term
Weeks v. United States (1914)
3 of 14
Term
Powell v. Alabama (1932)
4 of 14
Definition
The Supreme Court held that "separate but equal" facilities are inherently unequal and violate the protections of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
5 of 14
Definition
Both states and the Federal government are required to use the exclusionary rule to sanction noncompliance with the mandates of the 4th Amendment (overturning Weeks and Wolf).
6 of 14
Definition
Indigent felony defendants have the right to appointed counsel (Betts overruled).
7 of 14
Definition
Due process of law is violated when prosecutors either willfully or inadvertently conceal evidence that might be favorable to the defense because it is exculpatory.
8 of 14
Term
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
9 of 14
Definition
Abortion rights fall within the privacy implied in the 14th amendment
10 of 14
Definition
Is a classically known case of violent or aggressive behavior within the home, typically involving the abuse of a spouse or panther.
11 of 14
Definition
Criminal case in the United States on the assault and rape of a 28-year-old white woman.
12 of 14
Term
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
13 of 14
Definition
Upheld the police practice of "stop and risk" when an officer suspects a crime is about to be committed
14 of 14
Plessey v. Fergusson (1896)
Abortion rights fall within the privacy implied in the 14th amendment
Segregations did not in itself constitute unlawful discrimination.
The decision held that a black slave, could not sue in court for his freedom because he was not a citizen, but a piece of property.
Indigent felony defendants have the right to appointed counsel (Betts overruled).
2 of 14
Weeks v. United States (1914)
Due process of law is violated when prosecutors either willfully or inadvertently conceal evidence that might be favorable to the defense because it is exculpatory.
The exclusionary rule was established in Federal prosecutions.
Established judicial review.
The Fifth Amendment requires that law enforcement officials advise suspects of their right to remain silent and to obtain an attorney during interrogations while in Police custody.
3 of 14
Powell v. Alabama (1932)
The decision held that a black slave, could not sue in court for his freedom because he was not a citizen, but a piece of property.
Indigent felony defendants have the right to appointed counsel (Betts overruled).
Upheld the police practice of "stop and risk" when an officer suspects a crime is about to be committed
The Court determined that poor, needy, defendants in a capital case in state have a right to court-appointed counsel.
4 of 14
The Supreme Court held that "separate but equal" facilities are inherently unequal and violate the protections of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Miranda v. arizona (1966)
Gideon v. wainwright (1963)
Marbury v. madison (1803)
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
5 of 14
Both states and the Federal government are required to use the exclusionary rule to sanction noncompliance with the mandates of the 4th Amendment (overturning Weeks and Wolf).
Roe v. Wade (1973)
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
6 of 14
Indigent felony defendants have the right to appointed counsel (Betts overruled).
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Brown v. board of education (1954)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
7 of 14
Due process of law is violated when prosecutors either willfully or inadvertently conceal evidence that might be favorable to the defense because it is exculpatory.
Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
Terry v. Ohio (1968)
Brady v. Maryland (1963)
Powell v. Alabama (1932)
8 of 14
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
The Fifth Amendment requires that law enforcement officials advise suspects of their right to remain silent and to obtain an attorney during interrogations while in Police custody.
Established judicial review.
The exclusionary rule was established in Federal prosecutions.
Due process of law is violated when prosecutors either willfully or inadvertently conceal evidence that might be favorable to the defense because it is exculpatory.
9 of 14
Abortion rights fall within the privacy implied in the 14th amendment
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Roe v. Wade (1973)
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
10 of 14
Is a classically known case of violent or aggressive behavior within the home, typically involving the abuse of a spouse or panther.
Roe v. wade (1973)
Brady v. maryland (1963)
Mapp v. ohio (1961)
Thurman v. City of Torrington (1984)
11 of 14
Criminal case in the United States on the assault and rape of a 28-year-old white woman.
Powell v. Alabama (1932)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Central Park Five (1989)
Plessey v. Fergusson (1896)
12 of 14
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
The Fifth Amendment requires that law enforcement officials advise suspects of their right to remain silent and to obtain an attorney during interrogations while in Police custody.
Due process of law is violated when prosecutors either willfully or inadvertently conceal evidence that might be favorable to the defense because it is exculpatory.
The exclusionary rule was established in Federal prosecutions.
Established judicial review.
13 of 14
Upheld the police practice of "stop and risk" when an officer suspects a crime is about to be committed
Brady v. Maryland (1963)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Terry v. Ohio (1968)
14 of 14