Fatal Lessons: The Good Teacher (TV Movie 2004) - Fatal Lessons: The Good Teacher (TV Movie 2004) - User Reviews - IMDb
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Never trust a school teacher with bleached hair who dresses inappropriately - 1 x spoiler
petershelleyau26 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This made for TV movie is a mix of serial killer and other woman genres, that doesn't feature too many stupidities. (The biggest one is probably naming a character Samantha Stephens, as in Bewitched). The narrative doesn't supply much back-story or psychological motivation for the actions of the predator (and her spider-web stockings are a bit much), but then it doesn't make what she aspires to that attractive either - bland domesticity which "grows old". Also the notion of her writing a book of her story as she experiences it suggests that she wants to be caught, because her readership necessitates infamy, with the voice-activated word processor being a nice touch. Erika Eleniak is an acceptable villain, but she can't elevate the role into greatness. Whilst Patricia Kalember provides some tiny moments of pleasure within the confines of her role as doormat housewife, the best performance comes from Lori Triolo, who does wonders with a minor part and thankfully isn't punished. However, the climactic struggle to the death is too stunt-double obvious, with a denouement that is totally unbelievable.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Teacher's Pet
JasonDanielBaker5 February 2015
Gold digging poisoner/femme fatale extraordinaire Victoria (Erika Eleniak) is fresh from her last caper and eying a new one. She adopts a new identity and takes a job in a small town as a schoolteacher.

Quickly she targets a wealthy young couple with two children, one of whom is a pupil of hers. She becomes best friends with the wife and her gullible husband and continues to weasel her way into their lives stealthily threatening all that they hold dear. They come to find that the truth about Victoria is much darker than they ever could have imagined but it might be too late.

Eleniak was Playboy magazine's Miss July for 1989. Often people define her by that title only. But she is arguably the very best of Playboy Playmates turned Hollywood actresses. In fact she was an actress (Child star) before she ever posed for Playboy. That was her in E.T. getting kissed by Elliott in the classroom scene. In feature film roles like Under Siege and Chasers she was more than passable. In this one however she bit off way more than she could chew and it comes off like a bad caricature.

Ex-TV star Patricia Kalember (Thirtysomething) is not very convincing in her role as the wife/heroine. She does not play the role as the classic passive victim we are used to seeing in movies. Her own pro-activeness actually gets her into trouble and allows her to shape the plot.

But she seems to look down upon the material here as well as the production itself. I do not just find her unconvincing as the character she plays. I actually think her distaste for the work she has settled for in this drek comes through despite whatever professional face she may have put on during shooting. She looks like she knows this one was headed direct to video or cable. Could she have known where it really did end up? Specifically, it is being marketed as a discount item for sale in dollar stores by an outfit known as Direct Source Special Products. Can you guess what price it commands? This looks like a TV movie and plays much like any movie of the week has but particularly like the not very good ones. It gives you some idea of why TV movies of the week are looked down on by audiences and often snubbed by actors who are offered roles in them.

The controversial subject matter designed to win over audiences is another one of those Hollywood thriller clichés. Eleniak's character is to teachers here what Glenn Close was to mistresses in Fatal Attraction.

As in other movies made for the small screen much of what is shown is sanitized, the supporting characters are played by no-name actors and the location is British Columbia doubling for the American Pacific Northwest. Casting was actually key in producing the dud that this turned out to be. The no-name actors in supporting roles are no-names for a reason. A non-descript guy portraying a Floridian victim of the title temptress spouts off his lines with an unmistakable Canadian accent.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
With friends like this who needs enemies
marbleann31 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
And I don't mean the villain . This is a movie about a woman who all of a sudden befriends her daughters teacher. The new friend has a "I can't stand to see a family happy complex". So of course she goes out to destroy her family. This movie really bothered me because we have to suspend belief. We have to believe a wife of a doctor a fairly intelligent woman is going to not know something is very wrong with her new friend when things start happening right after she meets her. You see this new friend has a special tea she concocted and gave it to the Patricia Kalember character. This tea makes people forget things that they are suppose to do. So now we have this seemingly smart women forgetting all types of things and acting weird. But not only that she gives her family poison for dinner. Her hubby who before that seems like a blithering idiot decides to test the salad and finds poison is in it. Instead of sending her straight to get some counseling he takes a trip. Oh and the family dog ends up dead. But the most ridiculous thing about this flick is that instead of connecting the dots to the new friend she connects it to her trusty best friend. Even after her husband said her best friend would not do anything to her. They evidently have been best friends for years so all of a sudden the best friend is going to do terrible things to her including having a affair with her husband for no reason. Then she believes this strange man who knows about her new friends past but when he tells her he doesn't really know about her best friend she thinks that he is talking about her real best friend! Mind you the real best friend and her have not been talking now for a while. Or and of course the sociopath writes everything down. So we know sooner or later it is going to be read. The end is very predictable. She soon figures out that the new best friend is a nut it is very anti-climatic because she has read the plans her friend had wrote down. When she finally goes and apologizes to her real friend the friend accepts her apology. I am all for forgiveness but this women all through the movie disregarded her friendship with her best friend even against protests from her husband and let a newbie come in and take over. I would of told her forget about it because I would be weary of what would happen next time she met a new friend. THe actors do what they can with the script. But like I said one has to suspend belief to really feel any suspense, which is OK as long as the movie is Science Fiction, which this is not. I had no sympathy for the so called victim because of how she was so ready to blame everything on a long time trusted friend. I actually was rooting for the villain. Oh and why didn't anyone else in that family drink that ice tea? It was right in the refrigerator.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I rooted for the dog
guil1214 October 2009
I didn't even watch this whole film which may or may not be fair judgment. But when it started out with my least favorite actress in the lead, Erika Eleniak, I knew it would be awful. I have never liked this actress in all that she's done and am amazed her career still exists. She's God-awful. And to top it off she plays a bitch. When you saw the doom of the cute dog, you knew the predictable would happen. Why do writers always kill the loving pets? Is it because we love animals more than people? But rest assure Casey T Mitchell, the author, kills the dog first off. Thanks Mitchell for your bad taste. Then there's Patricia Kalember and Ken Tremblett as the parents and victims of the bitch. And of course, like all LMN victims, they are clueless, even when they are forewarned. Again I ask why are victims so stupid in figuring things out? Mitchell doesn't disappoint me. He makes them so stupid you already figure the ending out. And I also picked the next victim. Now mind you, I didn't see the rest of this crap, but I'll bet the neighbor was next. Am I right? Lori Ann Triolo appeared briefly in the beginning before I switched channels. But I'll bet she got done in.

Michael Scott directed this boring piece of crap. Beware this Erika Eleniak. She's terrible in all she does.
12 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not that bad.. + spoilers
alin0018 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
FATAL LESSONS: THE GOOD TEACHER: Samantha Stephens and her unsuspecting family befriend a school teacher, Victoria, and suddenly a series of incidents occur, including mysterious phone calls, missing household items and strange family illnesses. Now Samantha must prevent Victoria from repeating her deadly actions of the past to save her family's future. Stars Patricia Kalember (Signs, Thirtysomething), Erika Eleniak (Baywatch, The Librarians, Betrayal) and Ken Tremblett (The Guilty, Tourist Trap, First Shot).

Well the movie isn't that bad. If you don't have nothing good to watch, it's worth giving it a try. Patricia Kalembar must save her family from falling apart and all ends well..

6/10
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Odd Thing About Serial Killer Movies . . .
Putzberger4 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
. . . is that you often end up cheering for the villain. (Well, at least I do.) "The Good Teacher" is no exception. What makes it mildly interesting is that as the killer's psychosis is presented as a fait accompli -- from her first scenes, the audience knows she's a predatory lunatic and the film's mildest suspense and dramatic irony is generated by how long it takes for the intended victims to figure it out. However, the psycho, as played by Erica Eleniak, is so brittle and blatantly manipulative that the rest of the characters have to be thoroughgoing dimwits to figure it out. And Jesus, they are -- every stalker should have such clueless prey. The good doctor, his devoted wife and cute children (the boy who plays the pre-teen son may be the worst child actor in history) are so damn gullible you start to think they deserve their impending doom. Erica Eleniak isn't great, but she's at least entertaining, especially in a semi-comic episode where she picks up a loser in a bar and takes him back to her hotel room for a little "rough sex" that gets a little too rough. The rest of the cast seems pretty zombified, except for the too-smart neighbor and a cute dog that, of course, meets an unfortunate end (why do the makers of these movies hate animals so much?). Mild, mindless entertainment that's almost as much fun to ridicule as it is to watch.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Time For Your Injection...
azathothpwiggins15 November 2021
FATAL LESSONS: THE GOOD TEACHER is a good made-for-TV thriller. Erika Eleniak plays the homicidal teacher, Victoria Paige, insinuating herself into a typical suburban family in order to destroy them. Said family consists of Dr. Dad, Nurse Mum, the kids, and their loveable dog.

Victoria gets to work right away, undermining the cutesy clan by isolating mum, etc. Vicky also uses her arcane knowledge of all things herbal / pharmacological to facilitate her eeevil agenda. She can incapacitate as well as kill.

If you enjoy movies about psychotic women on a sinister rampage, then look no further! Ms. Eleniak has never been better, except perhaps when she popped out of that cake in UNDER SIEGE!...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
still God awful
geoffox-766-41846715 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I vote zero for this trite. And not only for the writing but for the choice of performers. I have always disliked Erika Elaina (whatever) in anything. She comes off like a bimbo from Playboy magazine.

Here she attempts to be a killer and a teacher pulling the wool over everybody else in the movie. The worse being the stupidity of the wife. She gets drugged and doesn't know it. She get's stepped on keeping her away from a trip of which bitch Erika takes her place. She has things stolen from her making her seem out in space. She almost stabs her husband. You want her to go away.

Whenever anything goes wrong with wifey, she runs to the teacher who is obviously out to kill her. The husband doesn't have a clue and quick to blame wifey. I think the actress playing the wife is good but the lines she is given are ridiculous. The neighbor gets blamed for everything and wifey is quick to accuse because the teacher, a stranger, tells her so.

I don't see how money can be spent for this trite and a performance by a no-talent actress as Erika. I only hope I never have to see her on screen again.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good Fun. Surprising Performance.
jamieraywright21 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed this film. I had not seen Erica Eleniak in any particular role since "Under Siege." And I had never seen her in a leading role. She did a good job as a scary villain -- probably had a lot of fun doing it. Good on ya, Erica!" The rest of the cast was lack-luster -- even dowdy. They did not seem as glamorous as Erica. I wonder if this was an artistic decision by the director or the actors. I assume that this film was done for the television, video, and overseas market. One also wonders what someone watching late night TV in some foreign country would think of the film. This said, the film wasn't bad, for what it is.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
No-one could be this dumb
plkent6728 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of those movies you force yourself to watch till the end hoping it will get better. It never does.

We are expected to believe that a reasonably intelligent woman suddenly mistrusts her best friend of several years and blindly follows a total strangers lies. Seems like the only smart one in the family is the dog; to bad he gets killed off in the very beginning. As usual in movies like this one, doctor hubby thinks wife is going crazy. But that doesn't stop him from going on a trip at the most crucial time. Ending is your typical victim discovers the truth and has to save the family.

If you have nothing better to do, go ahead and watch it. But don't say I didn't warn you when you get to the end and say "you've got to be kidding me!"
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed