This new article from the AC press raises a lot of questions.
Data suggest scallop boat was not dredging when it sank
By RICHARD DEGENER Staff Writer, 609-463-6711 | Posted: Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:20 am | 0 comments
Font Size:Default font sizeLarger font size The Coast Guard says it is still trying to unravel the corporate ownership of the Lady Mary.
.prWrap,.prWrap DIV,.prWrap TABLE,.prWrap TABLE TBODY,.prWrap TABLE TR,.prWrap TABLE TD,.prWrap IMG{margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;padding:0px 0px 0px 0px;border:0px 0px 0px 0px;overflow:visible;direction:ltr;background:none;background-color:transparent;}
CAPE MAY — An electronic tracking system the government uses to enforce fishing regulations is providing new clues on the last hours of the scallop boat Lady Mary.
The vessel that sank about 70 miles offshore March 24, taking the lives of six Cape May County fishermen, was equipped with a Vessel Monitoring System.
The VMS transmitted signals showing location, course and speed about every 30 minutes during its final trip until the signal abruptly stopped during the time period the lone survivor said the boat sank. A signal was due at 5:40 a.m. but never came.
“The computer was underwater,” said Steve Weeks, the North Carolina attorney who represents the owner of the Lady Mary, Smith & Smith Inc. of Bayboro, N.C.
But the circumstances of the sinking and who may be liable for it are still far from clear, as Weeks says speed data from the VMS call into question a theory on what caused the Lady Mary to sink, and he contradicts his client’s claim that the boat was even partially insured. Meanwhile, the Coast Guard remains uncertain as to just who owns Smith & Smith Inc.
A snag in the theory
The only survivor, Jose Luis Arias, was asleep when the boat began taking on water and has thus far provided limited information on what happened. Arias, however, has placed the sinking at about 5 a.m. and this fits the VMS timeline.
Weeks said the last VMS signal, a technology first used with sewage sludge barges to make sure they discharged at the correct locations off New Jersey, was at 5:10 a.m.
Perhaps more importantly, Weeks said the vessel was not moving fast enough to tow a scallop dredge, which requires a speed of 4 to 5 knots, during the night. He said the boat stopped fishing sometime after midnight and may have been semi-anchored, using the scallop dredge to slow its drift.
“At midnight, it was going 4 knots. At 12:30 (a.m.) to the sinking, it was 1 to 1.5 knots. I think the vessel is not trawling. I think the vessel is laying to,” Weeks said.
This runs counter to an earlier theory that the crew was scalloping and the dredge got hung up on an underwater object, dragging the boat down.
The lucrative scallop grounds known as the Elephant Trunk could be the key. The area was closed in 2004 to allow scallop stocks to recover. It reopened in 2007 with an estimated 100 million pounds of scallops to harvest.
Weeks said sometimes boats go into areas that had been closed and quickly fill the deck with scallops. They sometimes stop fishing in order to shuck them, leaving their dredge in the water to slow their movement.
Or, the crew may simply have taken a break. Weeks said there is some evidence from Arias that most of the crew was asleep. The crew included: brothers Timothy Smith and Royal Smith Jr., of Middle Township, whose bodies were recovered by the Coast Guard; their uncle, Bernie Smith, of Wildwood; Frank Credle, a cousin of the Smiths who lived on the boat; Frank Reyes, of Middle Township; Jorge Ramos, of Lower Township; and Arias, of Wildwood. The bodies of Credle, Reyes, Ramos and Bernie Smith have not been recovered.
“Arias said he was sleeping in the forepeak. Tim woke him up and said, ‘The boat is sinking, grab your survival suit.’ They get to the pilot house and Royal Smith Jr. is up there trying to handle the boat,” Weeks said.
Finding the wreck
Weeks also represents Royal “Fuzzy” Smith Sr. He lost a brother, two sons and a cousin in the sinking, and Weeks said he wants answers. Weeks said he wrote a letter to Cmdr. Kyle McAvoy, who heads a Coast Guard Marine Board of Investigation inquiry into the sinking, asking that scuba divers or at least underwater cameras be used to examine the wreck.
The position of the dredge could help determine what happened. Photos also could show evidence of a collision, which Weeks said could have involved a freighter or even a submarine. Arias said the boat did not flip but was pulled down, which Weeks said could happen if a vessel ran into the extended cable on a scallop dredge.
“I’m asking that (the inquiry) not be reconvened until such time as the vessel is examined. I don’t see how they can reach any credible conclusion until then. The vessel is the best evidence in the case,” Weeks said.
