Lady C Tea YouTube 4/27/24 (a few nuggets paraphrased by me) : r/SaintMeghanMarkle Skip to main content

Get the Reddit app

Scan this QR code to download the app now
Or check it out in the app stores
r/SaintMeghanMarkle icon
r/SaintMeghanMarkle icon
Go to SaintMeghanMarkle
r/SaintMeghanMarkle
A banner for the subreddit

Bonjour! Welcome to our snark sub on faux feminist Saint Meghan and her hypocrite prince, Harry.


Members Online

Lady C Tea YouTube 4/27/24 (a few nuggets paraphrased by me)

ALLEGEDLY

Greetings from Castle Goring. Today I am going to address an issue that I have had so many questions on, then I will plunge right into questions. 

Lady C acknowledges a viewer who says there is an Ashleigh Hale registered as an attorney in Virginia.  This may explain why there is not an Ashleigh Hale registered in California.  I do want to be fair that is there is a question if Ashley Hale is an attorney or not, it should be decided in her favor. 

Apparently Strawberry Jam has an alternative meaning.  I would not put it past Harry and Meghan to put out these jars of jam, knowing the alternative meaning, and sitting back and laughing about this.  Certain personality types like to play cat and mouse with people.

And now I want to clear up my thoughts on what the Palace should do to clear up the questions revolving around Meghan’s conduct surrounding Archie in particular, and then the birth of Lilibet.  Let me say this situation is unique.  It has never happened in history before.  There have been children in history whose place in the line of succession have been questioned.  Because of this, there is a requirement that an approved doctor sign off on the birth.  The sole exception to this is Archie.  The background of this is detailed in my book.  The fact is, Meghan’s conduct has created valid suspicions as to whether she gave birth to Archie and Lili.  Both births were engulfed in mystery and lack of transparency.  The British people deserve to know that anyone in the line of succession have a right to be there.   This has also created questions as to whether the Crown colluded with Meghan and Harry.  It did not.  My understanding is that the questions that were raised at the Palace did not reach, “those whose interests are more greatly involved than anyone else’s.”  There is no doubt that at some point, everyone became aware that something was amiss regarding the birth of these children.  I will tell you what my solution is.  The Royal Family has to function within the law.  Once a birth certificate is issued, it is then presented to be entered into the line of succession.  Meghan and Harry’s conduct has resulted in a situation where trust has been destroyed.  Also, Harry’s own statement that Archie was two weeks old when he was supposed to be two days old is a red flag.  That comment right there, is the justification for the palace to honor their duty of care to the monarchy and the citizens of this country, and to the children involved.  If Meghan gave birth to Archie and Lilibet, it couldn’t be simpler.  The Royal Family has a duty of care to present evidence that Archie and Lilibet were born of the body of the woman listed on the birth certificate.   Any woman who gives birth to a child in close proximity to the throne knows she will not have the right to privacy regarding the birth of the child.  Meghan has trampled on our rights.  It is our right to know that the children in the line of succession belong there.    Nobody is saying the birth should have been recorded.  But the Home Secretary should have been in the next room with contact communications with the midwives and doctors.  We need to be clear on whose rights trump whose.  The fact that the Palace is ignoring OUR rights is total incompetence.  My feeling now is the matter is too damaging to the reputation of the Royal Family.  It is too damaging that two children whose births were not verified should be included in the line of succession.   Authorities should be prepared to clear up this mystery. 

Whose rights trump whose?  Meghan and Harry have established themselves as unreliable.  Their mental health should be questioned.  By evidence of their conduct, they create mischief and probably enjoy playing games.  Their conduct has created doubts for us to accept their word about anything.  Why would be accept the word of a man who said the child had already been born for two weeks.  The baby was supposed to be a home birth, but would not name the doctor.  There are so many things that lead many to conclude she did not give birth.  And if she did give birth, why are they allowing so much doubt to continue?

This is a huge constitutional issue as a result of their conduct.  Authorities are duty bound to investigate this to prevent this doubt from continuing.  The palace needs to provide proof of legitimacy. Remember that observation that Harry and Meghan are one plane crash away from the throne?  The citizens have a right to know if Archie and Lilibet were born of the body.    And if they were not, then they are depriving others in the line of succession of their rightful place in the line of succession.

So far, the palace hasn’t done anything.  I will cut them some slack because there is no groundswell of actual demand to act on this.  The mainstream media has failed to touch this subject.  Even if the palace suspected there was a need to clear this up, they can’t go in gangbusters, unless there is a HUGE demand by the public to know the truth.  The palace is playing Ostrich.  They took a long time to add Lili to the line of succession.  They also made the announcement that a daughter was “born for” the Ducke and Duchess of Sussex and not a daughter was “born of.”  A clear implication that the child was not delivered by Meghna’s body. 

The only way this will be resolved is if the PUBLIC demands for this to be cleared up.  This is the ideal time to clear this up.  Meghan needs to supply proof these children were born of her body and use her own eggs.  The fetus Meghan showed on Netlix had Archie’s features redacted.  This is ridiculous.

This is not going away.  There is an arguable case that Meghan did not give birth to the children.  The Palace has shown they will respond to public demand.  The public was not happy with the idea of Harry ever serving as counselor of state so they took action to add Anne and Edward. 

I would encourage you all to write to the Palace.  It is in everybody’s best interest that these doubts are put to bed.  If not, the doubt will increase.  There was so much physical evidence that Meghan had a bouncing and bending baby bump.  There she was at 8 months, wearing stiletto heals, bending down, knees together, she bounced back up, no assistance required.   Harry didn’t even try to help her up.   Do you see why there is rational reason to doubt?

If the Palace does not clear this up, they are remiss to their duty to the people.  I think you, the PUBLIC, should do something about this.  You should notify the proper authorities you demand this to be cleared up.  If this doubt is not cleared up, then reasonable people will come to the conclusion that this is true.

If you disagree with me, I respect that.  But I know enough that courtiers are ignoring their duty to the monarchy.    Meghan’s right to privacy does not trump our right to know.  Harry and Meghan are not trusted and we want this matter cleared up.  And if it is not cleared up, then I do not acknowledge the children as legitimate.

This is not about adoption or surrogacy.  This is about honoring the rule of law with the rules for line of succession. 

This Redditor’s note:  Lady C did this video in response to her appearance on Dan Wootton’s show this week.  She wanted to elaborate on her comments. 

Toodles Sinners!

PS. Suggest the mods create an official moon bump pinned thread for the MSM.

Addresses for the King and PPoW

His Majesty The King
Buckingham Palace
London SW1A 1AA 

Their Royal Highnesses The Prince and Princess of Wales
Kensington Palace
London
W8 4PU

Share
Sort by:
Best
Open comment sort options
u/AutoModerator avatar
Moderator Announcement Read More »
More replies

Interesting. She is being more direct than beating around the bush. I wonder if something is coming up.

I hope so!

u/Fuzzy_Suggestion_749 avatar

At least Lady C has begun mentioning the Harkle absurdities. The British public doesn't think that Haz will ever be king and have high hopes that William or his children will succeed the throne. They will only act out if the disastrous and unthinkable happens (may that day never come) and Haz does come to the throne and A becomes the heir apparent. Then the public will act out and demand that all three of them be removed from the LOS. The public needs to gold the Harkles accountable for all the crap they have done after leaving the BRF.

More replies
More replies
u/Latter_Item439 avatar

No shes saying IF you want something to come up then we the public need to demand it because courtiers are not doing their duty to the monarchy they are sticking there heads in the sand and since the msm won't address the issue of legitimacy we the public need to start writing to the palace and the government. This is the only way it will come out when the public demand a response......so there is no big reveal

u/St0ltzfuzz avatar

Wouldn’t the birth certificates have to include the surrogate names if that is who gave birth? I’m confused about that.

u/Latter_Item439 avatar

No there is a court proceeding that issues a birth certificate with the receiving parents names quite quickly i believe and who knows what money can make happen even more quickly .....neither child's birth certificate was available for a rather significant amount of time lending to the surrogate argument along with the list of other hmmmm things 

u/Euphoric_Travel2541 avatar
Edited

Because the surrogacies would mean the children are no longer in the line of succession, all that the public would need to know is that a surrogate was used, not the surrogate’s name or identity.

They could provide evidence that MM gave birth to them through a signed affidavit by the attending doctors, birth certificates and the like.

Surrogacy could be accepted as a means of producing the next generation in the future, but the King would have to issue a letters patent about that, to change the law. Until then, birth from delivery from the body of the woman is required.

More replies
More replies
u/somespeculation avatar

In the Spring…then after Easter…then in her book…nothing. Just drips with increasing hints to keep her viewership monetized.

Best case scenario, she actually knows through viable sources but doesn’t actually have evidence beyond trusting her sources.

Otherwise, if it was airtight, wouldn’t it make sense to put in her book? Sales would soar!

This suggests she has nothing. There will be no ‘big revelation’.

u/Latter_Item439 avatar

Its clearly not happening she basically just said unless the public start writing letters on mass to demand proof of legitimacy then it won't happen courtiers are not letting the big fish know whats going on they are sticking there heads in the sand that the palace will respond to public demand they proved that with the uproar over Harry being COS they responded immediately by adding Edward and Anne and making sure only working royals will be called. So basically the public needs to start demanding proof these children were born of body like every other person had to except meghan markle. So you are absolutely right like a lot of us knew there's no big reveal any more then there was last year or the year before . 

More replies

I don't agree with you. With this video, Lady C now has taken it to the edge that keeps her just safe enough on this side from being sued. I appreciate ALL that she said in today's video.

u/somespeculation avatar

And that’s okay. Respectful discussion and disagreement is a great aspect of this sub.

Cheers

I agree, lol!

More replies

I agree with you. It’s HUGE that Lady C is saying the public should write letters.

More replies
u/Euphoric_Travel2541 avatar

I think so, too. People are getting taken in by her claims and hints.

Plus Harry and his first wife and their alledged offspring are totally irrelevent. They will never succeed to the throne and never be councellors of state.

Which is why, imho, nothing is going to be done. Harry and his first wife are great at making themselves more irrelevant every day.

u/somespeculation avatar

Precisely.

And the more they force the issue, like ‘announcing Princess Lilibet’ in People - six months to the day after the Queen’s death - the more hypocritical they look.

lol yes - using People Magazine as The Royal Circular or whatever it is called. Totally in line with selling tickets to state dinners/s

more reply More replies
More replies
u/Electronic_Sea3965 avatar

I understand your point BUT sorry, they must be exposed.  Do not lie and try and pull a fast one on THE ROYAL FAMILY, THE GOVERNMENT AND THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM! It's unreal and 110% unacceptable.  

I get what you are saying. I just don´t think it will be a priority for the crown or the government. Just like Edward and Wallis - they WERE traitors before and during the WWII. But only exposed now. Or Andrew and his shady deals as Trade Ambassador - records sealed for 70 years.

more reply More replies
More replies

Never say never. The POW’s travel together… what if the the Princess of Wales is physically no longer able to work. Cancer is no joke. Especially the treatment.

More replies

Totally.

Yup! And i can barely get through the book with the way she writes. It’s boring but i hope it gets better

More replies
u/residentcaprice avatar

surprised she is rallying viewers to write in, perhaps the comeuppance isn't delivering as fast as expected.

u/Personal_Signal_6151 avatar

Is there a UK equivalent of Change.org to create a petition?

No legal effect but could get the ball rolling with the authorities.

More replies

Edited my OG post to add contact addresses.

[deleted]
[deleted]

You're the best!

u/Adorable_Image1177 avatar

Who should be the addressee for BP? Feel uncomfortable addressing it to a cancer-stricken monarch 😐

His staff will read it for him anyway.

u/cuimhnigh avatar

Maybe "The Office of HM King Charles"? Idk

u/Adorable_Image1177 avatar

Thank you

More replies
More replies
More replies

Excuse my ignorance! My question is this, when Lady C calls on citizens to write the palace does that include the entire commonwealth? So should our Aussie, Canadian, etc sinners write the palace? I assume so since Lady C is Jamaican, but just want clarity from someone that knows. TIA

I think she does mean the Commonwealth and the British. I do not type what she says word for word but she mentioned she has rights as a Jamaican and as a Brit. Lady C loves the Commonwealth. She speaks of the Commonwealth with reverence.

You do such a great job for us all, Daisy! Thank you!

Perfect! Canadian here. I'll be writing for sure.

More replies

Absolutely. Edit: approximately 2.6 billion people.

More replies

The Realms are directly affected by the LOS, absolutely, which includes 🇨🇦 🇳🇿 🇦🇺

u/Personal_Signal_6151 avatar

Could Americans weigh in as Amicus Curiae?

More replies

Thank you for this great summary, Daisy!!! Very, very, interesting!!!

This feels like the most direct Lady C has been on this subject. It feels like she knows (or has heard rumors) that something is coming. Thank you, as always, Daisy, for listening and transcribing for the rest of us.

u/pdrum01 avatar

She was unusually emboldened and opinionated on the subject today. Previously she's skirted dealing with questions directly. Suggests something is coming down the pipe.

Normally it is allegedly and supposedly. So it seemed a bit unusual.

u/pdrum01 avatar

I know. Legal reasons and all that. She took it right up to the wire today without actually confirming that there may have been surrogates. Suspect she already had it confirmed.some time ago but for some reason sees the need to devote an entire cast to it. The emphasis on potential reputation damage to the Royal Family and the need for the palace to make a move to prevent it was quite pointed.

Perhaps she wants the palace to move before her so they can do their damage control? I honestly do not really have any idea but she has been emboldened by something.

more replies More replies
more reply More replies
More replies
More replies

You're correct.

u/MissyouAmyWinehouse avatar

Lady c is always saying something big is coming in a few months, few seasons, next year etc. she said something big would be revealed this spring. But now it seems like that’s been forgotten about & now she’s encouraging the public to ask for the info to be released?

That does sound like the direction.

More replies
u/Heavy_Enthusiasm_195 avatar

In her first book she explains the bedpan baby and the suspicions back then

She discussed the idea that the RF would have been the last to suspect something was not right about the megnancy with Archie and it was only when the public created a wave of speculation that they were made aware of this. Lady C mentioned this same thing a year + ago and said that because the public was stirring the pot, the RF started investigating. There may be a whole lot more of this to come, but what’s out now AND when it becomes mainstream like the bullying reports, the use of donor eggs and surrogates “Harry’s kids”will revealed.

I did not realize she said that the BRF would be the last to suspect. Did she expand on why? I would be so cynical and suspicious if I was part of such a historic monarchy. (Which may just show my personality more than anything. 😉)

More replies
[deleted]
[deleted]

Comment removed by moderator

u/AutoModerator avatar

Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

More replies
More replies

Wonderful, thank you Daisy. I'm going to write to BP about this, as Lady C suggests. As a citizen of the UK, I agree that I have a right to know that all individuals in the Royal line of succession are legitimate additions. Rachel Ragland and her poodle are not special and different, and on this matter they should be forced to conform.

They are special and different in the respect that the Palace had never seen this level of dishonesty, oiliness and contempt before the Meghans came to town.

Yes exactly right. If Meghan faked these pregnancies, this is psychopathic behavior. Totally next level crazy.

u/Cocktailsontheporch avatar

Not only psychopathic....it is TREASON, and BOTH H&M are guilty, which would not just remove all three from LOS but remove ALL titles from Harry which removes all from M and children. No longer Prince,Duke,Duchess, Princess and no Sussex. Mr.& Mrs. Mountbatten-Windsor if lucky....unless the two want to use Spencer to cling onto Diana connection.

u/Capable_Puzzle avatar

which would not just remove all three from LOS but remove ALL titles from Harry which removes all from M and children. No longer Prince,Duke,Duchess, Princess and no Sussex.

And Meghan would leave him and take everything except the children, who would now be useless to her.

Yes!

More replies

If Meghan faked these pregnancies, this is psychopathic behavior

Agree 100%!

More replies
More replies

Exactly YOUR taxes support the Royal family. You technically are their employer. If I was in your country I’d want to know!

u/jemder avatar

No they do not.

The only contribution the taxpayer makes to the Royal family, is for security and it comes from the amount of tax paid for the overall security of the nation.

The amount for the Royal family, plus the Prime Minister other members of the Cabinet and visiting heads of state, amounts to around a pound per taxpayer per year and is much less than the Treasury gets from the Crown Estates which contibute millions each year for taxpayers.

The government has taken more from the Monarch on an annual basis than they have given back for 400 years.

More replies

Can you start a petition?

More replies
More replies
u/stark_trends avatar

Lady C is spot on - the public has a right to know. And the public should be demanding facts. She raised another good point - that the invisikids being in the LOS deprives others of their rightful place in the LOS. The invisikids being #6 and #7 in the line of succession is usurping those who rightfully belong in that position. The Harkles can claim racism or hold their breaths and stomp their feet and cling to their perceived victimhood, but this charade surrounding the mystery of the births of these children has gone on long enough. Time for transparency rather than believing any story the Harkles spin. And thanks once more, Daisy!

u/Pollux0531 avatar

You would think Andrew would be raising a stink about invisikids from a guttersnipe, that are pushing he and his family down the LOS.

u/vanilla_finestflavor avatar

raising a stink about invisikids from a guttersnipe

(no other comment, just admiring your use of words lol)

🤔🤔

More replies
More replies
u/Human-Economics6894 avatar

It is not Palace who has to resolve this. Because if this is a constitutional issue, it is Parliament that has to take action on the matter.

I share with Lady C the fact that not all people who work at Palace are competent. Those Sussex children should never have had titles. It was not their responsibility, legally that is wrong and it has been a terrible decision, especially for those children. But regarding what happened with the pregnancies, it is Parliament that should demand answers. Because? Because it is Parliament that speaks for the people (yes, in theory, I know). And here the most serious inaction is that of Parliament.

When Megsy violated protocols by having baby Archie however she wanted, why didn't Parliament raise a formal protest? It was Parliament's duty to do that: "no ma'am, what you do is not appropriate, stick to the rules." They didn't do it, why? Because Parliament preferred to go woke and support Megsy since she is a modern woman, and a feminist and blahblahblah. And when the girl Betty was born, Parliament was perfectly able to point out that since that girl did not comply with the protocols, she was outside the LoS.

It is a parliamentary monarchy. The king is under the rules of Parliament. The BRF is under its rules. Why, seeing what everyone saw, didn't they tell Megsy and Hank that things are not how they want but how they are told they should be?

I don't excuse Palace, they gave these two too much leeway. But if they write letters, it is to Parliament. Parliament must take action. And no, a pregnancy test is not needed. This serves as a shield for Megsy, because her medical data is private and there is nothing she can do without it ending up harming other people. No. Megsy and Hank simply didn't follow protocol, so those kids don't meet the requirements.

So, do both. UK citizens: write to your MP AND BP.

Commonwealth: your Head of State and BP.

Anyone else: write to the Speaker of the House and BP.

I said the same thing in my comment. If you are going to write, write to Parliament. The palace will do nothing, unless fully forced to do so, and a letter writing campaign to the Palace will not do any good.

Although, I do think the Monarchy has, has had, and continues to have, some skin in the game. They are the ones who titled them and put them in the LOS, and who did so knowing that what the law requires was not adhered to.

The reasons for not insisting that the two of them follow the law, whether it be the Crown or Parliament (and I fully believe that your suggestion of being too woke is definitely at least one of the reasons for it), do not matter. The law exists for a reason, and Parliament had a chance, within the last 10 years or so, to change it. If you aren’t going to change it, then enforce it. Allowing this to languish is irresponsible at best.

u/Human-Economics6894 avatar

The problem is that Palace cannot do things unless Parliament approves it. As happened with the State Councilors. So, we must put pressure on Parliament, so that Parliament formally demands explanations from Megsy and Hank, making it clear that the matter is not a "family matter" but a state matter. I think that will scare Megsy and Hank more, because Parliament does have the power to remove the Harkles from the LoS.

I agree. Parliament seems like the way to go to me. I did think that palace could have (and should have) refused titles and LOS listings until the law was complied with. Otherwise, it looks to me as though the Crown is breaking the law as well.

u/Human-Economics6894 avatar

That's where the detail is. Palace had to follow the law because Hazz recognizes those children as his children. That's why it took weeks, because they couldn't see a way around it.

And also, let's not overlook the fact that Megsy already mentioned, I don't remember if it was on Oprah or Finding Freedom, that they forced her to take DNA tests or something like that. I launch it because she is clear that sooner or later the matter is going to fall on her. Palace cannot fall into that trap, but Parliament can perfectly well avoid the issue by claiming that the Harkles violated other protocols.

More replies
More replies
More replies
u/Heavy_Enthusiasm_195 avatar

So they need to do an inquiry like in Di’s death.

More replies
Edited

In 2019 Parliament was too busy trying to ignore the result of the Brexit referendum, most of the MPs on all sides were determined for the UK to still be ruled by the EU, I doubt those people care who is in the LoS.

More replies

I'm assuming Lady C is referring to "strawberry jam" as being a strain of marijuana rather than the Urban Dictionary definition.

She did not elaborate but I saw on X today a comment to not look up strawberry jam in the urban dictionary.

They have been pulling this since the "roasted chicken" at the engagement. The first words for Archie being "crocodile" and his gift from HMTLQ being a "waffle iron" The little @$$holes have been playing crudely all along. Lying down with the fleas they are.

Who does this giggling about sex at their age?

I see it all the time online too. I grew out of silly sexual innuendo jokes in middle school, so I assume it’s that age I see online.

But JFC, these people are middle-aged! Who giggles about sexual terms after a certain age? They truly are emotionally stunted humans.

I don't give a junk who they act all juvenile with, to be honest. But I sincerely would have hoped they had enough decorum not to behave like pigs in front of HMTLQ. I'm not surprised, however.

more reply More replies
More replies
More replies

That's why nacho comment was disgusting

u/Zestyclose_Road_3224 avatar

Can confirm… do not look it up.

I did not. I can live the rest of my life not knowing.

wish I had seen your comment about 5 mins ago. And confirming your confirmation - just don't look it up!

u/Zestyclose_Road_3224 avatar