The Quick and the Dead (TV Movie 1987) - The Quick and the Dead (TV Movie 1987) - User Reviews - IMDb
The Quick and the Dead (TV Movie 1987) Poster

(1987 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
30 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"The meek ain't gonna' inherit nothing west of Chicago!"
FightingWesterner31 July 2011
Mysterious gunslinger Sam Elliot becomes a guardian angel to genteel easterners Kate Capshaw, Tom Conti, and their young son, who've unwittingly attracted the attention of a particularly nasty gang of cutthroats.

A simple story with lots of violence, there isn't much to ponder here. However, it's always a lot of fun to watch Elliot shoot and drawl his way through a made-for-television western. Matt Clark and Patrick Kilpatrick always make good villains as well.

One thing that made me kind of uneasy though, was watching Elliot's character's almost constant drooling over the married Kate Capshaw, often times in full view of her husband and son!

On a side note, I miss these old HBO Pictures of the eighties and nineties, before they became all political, all boring, all the time.
27 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sam Elliott was born too late
MBunge28 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Adapted from a Louis L'Amour book and made for television by HBO back when it was still trying to define itself as something other than "that movie channel on cable", The Quick and the Dead is a tale of independence, revenge, forbidden romance and the brutal truth of survival in the Wild West. It contrasts the larger-than-life persona of the frontiersman with the understated character of the settler and grapples with what it means to be an honorable man in a lawless land. Highlighted by a charismatic performance from Sam Elliott, as if there's any other kind, and an old fashioned plot that cares more about making sense than rushing from one scene to the next, this film is proof that great Westerns are always being made. People just aren't always paying attention.

Duncan McKaskel (Tom Conti) is a Civil War veteran who came out of the horrors of Gettysburg with a loathing for violence. With his handsome wife (Kate Capshaw) and young son (Kenny Morrison), Duncan is leading his family into the Wyoming territory to make a new life for them all. In the middle of almost nowhere, the McKaskels run afoul of a gang of worthless toughs led by the smart but lazily evil Doc Shabitt (Matt Clark). Only the assistance of a traveling gunman named Con Vallian (Sam Elliott) saves the McKaskel's from an early death and helps them flee across the wilderness with Shabitt and his men in pursuit. But Vallian isn't motivated by the pureness of his heart. He only got involved to kill a half-breed (Patrick Kilpatrick) riding with Shabitt and has his eyes on Duncan's wife.

There's really only two complaints you can make about The Quick and the Dead. Since most of the movie sees Shabitt's gang getting killed one at a time, there's never that much sense of external danger to the McKaskels and Vallian. And the make-up applied to Patrick Kilpatrick to pass him off as an Indian instead gives him the look of an Oompaloompa with gigantism. Con Vallian is supposed to be a half-breed too, but they didn't slap a bunch of goop on Sam Elliott's face. Perhaps they should have simply found an actor who looked slightly less white than a guy named Patrick Kilpatrick.

Other than that, this is a fine motion picture. The lack of external threat is more than compensated for by the internal dynamic between the McKaskels and Vallian. First, it establishes that Vallian is basically using this family for his own ends, distracting Shabitt and his gang so Vallian has a shot at the half-breed. It gives an edge to Vallian's presence as a challenge to Duncan as a man, as a hero to his son an a potential lover to his wife. The conflict between those two men is at the heart of this story and the scales aren't tipped to one side or the other. Duncan isn't presented as a hapless sad sack. He's a brave and admirable man who's out of his depth and knows it.

Indeed, there's a good bit of this that plays like a romance novel where the woman is caught between the good man she married and the mysterious bad boy who rides into their lives and it's how Vallian handles that situation that truly reveals whether he's a hero or a villain. And it's all handled with a minimal amount of melodrama because there's no room for that stuff in the hard land of 1876 Wyoming. This isn't about Duncan or Vallian being the better man. It's about people who have enough respect for each other to not let their emotions overwhelm them.

The Quick and the Dead makes you wish Sam Elliott had been born several decades earlier so he could have made dozens and dozens of Westerns at the peak of the genre's popularity. Tom Conti is no slouch, though. He endows Duncan McKaskel with a strength that isn't as ostentatious as Vallian's but is ever present. Matt Clark is an effective villain who finds himself undone by his commitment to his own villainy and Kate Capshaw is quite good as a woman growing into the expanded role both allowed and demanded of her by the frontier.

This is a quality Western. Yes, it does look and feel like a TV move instead of a big screen product but don't hold that against it. You won't regret slowing down to watch The Quick and the Dead.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
HBO film based on a Louis L'amour tale...
AlsExGal20 May 2023
...with Tom Conti and Kate Capshaw as settlers in post-Civil War Wyoming. They, along with their young son (Kenny Morrison), run into a band of outlaws and cutthroats led by the deceptively-avuncular Doc Shabbit (Matt Clark). The family seem doomed until the intervention of the mysterious Con Vallain (Sam Elliott), who escorts the family across hostile territory.

Director Robert Day tells the story competently and in a straightforward fashion, with no stylistic excess. Elliott is well-cast, as is Conti as the kindly war veteran suspicious of Elliott's motives, as well his attention toward his wife. Capshaw looks nice, but her performance is spotty. She seems to adopt a period-specific speech pattern in many scenes that is admirable in its intent, but questionable as the others in the cast don't attempt the same. Still, I enjoyed this minor film well enough, and would recommend it to western fans.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This is one terrific western
drgibson16 April 2001
This is one terrific western film. Sam Elliott, who is marvelous as a "Shane-like" character, plays a drifter who follows a family of green homesteaders across the western plains and protects them from a savage pack of outlaws. The family, which includes Tom Conti and Kate Capshaw, also becomes more sufficient as the story progresses. It's a lean, well-directed film, with not a scene or character wasted. Not until Unforgiven did a western film arrives as superior as this HBO production. The story is based on an entertaining L. Lamour novel of the same name. The novel has a significant plot twist from the film, which I won't reveal here.
31 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An Enjoyable and Exciting Western Story
john-hitchcock8 April 2011
The story of The Quick and the Dead is very simple: a young married couple and their son accidentally anger a gang of bandits and they begin pursuit, then a mysterious drifter begins helping them out and protecting them from said gang. However it is still a well-written story that manages to keep you interested in what's happening.

The acting is decent enough. Sam Elliot is no Clint Eastwood but he does a good job as the stranger who befriends the young settlers who are heading West. Kate Capshaw, who you may remember as Willie Scott in Indiand Jones and the Temple of Doom, and Tom Conti also deliver some great performances as the young married couple who are travelling to the West with their son in the hopes of starting a new life.

The villains are also well-portrayed. Matt Clark manages to be intimidating as the leader of the bandits, but he manages to be a fairly complex character rather than just a cardboard-cutout villain. The rest of the gang does have their own inner-conflicts which they deal with over the course of the story.

I also thought the historical references were interesting. It is mentioned that the film takes place shortly after Custer's Last Stand, although the actual events have little bearing on the main plot beyond a very brief sub-plot which I'm not going to go into detail about.

Overall, this is a very entertaining and interesting film and I'd recommend it to any fan of Westerns.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hackneyed plot with mature insights and surprises
Wuchakk29 April 2014
RELEASED IN 1987 and directed by Robert Day, "The Quick and the Dead" is a made-for-HBO Western starring Sam Elliott as Con Vallian, a mysterious stranger who helps a family heading West in their conflict with a group of ne'er-do-wells. Vallian's desire is piqued by the wife (Kate Capshaw), is that interest mutual? Will the family make it to the Bighorn Mountains alive-and-well or will violence and adultery destroy them?

If you don't remember Kate Capshaw, she was the blonde in 1984's "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom" and later married director Steven Spielberg.

I was impressed with this little-known Western. Although made for cable, it's based on a Louis L'Armour book and is actually better than some theatrically released Westerns. There are flaws, like the kid's questionable acting skills and the fact that the film was noticeably shot in Northern Arizona rather than Eastern Wyoming, but -- all things considered -- this is a solid realistic Western in the tradition of "Shane" and "Will Penny." Don't expect the mythic tone of 1995's big-budget Western of the same name.

Highlights include the breathtaking cinematography, a believable and mature approach, Kate's beauty, a hackneyed plot redeemed by quality characters (like Tom Conti as the settler husband/father), insightful drama & plot surprises and, of course, Sam Elliott as the quintessential Westerner. Really, Elliott is as good or - more likely - better than any Western icon you care to name (Wayne, Eastwood, Cooper, Scott, Stewart, Costner, etc.).

There are mature and insightful themes, like the undeniable connection of Vallian and Susanna. Most of us can relate: You stumble across someone of the opposite sex and instinctively sense a palpable connection, some kind of profound mutual fascination, yet - for whatever reason - pursuing an intimate relationship is not an option. In an entire lifetime you will only experience a handful such 'connections,' or less. These exchanges are permanent because they are so potent they are forever burned into one's psyche.

"The Quick and the Dead" may not be a top-notch Western like "Dances With Wolves" or "The Outlaw Josey Wales," but it's certainly a quality Western and well worth your time.

THE MOVIE RUNS 91 minutes.

GRADE: B.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sam Elliot at his best
Grandlk.21 May 1999
This is a medium key film with a solid story line. You have to admire the economy with which HBO produced this film. Only about a dozen actors ever appear and most of them are gone by film's end. The pacing isn't fast but it's sure. Elliot moves through the phases of mysterious stranger to family friend and a logical fashion. Likewise Conti and Capshaw progress from greenhorns to being a self reliant family unit.
26 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Hondo like hero
bkoganbing26 January 2017
Sam Elliott who is doing his level best to keep the western alive as an American art form stars in The Quick And The Dead which has nothing to do with the film Sharon Stone, Gene Hackman, and Leonardo DiCaprio did. But it has one great western pedigree as the story is from the pen of Louis L'Amour.

In fact there are some elements in this story that are most similar to L'Amour's most famous western Hondo. Although Sam Elliott isn't quite the G-rated cowboy John Wayne was.

Tom Conti, Kate Capshaw and their son Kenny Morrison are traveling west to settle and work the homestead that Conti's late brother had in Wyoming territory. But they run afoul of some outlaws led by Matt Clark and the outlaws mean to them harm.

If you remember in Hondo the mutual attraction of the frontier scout and the settler's wife who is waiting for her husband to get home. That's going on big time here only Conti is very much on the scene. Elliott thinks him a worthless tenderfoot at first, but Conti's character develops over the course of the film and the more you see, the more you realize there's a lot to him. A lot more than there was to Leo Gordon in Hondo.

Nice location cinematography in Arizona standing in for Wyoming territory. The roles are well cast and cowboy heroes don't come any better than Sam Elliott.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Both Men and Women will like this western, and for one reason.
padutchland-123 April 2006
Yep, the reason is the man who wrote it - Louis L'Amour. Most of his stories, although about tough men, always had women in them - and they were strong women. Women with common sense who knew how to get things done. In the Quick and the Dead it was Susanna McKaskel played by Kate Capshaw. Sam Elliott had it right when he said she was a handsome woman. Kate Capshaw was indeed beautiful in this film. She reminded me of a clean-scrubbed, Debbie Boone type "real" woman! At least in this movie, who knows what is in anyone's home life. In the story, she is traveling by covered wagon with her husband and son to a new log cabin home in the wilderness. They had set off alone due to disease sweeping the wagon train. They are beset by a group of "bad guys" who follow them relentlessly, thinking they can steal their horses, goods and one of the outlaws wants Kate. Of course they never figured on Sam Elliott as Con Vallian mixing in to help the pilgrims. I'm not going to give the details of the story away, except to say it was well done and one of those movies that you "know", that's the way it really was in the old West - not fancy dressed gunslingers parading up and down the town street. The western landscape was beautifully photographed. This is a Conagher type movie that is down to earth with hard living and real drama. As for the actors of course Sam Elliott is always great, with his smartest move marrying that pretty Katharine Ross in real life. He fits in somewhere between John Wayne and Clint Eastwood in the resourceful, tough guy roles. And he has that deep voice that allows no argument. He has so many great movies to his name like Gettysburg, We Were Soldiers, Conagher, Road House and Shadow Riders. He's a top hand at acting. Tom Conti as Duncan the husband was a bit of a disappointment for me. Not that there was anything wrong with his acting, he is good. I just think he was miscast and looked too much like a soft modern man instead of a disillusioned ex soldier from the Civil War taking on the extremely dangerous trek to the West. Then again that was the part he was playing, and if it hadn't been for that lean, mean mountain man helping, he and his family would have been dead. Kate Capshaw whose real last name is Nail, got her name from first husband Robert Capshaw. Then she married Steven Spielberg, her director in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. Spielberg may be way out in left field politically, but he sure knows how to choose a good woman for a wife. Unfortunately, Kate's career has been up and down but don't think she has to worry with the Spielberg bucks. I like Kate's style and wish hubby Steven would get her more work back into the movies. The McKaskel's young son in the movie is played by Kenny Morrison. He was no Brandon De Wilde in Shane, but did fairly well for the part given him. He continues to work in film including some CSI TV work. He is just coming into his prime so who knows. The actor playing the half-breed Indian tracker was Patrick Kilpatrick is certainly a good actor. However, I'd have liked to see a real American Indian play the part, but I guess they couldn't find a Graham Greene. I have to mention the leader of the outlaws, Matt Clark. This guy has been in so many movies and TV shows his face is like a member of the family. I've never seen him do a bad acting job - he's a professional. I especially remember his great supporting acting in Emperor of the North Pole as the yard worker bullied by Earnest Borgnine, a part in The Outlaw Josey Wales and a host of others. I have no idea why another movie in 1995, took the same title as this The Quick and the Dead. It's a silly excuse for a Western fantasy starring Sharon Stone, and who knows why a good actor like Gene Hackman would associate himself with it. Stone doesn't surprise me as she uses her sexuality to get roles then pretends she is morally superior in real life. Be sure not to confuse the two movies - the Louis L'Amour/Sam Elliott 1987 version is the real Western. If you like westerns with a truer to life flavor, and if you like Louis L'Amour, this movie will appeal to you. It is well worth watching.
26 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Notable TV Western with Sam Elliott's nice acting as a mysterious stranger who helps a family to start a new life
ma-cortes3 December 2021
Thrilling Western in traditional style in which a mysterious stranger joins a colonist family arriving in the West . An attractive and agreeable Western with good performance by the protagonist trio : Sam Elliott , Kate Capshaw , Tom Conti . It deals with a good-natured marriage formed by Duncan McKaskel (Tom Conti) , an ex-Union soldier , and his wife , Susanna (Kate Capshaw ), they're a young married couple who, along with their child , Tom (Kenny Morrison), are travelling to the West hoping to begin a new life , arriving in a small village . They meet Doc Shabitt (Matt Clark) and ask for directions . Doc politely suggests a place for them to stay , but then the latter managing to snatch away two of their horses . Later on , the family meets a rare cowboy , Con Vallian (Sam Elliott) , who help them . Along the way , they manage to escape from the ruthless gang , while Vallian outriding and escorting them . As the outlaw band sets after them , as Doc leads his men in pursuit of a restless vendetta , while Vallian protects them from Shabitt's gang .

This fine Western contains thrills , romance , adequate action set-pieces, chases , go riding , and taking place impressive quick-draws . This special Western picture with breathtaking duels concerns a good family pits nasty bandits resulting in a deadly gun-battle and it turns out to be an enjoyable as well as hyperbolic homage to the traditional style Western. This ¨The Quick and the Dead¨ (1987) contains strong performances augmented by blazing guns , hobbled by an uneven writing . Nevertheless, it doesn't have much interest at times , neither intensity enough , though Sam Elliott captures his role pretty well as a stranger riding into a homesteading family's life when they are attacked by a violent band . Robert Day's slick direction , awesome interpretation and interesting story from Louis L'Amour's novel as well as James Lee Barrett's script enhance interest in this television Western . Standing out the great Sam Elliott as the merciless Mestizo who tries to help them by finding a new home , while he seeks justice and vengeance and along the way enjoying a little love relationship with Kate Capshaw - Spielberg's wife - who has never been so charming and glamorous . Star Sam Elliott is a detached figure in Western genre , being one of its main representatives , performing a lot of them in the Seventies , Eighties and Nineties , as cinema as TV , such as : ¨Cactus¨ , ¨Houston The Legend of Texas¨ , ¨Yellow Rose¨ , ¨The Quick and the Dead¨ , ¨Gettysburg¨ , ¨Hi-Lo County¨ , ¨You Know My Name¨ , ¨Buffalo Girls¨ , ¨Indians¨, ¨Wild Times¨ , ¨The Shadow Riders¨, ¨The Desperate Trail¨ and several others . While Tom Conti is cool as the brave husband , a war veteran , who decides to no longer take any humiliation or battery . Adding other notorious secondaries as Matt Clark and Patrick Kilpatrick.