Ownership in question
The inquiry was put on hold last week after Fuzzy Smith requested an attorney. Weeks said he also represents Fuzzy Smith, but he said the boat was owned by a corporation and Timothy Smith was the sole shareholder. Weeks said the elder Smith worked as dock manager for the Lady Mary. Weeks said the Coast Guard has identified Fuzzy Smith as a “party of interest” in the case and this scares Weeks.
“They got the wrong person. It seems like they want to make a criminal case. The Coast Guard hasn’t even identified the owner,” Weeks said.
McAvoy on Tuesday said it is still looking into the corporate ownership issue.
Weeks has also requested all search and rescue reports, radio logs from Coast Guard aircraft and vessels, statements taken by investigators, testimony at the inquiry, and information relating to the Coast Guard’s emergency position-indicating radio beacon, or EPIRB , practices.
An EPIRB is designed to send a satellite signal when a boat sinks. The Lady Mary’s EPIRB did alert the Coast Guard, but the signal was not logged until 7:07 a.m., according to the Coast Guard.
“If the vessel sank between 5:10 and 5:40, why no signal? The reason could be the positioning of satellites. I want to see a written document on where the satellites were. EPIRBS have a hydrostatic release at a certain depth. It’s possible the vessel did not sink right away but turned upside down with air in the hull and it couldn’t be released, or it became entangled and didn’t surface. There are a lot of unanswered questions,” said Weeks.
Who is liable?
There are also liability questions. Weeks said he does not think the Lady Mary was insured, but if there was a collision, then another boat owner could be liable. He stressed that Fuzzy Smith is not liable. Smith has previously said the Lady Mary had some limited insurance.
Weeks also addressed the stability issue, which is sure to come up at some point. He acknowledged a pilot house was added to the Lady Mary but said it had survived weather worse than this. Weeks said additional ballast was added and the outriggers were shortened for more stability. He said plywood was used to keep the weight down.
Weeks also argued there is no evidence the boat rolled over, but appears to have been pulled down.
“Any conclusion as to the loss until the vessel has been examined is based upon nothing but speculation. The surviving eyewitness, Jose Arias, doesn’t know what happened,” Weeks said.
On Tuesday, McAvoy said the Coast Guard is working on examining the wreck, which the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration believes it has found using sonar technology.
E-mail Richard Degener:
RDegener@pressofac.com
Posted in Top_three on Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:20 am Updated: 1:27 am.
Data suggest scallop boat was not dredging when it sank
By RICHARD DEGENER Staff Writer, 609-463-6711 | Posted: Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:20 am | 0 comments
Font Size:Default font sizeLarger font size The Coast Guard says it is still trying to unravel the corporate ownership of the Lady Mary.
.prWrap,.prWrap DIV,.prWrap TABLE,.prWrap TABLE TBODY,.prWrap TABLE TR,.prWrap TABLE TD,.prWrap IMG{margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;padding:0px 0px 0px 0px;border:0px 0px 0px 0px;overflow:visible;direction:ltr;background:none;background-color:transparent;}
<img name="prti" style="width: 1px; height: 1px; float: none;" width="1" height="1">
CAPE MAY — An electronic tracking system the government uses to enforce fishing regulations is providing new clues on the last hours of the scallop boat Lady Mary.
The vessel that sank about 70 miles offshore March 24, taking the lives of six Cape May County fishermen, was equipped with a Vessel Monitoring System.
The VMS transmitted signals showing location, course and speed about every 30 minutes during its final trip until the signal abruptly stopped during the time period the lone survivor said the boat sank. A signal was due at 5:40 a.m. but never came.
“The computer was underwater,” said Steve Weeks, the North Carolina attorney who represents the owner of the Lady Mary, Smith & Smith Inc. of Bayboro, N.C.
But the circumstances of the sinking and who may be liable for it are still far from clear, as Weeks says speed data from the VMS call into question a theory on what caused the Lady Mary to sink, and he contradicts his client’s claim that the boat was even partially insured. Meanwhile, the Coast Guard remains uncertain as to just who owns Smith & Smith Inc.
A snag in the theory
The only survivor, Jose Luis Arias, was asleep when the boat began taking on water and has thus far provided limited information on what happened. Arias, however, has placed the sinking at about 5 a.m. and this fits the VMS timeline.
Weeks said the last VMS signal, a technology first used with sewage sludge barges to make sure they discharged at the correct locations off New Jersey, was at 5:10 a.m.
Perhaps more importantly, Weeks said the vessel was not moving fast enough to tow a scallop dredge, which requires a speed of 4 to 5 knots, during the night. He said the boat stopped fishing sometime after midnight and may have been semi-anchored, using the scallop dredge to slow its drift.
“At midnight, it was going 4 knots. At 12:30 (a.m.) to the sinking, it was 1 to 1.5 knots. I think the vessel is not trawling. I think the vessel is laying to,” Weeks said.
This runs counter to an earlier theory that the crew was scalloping and the dredge got hung up on an underwater object, dragging the boat down.
The lucrative scallop grounds known as the Elephant Trunk could be the key. The area was closed in 2004 to allow scallop stocks to recover. It reopened in 2007 with an estimated 100 million pounds of scallops to harvest.
Weeks said sometimes boats go into areas that had been closed and quickly fill the deck with scallops. They sometimes stop fishing in order to shuck them, leaving their dredge in the water to slow their movement.
Or, the crew may simply have taken a break. Weeks said there is some evidence from Arias that most of the crew was asleep. The crew included: brothers Timothy Smith and Royal Smith Jr., of Middle Township, whose bodies were recovered by the Coast Guard; their uncle, Bernie Smith, of Wildwood; Frank Credle, a cousin of the Smiths who lived on the boat; Frank Reyes, of Middle Township; Jorge Ramos, of Lower Township; and Arias, of Wildwood. The bodies of Credle, Reyes, Ramos and Bernie Smith have not been recovered.
“Arias said he was sleeping in the forepeak. Tim woke him up and said, ‘The boat is sinking, grab your survival suit.’ They get to the pilot house and Royal Smith Jr. is up there trying to handle the boat,” Weeks said.
Finding the wreck
Weeks also represents Royal “Fuzzy” Smith Sr. He lost a brother, two sons and a cousin in the sinking, and Weeks said he wants answers. Weeks said he wrote a letter to Cmdr. Kyle McAvoy, who heads a Coast Guard Marine Board of Investigation inquiry into the sinking, asking that scuba divers or at least underwater cameras be used to examine the wreck.
The position of the dredge could help determine what happened. Photos also could show evidence of a collision, which Weeks said could have involved a freighter or even a submarine. Arias said the boat did not flip but was pulled down, which Weeks said could happen if a vessel ran into the extended cable on a scallop dredge.
“I’m asking that (the inquiry) not be reconvened until such time as the vessel is examined. I don’t see how they can reach any credible conclusion until then. The vessel is the best evidence in the case,” Weeks said.
Ownership in question
The inquiry was put on hold last week after Fuzzy Smith requested an attorney. Weeks said he also represents Fuzzy Smith, but he said the boat was owned by a corporation and Timothy Smith was the sole shareholder. Weeks said the elder Smith worked as dock manager for the Lady Mary. Weeks said the Coast Guard has identified Fuzzy Smith as a “party of interest” in the case and this scares Weeks.
“They got the wrong person. It seems like they want to make a criminal case. The Coast Guard hasn’t even identified the owner,” Weeks said.
McAvoy on Tuesday said it is still looking into the corporate ownership issue.
Weeks has also requested all search and rescue reports, radio logs from Coast Guard aircraft and vessels, statements taken by investigators, testimony at the inquiry, and information relating to the Coast Guard’s emergency position-indicating radio beacon, or EPIRB , practices.
An EPIRB is designed to send a satellite signal when a boat sinks. The Lady Mary’s EPIRB did alert the Coast Guard, but the signal was not logged until 7:07 a.m., according to the Coast Guard.
“If the vessel sank between 5:10 and 5:40, why no signal? The reason could be the positioning of satellites. I want to see a written document on where the satellites were. EPIRBS have a hydrostatic release at a certain depth. It’s possible the vessel did not sink right away but turned upside down with air in the hull and it couldn’t be released, or it became entangled and didn’t surface. There are a lot of unanswered questions,” said Weeks.
Who is liable?
There are also liability questions. Weeks said he does not think the Lady Mary was insured, but if there was a collision, then another boat owner could be liable. He stressed that Fuzzy Smith is not liable. Smith has previously said the Lady Mary had some limited insurance.
Weeks also addressed the stability issue, which is sure to come up at some point. He acknowledged a pilot house was added to the Lady Mary but said it had survived weather worse than this. Weeks said additional ballast was added and the outriggers were shortened for more stability. He said plywood was used to keep the weight down.
Weeks also argued there is no evidence the boat rolled over, but appears to have been pulled down.
“Any conclusion as to the loss until the vessel has been examined is based upon nothing but speculation. The surviving eyewitness, Jose Arias, doesn’t know what happened,” Weeks said.
On Tuesday, McAvoy said the Coast Guard is working on examining the wreck, which the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration believes it has found using sonar technology.
E-mail Richard Degener:
RDegener@pressofac.com
Posted in Top_three on Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:20 am Updated: 1:27 am.