Talk:Isabella I of Castile

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconVital articles C‑class(Level 4)
WikiProject iconIsabella I of Castile has been listed as a level-4 vital article in People. If you can improve it, please do.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Red flags[edit]

If the information and content of this article are of the same standard as the wording of the introduction ("brought down the crime rate" is not a sentence one can use about a 15th century monarch's government - there were no "crime rate" statistics in the 15th century, that is something that can be said about 20th or 21st century American presidents; and "by Catholic church in 1974" without article; etc. etc.) this whole article is in need of serious attention from a scholar.! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.81.74.177 (talk) 08:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requested move 1 October 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. Interstellarity (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2020 (UTC) Interstellarity (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]



– Article titles are titled based on their titled in reliable sources. There is hardly a reliable source that uses the current title. I think the last two are primary topics because this queen seems to most influential out of all the queens listed in the two disambiguation pages. Interstellarity (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Oppose. There are at least two books with "Isabel I of Castile" in the title here and here and one with "Isabella I of Castile" here. Srnec (talk) 22:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose. Greatly reduces recognizability. "Isabella of Castile" you might get away with, but not "Isabella I" alone, which is insufficient. You hardly find her referred to as that. And Queen Isabellas are far too many for you to claim this to be overwhelmingly the primary topic. Not least of which WP:SOVEREIGN guidelines request you do not remove country when there is more than one monarch of that name. Walrasiad (talk) 03:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose Her name was Isabel, not Isabella. Mztourist (talk) 05:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose. No evidence of primary topic. Numerous other queens and people from Spain called Isabella/Isabel. DrKay (talk) 08:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose this continuing seeming campaign to eliminate the Name # of country style. GoodDay (talk) 13:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose per opposers. Johnbod (talk) 16:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Later Years[edit]

the first sentence under the Later Years heading is an incomplete sentence.: "Isabella was given the title of Catholic Monarch by Pope Alexander VI, whose behavior and involvement in matters Isabella did not approve of." 69.61.224.68 (talk) 01:52, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]