Voodoo Academy (Video 2000) - Voodoo Academy (Video 2000) - User Reviews - IMDb
Voodoo Academy (Video 2000) Poster

(2000 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
37 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Finally! Exploitation for the rest of us!
johnnysugar28 October 2003
As a director, David DeCoteau has an extensive resume ranging from laughably cheap horror films ("Creepozoids"), late-night Cinemax adult "entertainment" ("Beach Babes From Beyond"), gay-film-fest favorites ("Leather Jacket Love Story"), and lame horror films ("Curse Of The Puppet Master"). That he uses about five aliases while directing should be a sign, but there is something indescribably alluring about watching a movie that is, simply, 100% pure trash. DeCoteau does not disappoint in this respect with the supernatural film "Voodoo Academy."

The plot centers around Carmichael Bible College, which apparently only enrolls six students each term. The college is run by the odd Mrs. Bouvier (Debra Mayer) and classes are taught by Hollis CarMichael (Chad Burris), an ex-Catholic priest who espouses a religion resembling a bizarre and clunky hybrid of Christianity and Scientology (check out the electro-charged confessional). However, as we learn before the opening credits even roll, Bouvier is in reality a wicked voodoo priestess and Hollis her nefarious assistant. When one of their rituals results in the death of a student, the duo recruit wholesome, clean-cut Christopher (Riley Smith) to fill his place. From the beginning, Christopher suspects something is amiss, and he soon begins to find out that dark and sinister forces are at work.

The film itself is an unabashed ode to trashy, campy dialogue as well as young men in designer underwear. Indeed, most of the film consists of scenes where at least one of the students is topless, working out, bathing, or simply skulking through the shadows in Ralph Lauren boxer briefs. That these students look quite good without their clothes on is an added bonus and is in fact the main reason anybody should even begin to rent or buy this film. Even Hollis -- a priest! -- has a topless scene. The plot, as little as there is, is telegraphed in the opening sequence, the actors by and large are wooden, and the special effects are imminently laughable. Never mind the lack of dramatic tension, the often grainy and washed out look of the film, and the absurdity of the premise, which features several scenes that exist only to present footage of the students touching themselves.

Still, this film has much to offer. As mentioned before, the film is pure trash in the best sense of the word. Few movies offer this degree of ridiculousness and remain watchable. The boys are all quite attractive and fit, and it's nice to see male flesh on display in horror films for once. And as horrible as the acting and dialogue can be, it's still better than sitting through another showing of "Star Wars Episode II." It's also nice to realize that filming this picture prepared Drew Fuller (who plays Paul St. Clair) for his role on the equally trashy but beyond redemption TV series "Charmed."

A note to viewers: This film should only be watched in its unedited form (the DVD is labeled "Lunar Edition" and "Director's Cut"). There is a massive amount of homoeroticism in this film, and the edited version removes most of it. And if you cut out the shirtless young men, you lose most of the reason the watch this film.

5 out of 10.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
3/10
desperateliving9 October 2004
You can't hold too much against this knowing that it was made in four days, and I had expected it to be campy anyway. (It's not all that campy in reality. With the exception of Kevin Kalisher and Huntley Ritter, who don't take themselves seriously, the rest of the cast plays it halfway straight; Riley Smith is exceptionally bad.) The ridiculous story is actually paid attention to, which kind of shocked me; I assumed the whole purpose with these ultra-low-budget horror movies was to cater to the basest sexual fantasies and not give a damn about the story, but they use lots of words like "technological" and "physicality" in the script to get their point across. (Although it's possible that the story is important only to explain why there's so few cast members.) Nobody cares about this stupid storyline, and the only things that are interesting in the film are the mocking of cults and the soft-core homoeroticisms (which aren't all that edgy). I would have enjoyed it more if there were just some random killings for no reason. The film is grainy, with a TV-quality look and acting level. There are a few "sexy" scenes that are alright -- the boys writhing in bed in their boxers, feeling themselves up; or being tied down and making orgasmic faces while wine is poured on them -- and some of them are kinda funny. And I liked the digs at L. Ron Hubbard and the intended irony of a story about religious cultists told with intense gay overtones, but it still isn't any good. 3/10
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No no no no no no no
EvanEast16 November 2003
And a few more "no"s on top of that. Voodoo Academy is, without a doubt, the least ambitious film of all time. What exactly is it trying to do? Tell a story? Obviously not; as has been pointed out, most of it's just barely-legal guys rubbing themselves. Could it, then, be an attempt at subversive homoeroticism? Well, maybe, if not for the fact it never ever ever goes beyond the most innocuous and nonthreatening forms of male contact. (Which is, to the delight of none, repeated about eighty thousand times.) Well, it is sort of a horror movie; is it trying to scare us? Not unless the director meant to do so through the utter tedium and vacuousness of his "work."

Never in my life have I enjoyed a movie less. This is the most boring and unnecessary thing I've ever seen. It's like Voodoo Academy takes the genres of horror, zombie, and gay movies, puts them in a grinder, then runs them through a coffee filter--only instead of it being the kind of coffee filter that filters out coffee beans, it's the kind that takes out everything vital, edgy, or in any way interesting. The result is 74 minutes of film every bit as exciting as a glass of warm water--only without the ability to rehydrate you after the 10-day gin binge that will inevitably befall you if you watch this abomination of human effort.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You Do That Voodoo so Well?
tim.halkin7 February 2003
A high-concept, homoerotic, genre film that - for all its bare chest rubbing, hair gel and glossed-lipped poutiness - falls flat on its face. Even worse acting only tops a lousy script.

That said, if you're into barely 20-something boys in spanking white boxer shorts and white socks touching themselves incessantly all over while having a mutual wet dream, well this one's for you! Frankly, I find doing my grocery list more exciting. Surprisingly enough, the production quality is halfway decent, though.

Those of us, who like high-concept horror, will hate this one. There's barely an attempt at plausibility, and the level of horror tends to bend more towards cute than scary. Those of you who like homoerotic, this is about as erotic as a PBS film. Is it soooo bad that it's good? No. It's just silly and boring.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hoo-Doo; Yoo-Doo; Doo-What? Makin' Voodoo Dolls and Not Whoope
joseph9520019 May 2005
O.K.; all you fans of the weird; the first thing you have to do to enjoy this movie is see what is really going on. It's obvious that the guys in this College are Gay. After all, even the very whorish Mrs. Bouvier can't even seduce the boys and then knows that because of their being gay, virginal, and young, they've got to be Virgins, and remember that Virgin Sacrifices were common in ye days of Ole. Well, let's stop right there on the subject of these boys Virginity! Now, I liked this film. It's a hoot! Here's a Wanna-Be Ron Hubbard known as the Reverand Carmichael with a woman playing a little bit of Tammy Fay Baker in her characterization, and there's Drew Fuller not knowing that he'll be on Charmed in a couple years, but for now he's got to make the best of a bad decision, but when you come right down to it, I'm sure that when they all read the script they probably couldn't believe that they all had agreed to make such a turkey, so they've, it seems, decided to play it as a high school play with a bit of ham, tongue and cheek, nd shameless showing off while pulling out all the stops with the hoke! And no joke, it's works! You can tell that the guys are all gay when Billy, when first meeting Christopher, calls him Crisco, and Christopher tells him that his name is not Crisco, and Billy, looking at Christopher in a sexy way says that he was only trying to get under his skin! And then when they're all having dinner and the wine is poured, Billy says, "Soooo, we're gonna get trashed" is a gay type sound to his voice, and later when he reaches for Christophers wine and Mrs. B. slaps his hand, it's a campy slap and funny, but for some reason no one sees all of this. They don't even see Billy telling one of the other guys that he loves him in a gay, jokingly way! And listen to most of their voices, they're all playing it in a monotone way, and that' not easy to do! Now, everyone gets the wrong idea about these guys rubbing their bodies in bed at night. Yes, the scenes are sexual, but remember that this only happens when the guy goes up to the attic-voodoo-altar, and remember that they've been drinking that wine, and then the wine is poured on the guy who is tied down to the voodoo altar and then when the Reverand massages the wine all over the guys body, the other young men feel the same thing although their asleep.

The Gal playing Mrs. Bouvier looks like three different women in the movie. The sophisticated owner of the school, the whorish vamp who tries to find out how virginal her young men are, and the incarnation of a female Devil, who when Christopher accuses her of killing her husband, she calls him a very Evil Boy! That whole scene is campy as hell!

So, this movie was not meant to be a rival to Gone With The Wind, but if you can relax and stop making wild comments about how bad it is; you'll find out that it's quite good, and very entertaining, and isn't that what movies are all about? Entertaining?
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A slap in the Face to typical T&A flicks!!
BHorrorWriter29 May 2001
This $60,000 b-movie is funny, silly, not scary at all, a must for horny young girls and gay men. Tons of Eye Candy--Young, well build guys running around in their underwear, sleeping in their underwear, writhing around and fondling themselves--In their underwear!