There's a magnificently atmospheric cinematography , heightened by professional cameraman Dick Bush providing vivid photography from Flagstaff, Arizona, Happy Jack, Kibab National Forest , Oak Creek Canyon, Arizona,Strawberry , Pine, Arizona, Bell Rock, Sedona, Red Rock Crossing, Sedona, Courthouse Butte, Sedona, Schnebly Hill, Boynton Canyon, Sedona, Arizona, among others . Including an evocative and moving musical score by Steve Dorff . This literate Western was competently directed by Robert Day . This British director was a good artisan who made all kinds of genres as adventures , thriller , terror , such as : "The Big Game" , " Corridors of Blood" , " Click and the dead" , "Initiation of Sarah" , "Man with Bogart's Face" , " Grass is always Greener over the Septic Tank", "She" , "The Way Stretch" . Furthermore , he made a number of TV series episodes from Dallas , Disleyland , The Sixth Sense , Ghost story , Sam Cade , Matt Lincoln , The Bold ones , Ironside , FBI , The Invaders , The avengers , among others . Rating : 6.5/10 . Well worth watching . The flick will appeal to Sam Elliott fans .
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A quick review
dworldeater5 May 2017
Totally unrelated to the Sam Raimi directed Sharon Stone film of the same title and much better too. The Quick And The Dead is a very under rated made for HBO western starring very authentic cowboy actor Sam Elliot. The film is very well made, looks great and is based off a book by Louis L'Amour. The pace is quick and is action packed. Performances are good and the dialogue is sharp. The film is very much in the same style as Shane and Pale Rider. Matt Clark of The Outlaw Josey Wales fame was a great villain. Sam Elliot was a natural for this role and was excellent here as leading man. The Quick And The Dead is excellent entertainment and will not let down fans of the genre.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent made-for-cable TV Western
Woodyanders16 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
1876, Wyoming. Niave newly arrived settlers Duncan (well played by Tom Conti) and Susanna McKaskel (a fine performance by Kate Capshaw, who looks positively ravishing) require the assistance of rugged frontiersman Con Vallian (a superb and convincing performance by Sam Elliott) in order to protect them from a group of outlaws led by the weaselly Doc Shabitt (veteran character actor Matt Clark in top slimy form). Director Robert Day, working from a smart and engrossing script by James Lee Barrett, relates the absorbing story at a steady pace, presents a flavorsome, yet unsentimental evocation of the old west, and stages the gunfights in a realistic and exciting manner. Con makes for a strong and interesting flawed hero who isn't entirely noble; he has lustful feelings for Susanna and keeps embarrassing Duncan every chance he gets. Moreover, the bad guys are a memorably scurvy lot, with especially memorable turns by Patrick Kilpatrick as fearsome half-breed tracker The Ute and Jerry Potter as the foul and lecherous Red Hayle. Kenny Morrison registers nicely as Duncan's loyal son Tom. Dick Bush's polished cinematography makes elegant occasional use of fades and dissolves. Steven Dorff's harmonic score does the tuneful trick. A worthwhile sagebrush saga.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Old fashioned Western
kmallen14 December 2006
Beautiful scenery of Sedona and Flagstaff AZ, not Wyoming in 1876 as advertised. Good acting and quality filming. Casting was pretty good especially Sam Elliott and the bad guys but the half breed Indian looked like a runway model.

The Louis Lamour plot was, as usual for the genre, a little contrived as Sam Elliott's character lives a charmed life in the film. I recommend it if you are a sentimentalist and believe in honor, valor, unrequited love and taking on the bad guys.

I might mention that one item in the movie about Custer's last stand where one of the characters relatives was assumed to be killed could have had a more hopeful outcome as not all of the Seventh Regiment was killed at Little Bighorn since Custer split his command and several hundred survived.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Even Prettier in H-D
darbski25 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** All the critical acclaim and other opinions, okay. I'm just gonna add my two cents because I think this is one terrific little western. It isn't all hazed up with dark, political motives, just good guys and bad guys. Let me get something off my chest, here. The OTHER movie of the same name? THAT'S the stupid one, as a matter of fact, I'm surprised that they didn't have the transformers (or maybe Batman), doing battle right along with all the other super gunfighters.

In THIS H.B.O. movie, the story is a lot more down to earth. Given that ALL westerns are fantasy, and are for entertainment I think that we have to look at just a couple items. The actors- you have to be able to find an identity for each one of them; Done, and Done. The scenery, is it sufficiently "western"? Yup, (more on this later). Dialogue? A small problem; too late twentieth century in places. Story? Good. Direction, Pretty darn good.

Just a couple of points... These things are prevalent in almost all westerns, and it's a P.O. Why, oh why, did Valion leave Dobbs' gunbelt, horse and gear? It's is his by right of booty. Plus, you DO NOT leave a horse saddled and tied up. If you're not gonna take it, unload it and set it free. You won't be doing it any favors, though; it's a domesticated animal, and needs to be taken care of. Same thing for Ute's pony and gear.

Another reviewer mentioned the fact that the relationship between Valion and the Ute (both are half-breeds) should have been explored. I agree. It would have taken a minute of dialogue or less to explain the fact that They were half-brothers, don't you think? Possibility - calling The Ute by name right before he killed him. Another "He led a raid on a Blackfoot village, killed a lot of women and children; including our mother". Oh, well...

How about this relevant issue? there is an outbuilding in Bender's Flats, so it MIGHT have been an outhouse, and once they left the area, they were doing their business in mother nature, but, Susannah's brother not putting up a privy? Inhuman.

Back to the scenery. When I first saw this movie on H.B.O., I was struck by how beautiful the surroundings were in Cinematography. I've owned a couple copies of this movie in VHS and DVD, and in High Def, it is striking to say the least. One of my favorite Westerns, and I recommend it for all who want an uncomplicated story that's entertaining and very well done on all points.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Why is it that the man who begs for mercy never gives it?
hitchcockthelegend2 February 2020
The Quick and the Dead is directed by Robert Day and written by Louis L'Amour (novel) and James Lee Barrett (teleplay). It stars Sam Elliott, Tom Conti, Kate Capshaw, Kenny Morrison, Matt Clark and Patrick Kilpatrick. Music is by Steve Dorff and cinematography is by Dick Bush.

In 1876 Wyoming, Duncan (Conti) and Suzanna McKaskel (Capshaw) are taking their son and belongings to start a new life out West. But driving through a barely populated tin-pot town, they find themselves beset by a bunch of outlaws run by Doc Shabitt (Clark). Luckily, help may be at hand in the form of tough no nonsense frontiersman Con Vallian (Elliott)?, that is if matters of the heart and secrets of the past do not confuse the issues to hand...

How nice it is as a big Western fan to find a television movie that shines bright in genre light. This is wonderfully old fashioned in its setting and telling, simple in plot structure it may be, but pretty much everything falls into place for a pic that for genre fans becomes more than just a time waster.

Elliott's calm rugged swagger is in full effect, Capshaw is splendidly tender yet stoic, and much to my surprise Conti proves more than capable as a Western hero in waiting - where his character's back story comes to make sense of the final quarter. The villains are a bit rote, with the usually reliable Kilpatrick barely passable as a rogue Ute Native American, while the child performance of Morrison is hardly a high point.

However, pic is set 99.9% outdoors, where we get an absolute ream of glorious Arizona locales to cloak the characters. It has shades of "Shane", which is no bad thing, and thankfully the finale - though not unexpected - is worth waiting for. 7/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sam Elliott protects his unattainable fantasy woman, in a 'reluctant buddy' western drama.
weezeralfalfa12 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Sam Elliott's Con Vallian is the classic wandering western frontiersman loner, who keeps popping up to save one lone traveling immigrant family(McKaskels) from a small gang of vultures(shabby Shabitt, kin and associates), who are intent on extracting vengeance for Vallian's killing of one of them when they are about to murder the man of this family(Duncan) for trying to retrieve the two horses they stole from him. Vallian makes clear periodically through the film his reason for wanting to protect this family from harm. He's mightily attracted to the beautiful, wholesome, Suzanna(Kate Capshaw); Duncan's wife. At one point, he catches her alone in the woods and extracts a passionate kiss from the ambivalent Susanna. Although Vallian saves their lives from the Shabitt gang several times, and they help save his life after he is wounded by this gang, Duncan sometimes wishes he would get lost, correctly suspecting he's trying to steal his wife's heart, and fed up with Vallian constantly giving them advice on what to do next, and criticizing Duncan's reluctance to use a firearm. Eventually, they become somewhat more comfortable with each other, after Suzanna assures Duncan that she is not tempted to have an affair with Vallian. It's clear during their parting conversation that Vallian still enjoys the strong admiration of Suzanna, if not her physical intimacy.

Vallian might aspire to replace Duncan in Suzanna's life. However, he makes no effort to hasten Duncan's demise, protecting him as well as her from harm. Besides, he wouldn't be willing to settle down as a sedentary family man, even with a fantasy woman like Suzanna. As he details at the end, he has to feel free to wander as he pleases, living life on the edge each day, with occasional opportunistic female encounters: normally with squaws. Vallian supposedly is a half breed, but certainly doesn't look or act it. On the other hand, the supposed half breed Ute, who serves as tracker for the Shabitts, clearly has lived as a Native American, but is clearly played by a full Caucasian.

The McKaskels supposedly left their native Ohio to help forget the horrors Duncan witnessed participating in the Civil War. Well, since this story clearly takes place in 1876, dated by the reported current massacre of Custer's 7th cavalry, including Suzanna's brother, they sure took their time escaping the 'dangerous' East. Another big problem with this explanation is that the Big Horn region of northern Wyoming was still regarded, by treaty, as Native American territory: off limits to European settlement. Thus, historically, the story about Suzanna's brother building them a well made cabin (complete with glass windows!) out in the middle of this 'Indian' territory isn't plausible. The NAs would have burned it down, as they had the forts built in this region 10 years earlier. As demonstrated by the 7th cavalry fate, if they were looking for a peaceful hideaway, the Big Horn region wasn't it at this time! The concurrent influx of gold seekers into the Black Hills, to the east of this region, was stirring up renewed conflict between Europeans and NAs in this general region.

The 'reluctant buddy' plot device used here is quite common in westerns and comedies. It tends to provide a more interesting screen play than films that feature a pair well attuned to each other..... The feature of a small group of nasty 'hyenas' pursuing a moving target for revenge or profit or both has also been rather common in westerns. Examples from the period of classic Hollywood westerns include : "Wagon Master", "The Cowboys", "Will Penny", "Along the Great Divide", "Ride Lonesome" and "Ride the High Country". Often a sexual encounter with a woman included in the victim party is part of what they want and, often, as in the present case, the woman is forced to learn to use a firearm effectively to help defend herself.

The location shooting in northern Arizona provides a scenic surrounds, with varied topography , from red cliffs and spires, to desert vegetation, to thin woods, and sometimes with snow-capped mountains in the background. This is a significant plus for me.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
hard men and women
sandcrab27720 May 2022
I pretty much like sam elliott in all his western roles especially the ones with his wife katherine ross...what i didn't like about this role was the way he leered at kate capshaw, although the waterfall shower scene was definitely one of her hottest ever ...
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"The meek are not going to inherit anything west of Chicago".
golferron16 February 2021
One of many great one liners!

Sam Elliott in my book is right up there with Clint Eastwood and John Wayne when it comes to westerns. I watch this movie every few months as I enjoy it so much. The characters are well developed, even Kate Capsaw who is there for more than just eye candy. She shows great charter and strength fighting and killing the man who had many ill intensions. Great drama, action and plot development. Oh, and did I say Sam Elliott? His mustache and slow drawl makes him born 150 years too late.

You can pull this movie out on Youtube.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
BEST OF THE WEST
I stumbled across this western gem while searching for the other movie of the same name starring Gene Hackman. I was taken in by the opening scenes and was kept gripped by the storyline, the scenery and cinematography, and the acting through to the final scenes. Based on one of the many western paperbacks by Louis L'Armour, I'm gonna now grab me a copy and have a read!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good western old fashion style
rguirado3 February 2004
Sorry I didn't read the original book, so I enjoyed the film but, I was always thinking on "Shane" updated, but I can't say if the original plays are similar. A film to be seen for all western lovers that retrieve us the bravery and sense of honor of prairies men.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You May Be A Teacher But You Got A Lot To Learn.
rmax30482318 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Impressive location shooting in northern Arizona helps this rather worn plot along, and so does the acting.

Tom Conti, ex teacher and ex Civil War sergeant, his wife Kate Capshaw, and their little boy Kenny Morrison, pull up stakes back east and head out West where a man and his family can escape the violence of the Civil War and breathe the fresh, clean, anarchic air.

They offend one of those crusty, villainous families that are so often offended in these Westerns -- "Shane," "Will Penny," the Clantons -- and Conti and family are pursued by these revenge-driven miscreants over snowy hill and grassy dale.

Well, I'll tell you. They don't know nothing' about survival in the West. Their hides are saved only by the appearance of Sam Elliott in buckskin and leather, toting a repeating rifle and various other gear. Elliott guides them through the wilderness towards the rude log cabin, miles away, that they will some day call home. But, of course, not if the evil family has anything to say about it.

Time and again, the pursuers and the pursued wound one another but each carries on, leaving a trail of blood. The pursuers actually are winnowed down. One by one, they are plugged, except for the youngest, who sensibly decides to hell with it and rides off alone towards home. The rest of the pursuers don't fare so well.

The plot line really is hoary. A pioneer family are unprepared for the violence they encounter and are saved by a romantic, sun-tanned stranger. The family's wife is attracted towards the mysterious savior and vice versa. "Mrs. McKaskel, if you wasn't married I'd of chased you till you dropped," says Sam Elliott, by way of declaring his deep affection for her. Mrs. McKaskel's pretty pale-blue eyes glow with pleasure.

The acting is professional enough. Nobody can complain. Sam Elliott is his usual laconic, masculine self. He has a habit of holding conversations while facing at a right angle to the other, which gives him an opportunity to stare over his shoulder at the person he's addressing. Poor Tom Conti is saddled with a face that's about as interesting as a bowl of porridge, a kind of fleshier Dustin Hoffman, and his voice sounds like he suffers from an adenoid condition. He handles the role very well but those attributes knee-cap his performance.

Kate Capshaw is quite a fox when you get right down to it but she's usually cast as a properly brought up, middle-class figure, as she is here. Only one film, whose title I can't remember, gave her an opportunity to show a slinkier and sexier side. I was genuinely worried about the family's son. He's about ten or eleven years old. I quailed at the thought of another cuddly kid saying cute things, but this kid can act. It could have been awful. He might have had disabling asthma attacks under stress or something. I shudder at the thought. That I never wanted to stomp him like an insect is a tribute to his talent.

I enjoyed the message though. I thought it was carefully considered, thoughtful, and humane. Only Wussies swear off violence. Real men kill.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A RATED 10 MOVIE
j1b1n13 February 2002
Were big Sam Elliot fans. Great Cast, Filming, Script and Movie Content. It was an easy movie to follow and watch. The Location was very Beautiful. It was Funny in parts. It was sad when Kate`s brother passed away. It was nice Kate and Tom got what they wanted at the end of the movie. Sam is an all around cream of the crop Actor...He`s good at everything he does in Movies. He Ranks right up there with John Wayne.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Neither the Quick nor the Dead could entice(1987)
meritcoba26 July 2014
With a title that was later reused for another movie, one would expect that this western would show at least one gun fight, you know like the one at the OK corral, but this movie hasn't one. What the title is referring to is a mystery and that is probably the key word for this western.

