Immagine non disponibile
Colore:
-
-
-
- Ci dispiace. Questo articolo non è disponibile in
- Immagine non disponibile
- Per visualizzare questo video scarica Flash Player
Man In An Orange Shirt: The Complete Series [Edizione: Regno Unito]
Tutte le versioni DVD | Edizione | Dischi | Prezzo Amazon | Nuovo a partire da | Usato da |
DVD
18 settembre 2017 "Ti preghiamo di riprovare" | — | 1 | 21,70 € | 21,70 € | — |
DVD
6 giugno 2018 "Ti preghiamo di riprovare" | — | 1 | 33,41 € | — |
Formato | PAL |
Collaboratore | Tommy Bastow, Phil Dunster, Michael Samuels, David Gyasi, Vanessa Redgrave, Julian Morris |
Lingua | Inglese |
Numero di dischi | 1 |
Tempo di esecuzione | 2 ore |
Spesso comprati insieme
I clienti che hanno visto questo articolo hanno visto anche
Descrizione prodotto
This captivating drama from the makers of Broadchurch and Apple Tree Yard explores forbidden wartime love vividly contrasted with a present-day romance nearly derailed by the consequences of the 1940s tale with which it is so intertwined. Written by best-selling author Patrick Gale, Man in an Orange Shirt features an exciting cast of outstanding young stars alongside Oscar winner Vanessa Redgrave.
Southern Italy, 1944: As chaos reigns all around them, British Army Captain Michael Berryman meets war artist Thomas March. Despite having a young fiancée, Flora, straight-laced Michael finds himself falling for Thomas' bohemian charms; their relationship, however, is made impossible by societal pressures.
2017: In a more accepting world, an ageing Flora looks on as her grandson Adam tentatively forms a relationship with his client Steve. But while the external obstacles have fallen away, a minefield of internalised issues and dangerous temptations still line the road to happiness...
Dettagli prodotto
- Fuori produzione : No
- Età consigliata : Adatto per 12 anni e più
- Lingua : Inglese
- Dimensioni del collo : 18 x 13,8 x 1,5 cm; 83 grammi
- Regista : Michael Samuels
- Formato supporto : PAL
- Tempo di esecuzione : 2 ore
- Data d'uscita : 18 settembre 2017
- Attori : Vanessa Redgrave, Julian Morris, David Gyasi, Tommy Bastow, Phil Dunster
- Studio : Network
- Garanzia e recesso: Se vuoi restituire un prodotto entro 30 giorni dal ricevimento perché hai cambiato idea, consulta la nostra pagina d'aiuto sul Diritto di Recesso. Se hai ricevuto un prodotto difettoso o danneggiato consulta la nostra pagina d'aiuto sulla Garanzia Legale. Per informazioni specifiche sugli acquisti effettuati su Marketplace consulta la nostra pagina d'aiuto su Resi e rimborsi per articoli Marketplace.
- ASIN : B071L3Y9RL
- Numero di dischi : 1
- Posizione nella classifica Bestseller di Amazon: n. 36,195 in Film e TV (Visualizza i Top 100 nella categoria Film e TV)
- n. 3,569 in Serie TV
- n. 7,172 in Commedie (Film e TV)
- Recensioni dei clienti:
Recensioni clienti
Le recensioni dei clienti, comprese le valutazioni a stelle dei prodotti, aiutano i clienti ad avere maggiori informazioni sul prodotto e a decidere se è il prodotto giusto per loro.
Per calcolare la valutazione complessiva e la ripartizione percentuale per stella, non usiamo una media semplice. Piuttosto, il nostro sistema considera cose come quanto è recente una recensione e se il recensore ha acquistato l'articolo su Amazon. Ha inoltre analizzato le recensioni per verificarne l'affidabilità.
Maggiori informazioni su come funzionano le recensioni dei clienti su Amazon-
Migliori recensioni
Recensioni migliori da Italia
Al momento, si è verificato un problema durante il filtraggio delle recensioni. Riprova più tardi.
i due protagonisti della prima parte sono bravi
la nonna è perfetta, il nipote tenero....
in complesso lo consiglio, è un autentico film d'autore
Una storia ben scritta: una rievocazione romantica di un amore proibito è il parallelismo con la nascita di un sentimento nei giorni odierni
Attori molto bravi
Vanessa Redgrave magnifica
Da vedere assolutamente
Le recensioni migliori da altri paesi
This is a deeply haunting and exquisitely beautiful film, well cast, slickly produced, achingly moving, and far above the usual television fare. I saw the original British version and quite fell in love with it. It is, I believe, arguably, a better film than either CALL ME BY YOUR NAME or GOD'S OWN COUNTRY (although I do love those). In fact, I loved it so much that I bought the original British DVD since I have a multi region player. I've probably watched the original British cut at least 15 times. When it aired on PBS I knew the film so well that I noticed that some dialog was missing from PBS's version. Since other reviews have dealt with the plot and story, I will not go into that here but will give you the lowdown about the cuts in the PBS version presented on this blu-ray product.
In order to compare the two versions, I set up two monitors and two players side by side. One ran the PBS version as aired, and the other monitor ran the original British DVD, both in sync so that I could spot EXACTLY what was missing. Below is a summary of my findings. I wish that I could list all 44 cuts with explanations of each, but I'm sure a review that lengthy is not allowed here, so I will summarize with selected examples. (Be aware of possible SPOILERS. Time numbers are approximate and are based on the British DVD running time-- your counter may not show the same).
The BAD NEWS is that there are at least 44 cuts or alterations made by PBS (I counted 44, but some could be counted as two). This speaks horribly of PBS's respect for their audience. The film aired on PBS in a full two-hour time slot so *no edits were necessary due to time constraints* since the original full version of the film falls well short of two hours anyway. Thus, it was NOT necessary to cut the film for time.
The GOOD NEWS is that most of the cuts, while maddening to say the least, are minor and are not substantive to character, story, or understanding/enjoyment of the film. So this blu-ray, although cut, is not necessarily a bad choice unless you are really a purist.
[Note: The original British version contains several "rear" shots of bare behinds. PBS has cut these (or, in one case, darkened the picture so much that it cannot really be seen). Apparently PBS thinks adult Americans cannot handle a bare behind. ]
Here are just a few selected examples of the more "minor" cuts:
Cut #1 - (1:39) ) During the chaotic battle scene Michael shouts to another soldier, "Aim at the olive groves until the others get through to relieve us!" This line was cut by PBS (why?? what possible reason could there be to cut this?) CONCLUSION: a maddening cut, but NOT substantive to the scene or program
Cut #5 - (10:22) When Lucien steps out of his shop to meet Michael on the street, in the original Lucien says, "I'm Lucien-- landlord, watchdog, purveyor of shade to the gentry. Who are you?" PBS cut this so that Lucien merely says, "I'm Lucien. Who are you?" (does PBS think we don't know what "gentry" is? also lost is Lucien calling himself "watchdog" which he later proves as he looks out for Thomas in prison by meeting Michael at the pub and again when he picks up Thomas upon Thomas' release from prison. Also lost is the fact that Lucien is the landlord. Why cut this??). CONCLUSION: an amazingly stupid cut but NOT essential information.
Cut#14. (42:15) Mrs. March (Thomas' mother) remarks to Michael about Thomas' beard: "His father did that [ie, grew a beard] once for Ibsen. Does it suit him?" PBS cut the Ibsen line, which told us that Thomas' father was evidently an actor. CONCLUSION: not crucial information, so NOT substantive to the overall understanding of the scene (yet why oh WHY cut this??)
Cuts #18 & 19 (54:00-55:06) PBS cut several shots of the department store employee looking across the room at Michael and making flirtatious eye contact. This is not substantive to the overall scene, as we still understand what is happening, yet it is maddening to think that PBS thinks that a bit of understated same-sex flirting is too much for adult American audiences to handle. (!!) And, yes I have to say it in this instance--- one cannot help but wonder if these cuts would have been made had the participants been male and female.
And here are some examples of the more IMPORTANT things which PBS cut:
Cut #4 (9:35) - After the war, when Michael gets off the bus in London, cut by PBS was a significant approx. 5 second shot of postwar heterosexual couples on the street openly hugging and kissing as they are reunited (as Michael steps down from the bus and studies his street directions for a moment). CONCLUSION: THIS IS A substantive change because the idea behind this shot is that post-war HETEROsexual public displays of affection were permitted, encouraged, and condoned--right on the sidewalk. In contrast, Michael has to reunite with Thomas in a dingy, dark upstairs storage room (Lucien's upstairs) and then flee to the country in order to express affection.
Cut#15 - (49:04) After Flora's sister tells her that she saw Michael with a suitcase and Flora calls his work and says "Oh, his wretched teeth. How stupid of me to have forgotten", PBS cut the rest of this scene, almost 30 seconds (!!) in which baby Robert continues to scream in his playpen and Flora screams back at him angrily and goes over and shakes the playpen up and down violently with Robert in it. Then, realizing what she's done, she picks Robert up in her arms and sobs, "I'm sorry, I'm sorry". CONCLUSION: This is substantive for several reasons, not the least of which is that it links importantly with a scene in part two when, at the dinner table, Flora implies to Adam that she was a bad mother to his father (Robert), but got a second chance with him (Adam).
Cut#16 - (51:30) PBS cut an approximately 20 second scene in which Michael comes home (after failing to meet Thomas upon his release from prison) and Michael tenderly and lovingly greets baby Robert, squatting down to Robert's playpen level and gently caressing his head. CONCLUSION: THIS IS SUBSTANTIVE for it answers Flora's previous angry question "Are you even safe around children?" and it is ALSO important as Michael's loving way with the baby contrasts sharply with Flora's angry and abusive shaking of the playpen (see 15. above), also cut by PBS.
Cut#25 - (12:06) Cut was this important dialog relative to character:
Adam (showing nude phone photo to Claudia): "Is that the [...] of a serial killer?"
Claudia: "This is so not okay. You're leaving a table of friends just to
[...] a complete stranger!"
This is a SIGNIFICANT cut as this is a major thesis statement of Adam's character!
Cut #39 - PBS Cut Adam saying to Steve: "Flora's SO not a granny". This is important for us to see how adam views Flora, especially in light of their violent words in a later scene
Cut#44 - Cut 25 second conversation between Adam and Steve. Adam asks: "Could you ever imagine having kids with me?" and they discuss it. This is important as it shows that Adam has been thinking about settling down from his hook-up lifestyle and it is this thinking that makes his ending resolution with Steve plausible.
Those are just a few selected examples. So, yes, there were some important things cut, but nothing that was absolutely crucial to one's understanding of the program as a whole. If you have a multi-region DVD player, I would encourage you to just buy the DVD from Amazon in Britian in order to get the uncut version, unless you have a large screen and really need the increased resolution of blu-ray (unfortunately, at this writing, there is no British blu-ray) . If you need the resolution of blu-ray go ahead and buy this version. The cuts are absolutely maddening, and are a real insult to PBS's audience; but they are mostly snippy, and are overall not significant enough to impede your enjoyment or understanding of this beautiful film. Yet, finally, one must still exclaim, "Shame, shame on PBS!" They could at least have released the original version on the blu-ray, if not on-air!
Many people have slated part 2 but I think they are missing the point. This series was made in 2017 as part of the BBC2 season to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the decriminalisation of homosexuality in 1967.
Part 1 depicts a doomed relationship post world war 2 because society would not accept two gay men together. The result is they are both unhappy , as is the wife of one .
Part 2 also shows doomed relationships initially via app dating, and despite a modern lifestyle for the gay protagonist, a lack of acceptance from a deeply conservative grandmother whose own homophobia was caused by the 1st story - and a lack of acceptance then of gay relationships. That homophobia forced a gay man to marry her, despite her loving him deeply.
Despite the saccharine happy ending, given what we know about the lifestyles of the lead characters , the narrative highly suggests the relationship is unlikely to last. Gay men have still not found true love and that despite a huge change in society in terms of acceptance, unhappiness remains .
“The trouble with open relationships is that they don’t end in a satisfying plate-smashing row. They just become about coffee beans and cat litter.”
Dettagli sulla conformità del prodotto
Vedi i dettagli di conformità per questo prodotto(Persona responsabile dell'UE).