David Decoteau, an openly gay director, really must have had a hard on to see these guys half naked. In typical fashion to most of his latest features..there is enough young male flesh on the screen to make any woman or gay man quiver in glee (that is not a bad thing...it is good!)

Little plot, too much dialogue, maybe 2-5 different location shots this movie was made because the director is a dirty old man...though most famous for most of the 80's t&a flicks....Check this out...it is different and that is what makes it good. I'm a straight man, and I am willing to pay money to buy this. Only see the DVD..the VHS cuts 20 mins out...

8 out of 10
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A non-gay gay film
Kevin-948 July 2002
In reviews and user comments I've read online about these films,

the writers will say things like `It's almost as if it's gay.' and `It

seems sort of gay.' The equivocal reactions are understandable.

Allow me to be more bluntly clear: This is a horror film which,

unlike Hollywood films, is more intent on pleasing a gay male

audience than a straight one (though technically none of the

characters are gay.)

In `Voodoo Academy,' along with his film `The Brotherhood,'

director DeCoteau has created what might be called `the non-gay

gay film.' These are films which are clearly designed to appeal to

a gay audience, yet nevertheless stop short of being overtly gay.

On the surface, they seem intended for a straight audience. The

characters are not gay and they don't engage in any romantic

activities together. (And certainly the marketing makes no

indication of a gay angle.)

Yet at the same time, it's clear that something is going on here.

There are lots of gratuitous shots of young men in designer

underwear. There's no straight romantic subplots and hardly any

women. Unlike Hollywood films, which bend over backwards to

please a straight audience (and avoid any possible hint of gay

subtext), these films are clearly more interested in pleasing a gay

male audience than straight ones.

As for the film itself, it's not very good. A bland young man enrolls

in a small (6 students) college, where something strange is going

on. Long stretches of the film are given to providing expository

information which ultimately proves irrelevant. Scenes lack

tension. And the overall story is fairly dumb and ends abruptly.

The technical stuff is good, but the acting is wooden and the

scenes just drag.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
* out of 4.
brandonsites19811 June 2002
High school teacher and her assistant at a private boarding school use half naked boys as their prey in helping to raise an army of the dead. No plot what so ever, just an extended series of boys wearing designer underwear touching and rubbing themselves in bed, walking around the school in there underwear only, and taking baths together. No camp value or laughs at all. This feels like gay porn, instead of an actual film. Disappointing effort from Full Moon Entertainment.

Unrated (90 mins.) or R-Rated (74 mins.); Strong Sexual Content.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Late night cheese from Charles Band
edkishel10 February 2003
Well what do you want, if you see the Full Moon on the back of the box, you know its late night cheese! All the films produced by Band under the EMPIRE label were great, Re-Animator, From Beyond, Troll, even Zone Troopers was fun. However when Empire Films folded, so did the quality of their films. So Full Moon is born, and they had themselves a pretty good little gravy train with Paramount distributing their flicks, but even they got tired of the same old vampire and Puppet Master junk, and subsequently pulled out. The pictures where pretty bad with big studio money, and without it they got worse.

Case in point with Voodoo Academy. Like most other DeCoteau films, there are allot of pretty young men running around in their boxer briefs, and a whole lotta fake lightening. Throw in an uninspired story, about 6 million candles, and actors who look like their bored and you have what I consider one of the worst Full Moon pictures to date.

I'm not going to beat this dead horse anymore by talking about everything that's wrong with this story, so I will talk about the only thing I consider good about this film, and that's the DVD Directors cut version. Now your probably wondering, if its so bad why would I want to see the director's cut? Two reasons; one, I wanted to see the footage that was so offensive that even Charles Band wanted it cut from the original release. It turned out to be 20 minutes of harmless male erotica (85 % of horror film rentals are by girls anyway) ho hum big freakin deal. The other reason I wanted this DVD is for the audio commentary.

DeCoteau talks at length about the process of "by the numbers low budget cookie cutter filmmaking". This is invaluable for film students like myself. Sometimes you learn how to do things right when you see how they are done wrong. All criticisms aside, Band has a very well tuned filmmaking machine (features shot in 4 days, that 24 pages a day!), and the special features of this DVD gives rare insight into Full Moon, the makers of films so bad they're, well bad.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Potentially Hot, Actually Dreadful
mgdq311 October 2006
This is one of those movies that should have been way better than it turned out to be. I dread to think what the Blockbuster-approved edit must have looked like, because the director's cut on DVD was a bore of the epic proportions. Naturally, you don't expect it to be "The Godfather", but an acting class or two might have come in handy.

Also, there were so many cute guys in this movie, but they were woefully under-exploited. I like watching a bevy of hotties writhe around in their BVDs as much as the next guy, but even I have a right to expect a little more. It wasn't a total loss, though; at least we got a peek a Drew Fuller's (covered) junk and truly upsetting haircut. And there's Huntley Ritter looking even cuter than he did in "Bring It On" (and acting about as well). There's always a silver lining, kids. You just have to look really hard for it. And occasionally, you have to make use of your pause button.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bible College, Six-Pack Abs and Satan
rockoforza25 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
While most horror directors feature lovely young girls menaced by evil, director David DeCoteau has turned the tables with films where handsome young frat boys are the victims. Voodoo Academy is one such movie and we know it from the opening scene, where a built young stud, clad only in his tighty whities and white socks, is bound to a table. A priest and a busty woman take turns massaging his near naked body until he is in the throes of orgasm – whereupon he is slain in a voodoo sacrifice.

Welcome to Carmichael Bible College, a male-only school for pure minded boys who have pledged to remain virgins. Rev. Carmichael and Mrs. Bouvier (see above) need six young male virgins for their nefarious voodoo ceremony. The whole movie revolves around these six. In a way, they are like the seven dwarfs – each with a defining characteristic. Chris, the new boy, is played by Riley Smith, who's featured on TV's new 90210 and has played tough guy roles in several action movies. Here, he is the smart guy that quickly catches on to the weird stuff happening at the school. His best friend is Billy, played by Kevin Calisher, a wiseass with a sculpted body. Then there's Rusty, played by Huntley Ritter from the movie Bring It On. Rusty is a teenage bodybuilding champ whose powerful young physique is always on display. Mike, Sam and Paul (Drew Fuller from TV's Charmed) complete the six.

Though the plot is murky, it comes down to drugging the unsuspecting boys with a lust-inducing potion and then luring them – one by one - up to Mrs. Bouvier's room where she seduces them before sacrificing them to Satan. After avoiding the drug, Chris wakes up one night and witnesses its effects on his buddy Billy. Billy, asleep and naked except for a tight pair of Tommy Hilfiger boxer briefs, is writhing in ecstasy, running his hands over his smooth, ripped body. With his bare chest and chiseled abs glistening with sweat, he works himself up to an orgasm in his sleep. Looking around the room, Chris realizes that each of the near naked boys is likewise involved in a wet dream of their own.

When Rusty, clad only in briefs and gym socks, goes sleepwalking, Chris, also in his skivvies, follows him to Mrs. Bouvier's room where he watches her run her hands over Rusty's muscled body and lick his impressive six-pack. When her seduction is complete, the young stud is ready for death and Satan accepts another sacrifice. The next day Chris tries to convince the other boys of their danger, but the drug is still working on them and transforming them from innocents to thugs. Flaunting their hard bodies and now dressed in wife beaters or skin tight black tee shirts, they've become "bad boys" waiting for their turn with Mrs. Bouvier.

One by one the other boys are targeted. Rev. Carmichael finds Paul soaking in the bathtub and offers him a soothing shoulder massage. While the boy moans with pleasure under the priests strong hands, the Rev slips a potion into the water and watches the young stud succumb. Mrs. Bouvier seduces another boy with her demonic charms and adds him to the body count.

Finally, only Chris, Billy and Sam are left and it's up to Chris to save them with a few tricks of his own. The Rev's and Mrs. Bouvier's magic finally backfires and they are destroyed. The boys, however, are permanently changed and their new badass attitude becomes them. Like Chris says, "Hey, I really wanted to go to Business School anyway."
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Cheap and dull
enkephalin0710 June 2006
Cheap and mind-blisteringly dull story and acting. Not a single good line, not even a line bad enough to be good, and no memorable delivery. Even the blooper reel included with the DVD showed how inept the actors were and how little fun any of them were having. The esoteric and occult basis was apathetically inauthentic, and the antagonists failed to be creepy or believable. The 'homoerotic' overtones were pointlessly tame and dissatisfying, and were limited to young boys caressing their chests while flaccid in their boxers. I'm not gay enough to appreciate it, but a little action might have at least kept me and my girlfriend awake.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Horror Film with a Twist
PeterBradford4 September 2007
I love this movie. I love seeing horror movies that dare to be different, that don't do the same thing I've seen over and over in horror movies before. VOODOO ACADEMY is a dark, intimate little horror movie about some creepy activities going on at a school for boys. The twist is that it has a strong homoerotic overtone, which works for the story. It's also a good example of how creative horror can be on a minuscule budget. I would have given it a 10, but it suffers from some horrible acting. The female lead spends the whole movie reciting memorized lines, but at no time does she give a performance. And the dude playing a priest...well...let's just say he comes across as someone who may have been in movies before, but never actually had to speak a line of dialogue until now. The young actors playing the students are all great, and more than make up for their adult co-stars' lack of acting ability.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Worth the watch, anyone will enjoy it.
The movie does have corny dialogue, yet funny -- an interesting story line -- yet not scary -- can be creepy. And an incredible cast. I do not agree with some other comments I've heard about the movie. Being a male -- and straight -- people may find it funny how I ENJOYED the movie. There is not a bit of male or female nudity in the film. When the cast masturbates or caresses themselves it is nothing more (if anything less) of what men do at sleepovers with other guys. Straight guys shouldn't be bothered about this movie. I did see the DVD uncut -- as far as the homoerotic tones -- there were more in Boogie Nights -- and MEN LOVED THAT MOVIE. Voodoo Academy scores a ***/**** rating in my book -- missing the last star only because of the thin story. The cast is believable and KUDOS to the director for painting a realistic picture of what guys do when they're together or in college. Men and women (gay or straight) will like the movie. I was especially pleased with the rising star Riley Smith. Very talented.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
More Like "Underwear Academy"
mikhail08027 October 2001
"Voodoo Academy" features an "Academy" like no other, one that houses only six male students in one bedroom. These teenage guys are instructed in religion by a sinister young priest, who enjoys tormenting and comforting them simultaneously. The sole administrator of this "Academy" is a young and seductive headmistress, and she retains her handsome charges on a short leash, so to speak.

Sexual overtones abound, and the director obviously has high regard for young male bodies. These young actors occasionally strip down to their designer underwear to sneak about the "Academy," and their sexuality is the entire focus of the movie. If you're not interested in the male form -- stay away!

Burdened by weak and awkward dialogue, this low-budget exploitation piece just stumbles along with a few laughable special effects tossed in between the yawns. The mood is claustrophobic, with tediously long takes, a handful of cheap sets and few costume changes. These visual elements come interspersed with seemingly unending sequences of banal dialogue, intended as character and plot development. It gives one the feeling it was filmed in three days...
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Full Moon's worst movie to date. Period.
insomniac_rod13 November 2004
What happened to Full Moon Pictures? I mean, this is their worst movie. I'm a big fan of their movies but this time they went too far. The execs. made a dirty move because they know that the fans would buy almost anything, even if it's crap. "Voodoo Academy" is a lame excuse for making a movie. There's no interesting plot. A sexy, very sexy teacher enlists metro sexual males in her academy in order to fill an army from the other world.

There are no women except for the super hot Debra Mayer, that, is the best thing in this "flick". She's very sexy and is Full Moon's favorite mistress.

The whole gay insinuations are lame and made me almost puke. I'm mad because I feel cheated; next time I will think twice before buying a Full Moon direct to video release.

1/10. Debra Mayer saves this trash from the cero rating even though that she has little screen time.

BOOT THIS ONE TO THE TRASH CAN, NO MERCY.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Relatively good
Vanyel19 December 2001
I was surprised that the acting was as good as it was for such a low budget horror flick. It's not great cinema by any means, but it was mildly amusing and if you like hot young guys writhing around in their underwear, you'll really like it.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
truly the worst film i've yet to see
dr_foxy19 October 2003
Warning: Spoilers
i know you've read that before, on countless other films no doubt if you're reading the comments here, but voodoo academy still stands as the absolute worst film i've been able to track down. no doubt the really bad ones aren't even available to buy or watch on tv, but even so i feel it's fair to qualify that i'm not just some dumb renter who picked badly.

i've seen two thirds of the bottom 100 ranked films here on the imdb, and i'm ticking of the remaining ones with every chance. most of those stand head and shoulders above this... excersize in absolute monotony.

i like to rate truly bad films (as in ones with no humour even in how bad they are) by how many people you need to watch it with to make it all the way through. if you can watch it by yourself, it isn't that bad. if you can watch it with one single friend... it's bad but could be a lot worse.

it took 5 of us to make it all the way through voodoo academy. and not even the usually fun moments of watching bad films (spotting the boom mic for example, 3 times in this one if i'm not mistaken) could take away the dry taste in my mouth. yes i'd watched it, but i'd also forced 4 of my friends to watch it with me to achieve that end.

i hope and pray we saw the directors cut... to think that there could be a version with 20 more minutes of big eyebrowed lugs with baby oil glands rubbing their torsos just scares the hell out of me. so much of the film centers around this.

i do applaud david decoteau for managing to lens this film in two days on a short budget, just as i applaud him for convincing people to pay him to make what is no doubt a celluloid version of some of his fetishes. but it isn't a good film. the original shop of horrors was shot in the same length of time for a comparitive amount of money (considering inflation) and was an utter gem. it's not an excuse for how bad this baby is.

spoilers ahead...

it's not even worth picking apart the plot holes or cliched know it all hero characters... the pacing of the film... is insane... nothing... is interesting for the length of time decoteau dedicates to the pectoral self massaging. no matter what your alignment or sex... rubbing just cannot sustain that kind of screen time.

the acting is cheese... but not overly amatuer... i've seen a lot worse in better films... but somehow it's the semi competent delivery of some of the worst lines you'll ever hear in a film, that really grates.

rent this if, like me, you have a fascination with the worst of the worst, and only if you're going to watch it with a group of people who are prepared to work to get through it. this is no ha ha ha the set wobbled affair. it's an endurance test you probably want to skip.

i'm sure there is worse... but i wouldn't be surprised if it has decoteau's name on it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
unexpectedly loved it
wrenjustin4 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
firstly, this is a movie that isn't meant to be scary, witty or anything that is meant for any awards, what it is is a simple movie with little plot, poor audio (the voices and there lips moving didn't match up most of the time) but it is meant to be a movie that gives an excuse to guys like me to watch some extremely hot guys, rub them selves in bed. and i loved it. i thought that every part of the movie gave an excuse for a guy to be in his underwear. and I'm not complaining. if the quality was a bit better i would be in heaven. but it ain't bad enough to totally ruin the experience. so what ever people say make up your own mind. i did. and I'm glad i didn't stray away because of what i had read.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What the hell is he doing with the crucifix???
Superwonderscope29 March 2002
Groundbreaking horror movie aimed at teen-age girls but definitely taken over by gays for its incredible homo-erotic scenes. The DVD is indeed highly recommended, especially for its original running time (are included the infamous scenes hat Charles Band did not wanted first because of its gay context) but also for the comments of David DeCoteau.

It's near zero budget with cheesy FX and sometimes ridiculous make up FX (poor Debra Meyer!). It's sometimes VERY badly acted. The camera does what it can do for a 16mm shoot (the FX are in 35mm). It's a grainy copy. It has no blood. It has half naked men caressing themselves in the middle of the night (among other things). It has a devious priest throwing a poisonous wine onto the bodies of the young guys tied up in a chapel. It has Ben Indra doing things with his crucifix. It has voodoo dolls with human heads.It has a lot of over-the-top action and basically a storyline but no screenplay. In other words : WAOW.

VOODOO ACADEMY sets all the basics of a new sub-genre that gave David DeCoteau, a real master of the B-Z grade movies, a unique point of view as a film maker.(just watch THE BROTHERHOOD 1 & 2, FINAL STAB and THE FRIGHTENING...you'll what i'm talking about)

And, oh, yeah, it is pure fun. So forget everything you know about moviemaking. Be open-minded. It's no Citizen Kane. But it's no Joel Schumacher either (thank god)...just a natural mix of John Waters and Roger Corman.

Superwonderscope says 8
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Surprised!
BSscott15713 September 2002
The director David DeCoteau who has filmed movies such as some of The Brotherhood movies. I checked this movie out and I thought the DVD version only had the Director's Cut, but the VHS version I rented said it was The Director's Cut on the VHS tape. I watched it and most of the whole movie was just guys rubbing each other. Taken place at a college named Carmichael's Bible College. The plot is about a woman taking hold of her dead husbands bought property and a supposed, twisted Reverand Mr. Carmichael decides to help turn this property with the twisted woman who trys to seduce her very small group of 6 boys into Voodoo dolls. The catch and story to this is that. Reverand Carmichael turns the school in to a church or bible school and teaches about God and Christanity. The whole thing that was surprising is that not only did Reverand say some confusing teaches. He came up with a confessional that is only in a Catholic religion, not a so called Christian religion. The Reverand trys to teach the boys by being pure and worthy, but the boys don't know as that Mrs. Bouveigh and Reverand have a another plan of their own. The Reverand has a weird way of showing his helping hand of trying to rid these boys of sin. That's mostly what he talks about throughout the whole movie. Is being guilty of sin is bad, but the thing that caught my eye is that his confessional is some radioactive type room that turns these boys into some lust objects. The movie mostly deals with boys rubbing each other for some so called bad dream after drinking wine at dinner on the first night of Riley Smith's arrival. Riley refuses the wine and sticks with water and starts to figure what's really going on at the school. The movie is short because the whole story mostly deals with guys just rubbing each other and getting seduced by the Reverand and massaged with this so called deadly wine or something like that. I can tell u now thats the whole plot of the movie. I wouldn't waste your money on this!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
So bad it's bad
danieljmcewen8 April 2022
Some movies are just bad. Not so bad it's good but bad. Really bad. The second star I gave was for the hot guys in underwear. There were no other redeeming values to this film.

I've seen movies with worse acting so that's technically a plus.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
In The True Tradition Of Full Moon Films!
AutographLover27 September 2000
This movie had to have the worst acting, special effects and storyline Ive ever see. I LOVED IT! This movie is really what Full Moon Entertainment is all about! A Must see for fans of b- films and camp horror! And the young hunks that star in this flick make it even more worth your while!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
There has got to be 6 million candles in this movie!!
edkishel20 January 2003
Well what do you want, if you see the Full Moon on the back of the box, you know its late night cheese! All the films produced by Band under the EMPIRE label were great, Re-Animator, From Beyond, Troll, even Zone Troopers was fun. However when Empire Films folded, so did the quality of their films. So Full Moon is born, and they had themselves a pretty good little gravy train with Paramount distributing their flicks, but even they got tired of the same old vampire and Puppet Master junk, and subsequently pulled out. The pictures where pretty bad with big studio money, and without it they got worse.

Case in point with Voodoo Academy. Like most other DeCoteau films, there are allot of pretty young men running around in their boxer briefs, and a whole lotta fake lightening. Throw in an uninspired story, about 6 million candles, and actors who look like their bored and you have what I consider one of the worst Full Moon pictures to date.

I'm not going to beat this dead horse anymore by talking about everything that's wrong with this story, so I will talk about the only thing I consider good about this film, and that's the DVD Directors cut version. Now your probably wondering, if its so bad why would I want to see the director's cut? Two reasons; one, I wanted to see the footage that was so offensive that even Charles Band wanted it cut from the original release. It turned out to be 20 minutes of harmless male erotica (85 % of horror film rentals are by girls anyway) ho hum big freakin deal. The other reason I wanted this DVD is for the audio commentary.

DeCoteau talks at length about the process of "by the numbers low budget cookie cutter filmmaking". This is invaluable for film students like myself. Sometimes you learn how to do things right when you see how they are done wrong. All criticisms aside, Band has a very well tuned filmmaking machine (features shot in 4 days, that 24 pages a day!), and the special features of this DVD gives rare insight into Full Moon, the makers of films so bad they're, well bad.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DVD explains more...
fangoria_magazine14 October 2000
VOODOO's dvd has a full 23 minutes of additional footage, much of it involving the hunky young cast getting hot and bothered with themselves under the thrall of a priest and his female partner aiming to steal the boys' souls at a Bible school. On his engaging commentary, DeCoteau notes that he intentionally pushed the boundaries with the film's homoerotic material (which he says was also very popular with the women at the film lab), discusses the process of shooting the movie in only four days and notes problems he had with the film stock, which are reflected in the grainy though generally sharp fullscreen transfer.

Other extras include a production audio track on which DeCoteau can be heard directing his cast (`More hands all over your body!'), behind-the-scenes footage and 37 minutes of DeCoteau trailers, also with commentary that's full of Fun Facts, such as the various standing sets (BEOWULF, HIGHLANDER: ENDGAME, etc.) the director has reused in past films.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed