Egon Schiele: Tod und Mädchen (2016) - Egon Schiele: Tod und Mädchen (2016) - User Reviews - IMDb
Egon Schiele: Tod und Mädchen (2016) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A lot was done right here
Horst_In_Translation23 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Egon Schiele: Tod und Mädchen" is a co-production between Germany and Luxembourg that resulted in a 110-minute German language movie from this year (2016). The director and co-writer is Austrian filmmaker Dieter Berner and with the script he got a nice deal of help from prolific Austrian actress Hilde Berger. I mentioned the Austrian impact several times already and this also impact also results in the language in here being Austrian German, a dialect of standard German and I as a German had occasionally difficulties to understand all the dialogues. But it is not so bad that you need subtitles either. There are also very brief inclusions of French language for example and you also won't need subtitles for these parts either. This is the story of Egon Schiele, a successful Austrian artist early in the 20th century. Despite his untimely death under the age of 30, his name is still known to many today, especially those with an interest in the world of painters. The title character is played by actor Noah Saavedra in what is easily his career-defining performance so far. He played a very small part in the latest James Bond movie "Spectre" as well. But in this movie we have here he is in basically every scene from start to finish.

The title could also be "Egon and his women" as the movie is packed with young attractive females crossing Schiele's professional (and inevitably also his personal) path. These would be Moa, Edith, Wally, Gerti, Adele and others and the good thing is that despite this quantity of women, all of them have their very individual strengths in which ways they add to the film. If there is any suspense in this film, then it is which of these women actually married Schiele eventually and she is also the one that died right next to him as we find out right at the beginning. One of the film's strengths is that it is a biopic. It is based on real events and real characters. Of course, parts were added for dramatization purposes I am sure, but this is not a problem at all. I am sure the crucial elements, such as the child abuse trial, are all based on facts. The film needed a little while to really start becoming interesting, but this may be just my personal bias as I have little to no interest in the world of painters. But it is even more impressive that Berner managed a film that still entertained me well, probably because the focus is on Schiele's personal life and yet it still never loses the professional life from the plot. It succeeds in both areas and the filmmaker nicely walked the fine line here. It is not so personal that it could have been about everybody and it is not so artistic that it really just would have been for art lovers. Really well done. More impressively, the film comes close to the two-hour mark and it almost flew by in my opinion. Yes none of the performances (including the lead) were majorly impressive, but they all were also fairly decent. Maybe Maresi Riegner was the best from the bunch. And there was even one really touching moment, namely when we find out about Wally's death (strangely not about his wife's death, which is not half as touching). The title is also a good reference, not just in terms of Schiele's most known work, but also in terms of the two different times when the film plays. All in all, this is one of the best period pieces from 2016 I have seen so far, maybe even the best. I was certainly positively surprised with this one and I found it clearly superior to the much older film starring Mathieu Carrière as Schiele. This 2016 movie is absolutely worth checking out, even for people with little interest in art and painters like myself, or maybe especially for those. One final note: I think they missed the perfect opportunity here to give us the ending credits the moment when we see Schiele dead, but that's just a minor criticism. The very brief epilogue afterward was unnecessary and did not add anything really.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a sketch
Kirpianuscus2 February 2019
Precise, powerful, delicate. Egon Schiele and the women of his life. Admirable performance of Noah Saavedra, flavors of Austria of Belle Epoque, wise use of biographic details. Could it be better ? Off course ! But, in the case of Schiele, it is difficult or too subjective to define this better. The film has the precious gift to be a correct one. A good invitation to discover the fascinating universe of the art of Egon Schiele. A sketch, maybe, but, obvious, an inspired one, reflecting care and science and admiration for the great artist. Not a story about a genius but portrait of an exceptional young man and his reflections of emotions in a special, profound special art. So, a beautiful sketch.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautiful, erotic, sad, and poetic
antoniatejedabarros1 November 2018
I've always been in love with Egon Schiele's work. He's probably my favourite painter. So, I was a bit skeptical about this film. But I loved it! The cinematography is beautiful, the performances are great (especially Noah Saavedra, Maresi Riegner, and Valerie Pachner), and the music is sublime. Egon produced in his short life around 300 canvases and around 2,000 water colours and drawings. And they are all amazing. I would have preferred a bit more about the paintings and less of the women, but overall, it's a wonderful film. Egon Schiele: Tod und Mädchen is a beautiful, erotic, sad, and poetic film. A real gem. 10/10
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
the artist deserved a more interesting film
dromasca16 February 2018
Despite being quite a popular and well established genre, biographical films about artists succeed quite seldom to become consistent works of art by themselves. In many cases they deal with personalities whose art and biographies are reasonably or well known to the audiences. The personalities of the artists, the environment they lived within, their relations with the society and the personal lives, in some cases controversial are good material, but the script writers, directors and actors have to match their cinematic work with the expectations, have to bring enough new elements to make the films interesting and above all have a formidable competitor for their films in the art created by the heroes of their stories. Austrian director Dieter Berner's tentative with "Egon Schiele: Death and the Maiden" (or "Egon Schiele: Tod und Mädchen" in German) is a good exemplification of a diligent tentative that does not succeed to avoid all the traps and surface above the crowd.

Egon Schiele was one of the lead artists in the period of art flourishing at the beginning of the 20th century in Austria. While post-Impressionism, Fauvism and Cubism was changing in a revolutionary manner the history of art in France, and while German artists were building the foundations of Expressionism and Abstract art, their Austrian colleagues of generation were shattering the bourgeois establishment with a more subtle and subversive approach. Certainly, the works of Klimt and Schiele were defining new aesthetic codes, but their attack on the conservative art was coming mostly on the moral grounds. In the decadent atmosphere of the end of the empire, they were living a free and amoral life according to the codes of their time, and this was reflected openly in their art. Egon Klimt, whose last eight years of his short life are described in the film, lived in a passionate but also deeply anxious manner. Had death not cut short his life (he died in the terrible flu epidemic in the last month of the war) he may have joined the expressionist current, and maybe become a great anti-war artist such as Otto Dix.

Unfortunately, little of the torments of the artist are translated to screen in "Egon Schiele: Death and the Maiden". We are served with a quite documented biographical film, which is as much as I can judge close and true to the facts that we know about his life. The focus of the script and of the film director was directed to the historical details and the sentimental life of the painter. There is too little in the film that can explain the psychological shock that one feels when looking at the paintings and drawings of Schiele, the deep mute shout that comes from the lines, the forms, the expressions of the people (mostly women) that he painted. The team of artists (Noah Saavedra, Maresi Riegner, Valerie Pachner) is very well selected, and their acting reveals a little more than the script does, but this is still enough. Director Dieter Berner succeeded to make a rather conventional film about a provoking artist.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
a diligent but anodyne biopic
lasttimeisaw22 November 2017
A biopic of Austrian painter Egon Schiele (1890-1918), what instantaneously catches our eyes is the pulchritude of its leading actor Noah Saavedra, whose Adonis appearance becomes almost too distracting for the movie's own good, but it shouldn't take the credit away from Saavedra's immersed embodiment of the ill-reputed expressionist, who leaves a vast legacy to this world after his own ephemeral and turbulent life.

After opening the picture with a frenzied sequence of some sort of familial turmoil and envisaging a moribund Schiele smitten with the Spanish flu pandemic in his last days, director Dieter Berner discerningly unspools Schiele's final decade chronologically through the relations with his models: from his underage sister Gerti (Riegner), with whom he forms an intimate bond teetering on the brink of incest, to a tableau-vivant performer Moa (Breidbach), then his bona-fide muse Wally Neuzil (Pachner), whom he first encounters in the studio of his mentor Klimt (Obonya), until his ill- matched bourgeois wife Edith Harms (Marie Jung), only to coyly divulge Schiele's feckless penchant towards his conquests, chiefly for the sake of artistic inspiration and utilitarian purpose, art first, women second, seems a fitting watchword for him.

It is Egon and Wally's romantic liaison highlights the narrative, and a sylph-like Valerie Pachner gives her best in projecting Wally's emotional gamut out of their artist-and-muse equilibrium, in particular during Schiele's scandalous trial of pornography and pedophilia (another taboo topic subjected to an ambiguous brush), her conflicted reaction stays with audience longer than the artist's outrage of witnessing one of his paintings being torched. But Berner ultimately sweetens the pill of their fallout, which prompts the name-change of the film's titular painting, out of the reverence to Egon's posthumous fame.

As picturesque as a painter's biopic could ever be, Berner's diligent but anodyne work doesn't pack a substantial punch which would be in concordance with his subject's singularities, especially that unique characteristic stemming from his licentious, tempestuous persona, still eludes us after him shuffling off this mortal coil.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Pretty boy and girls
killercharm1 August 2020
Biopic of expressionist artist Egon Schiele. It's a little artsy (!) but all in all pretty good. What exquisite bodies the two females who play his main models are endowed with. The movie tells his story with a good flow; it makes me want to read up on his life.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bland portrait of Egon Schiele, very good portrayal of his time
Sonique152 June 2021
It is always complicated to convey the essence of a great artist through cinema or TV.

This film is simple and delicate. The main actor is very intense and does a wonderful job in portraying Egon Schiele. All of the actors are very good, really. Unfortunately, their performances are not enough to elevate the film much above mediocrity. However, if the author fails to catch the true spirit of such an extraordinary and revolutionary genius, he succeeds in depicting the profound sense of melancholy and sadness, uncertainty and disenchantment that permeated Europe throughout First World War.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worthwhile
skepticskeptical5 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I find this depiction of the life of Egon Schiele quite interesting, both in terms of the development of his oeuvre and the historical times. I did not know that much about this artist until I spent five weeks in Vienna, where he is heralded as something of a local star at some of the museums. How sad that he should have succumbed to the Spanish Flu at such an early age.

I suppose that he could not comport himself in the same way today (sleeping with young models, even, apparently, his sister?) without being boycotted by the reigning morality brigade, but my preference is to consider artists' work without too much attention to whether they were "good" people. Using that as a criterion would simply eliminate just about any creator from serious consideration. Schiele's work is definitely interesting--whatever his moral principles may have been.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed