Books for Women in Prison : r/RomanceBooks Skip to main content

Get the Reddit app

Scan this QR code to download the app now
Or check it out in the app stores
r/RomanceBooks icon
r/RomanceBooks icon
Go to RomanceBooks
r/RomanceBooks
A banner for the subreddit

r/RomanceBooks is a discussion sub for readers of romance novels. Home of the magic search button and endless book recommendations as well as discussions about tropes and characters, Author AMAs, book clubs, and more. Happy Endings guaranteed.


Members Online

Books for Women in Prison

Discussion

I just finished reading {In a Jam by Kate Canterbary} and the end of the book, she linked to this: https://wpbp.org

It’s a way to donate books to women in prison. I need to read more on it but thought it was an awesome cause so wanted to share!

Share
Sort by:
Best
Open comment sort options
u/Sithina avatar
Edited

This is a wonderful program and definitely deserves support--and all the attention it can get. Because The Women's Prison Book Project still can get books into prisons--and that's becoming a much, much harder thing to do every single year.

One of the reasons it deserves support is because, in America, the prison system often censors books for a number of reasons--but, a lot of times, for where the book comes from--as in, the book comes from a "non-reputable" source: such as a used book from a lesser-known non-profit that a government-funded (or private) prison doesn't approve of. So, a lot of those paperback and hardcover books that readers donate to charities that are then going to donate to prisons? Yeah, they get tossed out, because they don't meet the criteria for bringing in to the prisons.

This is something known as "content-neutral censorship"--it's still book banning, by the way. (edit to add: not even ordering something to Amazon and having it sent directly to the prison is a surefire way to get a book or an item through, even though Amazon is a huge, well-known, verified vendor).

From the article I link below:

If content-based bans weren’t infuriating enough, another form of censorship may give you even more of a headache: According to Marquis,content-neutral bans have been on the rise since 2015.“Content-neutral,” she says, “means that the literature’s being withheld from people not because of the ideas or information contained in it,but because of other criteria that they’re saying need to be met for those physical copies to be allowed inside prisons.” You’re probably wondering, like what? “These run the gamut. Everything from no hardcover books to no free [donated] books, no used books.” Reading materials are also increasingly being censored because they’re not being mailed by approved vendors. 

Sounds like bullshit, right? But, guess what--this is how prison censorship and book-banning works. Oh, and if a book is in a language other than English? Well, guess what? That could be considered dangerous, because it might contain information an inmate could use to harm themselves, others, or the system itself, so it can't be allowed into the facility. Even if that non-English book is a romance novel with naked people on the cover--or tentacles. Sounds like bullshit, right? Nope. That's just how it works when it comes to book-bans and censorship in the prison system.

Facility workers (yes, people make these decisions--every package is scanned by a machine and then opened by a person, who views every single item and decides what is allowed in and what is sent back; if no answer is received from the person who sent the item, the item is thrown away after a set time--the inmate has no say in the matter) who decide what items/books/materials are allowed into their facilities. Facility works can even use these "guidelines" to ban creative writing materials and such from coming into their facilities because they might encourage inmates to explore ways of trying to "escape incarceration" or hurt themselves or another.(Edit to add: Ironically, self-help books and motivational books are frequently found on statewide prison ban lists; extreme christian nationalist/fundamentalist literature is not, a mirror of what's happening in various school and public library districts across America.)

And those types of content aren't even touching on factual types of books/articles/publications that include information on legal rights, incarceration, education, etc. Or fiction books that might contain sex, violence, questionable content, etc--like a romance novel, or a historical fiction novel, or a suspense novel.

And this censorship is on the rise.

Quotes above from The Story Behind Oppressive Book Bans in Prisons ( January 10, 2024)

From Reading Between the Bars (an about prison censorship from 10/25/2023, which is another fantastic and frustrating read):

Carceral censorship is the most pervasive form of censorship in the United States. The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and the departments of corrections (DOCs) in all 50 states and the District of Columbia censor literature – and the rationales they employ for censoring books are vast and varied. Prisons ban specific titles, based on the alleged threat of their content – a tactic similar to that of book banners who have targeted public schools and libraries in the past two years. Prison banned book lists in many states contain thousands of unique titles; any incarcerated individual in that state is barred from reading any title on the list. ...

Prison officials commonly justify censorship as necessary for rehabilitation and the maintenance of safety and security. The rationale that censorship should be used to accomplish these goals is specious—and yet often receives little scrutiny. ...

Prison censorship normalizes the idea that reading can be dangerous. (emphasis mine)

Yes, even romance books. It's one of the saddest, most frustrating, most angering things in this country, right alongside book-banning in schools and libraries.

So, yes, bring attention and support to this program, because it is doing great, great, necessary work that is under threat every single day. And it is fighting an already incredibly unfair battle that is weighted heavily against it. The prison system is horrible, but those stuck within it shouldn't be made to suffer because those of us outside of it don't agree with the system's existence or how it's run. And far too often, especially for incarcerated women, BIPOCs, LGBTQA+ persons--many of those people who end up incarcerated in the system spend an unfair number of years banned from living a full life because the justice system in American is already weighted against them. To take book escapes from them too is just an unimaginable cruelty, in my personal opinion.

Just sending books to programs trying to send those books into prisons isn't likely to get those books into inmates' hands--not in America, though programs are trying. Do your homework and make sure you are sending your books and your support to the right programs with the right connections to actually get those books through the doors and in to inmates hands--because those books will end up in the trash otherwise, and none of us want that.

(edits: typos, messed up a date on the article link, weird reddit formatting stuff--probably more edits incoming)

This isn't a programme I was aware of, but it's a really interesting one since a lot of the other similar programmes actually won't accept romance genre books - or will only accept very few. Thanks for sharing!

This one does! But they also have a high priority list and romance novels aren't on it which I can understand. They would probably get a high volume of just those because people have tons, the women could get bored of them or be saddened by them. Plus, if that is all you get to read it probably becomes formulaic. Skimming the high priority list it's stuff to keep the mind engaged: dictionaries, thesaurus (thesauri?), health, DIY/Skills, puzzle books, crochet books, Spanish non-fiction. They don't want to zone out.

Yes, that's what I was excited about!

This was part of the issue that came up when I was researching for *reasons* in the past- a lot of these programs don't get many requests for romance either because they're often targeting providing books for incarcerated men who don't request romance in the same frequency/volume or because there's facility limitations on what they're able to provide making a lot of romance not accessible - the programmes have to prioritize their effort, and so they prioritize providing the books that will get the most bang for their buck both in interest and accessibility - which tends to be other kinds of material.

More replies
u/EndzeitParhelion avatar

Won't accept romance?? :( That's so weird, why

u/Sithina avatar

I'm going to be writing a longer comment on this and linking a few things, but censoring books in prisons, especially in America, is a big problem, and it involves a huge number of books--not just romance, but non-English language books and a whole host of other types of books. It's really upsetting. It's a whole lot of bullshit, actually.

Edited

So, there's two issues at play.

  • One is supply/demand - basically that these programmes are often operating on a very tight budget, right? They're nonprofits and so they want to get the most bang for their buck. Most incarcerated people are men, most of these programmes are serving all men or mostly men (not this one), men often prefer or publicly express the preference to read genres that are not romance, but there's A LOT of second hand/cheap romance available... Many of these programmes don't accept romance genre books because it's not being requested frequently enough to move it through their system or because they don't see it being popular, or because when they do get requests for it, it's pretty easy to source.

  • The second issue is not all prisons or jails allow all reading material. It's very, very common for there to be stringent censorship rules or banned material in place. Many facilities will only accept books into their libraries or allow books to be shared with incarcerated people if they meet the censor's criteria. Often this includes prohibiting material that the censor defines as "explicit," "inflammatory" or a "safety risk" for whatever reason (the list actually goes on and on but these are sort of the top 3). Romance will sometimes fall under the "explicit" category or under my personal favourite (sarcasm, so much sarcasm here) - "lacking serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value." Some institutions are more lenient, some are more rigid. The worst I've encountered offered this as the guideline and refused to give a list of banned topics/books/authors or any other guidance - "Books must be informational, educational or inspirational." I didn't get a single romance through their censor.

I have a longer comment somewhere that goes into more detail which I'm happy to provide if anyone's interested. Censorship of prison reading material is really intense and complicated and often absolutely infuriating.

u/QuietLifter avatar

Worked in a prison for a long time & security is the most important concern. If reading material (or anything else) is going to create security problems, administration will not allow it.

What kind of security concerns do romance books cause tho?

more reply More replies
More replies
u/EndzeitParhelion avatar

Oh wow, I've never heard of that. I didn't think that prisons would actually care what kind of books you're reading.

More replies
More replies
More replies

When ebooks came out I donated something like 2,000 paperbacks to a book charity. I remember the volunteer who took them telling me that the romances would be going to a women’s prison where they were “in high demand”.

Very cool, thanks for sharing! Just sent them some money