The imposition of gender ideology
Gender ideology as such, did not arise all at once, but its emergence was conceived by certain „law of gradualness“. It is as if the development of that ideology took place according to the American doctrine of „cooking a frog in a pot of water“. If you put a frog in a pot of water and start heating the water gradually and for a long time, the frog will be cooked without even noticing it. But let us start from the beginning.
In Beijing 1960, a congress at which decisions were made that would later gradually bring about great changes in the social sphere of life, all unnoticed, so that the population of states and their institutions would find themselves in a great trap.
At that time, at that meeting, they decided that all UN member states must introduce sanctions into their legislation for the so-called hate speech. Something similar to a verbal offence in totalitarian government systems, which we „tasted“. In countries with a one-party system (Yugoslavia), any prominence and association of homosexuals and LGBT communities was banned and sanctioned. Moreover, they were persecuted by the government at that time, because in its legislation there was no legal basis for a possible lawyer’s defence.
With the advent of democratic changes, the introduction of civil rights and a multi-party system, freedom of speech and expression, free enterprise and market liberalization, this „Pandora’s box“ was opened, so we witnessed the so-called „Pride parades“ (honestly, at first I did not understand what the parade participants were proud of??!). The leaders of the newly established political parties also took part in those parades, estimating, I guess, how it would benefit them during the election. The organizers and participants of these parades initially silently explained that they only wanted to show themselves as those who express love differently. Behind this was targeting areas where love and awareness of it develop spontaneously, as an example of living in a natural community, such as marriage, the family, and the anthropology structure of man as a creature.
In those times, for example, Serbia continued to repress such groups and individuals by banning „gay parades“. However, as the country is on the verge of joining the EU, such parades began to be held in their country, and the procession was protected by about 700 special police officers.
The imposition of gender ideology is also trying to equalize all institutions, including marriage, the community of men and women as the basic cell of every society. It is, therefore, the dissolution of marriage, the separation of children from their parents not to accept family upbringing, and in schools, the curriculum of sexual upbringing has already been set as a cuckoo in the nest.
Croatia then „got back on its feet“, and the referendum included in the Constitution that marriage is exclusively a union of a man and a woman.
The tactics of that ideology continued anyway, we got the same-sex unions with everything legally related to marriage (a division of property in divorce, inheritance, etc.).
The next step was to allow two men in a same-sex community to be foster parents and then comes the adoption of children into such communities. In the documents of these children, it will be written „Parent 1“ and „Parent 2“, and there have already been requests to add gender that the students currently feel to student certificates (alongside sex).
In the growth of children, the goal is, again, to prevent natural identification with father and mother, by real nature accepting man as a God-created being, and shaping the identity of male and female.
For such disoriented children, the only question is when they will become destroyed for society.
If we go back to the beginning of this article and the description of „cooking a frog in a pot of water“ we can see now what is gained from the brutal imposition of gender ideology. Anyone who reasonably and constructively criticizes this phenomenon in society, pointing out the consequences, is called backwards, conservative and the like.
Every state that has ratified the Istanbul Convention (and there are states in the EU that have refused to do so, thank God) must incorporate it into all pores of society so that their supporters can only see the promotion of human rights, „freedom of choice“, without any discrimination. The Croatian government ratified the Istanbul Convention (a Croatian intellectual participated in the creation of the document), despite the will of the citizens, preventing the collection of signatures for a referendum rejecting the convention, obstructing the results by justifying invalid ballots and destroying original papers.
Hopefully, the new government will reject this ideology in the form of the Istanbul Convention and thus show genuine concern for man by serving his people.
Born in 1953 in Bugojno, BiH. After graduating from high school, he came to study in Zagreb. At the religious education held for students in Frankopanska Street, near the Sisters of Mercy of St. Vincent de Paul, he meets Prof. Tomislav Ivančić, who then came from his studies in Rome, and remains with him in the religious Community with five more students. He spent the summer of 1975 with the Community in Davor, in the autumn of that year started publishing the magazine KORACI (STEPS, which is the predecessor of Hagio.hr), as a member of the editorial bord and the author of the editorial for the upcoming numbers. He has remained in Zagreb permanently, father of five children and, at the urge of Prof. Ivančić, founded his own business, and later a company. As a self-employed person for over thirty years of such work, he retires. He is
currently a member of the Hagio.hr editorial board.
