Nemesis 3: Time Lapse (Video 1996) - Nemesis 3: Time Lapse (Video 1996) - User Reviews - IMDb
Nemesis 3: Time Lapse (Video 1996) Poster

(1996 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Nemesis III Prey Harder: The terror has returned, really!?
Platypuschow25 December 2018
Nemesis III Prey Harder otherwise known as Nemesis III Time Lapse is a contender for the worst movie in the franchise and that's really saying something.

The third Nemesis movie but seventh movie overall in the Cyborg (1989) franchise (Yeah it still confuses me as well) follows directly on from Nemesis II but that's just about all it has to its credit.

3 of these movies were made within the space of 2 years, that may explain why they're so poor.

Picking up from Alex's adventure as the sole hope for humanity's battle against the cyborgs and yadayadayada. Sue Price returns looking like a great action heroine in a movie that is quite frankly beneath her.

Industry veteran and original Nemesis (1992) star Tim Thomerson returns and is on usual great form but nothing can make up for the dreadful cast around him.

Awful sfx, snoozefest of a plot and absolutely nothing going for it this is the absolute pits within a franchise that's consistently bad anyway.

The Good:

Follows on well from Nemesis 2 (1995)

Tim Thomerson

The Bad:

Naff cgi

Plot is terrible

Things I Learnt From This Movie:

Girls love stamp collections
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
taken within its many limitations it remains a fun, albeit trashy Sci-fi/fantasy B-movie.
Weirdling_Wolf6 March 2021
While the law of diminishing returns can be rigidly applied to, Albert Pyun's kinetic Cyberpunk tetralogy 'Nemesis', the fitfully fabulous franchise's conspicuously declining production values, and overreliance on flashbacks to pad out the increasingly bizarre narrative proves irksome, and yet, even with all its obvious recycling 'Nemesis 3 : Time Lapse', contains enough unrestrained lunacy to appease more forgiving 'Nemesis' aficionados. Taken as a standalone work, this admittedly patchy, frequently silly Sci-fi shenanigans may seem inconsequential, more seasoned schlock seekers will no doubt revel in its myriad eccentricities!

The film's strengths reside in the welcome return of dread locked, Sue Price as the dynamic, DNA-mutated Amazon, Alex Rain, undertaking a quest to locate her equally ripped warrior siblings she was latterly unaware of! Girding her magnificent loins, our hypertrophically muscled heroine must grimly battle her way across war-ravaged Africa, these bloody travails cementing the legend of her fearsome fighting prowess! Alex's main obstacles being dastardly droid, Farnsworth 2 (Tim Thomerson) and the two sinuously sleek, garishly garbed cyber assassins, Lock (Sharon Bruneau) & Ditko (Debbie Mugli), their outrageously camp performances providing an additionally tweaked weirdness to psychotronic shoot 'em up 'Nemesis 3 : Time lapse'.

It's highly unlikely that great numbers of Sci-Fight fans will go on to watch the 4th Nemesis instalment after witnessing this frequently misfiring oddity, but I must profess to having a genuine affection for this absurd, boisterously bullet-shredded, cyber Kooky action tetralogy! The juicily jacked, Sue Price is one of the most entertaining, physically adept, serially Cyborg retiring B-Movie heroines, and even with all its strident silliness 'Nemesis 3 : Time lapse' remains a frantically fun, albeit terminally trashy Sci-fantasy freakshow from beloved B-Movie maestro, Albert Pyun!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Part 2, Take 2
Tito-810 November 1998
Perhaps the worst of the "Nemesis" films (and that says A LOT!), this mess features so many flashbacks to part 2 that you might as well say that you've seen them both, even if you've only endured this entry. Making matters worse are two wisecracking cyborgs who have absolutely no entertainment value. In other words, they are a perfect fit for this endlessly boring cinematic mistake.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just plain sad.
Quetzl18 June 1999
I really wanted to like this film. The second film in the series had this silly, drive in movie feel to it that was fun (of course, I was also drunk). I watched this film with the highest expectation of a similar experience of high cinematic hilarity, a-la- Mystery Science Theater 3000. I WAS WRONG!!!!! This movie is a god awful waste of film, and I LIKED THE SECOND ONE!!!! From the effeminate villain with the David Bowie fright wig, to the tacky, obnoxious female villains with laughs that could strip the paint off a garage door, this whole thing was just a painful mess. I actually felt bad for Sue Price, because the material was beneath an actress of her stature (that pretty much says it all). An awful, awful film (that's not a recommendation).
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
"Prey" for deliverance....
Mister-620 August 2000
There's something about a movie that features female bodybuilders that gets me in front of the screen every time.

I've seen "Pumping Iron II", "Aces: Iron Eagle III", "Raven Hawk", and even the TV movie "Getting Physical", which featured some big names in the sport. They were tolerable in their own ways (mostly, because they featured Rachel McLish. ROWWR!!).

Then I went and watched "Nemesis III: Prey Harder", on the sole basis that it featured such luminaries as Sue Price, Debbie Muggli, Sharon Bruneau and Ursula Sarcev. Love the ladies, always will, but after this I'm kinda glad I missed the first two "Nemesis" flicks.

Well, the first one, anyway. Most of the footage here is lifted bodily (and kicking and screaming, I would guess) from "Nemesis II". Actually, that one looked marginally entertaining from the evidence supplied here.

But even though Price and company flex and pose, they don't get much of a chance to do anything else (like, say, ACT!). In fact, this whole film is an exercise (Get it? Ha-ha...) in oblique story-telling, ambiguous characters and open-ended movie-making (in terms of filming as well as the story-line).

Nothing makes much sense but even if it did, there would still be issues - such as making such small parts for such larger-than-life women as these. What a crime.

Of course, it was written and directed by Albert Pyun, so what did you expect: cohesion?

One star only, in consideration for all the hard work that Price, Muggli, Bruneau and Sarcev obviously put into their bodies, NOT the "craft" work done within the movie itself.

Thanks, ladies.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Back without a plan
unbrokenmetal11 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Continuing directly from where part 2 ended, Alex (Sue Price) wakes up in a desert. She meets Farnsworth (Tim Thomerson), the villain from part 1, who offers help, but secretly scans her because the cyborgs from the future are still trying to find out more about her. The not very trustworthy mercenary Edson (Norbert Weisser) and the mentally deficient, but brave and loyal Johnny (Xavier Declie) join Alex in the fight against Farnsworth and the cyborgs.

The basic idea of part 3 is go back to the same locations (in Arizona) as part 2 and blow up a few more buildings. ** Spoiler** It develops no real solution to Alex' problems and simply kills everyone in the end, so she may start all over again in part 4. ** End of spoiler ** Neither the complicated structure with flashbacks within flashbacks nor the cheap, awful neon light glow effects used almost every minute make it more user-friendly. The jeeps turning into moving bubbles were totally pointless. The killer twins with white hair are an awkward attempt at the self-irony of trash movies. I watched the 4 Nemesis movies (which I watched first in the 1990s) again now in chronological order for my reviews and voted 7/7/5/5, so you easily see I was not as satisfied with part 3 as with its predecessors.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nemesis 3: Time Lapse
phubbs18 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Third times a charm right?...right?!! well no. The plot continues somehow in this weird ass sci-fi action franchise. The first film was pretty unique and turned out to be a bit of a cult, the second film turned out to be a reasonable 'Terminator/Predator' rip off which had a nice rubber suit involved.

This time Pyun makes a film virtually out of flashback material from the previous two films, yet somehow he manages to nab his muse Tim Thomerson. Continuity is good for this series of films mainly because they were all shot back to back, almost, so at least the cast sticks around. The problem is you can clearly tell this is the arse end of filming from the second film and they've made a third out of it, the leftovers.

The plot follows on from the second film naturally (back to back remember) and simply sees Alex our muscly female heroine trying to regain her memory. This is the reason most of the film is flashbacks from the last film and rather dull, other than that there are more cyborgs on her tail yet again.

The effects are extremely basic this time, embarrassingly so. In short there aren't any real effects, its all very primitive looking superimposed digitally glowing electronic lights and dreadful looking blur effects that have all been added in post-production. It looks like something a student would achieve in school frankly, it all looks so hokey and cheap. Yet on the other hand they still manage some half decent explosions and vehicle action so there was some cash to use.

I think the reason this film feels so mundane is because you merely have human looking cyborg characters running around trying to kill everyone. Its not very exciting and the characters themselves look pretty crappy costume wise, I did miss the Nebula/Predator hunter that's for sure. Pyun obviously likes sexy ladies if you haven't already guessed because the main two cyborgs are super slim fit females with trashy blonde wigs. Plus weightlifter Price gets her tight tanned ass out in the sun again with a very thin thong running between her hot buns. Was that a contractual obligation or something?

Its all very boring really this one, the worst bit about it is the fact it all looks the same in every shot, the same locations over and over. The second film was exactly the same locations wise too of course, so it really feels like a slog getting through this without the cool Nebula cyborg hunter. The only bit I quite liked was seeing Thomerson's human projection break up and seeing his real cyborg identity shine through underneath, (he's a cyborg hunter with a human image/camouflage-like shield being projected around him). Its actually a neat little idea and the effect is probably the best in the film, his robotic glowing green eyes and scan lasers looked hilariously bad but a little creepy I guess.

3.5/10
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Total Ca-Ca
jellopuke18 July 2020
This was utter garbage. Probably 30 minutes of this is reused footage from 2, the attempt at an amnesia plot is so stupid and pointless that it ruins everything they did. But then there's the AWFUL painted on effects, like someone just got final cut and found the "blur circle" feature. Drawn on glowing eyes, needless yellow glow, just total crap. I don't know if they ran out of time or money but probably half the movie is missing and the attempt to piece together what they have is terrible. AVOID THIS CRAP.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
waste of a dollar
speare29 April 2000
I got this thing off the sci-fi shelf because I remembered seeing the first of the series when I was a kid. I'd rented the second one and it was a decent "B" sci-fi. This one was out right obnoxious. The "special" effects on the cars looked like something my 4 year old cousin could have done. The two assistant female cyborgs were so terrible that I literally cringed every time they came on the screen. The plot left so much to be desired that it made me sick. I don't know what anyone was thinking when they agreed to be a part of this movie but I'm sure that they'd have done better to have left it at 2 movies. The movies in this series are going from good to decent to terrible. I only hope that no terrorist groups have access to this movie as it makes an excellent torturing device.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Aaargh!!!
Miikaj7 July 1999
Nemesis 3 is the worst movie what I have ever seen!!! I think that Nemesis 3 was only 30 minutes long. And that movie was so boo-oo-ring. When that movie ends and I saw word: NEMESIS 4... I thought I will...NOT watch that movie never again.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Yippee Skippy
DavyDissonance8 April 2019
The butch lesbian continues to run around for no apparent reason battling cyborgs to save the future or some $#!+ like it. Nemesis 3 isn't as bad as some people make it out to be. I agree that the flashback scenarios are irritating and the twin cyborgs are annoying as hell but this is still relatively decent straight to video action movie. The action sequences are pretty good with a lot of explosions, some of the cyberpunk elements are actually fairly good and Sue Price running around in her 3 foot tall muscular frame is, uuuuuh, sexy I guess if you like that feminine manly crap. Very very very very far from the best movie ever made but it's not too terrible. I've seen a lot worse I guess.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
(Tip: it's not dumb, it's just stupid.)
eminkl19 October 2019
Incomprehensible mess consisting of scenes from the last movie mixed with some of the worst effects you could ever hope for, all poorly edited to stretch over an hour and a half when it could have been 15 minutes. Nevertheless, if you are monotonizing their lines in gigantic female bodybuilders and bending their powerful buttocks, this may be your film! Now available is a MIND-BLOWING TWIST! (Tip: it's not dumb, it's just stupid.)
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Why why why but why?!
cederick-forsberg26 January 2010
This is going to be my first review on IMDb and I'm glad that the standard rating is 1 out of 10 because then I don't have to change anything...

First there are awful movies. Movies you can make a laughter out of, like Island City, Battlefield Earth or Conan The Destroyer. That is totally acceptable. They makes a great party enhancer. Then there are the worst movie ever. I cannot believe how utterly crappy this steaming pile of dog turd was.

I found it on a second hand store on VHS and bought it quickly because I like sci-fi, Terminator, post-apocalypse and stuff like that. Everything on the box art was very promising. Then I loaded in the tape quickly when I got home and the first thing that I noticed was... WHAT? There was maybe 10 minutes (or more) of switching between present clips and flashbacks in a very annoying blue effect, with sounds that makes you puke. And it just continues over and over. Then some "acting" kicks in and you wonder why you were ever born in a world, where this abomination of mankind actually exists... And then I realized, THERE ARE ACTUALLY TWO PREQUELS. I didn't think about it first, but the title says "3" in it... And I was horrified. But as I actually in great pain and agony watch it to the end, I thought nothing could ever make me feel worse about myself and this universe... But then a little text showed up saying... "Next..." and... NEMESIS 4?!?!?! NO PLEASE NO!!!!!!!!
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed