Captain America - Civil War

Impossibile caricare il contenuto multimediale.

Un piccolo punto di rottura nella casa Marvel che porterà a questa battaglia "Amichevole" ma sempre spettacolare con l'arrivo di nuovi protagonisti che si uniranno agli AVENGERS per la più grande battaglia mai vista. Perla importante di questo mondo da vedere assolutamente.

Eccezionale Terzo Capitolo di Capitan America ... oppure era il Terzo Capitolo di Avengers? - Edizione SteelBook

Recensito in Italia 🇮🇹 il 26 settembre 2016

Altra grande film della Marvel, non solo spettacolare, divertente e convincente ma anche con un messaggio che lascia riflettere "Quello che facciamo per proteggerci è esso stesso la minaccia più grande che può colpirci?"

Comunque lasciamo stare il film visto che di recensioni ce ne sono abbastanza e non sarà questa a far pendere l'ago della bilancia da un parte o dall'altra.

Veniamo invece a descrivere l'aspetto tecnico ed il confezionamento.

Il comparto video è perfetto; il film è stato registrato interamente in digitale e non si notano difetti rilevanti; le immagini hanno sempre una colorimetria di altissimo livello e una fluidità adeguata e realistica.
Peccato che la scelta del formato video ricada ancora su un 16/9 con rapporto a 2.39:1 e non a 1:85:1; il risultato è la presenza delle fastidiose bande nere in testa ed in coda alla TV.

Il comparto audio stavolta, anche inaspettatamente, è di ottimo livello grazie un DTS 5,1 che funziona molto bene. I dialoghi sono ben integrati con la colonna sonora, ed i rumori di sottofondo.L'audio è armonizzato in tutte le sue componenti, cosa che non accade molto spesso.
Certo sarebbe stata auspicabile finalmente una traccia HD come quella inglese, ma in mancanza di questa stavolta possiamo accontentarci (basta pensare ad Avengers 2 una vera delusione dal punto di vista sonoro).Leggermente bassa la traccia di registrazione anche se ben definita.

Venendo invece al confezionamento, la Versione in SteelBook è sicuramente da collezionisti; un artwork puro fronte,retro e all'interno, senza scritte inutili che sporcano la cover; no vado pazzo per le faccine microscopiche degli Avengers sulla costolina centrale, ma sembra che la Marvel non la pensi allo stesso modo, visto che non è la prima e di sicuro non sarà l'ultima.

La confezione contiene due dischi con il film in BluRay e BluRay 3D.

Sperando di esservi stato utile auguro a tutti una splendida visione.

4 persone l'hanno trovato utile

Alessio

Spettacolare!

Recensito in Italia 🇮🇹 il 26 settembre 2016

Non ho potuto vederlo al cinema, l'ho visto a casa direttamente in 3D, film entusiasmante.. i creatori di questi film riescono sempre a trovare nuovi spunti e nuove idee per sorprendere gli spettatori. E così troviamo quasi tutti i personaggi dell'universo Avengers finora presentati più qualche piacevole aggiunta (Spiderman e BlackPanther) che serve loro da presentazione per i prossimi film, schierati in due gruppi con due linee di pensiero diverse che combattono per quello che pensano sia la giusta causa. I personaggi presenti sono anche più di quelli presenti nei film Avengers di solito, tutti mostrano forti miglioramenti e nuove abilità che sorprendono lo spettatore. Il tutto inserito in un contesto piuttosto futuristico, cercando di mantenere l'idea di un mondo prossimo al nostro.
Il 3D del film non aggiunge moltissimo, lo reputo migliore di altri film Marvel, ma senza particolari effetti da giustificarne davvero l'acquisto, a meno che non si è davvero appassionati.
I contenuti speciali (presenti come al solito sul solo disco 2D, cosa che odio perchè costringe a dover cambiare disco) sono abbastanza ricchi rispetto al solito, con scene eliminate/estese, gag, interviste e commenti dietro le quinte molto interessanti.
Questo film porta nuovamente in alto l'asticella della qualità dei film Marvel, che con Avengers2 aveva un pò diminuito la qualità. Adesso restiamo in attesa dei prox film Marvel Doctor Strange (di cui presente trailer su disco), Spiderman Homecoming, Black Panther, etc..

5 persone l'hanno trovato utile

Sempre più bravi alla Marvel

S. Lusetti

Recensito in Italia 🇮🇹 il 23 settembre 2016

Sarà perchè proprio in questo periodo é in edicola la raccolta Marvel che contiene i più recenti (e riuscitissimi) crossover, però questo Civil War contiene pillole di tanto, pillole di tutto e certo senza una buona conoscenza dell'Universo Marvel non é semplice cogliere ogni dettaglio.
Se invece si é dei veri fumetto-dipendenti allora il gusto é eccezionale.
All'ultima scena... sfido chiunque a non saltare gridando "GO Cap!" e quando esce il seguito...?
Veniamo al prodotto: il bluray non delude mai per qualità ed anzi forse ci ha abituati fin troppo bene... siamo più al cinema in casa che ... al cinema!
Ottimo rapporto qualità prezzo, come sempre.
Inutile dire che il vero Fan colleziona i fumetti ma anche i Movie.. un pezzo di storia dentro con Stan Lee che stavolta é un Corriere Espresso e non vedo l'ora di sapere cosa farà nei prossimi cameo....
Non chiedetemi del doppiaggio perchè un prodotto é originale quando nessuna delle sue parti viene sostituita o sovrapposta... un piccolo sforzo quindi... impariamo l'inglese e impariamo a riconoscere gli Interpreti dalla loro vera voce.
Una volta acquistato il bluray la lezione di inglese é... gratuita... perchè non approfittare ?
(se proprio non ce la fate, mettete i sottotitoli in Inglese, non in Italiano sennò non serve...)
Buona Visione a tutti !
(Si coglie il doppiosenso?)

2 persone l'hanno trovato utile

Barbara Bruno

Confezione danneggiata

Recensito in Italia 🇮🇹 il 7 gennaio 2023

La confezione del Blu Ray è arrivata danneggiata con un pezzo di plastica laterale rotto.

Traduci tutte le recensioni in Italiano

Le recensioni migliori da altri paesi

FourLightYears

Spectacular movie with a plot that needed more thought

Recensito negli Stati Uniti 🇺🇸 il 25 settembre 2016

I really want to give this movie one more star, because I think the Russo brothers did a great job making this a serious movie and avoiding the silliness and wisecracks that are typical of mainstream superhero movies. It is believed, I suppose, that if a fantasy/superhero movie were made as a serious drama, it wouldn't be any "fun." Or, because of the subject matter, it's impossible to make serious dramas out of such movies. M. Night Shayamalan's Unbreakable proved that wrong a long time ago, and the Dark Knight trilogy made it "ok" for filmmakers/fans/reviewers to take these movies seriously. Anyway, hats off to the Russos for that choice.

Unfortunately, despite the parade of excellent Marvel movies that we've seen over the last 15 years, I have significant issues with this film (even though I do think it is a good movie). First, the minor concerns. I feel like the fight scenes are over-choreographed. A lot of times it looks like the characters are dancing instead of fighting. There's a general lack of "grittiness" in the combat. Unless one hero is fighting one of the other heroes, no move ever really seems to fail and no punch ever misses (kind of like Legolas in The Lord of the Rings). And during the face off at the airport, I think the Russos show a lack of courage in the way they directed the fight. Every dramatic or interesting move, it seems, gets undone. Iron Man has a trick up his sleeve to get Captain America's shield--enter Spider Man who snatches it away. Great move! Except Cap gets it right back. Let's see some consequences--make Cap fight without his shield. Spidey binds Cap's hands together with webs. No problem--Cap holds up his hands and Hawkeye shoots off the webs, like it never really happened. Whenever one of team Iron Man is about to deal team Cap a significant blow, suddenly Scarlet Witch puts a stop to it out of nowhere. You can't make a really good battle out of mostly thwarted moves. Also, the Russos didn't have the balls to have a member of team Cap actually take down Rhodey, which would have potentially led to future animosity and, more importantly, character motivation. They made it accidental friendly fire from Vision, and therefore, completely forgivable--Total bait and switch from the advertising campaign which showed Tony holding Rhodey in his arms as if he were dead, making it appear as if Cap or someone on his team was responsible for it.

A more significant concern I have is that the plot (and I know the source comes from the comics, but still...) very much resembles the plot of X-Men 3 when the heroes have to take sides on the issue of whether mutants should have to be registered and whether the mutant "cure" should even exist.

Also, I'm confused about the way the characters were represented. In the comics, superheroes have widely varying levels of power. Some are clearly more powerful than others. In this movie (with the exception of Vision and Scarlet Witch), the heroes all seem roughly equal in their abilities. Look, Captain American is a great character, but he's only a human--albeit, a human at the peak physical abilities possible for a human--with a shield. If he were punching Iron Man like he does in the movie, he would break his hands. Tony Stark's armor is not tin foil. And yet, Tony's suit warns him during one particular fist fight that "you can't beat him hand to hand!" The interesting aspect of Captain America isn't his powers, it's his character. His real powers are his leadership, courage, and vision. But for someone who is supposed to be a great leader and decision maker, he makes some really poor decisions, which leads me to my next criticism...

The directors said they wanted to show the heroes finishing up a character arc, but the problem is, the characters have become the opposite of what they once were. That's not an arc, that's a mis-interpretation or misrepresentation of the characters. Cap was right to oppose SHIELD when he found out it was infiltrated by HYDRA, but it strains belief that he would turn out, in this film, to be pro-vigilante! Am I to understand that he would really, for example, violate the sovereignty of other nations if he personally felt it was a good idea? That he would defy a government that might ask specifically that he not get involved? Again, the reasoning strains credibility. His argument is basically, "if I feel like I should get involved, I'm going to." From what I can tell, the only thing that was being asked of the Avengers is that they refrain from getting involved unless specifically requested by the military/government/country...whatever. It seems like a rational middle-ground that a person like Captain America would be particularly receptive to, especially considering that the argument in favor of the regulation rests on the fact that the Avengers are responsible for untold damage and probably thousands of deaths. Also, there's nothing saying that if the regulating bodies are destroyed or are too overwhelmed to request help, the Avengers couldn't step in. Moreover, since much of Cap's value is in his decision making ability, he sure lets his emotions dictate his actions a lot, very unlike someone who is known for rational thinking and keeping a cool head. In Civil War he's like the cliched character who always says "I'm going with you!" on missions, against all good advice because of his personal emotional investment. Falcon is also strangely pro-vigilante considering that he's also a military man, like Cap, invested in a command structure. Presumably, though, he's with cap mainly because he's Cap's friend.

As for Tony Stark, the Russos have made another incomprehensible change, but this one doesn't show Stark acting quite as much out of character as Captain America. Still, he's ends up in a place basically the opposite of where he started, going from vigilante in Iron Man 1 & 2, in which he tells the government flat out that they can't have the Iron Man technology, to strict anti-vigilante in Civil War. However, his change is presaged somewhat in Iron Man 3, when he is seen backing away from his personal need to play the superhero and save the day. He also seems to have grown a little weary of the responsibility of being Iron Man. There is also a brief scene when he is informed that the actions of the Avengers in Age of Ultron resulted in the death of a small innocent boy. It's rather obligatory and not entirely convincing as a motivation for Stark to change his worldview.

And the other characters, well... It's never entirely clear what their motivations are with regard to fighting one another. In the marketing, the premise seemed to be that the characters were fighting because they had taken different sides in the debate over the Sokovia Accords. However, the character motivations are quite varied...
Stark's desire to keep Scarlet Witch under wraps doesn't make much sense, and Scarlet Witch's need to need to get out RIGHT NOW! doesn't make much sense either, so her motivation is that she's a brat basically. Vision is fighting on Team Tony because he's already allied with Tony, I guess. Spider-man is with Tony because Tony went to meet him and Spidey wants to impress Mr. Stark. What are Peter Parker's views on the accords? Rhodey is a military man, who has faith in a governing body, so his motivation is pretty natural, actually. Black Widow makes an argument in favor of the Avengers being under some sort of oversight, but then she turns against Team Tony, helping Cap and Bucky Escape. I have no idea why Scott Lang/Ant Man is there. I don't know why Hawkeye is fighting except that, according to Jeremy Renner, Cap called him before Tony did. Bucky is only trying to clear his name. T'Challa is only there to kill Bucky. Almost none of it has to do with the differing political opinions. The premise would suggest that this whole "civil war" is about one group of superheroes fighting against another group that has different beliefs, but as it turns out, all of these people are fighting because of the convictions of only a few of them.

The movie just doesn't have a good coherent premise. One side of the argument over the accords is pretty clearly right. The request by the government is pretty reasonable. It's not as if they're requiring all the Avengers to be microchipped or something. And it's hard to believe any of these people should be allowed to Assemble and use their powers whenever and wherever they feel like they should. But also, there are only a couple of characters who have really strong feelings about the issue, but the movie makes it seem like that's what the whole "civil war" is about, when it's really just about a guy manipulating them all into fighting each other.

26 persone l'hanno trovato utile

Rowana

Team Tony was right -- and here's why this great movie proved it

Recensito negli Stati Uniti 🇺🇸 il 21 settembre 2016

Steve: *Leads and then botches a mission in Lagos, Nigeria because he brought an unprepared team member AND totally misread the situation in the first place - leading to 11 people dying and many more injured.*

Wanda: *Kills 11 innocent people by not being able to control her powers and being untrained enough for the mission.*

Steve and Wanda: *Fluff off the 11 deaths in about two lines of dialogue, plus a couple of furrowed brows during the meeting with Ross.*

Steve and Wanda: *Never refer to the screwed-up mission or the 11 deaths again. Doesn’t really seem to bother them.*

Wanda: Waaaah! You locked me up in my room! How dare you?? *Proceeds to escalate airport fight to deadly proportions, causing injuries and millions of dollars in damages*

Steve: Literally CHOOSES NOT TO DO the Right Thing (which is protecting the many) and runs off to save his one pal instead, becoming the catalyst for many more deaths and injuries and millions of dollars in damages – thus giving up the right to be Captain America (and he knows it; hence his throwing away the shield).

Fandom at large: Everything Steve does is right because he’s Captain America! We love Steve and Wanda!

Tony Stark (with not too much screen time but making the most of it…): *Takes complete responsibility for all his actions, especially blaming himself for Ultron even though he’s clearly NOT completely responsible. In fact, takes utter responsibility and blame even at the expense of his own health and well-being. Cares probably way too much. Listens to the pain of a mother who lost her son in Sokovia; lets it affect him personally and terribly. Tries to the utmost of his ability to keep the Avengers safe and together. Pays for all their mistakes and embarrassments, including stuff they blow up and destroy – and probably funds an army of lawyers and advisors to pay damages to the people injured and the families of the people killed as collateral damage on Avengers missions. Keeps Wanda SAFE in a SAFEHOUSE because she’s a visa-less foreign national who could be killed by Ross’s goon squads or imprisoned without bond at any time - also because she just KILLED 11 PEOPLE. Feigns going along with Ross even though he doesn’t trust Ross, because he wants to keep everyone safe and together and knows politicians don’t stay in power forever and that contracts can be negotiated. Tries valiantly throughout the story to use reason and rationality, offers of compromise and negotiation, to get Steve to at least listen to his side – because guess what, the Avengers actually do need accountability. Is rebuffed again and again but still tries. Brings Spider-Man to the airport SPECIFICALLY to “web ‘em up” and capture HIS FRIENDS WITHOUT HURTING THEM and finds it’s Cap’s side that escalates the war. Has to endure the grave injury of his best friend Rhodey and no doubt blames himself for that too. Goes to Steve’s side IMMEDIATELY when he gets the evidence that Bucky was not the Vienna bomber, to try to make things right. Bravely goes alone in a helicopter through a raging ocean storm to the Raft, at tremendous danger to himself, to try to find out where Steve is – knowing Ross could lock him up, too, and no one would be the wiser. Is stunned and appalled by what he finds there, but has to play the high-stakes game and get his information and get out if he wants to somehow save the Avengers and help Steve.Has to endure the cruel jibes of Clint, which he hides his feelings about. Escapes the Raft, flies more than 6,000 miles to Siberia, ALONE in the armor, to try to make amends. Almost succeeds– until he finds out his erstwhile friend kept the most terrible of all secrets from him for two years. Reacts as any human would (since he JUST SAW video footage of the murders of his parents, and the murderer is standing right there…).*

Fandom at large: Aggghhh! Tony locked up Wanda and brought a child to the airport fight and then he attacked Bucky! He’s a spoiled rich guy with no feelings and no morals!

“Civil War” screenwriters Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely (on the Blu-Ray): Steve is better than Tony and a greater moral character.

Tony Fans: ………what???

The movie, as a whole, was great, but listening to some of the commentary on the Blu-Ray from the Russos and the screenwriters seems to directly contradict how Tony's story arc actually emerged onscreen. Tony was BY FAR the more sympathetic character when compared with Steve - I can't tell you the number of people who have said they went in to the movie as Team Cap and came out solidly on Tony's side.

It's pretty clear the Avengers DO need accountability - an idea that Tony, by reason, rationality, and almost pleading, tried to get across to the stolidly non-responsive Steve. If 117 countries say so, then something needs fixing. You can't just imperially say "our hands are the best hands" -- that's a dangerous notion, and says who, anyway?

Chris Evans' s Cap, in fact, was a stubborn lump throughout this movie (what the heck WAS his motivation for refusing the Accords - especially when it was clear that they were open to negotiation and discussion??) -- only coming to life at certain times (the church scene was nice...) while RDJ simply blew everyone else off the screen with his emotion-driven arc.

I simply found this movie very one-sided, as much as I liked it. Cap's side and his bullheaded stubbornness were never explained clearly, while Tony (with MUCH less screen time) got to portray a fully realized argument and a full range of emotions explaining and illuminating his side and his feelings. Some critics and fans are calling this "Iron Man 4," with very good reason. As one major critic said, it's odd that the movie is called "Captain America" when Captain America is the least interesting character in it.

4 persone l'hanno trovato utile

Eman's Movie Reviews

One of the Best Marvel Films to Date.

Recensito negli Stati Uniti 🇺🇸 il 8 maggio 2016

The Good:
Similar to Captain America 2, within just a few minutes we're thrown into the suspense and action that sets the tone for the film. Almost each character gets their moment to shine in terms of action or just displaying their special abilities. The MANY different fight scenes will keep your eyes glued to the screen. There's rarely ever a dull moment and the overall pacing of the film was done very effectively despite being over 2.5 hours long. I think it’s also safe to say that the airport scene is by far one of the best scenes in the film.

There were so many surprises in this film. Rarely do I get to say this, but the trailers actually didn't give a lot away. The trailers were altered to the point where some things will still look new.

The themes and writing in this movie were carried out in a believable, coherent and authentic way. The motivations of the many characters did not seem forced, in my opinion. This led to some nice plot twists that continue to progress the story. (Though some of those twists were mildly predictable). It's rather difficult to choose a side of one of the characters because the moral lines are so heavily grayed. As a fan of the Civil War comics (great read by the way), I was very appreciative of how Marvel was able to stay true to the nature and feeling of the source material even though they had to change a lot of the details for the sake of the movie. They did a great job of handling issues like the collateral destruction of cities, the loss of life, and the responsibility of great power.

What's even more interesting is how the movie is able to maintain an overall serious tone but still find time to have many humorous moments. It's not a comedy, but it does stay true to that "Marvel Fun" that we've come to enjoy.

Let’s get into the characters. It’s no surprise anymore that Spider-Man is a feature in this film. His scenes are probably one of the biggest highlights in the movie for both his humor and the action he brings to the table. Luckily what you see in the trailers is only a tiny glimpse of what’s to come with Spidey.

Zemo (played by, Daniel Brühl) made for a good villain in this story. It was interesting to see how his motivations drove his actions. Similar to how Tom Hiddleston’s Loki’s character was developed, we are given a bit more complex villain with Zemo’s character.

Black Panther....YES! He was AWESOME. Yes I’m biased because he’s like the first black superhero (And because you know…I’m black) I was so happy and proud to see Chadwick Boseman bring this character to life. From his African accent, presence of royalty, all the way down to his proficient cat-like ninja fighting style, he truly embodied what the Black Panther character always intended. (That is to have a sense of pride in African culture) His role in the film has definitely made me more optimistic about the upcoming solo film.

I was impressed with how this film was able to juggle so much at once. With this huge cast of characters, it rarely felt as though any one of them suffered from a lack of screen time. Not only that but Civil War also managed to still serve as a platform for the upcoming solo movies.

The Bad:
What?! There’s some bad? I know I was shocked too, but bear with me. There’s are two issues I had problems with, but they're kind of spoilery so I won't list them here. If you're really interested, just visit my youtube channel youtube.com/c/EmansMovieReviews and you can see the two things i had an issue with.

The Reason:
I think it’s safe to say that Marvel has done it again. Civil War had a lot of expectations and I think it delivered on most of them. I know a lot of people really want to compare this to Batman V Superman because the movies share practically the same themes. I think that while this may feel like a natural comparison to make, it may be a little unfair to do so. Batman V Superman had a completely different motive and intent behind it. It was a setup movie for all of the other movies DC wants to kick off. (Not to mention they had to play catch up in the comic book movie realm) Civil War was a solo movie for Captain America that just so happened to set up other movies and continue the overall story arc of the Marvel cinematic universe.

So I think a much better comparison for Civil War would be to its predecessor, Captain America 2: Winter Soldier. Avengers: Age of Ultron was best compared to Avengers 1 because it was the same director trying to do better than before. Avengers 2, unfortunately, disappointed because it was really more of the same without very many new aspects to elevate the movie. All we got were the superhero team-up moves and three minor characters. (Well…2 other characters that lived.) :-/

If I had to compare the two, I’d probably say that Civil War comes in slightly lower than Winter Soldier. Winter Soldier gets the edge for its originality. It was the first time we saw an espionage film that just so happened to have super heroes in it. It was the first time we saw super heroes cross into a different movie genre, thus making it rather hard to top. There was no way for Civil War to be any more original than Cap 2, in my opinion. Civil War does give us more of the same compared to Cap 2, except it does two things uniquely different. We’re given two new major characters in Spider-Man and Black Panther, and it accomplished the seemingly difficult task of juggling many characters at once. The movie was about 55% Captain America’s story 25% setup for new characters and 20% everyone else.

Overall, Civil War was a very good movie. There are also two end credit scenes, so be on the lookout.I’d say Civil War is a must see in any format.

The Rating: 9/10

60 persone l'hanno trovato utile

Drolito

très bien !

Recensito in Francia 🇫🇷 il 3 febbraio 2017

Depuis son premier opus, la saga Captain America nous a gratifié de bons films très agréables à regarder avec un récit cohérent et de l'action bien rythmée et maîtrisée ; cependant quand ils ont annoncé que ce troisième volet serait basé sur le cultissime cross-over « Civil War », je ne cache pas que j'avais quelques réserves (« peurs » seraient même le mot le mieux adapté). Pourquoi ? C'est simple : « Civil War » invite dans son récit un sacré paquets de super-héros/mutants qui ne sont pas encore apparu dans l'Univers Cinématographique Marvel (les 4 Fantastiques, Sentry, les X-Men, La Cape, L’Epée, Captain Mar-Vell, Miss Hulk, les New Warriors, Namor, The Punisher, Hercule, Dr Strange...) pour des raisons très simples (faire un film pour chaque équipe/héros serait trop lourd et dangereux financièrement sans compter le fait de se retrouver avec un nombre hallucinant de protagonistes) et d'autres plus compliquées (les droits possédés par d'autres studios comme pour les X-Men et les 4 Fantastiques). Et bien, ils ont trouvé une solution simple et cohérente : plutôt que de mettre en images tous les héros/mutants de la planète du comics, on se concentre sur la seule équipe de super-héros connue dans l'UCM à savoir les Avengers. Et il faut bien avouer que, à moindre échelle bien entendu, le sujet reste identique puisqu'au vu de ce qui s'est passé dans les précédents films (New-York attaqué par des E.T., la poursuite Captain/Winter Soldier mettant à feu des quartiers entiers, Ultron réduisant en poussière toute une région d'un pays) : malgré leurs intentions louables, les héros et leurs pouvoirs sont-ils un danger pour la population voire la planète. L'avantage c'est que l'ensemble reste cohérent (créer une déchirante dichotomie au sein d'une « communauté » qui semblait pourtant unie) sans pour autant faire un parfait copier/coller du support d'origine (les puristes vont encore gueuler qu'il manque plein de chose mais parfois ils faut savoir mettre de l'eau dans son vin...et puis soyons sérieux : l'UCM vient de nous faire découvrir Captain America, vous croyez vraiment qu'ils vont déjà le tuer ??!! Un peu de réalisme que diable...). Et puis cela permet de rajouter un peu de profondeur et de tragique en développant un peu plus les héros et leur passé (le trio Iron Man/Captain/Bucky), en mettant en avant les derniers arrivés (très bon traitement de La Sorcière Rouge et de La Vision) et en nous proposant des p'tits nouveaux. A ce sujet, ce film est une excellente surprise : d'un côté nous avons une belle découverte avec un Black Panther très classe (le choix de Chadwick Boseman en T’Challa est nickel chrome !), et de l'autre une attente comblée en la personne de Tom Holland qui est le nouveau Spiderman. Il faut avouer que le cas Spidey était assez délicat à gérer mais force est de constater que son arrivée est parfaitement maîtrisée (son introduction est même tout simplement l'un des meilleurs passages du film !) et qu'il fait bonne figure en sidekick comique. En tout cas, c'est un plaisir de voir une si agréable prestation après celle vomitive du branquignole Andrew Garfield dans les deux purges d' "Amazing Spiderman". Et côté action me diriez-vous ? Rien à dire : les frangins Russo reprennent leur mise en scène nerveuse et leurs chorégraphies soutenues de "Captain America 2 : Le Soldat de l’Hiver" qui nous laisse quasi aucun moment de répit (l'avantage, c'est qu'on ne peut absolument pas s’ennuyer une seule seconde !) et dont l'apothéose demeure la formidable séquence de l’aéroport qui nous réserve son lot de surprises puisque la bande-annonce a eu (pour une fois !) l'intelligence de ne pas nous la dévoiler dans son intégralité pour nous laisser un peu d'inédit lors de notre visionnage. Je terminerais pour dire que tout le casting du film s'en sort avec les honneurs, je n'ai pas spécialement trouvé de point noir sur ce sujet là...de toute façon, quand votre film aligne sur l'écran Robert Downey Jr. , Chris Evans, Scarlett Johansson, Jeremy Renner, Sebastian Stan, Paul Bettany, Don Cheadle, Elizabeth Olsen, Chadwick Boseman, William Hurt et Daniel Brühl (qui campe un Baron Zemo fort plaisant au passage !), il serait vraiment dommage que la sauce ne prenne pas !! Bref, ce troisième opus des aventures du héros le plus patriote des USA est un bon millésime grâce à son scénario intéressant et plutôt bien écrit (vu l'ampleur et la complexité du « Civil War » d'origine), son action diaboliquement efficace et ses acteurs délicieux. C'est d'autant plus rassurant que les frangins Russo auront l'honneur de terminer en beauté cette phase 3 en réalisant "Avengers 3 : Inifinity War Part 1" : vivement que ça sorte !!

8 persone l'hanno trovato utile

HugoSC

ofertas

Recensito negli Stati Uniti 🇺🇸 il 20 giugno 2023

gracias