Three New Politically-Incorrect Videos, by Kevin Barrett - The Unz Review
 PodcastsKevin Barrett Archive
Three New Politically-Incorrect Videos

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Video Link

https://rumble.com/v15px3d-slow-vax-death.html (2:47)

Video Link

https://rumble.com/v15sd9j-joel-hirschhorn-on-long-covid-and-collapse-of-scientific-medicine.html (40 min.)

And here is the one that mainstream Western feminists won’t like. I am betting that YouTube won’t find it offensive enough to censor. Good thing Nina Jankowicz and the DHS Dinformation Police went out of business, otherwise she might dress up as Mary Poppins and sing a song about it.

(Republished from Substack by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 13 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Biff says:

    Where’s Tiffany Dover?

    • Thanks: Fidelios Automata
  2. meamjojo says:

    I never watch videos. Too much of a time sink. So I can’t comment.

    • Agree: Sollipsist
    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  3. Renoman says:

    I figure the vax deaths will really start to hit in July. Just my guess.

  4. @meamjojo

    Responding to comments by people who never watch videos so they can’t leave comments except to comment on the fact that they never comment is an even worse time sink. So I can’t comment on your comment.

    • LOL: A123
    • Replies: @A123
    , @Sollipsist
  5. A123 says: • Website

    Free of charge… A fourth politically incorrect video.

    PEACE 😇

  6. A123 says: • Website
    @Kevin Barrett

    The VAX death issue is difficult to parse to a simple comment.

        -A- It is hard to see the statistics among professional athletes to be anything other than alarming. These are, by definition, humans in near perfect health.

        -B- A rock star or a rapper dropping dead on any given day is par for the course with drug use and extremely bad life style.

        -C- The anecdotes among ordinary citizens are difficult to fit to any any pattern.

    The big potential question is, “Did Pfizer Commit Fraud?” That could void their vaccine legal immunity.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  7. @A123

    Good points. I’ve interviewed experts who think the vaccines have killed well over 100,000 Americans (possibly two to four times that number):
    https://www.unz.com/?s=kirsch&Action=Search&ptype=audio

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Ron Unz
  8. @Kevin Barrett

    Given the fact that the Jmedia has both covered up and normalized vax deaths you can bet the numbers are far higher than any of us can imagine….and who knows about long term damage.

  9. Ron Unz says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Good points. I’ve interviewed experts who think the vaccines have killed well over 100,000 Americans (possibly two to four times that number):

    As you know, for the last year or two I’ve been saying that the anti-vaxxing arguments seemed like total nonsense to me, possibly even promoted by the Establishment to make conspiracy-oriented types look ridiculous:

    https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/are-the-opponents-of-the-covid-injections-anti-vaxx-crackpots/

    https://www.unz.com/runz/covid-deaths-and-vaxxing-deaths/

    I think the data that’s now coming out tends to show I was correct all along.

    If you go to the CDC website, you’ll see that total “excess deaths” since the beginning of the epidemic are more than 1.3 million. However, the monthly American death rate from all causes has recently been substantially declining, and is back down to almost what it was at the beginning of 2020 before the Covid epidemic began:

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/COVID19/index.htm

    This seems to fit very well with the theory that Covid was a dangerous illness, but now that such a large fraction of the American population has either gotten it or been vaxxed, deaths have sharply declined.

    On the other hand, consider the anti-vaxxer framework. If the vaccines were really dangerous, wouldn’t we expect to see a continuing rise in deaths as more people were vaxxed—sometimes three or four times—and more time passed? If the government is encouraging quadruple vaxxing but deaths are declining, I really doubt the vaccines are all that dangerous.

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  10. @Ron Unz

    You could be right, Ron, but I don’t think it’s quite as obvious as it appears at first glance. A moderate “anti-vaxxer” might guess that out of 1.3 million excess deaths there have been one million COVID deaths, 200,000 vaccine deaths, and 100,000 lockdown-induced non-COVID deaths. The vaccine deaths would presumably happen, on average, in fairly close proximity to the shots. The average lag between shot and death might be, say, two weeks. So if we tracked the number of shots being given with overall excess deaths we would expect that since the number of shots administered per month has drastically declined https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/daily-covid-19-vaccination-doses?time=2021-01-04 the excess deaths will have also declined. (Note that Mathew Crawford and many others claim there has been a pronounced jump in “COVID deaths” shortly after vaccine roll-out in virtually all counties that have used the MRNA vaccines.)

    Another issue is age distribution. Excess death counts don’t distinguish between deaths of older people and deaths of younger people. So if older people are dying less frequently from COVID due to vaccines or omicron or the gradual endemicity of the virus, while young people are dying more frequently due to the vaccines, the overall excess death count might still drop, because most deaths occur in older people, even though the number of lost life-years wasn’t dropping nearly as fast. See: https://www.wfyi.org/news/articles/insurance-death-rates-working-age-people-up-40-percent

    • Replies: @A123
  11. A123 says: • Website
    @Kevin Barrett

    The highly distracting term “anti-vaxx” refers only to the extremely tiny population that refuses all vaccines. Given the horror of Polio, it is hard to grasp why anyone would be “anti-vaxx”, but they do exist.

    To focus the discussion exclusively on the COVID vaccines — Two new terms are required:

    Vaxx-Realist — Those who want to weigh disease risk vs. COVID vaccine risk.
    Manda-Vaxx — Those who insist everyone *must* receive COVID vaccine & multiple boosters.

    Another issue is age distribution. Excess death counts don’t distinguish between deaths of older people and deaths of younger people. So if older people are dying less frequently from COVID due to vaccines

    I have tried to make this exact point in other forums. 90%+, possibly 95%+, of the disease deaths are in those with both:
        • 65+ years old
        • At least one (and usually several) preexisting conditions

    If one follows the science, the Vaxx-Realism is highly compelling. Those who are elderly and have compromised immune systems have logical reasons to participate in the experimental vaccine & booster regime. Vaxx-Realism also leads those with virtually nil disease risk (e.g. healthy children, professional athletes) to opt out of the vaccine risk.

    The Manda-Vaxx side is based on emotion, specifically fear. The new mRNA method produced experimental vaccines quickly. They were then rolled out to the entire population with insufficient testing. This requires blind trust in MegaCorporation authority & veracity. And, we know Big Pharma has lied in the past. Do you remember the pain killer Vioxx?

    Manda-Vaxx dogma is virtually identical to the “anti-vaxx” belief system. They are both fruit from the tree of science denial.

    PEACE 😇

     

  12. @Kevin Barrett

    Fair enough. And funny. But… maybe merely consider that transcripts are much appreciated by some of us?

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  13. @Sollipsist

    As I have explained many times, transcripts require a lot of time that I don’t have, so I only do them occasionally, and paywall most of them to encourage subscriptions. See:
    https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/peter-mccullough-and-jessica-rose
    https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/michelle-malkin-on-being-banned-from

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings