Escobedo V. Illinois Flashcards

Escobedo v. Illinois
June 22, 1964

After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not completed questioning. The petitioner also was not warned of his right to remain silent before the interrogation. He was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. He was then granted certiorari (or review of case by higher court)

Constitutional Issue: Escobedo was denied the right to counsel as guaranteed by the 6th amendment

Holding: Declared unconstitutional and he was given another trial.

Escobedo v. Illinois
June 22, 1964

After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not completed questioning. The petitioner also was not warned of his right to remain silent before the interrogation. He was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. He was then granted certiorari (or review of case by higher court)

Constitutional Issue: Escobedo was denied the right to counsel as garuenteed by the 6th admendment

Holding: Declared unconstitutional and he was given a nother trial.

Escobedo v. Illinois
June 22, 1964

After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not completed questioning. The petitioner also was not warned of his right to remain silent before the interrogation. He was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. He was then granted certiorari (or review of case by higher court)

Constitutional Issue: Escobedo was denied the right to counsel as guaranteed by the 6th amendment

Holding: Declared unconstitutional and he was given another trial.

Escobedo v. Illinois
June 22, 1964

After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not completed questioning. The petitioner also was not warned of his right to remain silent before the interrogation. He was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. He was then granted certiorari (or review of case by higher court)

Constitutional Issue: Escobedo was denied the right to counsel as garuenteed by the 6th admendment

Holding: Declared unconstitutional and he was given another trial.

Escobedo v. Illinois
June 22, 1964

After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not completed questioning. The petitioner also was not warned of his right to remain silent before the interrogation. He was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. He was then granted certiorari (or review of case by higher court)

Constitutional Issue: Escobedo was denied the right to counsel as guaranteed by the 6th amendment

Holding: Declared unconstitutional and he was given another trial.

Escobedo v. Illinois
June 22, 1964

After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not completed questioning. The petitioner also was not warned of his right to remain silent before the interrogation. He was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. He was then granted certiorari (or review of case by higher court)

Constitutional Issue: Escobedo was denied the right to counsel as guaranteed by the 6th amendment

Holding: Declared unconstitutional and he was given another trial.

Escobedo v. Illinois
June 22, 1964

After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not completed questioning. The petitioner also was not warned of his right to remain silent before the interrogation. He was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. He was then granted certiorari (or review of case by higher court)

Constitutional Issue: Escobedo was denied the right to counsel as guaranteed by the 6th amendment

Holding: Declared unconstitutional and he was given another trial.

Escobedo v. Illinois
June 22, 1964

After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not completed questioning. The petitioner also was not warned of his right to remain silent before the interrogation. He was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. He was then granted certiorari (or review of case by higher court)

Constitutional Issue: Escobedo was denied the right to counsel as guaranteed by the 6th amendment

Holding: Declared unconstitutional and he was given another trial.

Escobedo v. Illinois
June 22, 1964

After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not completed questioning. The petitioner also was not warned of his right to remain silent before the interrogation. He was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. He was then granted certiorari (or review of case by higher court)

Constitutional Issue: Escobedo was denied the right to counsel as guaranteed by the 6th amendment

Holding: Declared unconstitutional and he was given another trial.

Escobedo v. Illinois
June 22, 1964

After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not completed questioning. The petitioner also was not warned of his right to remain silent before the interrogation. He was convicted of murder and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. He was then granted certiorari (or review of case by higher court)

Constitutional Issue: Escobedo was denied the right to counsel as guaranteed by the 6th amendment

Holding: Declared unconstitutional and he was given another trial.

Escobedo V. Illinois

Students also viewed