While there was some doubt and debate over her parentage she was recognised as his legitimate daughter. If she had been fully considered her mother's adulterous bastard Philip would not have needed to usurp her inheritance by legal means because it WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN NECESSARY.But in situation of dubious paternity she ought to be confirmed an heir by her supposed father, she wasn't. Philip was Louis's legal heir.
Apologies Kellan.Guys and girls, can we move PAST the debate about Salic Law here, sil vous plait?
I know I started it through my ignorance above, but I feel if the precedent is already there, then Louis XI is not lkkely to challenge it unless he wants to have France up in arms.
Most likely scenario is either a) as @isabella pointed out, that he attempts to set Charlotte aside; or b) like Karl VI/Henri de Chambord stupidly believes he will outlive his wife, so does nothing. Given that Louis is older, my belief is that a) is likelier. Unless Charlotte were to conveniently die from an illness when a doctor gives her an overdose of the wrong medicine.
I agree that the former seems likely.