Now the first mystery is the mysterious stranger played by Sam Elliott. Sam Elliot? Yep, the same. I am probably like many other people who instantly respect a man like Sam Elliott without actually knowing why. Sam Eliott is known, but if you ask me to tell you what from I have a hard time to tell you. Sam Elliott is a decent actor, but apparently not considered to be able to carry a leading part in a major movie. Or at least.. I can't recall one. But never mind about that. Here Sam has a leading role.

Now the mysterious part about the mysterious stranger points to an overarching mystery. The question to ask is: why? Why does Sam Elliot help this family that is riding out, all alone, into the wilds? Why is this family braving the wilds on there own? The reason supplied is that they go to some place to breed cattle on the invitation of a family member, but still.. is traveling on your own such a good idea? Why are the bad guys sitting around in some forlorn village, consisting of 4 houses, lacking any inhabitants? Were they waiting for this single family to happen along so they could rob them, kill the men (a man and his son) and rape the woman? It remains a mystery.

Another mystery: there is an half breed Indian helping them.. why? He just happens along, gets a drink and he is the best of mates with these bad dudes. Again we don't know why.

So these bad dudes steal the horses of the family.. and thus the story kicks in. The husband of the family gets the horses back, covered by the mysterious stranger who shoots one of the bad dudes. And the bad guys then want revenge. While the family treks through the wild hoping to outrun the bad dudes, the bad dudes try to catch up with them. Several times they do catch up, which results in some fighting which whittles down the group of bad dudes.. who thus thirst even more for blood.

The story then follows a rather linear plot and ends in a predictable way. It is nothing to write home about. And again another mystery rises: the family went out in the wilds to do some cattle raising. Where is the cattle? They didn't bring any along.. and the hut they end up in seems to be in some valley in between mountains. Not the kind of country one would associate with cattle raising.

The whole story is like that: a mystery as to why people do what they do. But the greater mystery is just the failure to make more of this story. The mysterious stranger confesses himself to be a half breed, just like the half breed Indian who helps the bad guys. One would expect something to result from this. They could have been brothers. They could have been anything more than adversaries, but nothing develops. There is a potential conflict between the mysterious stranger and the husband in the family, but even that sizzles out to nothing.

The story is bland. It is not the acting that makes this movie mediocre on it's own. It is the lackluster plot that is pretty linear and shies away from anything interesting.

This movie is a forgettable movie.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Boring, stay away!
chipe15 April 2014
I'm amazed that no one really disliked this movie here, in the "user reviews" and the "message board." (Though the two external reviews are tepid.) I was bored out of my mind. The production values were good (scenery, etc.). The actors were notable. The big killer is the story and dialog. Everything is drained out -- from the beginning you see where the story is going, and it never deviates, no surprises or depth.

Eight bad guys are after a pioneer settler family (husband, wife, son) making their way west alone on their covered wagon. They follow and menace the family, but peculiarly never really ever catch up. The family is protected by the mysterious stranger (Sam Elliott) who pops up now and then to sprout advice, sage remarks, insults and leers at the wife, Kate Capshaw, who might be a beauty on the lone prairie, but here looks pretty haggard.

Avoid this unless you are a fan of the actors and film makers.
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"I figured you haven't had any fresh meat lately."
grizzledgeezer15 July 2014
Sam Elliott tosses a dead antelope in front of Kate Capshaw, then delivers that line with a more or less straight face.

Talk about double entendre! It's not the ungulate he's referring to.

The main reason for seeing this film is Sam Elliott, one of the sexiest men of the last century. (Why no one did a remake of "The Virginian" with him is beyond my comprehension.) He could be William-Conrad tubby and still be good-looking. Here he's spectacularly thin and angular. I wonder how many hetero men harbor a hankerin' for him.

The story is nothing special. All the good people live and the bad people die. The dialog rarely rises above the perfunctory.

Westerns are rarely detail-accurate. This one shows something hardly ever seen in Westerns -- a chew stick. After dinner, Elliott chews on one to clean his mouth. On the other hand, one of the bad'uns calls Conti's son a "rug rat", a decidedly late-20th-century term. Capshaw mispronounces "cavalry" but the director doesn't catch it. And I wonder how "Kentucky corn liquor" (which is presumably moonshine) can be brown.

Not the worst way to kill 90 minutes -- but hardly a great Western.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed